Bug#402011: [m68k] incorrect inline assembly

2006-12-09 Thread Roman Zippel
Hi, On Sat, 9 Dec 2006, Mike Hommey wrote: > Tha patch contains a bad bugzilla bug reference. Could you point to the > real one, please ;) What do you mean? I changed it to the bts number of the orignal report with the first version of the patch. bye, Roman -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAI

Bug#401585: [m68k] ICE: in reload, at reload1.c:1079

2006-12-09 Thread Roman Zippel
Hi, On Sat, 9 Dec 2006, Matthias Klose wrote: > Roman, do you intend to provide a fix for gcc-4.1? Attached, it's an update to the m68k-fpcompare patch. For the log: Allow any fp constant as any immediate operand during and after reload, even for special constants in case reload can't find a fr

Bug#401129: [php-maint] Bug#401129: [m68k] FTBFS due to alignment problem

2006-12-08 Thread Roman Zippel
Hi, On Fri, 8 Dec 2006, sean finney wrote: > you happen to know if php4 suffers from a similar problem wrt this? I don't think so, the problem was introduced with 5.2.0. > i'll probably wrap this up with a couple other loose things for an > upload this weekend. Thanks. bye, Roman -- To UNS

Bug#402061: [m68k] missing arch/m68k/kernel/module.lds

2006-12-07 Thread Roman Zippel
Package: linux-2.6 Severity: important Hi, External kernel modules currently fail to build as can be seen here: http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?&pkg=linux-modules-extra-2.6&ver=2.6.18-2&arch=m68k&stamp=1165225409&file=log To fix the problem please include the arch/m68k/kernel/module.lds file i

Bug#402022: [m68k] FTBFS: failing self-test

2006-12-07 Thread Roman Zippel
Package: git-core Severity: important Tags: patch Hi, git currently fails to compile as it fails the self test. I looked into this and with the help of the author there is now a patch for this to fix the problem: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=git&m=116522648806237&q=raw bye, Roman -- System

Bug#402011: [m68k] incorrect inline assembly

2006-12-07 Thread Roman Zippel
Package: xulrunner Version: 1.8.0.8-1 Severity: important Tags: patch Hi, Currently epiphany-browser fails to build as seen here: http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?&pkg=epiphany-browser&ver=2.14.3-3&arch=m68k&stamp=1163307325&file=log The problem is the XPTC_InvokeByIndex() function, gcc can as

Bug#401124: [m68k] alignment problems causing segfaults

2006-12-04 Thread Roman Zippel
Hi, On Mon, 4 Dec 2006, Troy Heber wrote: > On 12/01/06 00:40, Roman Zippel wrote: > > A few structures are not evenly dividable by word_t and thus too > > little memory is allocated. > > I'm trying to figure out how this is a bug in Judy. It seems like the > all

Bug#401129: [php-maint] Bug#401129: [m68k] FTBFS due to alignment problem

2006-12-01 Thread Roman Zippel
Hi, On Fri, 1 Dec 2006, sean finney wrote: > @@ -373,6 +373,11 @@ > #ifndef ZEND_MM_ALIGNMENT > # define ZEND_MM_ALIGNMENT 8 > # define ZEND_MM_ALIGNMENT_LOG2 3 > +#elif ZEND_MM_ALIGNMENT < 4 > +# undef ZEND_MM_ALIGNMENT > +# undef ZEND_MM_ALIGNMENT > +# define ZEND_MM_ALIGNMENT 4 > +# define

Bug#401129: [m68k] FTBFS due to alignment problem

2006-12-01 Thread Roman Zippel
Hi, Here is also how it's officially fixed now in CVS: http://news.php.net/php.zend-engine.cvs/5437 Please release a new package with this patch. Thanks. bye, Roman -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#401129: [m68k] FTBFS due to alignment problem

2006-11-30 Thread Roman Zippel
Package: php5 Severity: important Tags: patch Hi, php5 currently fails to compile because it crashes in the allocator. The basic problem is, that the used alignment is to small. The allocator needs two bits for type information, but the alignment is set to two on m68k. The attached patch fixes t

