Bug#1100851: yosys: Unreproducible yet again

2025-04-13 Thread Scott Ashcroft
On Wed, 2025-03-19 at 15:36 +, Scott Ashcroft wrote: > On Wed, 2025-03-19 at 15:25 +0000, Scott Ashcroft wrote: > > If it works I'll send over a patch you can cherry pick. > > https://salsa.debian.org/sashcroft/yosys/-/commit/8b166e2bbab49d1d1b4bf211ed75203443c60c4c &g

Bug#1100781: yosys: Bring back i386/32bit support

2025-04-09 Thread Scott Ashcroft
On Tue, 2025-03-25 at 14:02 +, Scott Ashcroft wrote: > On Tue, 2025-03-18 at 21:52 +0000, Scott Ashcroft wrote: > > If we can get the three fixes accepted upstream 32-bit should build > > and > > pass all tests. > > I've raised an upstream pull request: >

Bug#1100781: Why use builtins?

2025-04-05 Thread Scott Ashcroft
On Wed, 19 Mar 2025 09:48:47 +0100 Philipp Klaus Krause wrote: > What is the reason to use implementation-specific builtins? > > The type-generic macro stdc_leading_zeros from stdbit.h (section 7.18.3 > of the ISO C23 standard) looks like it would be fine here. Hi, The upstream docs for buildin

Bug#1100781: yosys: Bring back i386/32bit support

2025-03-25 Thread Scott Ashcroft
On Tue, 2025-03-18 at 21:52 +, Scott Ashcroft wrote: > If we can get the three fixes accepted upstream 32-bit should build and > pass all tests. I've raised an upstream pull request: https://github.com/YosysHQ/yosys/pull/4960 Cheers, Scott

Bug#1100851: yosys: Unreproducible yet again

2025-03-19 Thread Scott Ashcroft
On Wed, 2025-03-19 at 15:25 +, Scott Ashcroft wrote: > If it works I'll send over a patch you can cherry pick. https://salsa.debian.org/sashcroft/yosys/-/commit/8b166e2bbab49d1d1b4bf211ed75203443c60c4c Other patches may need to be refreshed due to line number shuffles in the Makefil

Bug#1100851: yosys: Unreproducible yet again

2025-03-19 Thread Scott Ashcroft
On Wed, 2025-03-19 at 16:18 +0100, Daniel Gröber wrote: > > yosys-config has differences which look weird. Some substitution > > thing > > involving YOSYS_VER. Yes. YOSYS_VER seems to have been added to the CXXFLAGS between 0.49 and 0.51. It has quotes in it and depending on how your shell (bash v

Bug#1100781: yosys: Bring back i386/32bit support

2025-03-18 Thread Scott Ashcroft
On Tue, 2025-03-18 at 19:23 +, Scott Ashcroft wrote: > That only leaves the cxxrtl tests failing. I don't think fixing them > will be as straightforward. Once I figured out what the test was trying to do it turned out to be quite simple. It is trying to compare the cxxrtl versi

Bug#1100781: yosys: Bring back i386/32bit support

2025-03-18 Thread Scott Ashcroft
On Tue, 2025-03-18 at 16:59 +0100, Daniel Gröber wrote: > Actually we really ought to look into doing some more un-vendoring in yosys > in general. It looks like at least in yosys they apply their own patches so it might not be that easy. Some progress on making 32-bit work again. I've managed t

Bug#1068174: yosys: Please package the latest upstream release

2025-03-18 Thread Scott Ashcroft
On Tue, 2025-03-18 at 15:02 +0100, Daniel Gröber wrote: > Last time it just needed a strategically placed (double) cast. Idk > why this > would have started breaking again? https://github.com/YosysHQ/yosys/commit/2edb9397c317cb3ef3e4d29741069e0cd900eadb "Unclear if there are any changes lost that

