Package: apt
Version: 0.7.25
It does not appear to be possible to escape '@' in proxy credentials in
apt.conf using either '%40' or '\'.
Any updates on the status of the laconica aka statusnet package?
Sam
It's good to see this progressing as I was unpleasantly surprised to
discover that packages like wordpress still don't do sensible things when it
comes to setting themselves up. If I wanted to download and extract the tar
file that's what I'd have done - by installing a package I expect that
things
Hi James, Matthew,
I too would like to see wordpress-mu in Debian and would be happy to help
make it a reality, though I'm actively looking for someone to sign my key in
Paris so I can get back to work.
Sam
We did indeed intend to package this but gave up after failing to get even
the vanilla package up and running. It seems there are ongoing installation
issues on the project's mailing list and unfortunately the vendor's .deb is
unsuitable because it's basically a wrapper around easy_install. We also
3.3 is a field of use restriction so this software is (unfortunately) not
DFSG compliant:
http://aws.amazon.com/asl/
*3.3 Use Limitation.* The Work and any derivative works thereof only may be
used or intended for use with the web services, computing platforms or
applications provided by Amazon.co
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 9:23 PM, Neil Williams wrote:
> Maybe. I don't use VM so I'm utterly reliant on others for such issues.
You would likely find they make your life a lot easier (snapshots et
al are incredibly useful for development). Check out VMware's free
server & player products or roll
Hi Neil,
Sorry it's 513888 (copied) - reassigned as requested.
> I suspect a problem with using a VM.
Perhaps. I'm more inclined to think something's 64 when it should be
32 or vice versa (actually there was another error about looping and
binfmt that I ran into). VMs should definitely be a targ
The signing error was resolved by going to a shell and manually executing:
d-i preseed/early_command string wget -O /tmp/keyring.udeb
http://www.emdebian.org/d-i/emdebian-archive-keyring-udeb_1.4.3.1_all.udeb
&& udpkg -i /tmp/keyring.udeb
Not sure why this wasn't done because the preseed.cfg file
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: businesscard ISO in VMware Fusion
Image version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/arch-latest/amd64/iso-cd/debian-Lenny-DI-rc2-amd64-businesscard.iso
Date: 20090202
Machine: VMware Fusion
Processor: 1
Memory: 384Mb
Partitions: guided
> I believe Debian is about quality software, not just popular software, and
> those two reasons alone are sufficient for me to say qmail fails the
> "quality" test.
By that metric we've got a lot more to throw out...
Seriously though, qmail-src et al are an unnecessary annoyance. Get
this in A
http://linux.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/11/30/0430201
ezmlm-idx however is GPL: http://www.ezmlm.org/
sj
test package uploaded to http://samj.net/devel/pound/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tags +upstream
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Agreed, it would be nice to see ipv6 in pound. There was some
discussion about it earlier in the year that may be of interest to
you:
http://www.apsis.ch/pound/pound_list/archive/2006/2006-03/1141502757000
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? C
I tend to agree with Thijs on this one - I regularly use gzip for compression of things other than tar files and it was built (and functions) as a standalone compressor; Recommends is more appropriate here. - samj
team. Apologies.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Sam Johnston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Nov 2, 2005 11:55 AM
Subject: Re: [Pound Mailing List] PROPFIND 501 Not Implemented - after
upgrading from 1.8.2 to 1.9.4
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
There is a typo in my last post which points at the wrong bug. Please
reply to this post (cc 242066), NOT the last (cc 242866).
thanks
- samj
On 11/2/05, Sam Johnston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I just upgraded pound-1.8.2 to pound-1.9.4-1 on a Debian 3.1 serving
>
> > I just upgraded pound-1.8.2 to pound-1.9.4-1 on a Debian 3.1 serving
> > up subversion repository.
> >
> > I verified that pound.cfg (unmodified) still contains these 2 entries:
> >
> > ExtendedHTTP1
> > WebDAV 1
> >
> > After restarting pound, I get PROFIND 501 Not Implemented er
dencies on libreadline-dev and
> libssl-dev, which fixes this problem on my system.
>
> --
> Matt
> diff -u pwsafe-0.2.0/debian/control pwsafe-0.2.0/debian/control
> --- pwsafe-0.2.0/debian/control
> +++ pwsafe-0.2.0/debian/control
> @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
> Section: utils
> So I suggest you rename your package to the original passwordsafe.
Thanks for the feedback. From http://passwordsafe.sourceforge.net:
- Password Safe runs on PCs under Windows (95/98/NT/2000/XP).
- Linux/Unix clones that use the same database format have also been
written (see Related Project
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sam Johnston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: pwsafe
Version : 0.2.0
Upstream Author : Nicolas S. Dade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://nsd.dyndns.org/pwsafe/
* License : GPL
Description :
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
FTP admins,
Please remove vqregister as it has suid CGIs and a small audience (which no
longer includes the maintainer).
Thanks,
Sam
pgpNw0YXCj0Wr.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
FTP admins,
Please remove vqadmin as it has suid CGIs and a small audience (which no
longer includes the maintainer).
Thanks,
Sam
pgp5Voj7iEi8t.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Thanks for your concern about the package - an upload is on the way.
Sam
pgpMJHs0CQVFA.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 06:09:35PM -0400, Jesse Vincent wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 03:45:00PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > I am trying to run RT 3.4.1 with Apache 2.0.54 with mod_perl 2.01.
Apache
> > 2.0.54 fails to start up because of this error. Could someone give a
> >
Gents,
Just a quick note to say thanks for your assistance with maintenance
of the pound package in my extended absence; Michael and Joerg for
your NMUs and Joey for the security fix.
I would like to see about resolving the last of the bugs; see my
comments about each of them below:
#263578: SSL
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: debian-testing-sparc-businesscard.iso 20050522
from
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/sparc/current/debian-testing-sparc-businesscard.iso
Date: 200505231500(GMT+)
Method: Boot from CD
Machine: SunBlade 150
Processor: Ul
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: SPARC 2.6 mini.iso RC3 from
http://ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/testing/main/installer-sparc/rc3/images/2.6/mini.iso
Date: 200505231300(GMT+)
Method: Boot from CD
Machine: SunBlade 150
Processor: UltraSPARC-IIe 650MHz
Me
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: rc3 netinst iso from
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sarge_d-i/sparc/rc3/sarge-sparc-netinst.iso
Date: 200505231200(GMT+)
Method: Boot from CD unable to detect CDROM
Machine: SunBlade 150 (SPARC)
Root Device: /[EMAIL PROTE
30 matches
Mail list logo