Bug#401124: [m68k] alignment problems causing segfaults

2006-11-30 Thread Roman Zippel
Package: judy Severity: important Tags: patch Hi, An alignment problem in judy causes other packages to fail (e.g. miredo). A few structures are not evenly dividable by word_t and thus too little memory is allocated. The attached patch fixes this problem. An alternative solution is to round up t

Bug#384565: [Monotone-devel] Re: Bug#384565: monotone - FTBFS: Build killed with signal 15

2006-11-22 Thread Roman Zippel
alpha and powerpc [1]. > > [1] http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?pkg=monotone > > One suggested workaround (by Roman Zippel above) is to remove > -DBOOST_SP_DISABLE_THREADS. The ChangeLog indicates that Nathaniel > added this feature on 2005-09-30. > > So, my questions fo

Bug#385327: not fixed in gcc-4.1 4.1.1ds2-17

2006-11-17 Thread Roman Zippel
Hi, On Thu, 16 Nov 2006, Bill Allombert wrote: > On Sat, Oct 21, 2006 at 06:19:20AM -0700, Matthias Klose wrote: > > Source: gcc-4.1 > > Source-Version: 4.1.1ds2-17 > >[Roman Zippel] > >* debian/patches/m68k-secondary-addr-reload.dpatch: Add secondary reloads

Bug#326905: guile-1.6_1.6.7-1.1(m68k/unstable/poseidon): FTBFS on m68k

2006-10-22 Thread Roman Zippel
Hi, On Sun, 22 Oct 2006, Rob Browning wrote: > > I looked into this problem and with the attached patch I can > > successfully compile the package. The most important part is the > > SHORT_ALIGN define, as m68k has different alignment rules. > > I noticed that you increased the stack limit, but

Bug#394592: [m68k] FTBFS: Error: mwcomp is producing tokens that are not byte aligned.

2006-10-21 Thread Roman Zippel
Package: hula Severity: important Tags: patch Hi, hula current fails to compile on m68k and the problem is caused by the different alignment rules m68k has. The _TemplateStruct structure isn't properly padded, as it's expected by mwcomp.c. The attached patch fixes this and let's hula successfully

Bug#394587: [m68k] FTBFS: src/pyinotify/inotify_syscalls.h:77:3: error: #error "Unsupported architecture!"

2006-10-21 Thread Roman Zippel
Package: pyinotify Severity: important Tags: patch Hi, pyinotify currently fails to build m68k as it lacks the support for it. The attached patch adds the necessary support. It adds the missing system call numbers as they can also be found in the upstream sources. Please apply, thanks. bye, Roma

Bug#394581: [m68k] FTBFS: /build/buildd/python-gnome-1.4.5/pygtk/missing: line 46: automake-1.7: command not found

2006-10-21 Thread Roman Zippel
Package: python-gnome Severity: important Tags: patch Hi, python-gnome currently fails to build because it touches some of the autoconf files, which messes up the time stamps, so the generated Makefile might attempt to regenerate them again. The attached patch touches these files in the correct o

Bug#394578: [m68k] FTBFS: /build/buildd/lyskom-tty-client-0.13.alfa.8/missing: line 46: aclocal-1.9: command not found

2006-10-21 Thread Roman Zippel
Package: lyskom-tty-client Severity: important Tags: patch Hi, lyskom-tty-client currently fails to build because it touches some of the autoconf files, which messes up the time stamps, so the generated Makefile might attempt to regenerate them again. The attached patch touches these files in the

Bug#362032: FTBFS: autoconf errors

2006-10-21 Thread Roman Zippel
tags 362032 patch thanks Hi, The attached patch touches the autoconf files in the correct order, so this won't happen. Please apply, thanks. bye, Roman diff -ur progsreiserfs-0.3.0.5.org/debian/rules progsreiserfs-0.3.0.5/debian/rules --- progsreiserfs-0.3.0.5.org/debian/rules 2006-10-21