Bug#1068174: yosys: Please package the latest upstream release

2025-03-18 Thread Scott Ashcroft
On Tue, 2025-03-18 at 01:32 +0100, Daniel Gröber wrote: > We've seen FST problems due to i386 floating point weirdness before > (rounding, 80bit>64bit conversion IIRC). Might just be something like that > again. Looks like you are spot on. The i386 and amd64 versions write identical FST files. W

Bug#1068174: [Pkg-electronics-devel] Bug#1068174: yosys: Please package the latest upstream release

2025-03-18 Thread Scott Ashcroft
On Tue, 2025-03-18 at 00:16 +0100, Daniel Gröber wrote: > I tried quickly building 0.51 and that seems to have yet more issues: > > /usr/bin/ld: /tmp/cc8nRSkd.ltrans73.ltrans.o: in function > `abc::Scl_LibertyParse(char*, int)': > /<>/abc/src/map/scl/sclLiberty.c:563:(.text+0x41f0): undefined >

Bug#1068174: yosys: Please package the latest upstream release

2025-03-17 Thread Scott Ashcroft
On Mon, 2025-03-17 at 23:22 +0100, Daniel Gröber wrote: > Let's see how this goes: > > Uploading to ftp-master (via ftp to ftp.upload.debian.org): >   Uploading yosys_0.49-1.dsc: done. >   Uploading yosys_0.49.orig-abc.tar.gz: done. >   Uploading yosys_0.49.orig.tar.gz: done. >   Uploading yosys_0

Bug#1068174: yosys: Please package the latest upstream release

2025-03-16 Thread Scott Ashcroft
On Sun, 2025-03-16 at 17:34 +0100, Daniel Gröber wrote: > Hi Steffen, Scott, Hi. > Nah. I'm too much of a perfectionist for that. I'd sooner switch to HTML > output than have no docs in Debian at all (maybe we should enable those > anyway?). The HTML docs seem to use pip to pull in some python m

Bug#1068174: yosys: Please package the latest upstream release

2025-03-15 Thread Scott Ashcroft
On Sat, 2025-03-15 at 19:52 +, Scott Ashcroft wrote: > OK. I've managed to get an sbuild environment working by using the orig > tar file from the YosysHQ github. > The documentation issues are fixed up and I'm running what is hopefully > the final test build now. >

Bug#1068174: yosys: Please package the latest upstream release

2025-03-15 Thread Scott Ashcroft
On Sat, 2025-03-15 at 16:30 +, Scott Ashcroft wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, 2025-03-14 at 21:10 +0100, Daniel Gröber wrote: > > tl;dr: yosys packaging still has issues in the docs build. Python/sphinx > > help wanted :-). > > I'd love to help but something s

Bug#1068174: yosys: Please package the latest upstream release

2025-03-15 Thread Scott Ashcroft
Hi, On Fri, 2025-03-14 at 21:10 +0100, Daniel Gröber wrote: > tl;dr: yosys packaging still has issues in the docs build. Python/sphinx > help wanted :-). I'd love to help but something seems to have gone wrong with the pristine-tar branch so I can't build anything. When I try to build the packag

Bug#1051296: freecad: Issue still present in 1.0.0

2025-03-03 Thread Scott Ashcroft
On Sat, 04 Jan 2025 11:03:42 +0100 Tobias Frost wrote: > Thanks for the information. > > I can reproduce it here to. > > Workarounds that work for me: > >   COIN_GL_NO_CURRENT_CONTEXT_CHECK=1 freecad > >   freecad -- -platform xcb > > > This might be coin3 issue #1050302. I see that the coi

Bug#1068174: yosys: Please package the latest upstream release

2025-02-10 Thread Scott Ashcroft
On Mon, 2025-02-10 at 01:03 +0100, Daniel Gröber wrote: > Hi Scott, > > On Wed, Feb 05, 2025 at 08:28:47PM +0000, Scott Ashcroft wrote: > > That was much more difficult than I thought. > > Tell me about it! ;-) > > > The combination of your work and upstream had de

Bug#1068174: yosys: Please package the latest upstream release

2025-02-05 Thread Scott Ashcroft
That was much more difficult than I thought. The combination of your work and upstream had dealt with all the date/time based stuff. The tex source for the various images which get inserted had the magic: \pdfinfoomitdate 1 \pdfsuppressptexinfo 1 \pdftrailerid{} in them but the .tex file generate

Bug#1068174: yosys: Please package the latest upstream release

2025-02-05 Thread Scott Ashcroft
On Tue, 2025-02-04 at 16:52 +0100, Daniel Gröber wrote: > Hi Scott, > > On Tue, Feb 04, 2025 at 01:22:18PM +0000, Scott Ashcroft wrote: > > Then out of blue there was an upload in January, still based on an > > old > > version. > > Larry reminded me to do it that

Bug#1068174: yosys: Please package the latest upstream release

2025-01-27 Thread Scott Ashcroft
Hi, I think I've done the work to get 0.49 packaged and it has been merged in salsa. Can somebody check over what I've done and do the necessary moves to upload it? Cheers, Scott

Bug#1086256:

2025-01-08 Thread Scott Ashcroft
On Tue, 26 Nov 2024 18:25:07 + Scott Ashcroft wrote: > I think the fix for this is to add: > > -fno-jump-tables > > to the OPTIMIZE flags but I don't have atmega8 to test if the produced > bootloader actually works. > > I've now managed to find an

Bug#1089521:

2024-12-19 Thread Scott Ashcroft
Control: fixed -1 6.12.5-1

Bug#1087616: linux-image-6.11.7-amd64: Can't boot (boot freezes after [or maybe during] cryptsetup unlocks drive)

2024-12-13 Thread Scott Ashcroft
Hi, Looks like there are other users reporting that they can reproduce the issue in the systemd bug. The workaround of removing quiet or adding TERM=dumb to the kernel cmdline works for me. It is probably worth moving the Debian bug over to systemd versions 257~rc1, 257~rc2, 257~rc3 and 257. Chee

Bug#1087616: confirm linux-image-6.11.7-amd64 boot failure

2024-12-10 Thread Scott Ashcroft
On Tue, 2024-12-10 at 18:57 +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > Hello, Hi. > On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 12:08:17PM +, Scott Ashcroft wrote: > > Still happening with 6.12.3. > > Pressing a number of keys (it doesn't need to be enter) will get > > the > >

Bug#1087616: confirm linux-image-6.11.7-amd64 boot failure

2024-12-10 Thread Scott Ashcroft
Still happening with 6.12.3. Pressing a number of keys (it doesn't need to be enter) will get the boot moving again. Adding any sort of debug also seems to mask the issue. I suspect it could be a change in systemd which triggered it. Could it something needing more entropy in /dev/random which mash

Bug#1086256:

2024-11-26 Thread Scott Ashcroft
I think the fix for this is to add: -fno-jump-tables to the OPTIMIZE flags but I don't have atmega8 to test if the produced bootloader actually works.

Bug#1025307: yosys mips64el build failure (fix)

2022-12-04 Thread Scott Ashcroft
Hi, I agree if you only read the C then the code looks fine, if a bit odd. However, having looked at the coredump with gdb it seems the compiler optomises the dereference out and passes back a pointer to the soon to be invalid stack address rather than the value. It only crashes with the stack pro

Bug#1025307: yosys mips64el build failure (fix)

2022-12-03 Thread Scott Ashcroft
On Sat, 2022-12-03 at 14:35 +0100, Daniel Gröber wrote: > Hi Scott, > > While mips64el was indeed fix it looks like now we have failures on > armhf > instead, which was working before the patch. > > I've patched the test driver to print some more debug output and it > looks > like berkeley-abc is

Bug#1025307: yosys mips64el build failure (fix)