Bug#394575: [m68k] FTBFS: /build/buildd/kaptain-0.71/admin/missing: line 46: aclocal-1.9: command not found

2006-10-21 Thread Roman Zippel
Package: kaptain Severity: important Tags: patch Hi, kaptain currently fails to build because it touches some of the autoconf files, which messes up the time stamps, so the generated Makefile might attempt to regenerate them again. The attached patch touches these files in the correct order, so t

Bug#394565: bfbtester: [m68k] FTBFS: /bin/sh: autoheader: command not found

2006-10-21 Thread Roman Zippel
Package: bfbtester Severity: important Tags: patch Hi, bfbtester currently fails to build because it touches some of the autoconf files, which messes up the time stamps, so the generated Makefile might attempt to regenerate them again. The attached patch touches these files in the correct order,

Bug#353853: (no subject)

2006-10-21 Thread Roman Zippel
tags 353853 patch thanks Hi, The attached patch touches these files in the correct order, so this won't happen. Please apply, thanks. bye, Romandiff -ur gnobog-0.4.3.org/debian/rules gnobog-0.4.3/debian/rules --- gnobog-0.4.3.org/debian/rules 2006-10-21 01:42:38.0 +0200 +++ gnobog

Bug#394220: squid3: [m68k] FTBFS: error: expected '(' before '__extension__'

2006-10-20 Thread Roman Zippel
Package: squid3 Severity: important Tags: patch Hi, The squid3 currently fails to build on m68k and the problem is simply a missing pair of parentheses. The attached patch fixes the issue, so it will build fine on m68k. bye, Roman -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT pr

debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org

2006-10-17 Thread Roman Zippel
Package: gnusound Severity: important Tags: patch Hi, gnusound currently fails to build on m68k and the basic problem is that float32_to_le() incorrectly attempts to convert a big endian float to a little endian float. I guess on other big endian ports the value is silently converted to an intege

Bug#198075: gnu-smalltalk: (m68k/unstable) FTBFS segfaults during build

2006-10-17 Thread Roman Zippel
Hi, On Tue, 17 Oct 2006, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > The other problem is that the configure script doesn't configure the fault > > handler correctly, the m68k check is too late and CFG_FAULT already has been > > set fault-posix.h. > > > This means that, in theory, the fault-posix.h handler was f

Bug#393601: gauche: [m68k] libgc needs an update

2006-10-16 Thread Roman Zippel
Package: gauche Version: 0.8.7-4 Severity: important Tags: patch Hi, gauche currently fails to build, if it hits a buildd running 2.6. The problem is the included libgc and the separate libgc package already has the same patch. Please include the patch, so gauche works properly. Thanks. bye, Rom

Bug#198075: gnu-smalltalk: (m68k/unstable) FTBFS segfaults during build

2006-10-16 Thread Roman Zippel
Hi, I looked into the build problems and with the attached patch I can successfully build the package and even the test complete successfully. The main problem is with heap_block in alloc.h, which causes all following structures to be misaligned. The other problem is that the configure script do

Bug#391902: qt4-x11: [m68k] missing inotify defines

2006-10-16 Thread Roman Zippel
Hi, On Mon, 16 Oct 2006, Brian Nelson wrote: > To what file should those lines be added? There isn't a buildd log for > m68k on buildd.d.o, so I can't see the actual error. Sorry, I indeed forgot to mention that. m68k is missing in the list at src/corelib/io/qfilesystemwatcher_inotify.cpp bye

Bug#326905: guile-1.6_1.6.7-1.1(m68k/unstable/poseidon): FTBFS on m68k

2006-10-15 Thread Roman Zippel
Hi, I looked into this problem and with the attached patch I can successfully compile the package. The most important part is the SHORT_ALIGN define, as m68k has different alignment rules. I also synced the m68k gc_os_dep.c with the current Debian boehm-gc definitions. I tested it with debug op

Bug#390516: orbit2: [m68k] various alignment problems

2006-10-15 Thread Roman Zippel
Hi, Is there any progress here? If there is anything I can do help with this problem, please ask, but _please_ don't ignore this bug. It makes a number of other packages unusable, I provided the necessary information to fix the problem, so please don't delay this more than necessary. Thanks. b

Bug#322027: libatomic-ops: FTBFS on m68k: Cannot implement AO_compare_and_swap_full on this architecture.