2022-12-02 Thread Scott Ashcroft
On Fri, 2022-12-02 at 14:04 +, Scott Ashcroft wrote: > Hi, > > I agree if you only read the C then the code looks fine, if a bit > odd. > However, having looked at the coredump with gdb it seems the compiler > optomises the dereference out and passes back a pointer to

Bug#1025307: yosys mips64el build failure (fix)

2022-12-02 Thread Scott Ashcroft
Package: yosys Version: 0.23-3 Hi, I've done some work on why the mips64el build fails. The issue is that the test script tests/sat/grom.ys makes yosys core in libs/fst/fstapi.cc:fstGetUint32 Looking at the code it is clear that, when FST_DO_MISALIGNED_OPS is not defined, an address on the stack

Bug#1014274: reverse dependencies

2022-12-01 Thread Scott Ashcroft
Hi, I've done some work on why the mips64el build fails. The issue is that the test script tests/sat/grom.ys makes yosys core in libs/fst/fstapi.cc:fstGetUint32 Looking at the code it is clear that, when FST_DO_MISALIGNED_OPS is not defined, an address on the stack is returned to calling function

Bug#1025150: yosys: mips64el build failure fix

2022-11-30 Thread Scott Ashcroft
Package: yosys Version: 0.23-3 Hi, I've done some work on why the mips64el build fails. The issue is that the test script tests/sat/grom.ys makes yosys core in libs/fst/fstapi.cc:fstGetUint32 Looking at the code it is clear that, when FST_DO_MISALIGNED_OPS is not defined, an address on the stack

Bug#1014274: reverse dependencies

2022-11-28 Thread Scott Ashcroft
Hi, I've done some work on why the mips64el build fails. The issue is that the test script tests/sat/grom.ys makes yosys core in libs/fst/fstapi.cc:fstGetUint32 Looking at the code it is clear that, when FST_DO_MISALIGNED_OPS is not defined, an address on the stack is returned to calling function

Bug#1003967: fpga-icestorm: icetime looking in wrong directory for chipdb files

2022-01-18 Thread Scott Ashcroft
Package: fpga-icestorm Version: 0~20220102git3b7b199-1 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, icetime seems to be looking in /usr/local/share/icebox and /usr/bin/../share/icebox for chipdb files instead of /usr/share/fpga-icestorm/chipdb. icetime -d icebreaker.pcf -d up5k -P sg48 -mtr pcm.rpt pcm.as

Bug#897234: Wifi firmware doesn't install correctly

2018-11-30 Thread Scott Ashcroft
Source: raspi3-firmware Source-Version: 1.20181112-1 The contents of the package are: # dpkg -L raspi3-firmware /. /etc /etc/default /etc/default/raspi3-firmware /etc/initramfs /etc/initramfs/post-update.d /etc/initramfs/post-update.d/z50-raspi3-firmware /etc/kernel /etc/kernel/postinst.d /etc/ke

Bug#845661: tomcat8: Access log file suffix doesn't match suffix in rotation cron job

2016-11-25 Thread Scott Ashcroft
Package: tomcat8 Version: 8.0.39-1 Severity: minor Hi, The default server.xml shipped with tomcat8 has an access log valve config as follows: So files are produced in /var/log/tomcat8 with filenames like: localhost_access_log.2016-11-25.txt However, the log rotation script /etc/cron.daily/t

Bug#823157: network-manager: dhcp6 gets IP but expires it almost instantly

2016-05-01 Thread Scott Ashcroft
Package: network-manager Version: 1.2.0-1 Severity: normal There seems to be some sort of problem where dhclient gets an IPv6 address but it gets expires almost straight away. Then since dhclient isn't running any more it doesn't get renewed. Debug log from network manager looks like this: May

Bug#815125: Boot failure with Debian linux 4.4.2 package

2016-03-09 Thread Scott Ashcroft
> Could you boot a working kernel with memblock=debug on the kernel I'm not seeing any 'memblock: Could not reserve boot range' lines. See attached. Tried the patch anyway and it didn't work. Cheers, Scott[0.00] Initializing cgroup subsys cpuset [0.00] Initializing cgroup subsys

Bug#815125: Boot failure with Debian linux 4.4.2 package

2016-03-08 Thread Scott Ashcroft
The patch makes no difference. Is there anything else I can do to help figure this out? Cheers, Scott

Bug#815125: Boot failure with Debian linux 4.4.2 package

2016-03-08 Thread Scott Ashcroft
I'm still seeing the same failure in efi_call with 4.4.4-1 and 4.5-rc4 and 4.5-rc7 from experimental on an HP x360. It has the INSYDE Corp implementation of EFI which seems to be a common factor.  I'll try build the kernel with the patch suggested and test that. Cheers, Scott

Bug#690034: libmilter1.0.1: milters crash when under high load

2015-07-11 Thread Scott Ashcroft
On Fri, 2015-07-10 at 19:09 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > Control: tag -1 moreinfo > > Hi Scott, > > On Tue, 9 Oct 2012 10:57:09 +0100 (BST) Scott Ashcroft > wrote: > > I've got serveral milters when crash when under high load. > > The problem seems to be

Bug#764219: isc-dhcp-client: fails to configure the default route

2014-10-11 Thread Scott Ashcroft
Hi, This isn't a bug in the dhcp client but a misconfiguration of your dhcp server. The 'DHCP Client Behavior' section of RFC3442 says, in part: "If the DHCP server returns both a Classless Static Routes option and a Router option, the DHCP client MUST ignore the Router option." So you jus

Bug#755834: I can't reproduce this

2014-08-02 Thread Scott Ashcroft
Hi, I can't reproduce this and I run a dhcp server with DHCP_INTERFACES="" Is there anything in /var/log/daemon.log which shows why dhcpd didn't start? Cheers, Scott -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas

Bug#749410: isc-dhcp-client: shutdown/reboot hangs after K03rsyslog

2014-07-15 Thread Scott Ashcroft
Hi, I think the problem is that dhcp client is being killed off by /etc/init.d/sendsigs script. This means that it is dead by the time the nfs unmount script runs and that's why there is no network. I suspect that it should be making a symlink in /run/sendsigs.omit.d like rpcbind, syslog and

Bug#690034: libmilter1.0.1: milters crash when under high load

2012-10-09 Thread Scott Ashcroft
Package: libmilter1.0.1 Version: 8.14.4-2.1 Severity: normal Hi, I've got serveral milters when crash when under high load. The problem seems to be that a signal is caught in poll but the handler doesn't do the right thing. I think the problem is that the signal shouldn't fire at all. From the

Bug#659755: Cannot copy text from RDP window

2012-03-20 Thread Scott Ashcroft
I don't believe that this a bug in freerdp but only in remmina. If you run xfreerdp with the cliprdr plugin: xfreerdp --plugin cliprdr then the clipboard works correctly. remmina appears to be loading that plugin: grep cliprdr /proc/8389/maps 7fae695ef000-7fae695f2000 r-xp 08:02 1440

Bug#505137: grub-common: grub-probe returns fat for ext3 root fs

2008-11-25 Thread Scott Ashcroft
Felix Zielcke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Am Sonntag, den 09.11.2008, 19:11 +0000 schrieb Scott Ashcroft: > > Package: grub-common > > Version: 1.96+20080724-11 >> Severity: important > > > > > > grub-probe misdetects the root fs

Bug#505137: grub-common: grub-probe returns fat for ext3 root fs

2008-11-09 Thread Scott Ashcroft
Package: grub-common Version: 1.96+20080724-11 Severity: important grub-probe misdetects the root fs of one of my PCs (works fine on all others). lisa:/# grub-probe --target=fs / fat lisa:/# sfdisk -l /dev/sda Disk /dev/sda: 19452 cylinders, 255 heads, 63 sectors/track Units = cylinders of 822