2006-10-15 Thread Roman Zippel
Hi, Is there any progress here? _Please_ release a fixed package, which includes the patch. The patch is entirely m68k specific, so it won't do any damage to the other ports, but it would help m68k. Thanks. bye, Roman -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscri

Bug#391902: qt4-x11: [m68k] missing inotify defines

2006-10-15 Thread Roman Zippel
Hi, Is there any progress here? If there is anything I can do to help, please ask, but please don't ignore this bug... Thanks. bye, Roman -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#391902: qt4-x11: [m68k] missing inotify defines

2006-10-09 Thread Roman Zippel
Package: qt4-x11 Severity: important qt4-x11 currently fails to build as it misses some defines for the inotify system calls on m68k, adding this should fix the problem: #elif defined (__mc68000__) #define __NR_inotify_init 284 #define __NR_inotify_add_watch 285 #define __NR_inotify_rm_wat

Bug#391898: linux-kernel-headers: incomplete asm header for m68k

2006-10-09 Thread Roman Zippel
Package: linux-kernel-headers Version: 2.6.18-1 Severity: important Tags: patch Hi, The current kernel header break a few packages on m68k, e.g. binutils trips over the NBPG define, others like qt4-x11 need more system call defines. I included patches for these. The user.h change is already in Li

Bug#385917: [m68k] fix deadlock with pthread_spinlock

2006-10-04 Thread Roman Zippel
Hi, Would someone please take a look at this bug and apply this patch? It currently keeps stlport from compiling and keeps wasting the time of the buildd by doing nothing. If there's anything I can do to help, please ask, but don't ignore this bug! Thanks. bye, Roman -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

Bug#390885: binutils_2.17-3(m68k/unstable/aahz): FTBFS on m68k

2006-10-03 Thread Roman Zippel
Hi, On Tue, 3 Oct 2006, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > binutils fails to build from source on m68k. > > Here are selected excerpts from the buildd log. > > > | Automatic build of binutils_2.17-3 on aahz by sbuild/m68k 85 > | Build started at 20061003-0403 > | > ***

Bug#348010: gconf2 hangs

2006-10-01 Thread Roman Zippel
Hi, I looked into this and it turns out to be a problem in orbit2 (see #390516 for more info). The problem is that gconfd-2 fails to start up and gconftool-2 waits forever for it. It might be a good idea to make gconftool-2 a bit more robust and let it check that gconfd-2 started up properly an

Bug#390516: orbit2: [m68k] various alignment problems

2006-10-01 Thread Roman Zippel
Package: orbit2 Severity: important Tags: patch Hi, orbit2 is currently on m68k seriously broken and makes packages like gconf2 unusable (see #336289 and #348010). The reason is that m68k has some rather unusual alignment rules and this breaks several alignment assumptions in the orbit2 code. The

Bug#384565: [Monotone-devel] Re: Bug#384565: monotone - FTBFS: Build killed with signal 15

2006-09-28 Thread Roman Zippel
Hi, I debugged the problem a bit and the problem seems to be the BOOST_SP_DISABLE_THREADS define and monotone being linked against the multithreaded boost libraries. boost and monotone have a different idea of the sp_counted_base class, so that it gets initialized within monotone non-threaded

Bug#389400: mcmcpack: [m68k] fails to build from source

2006-09-25 Thread Roman Zippel
Package: mcmcpack Severity: normal Hi, mcmcpack currently fails to build and the basic problem is that the configure script doesn't find the trunc() function, because it looks in the wrong library. An easy solution is to add the line "AC_CHECK_LIB(m, trunc)" to configure.ac before the trunc check

Bug#389015: gjdoc: [m68k] the --disable-native configure option is broken

2006-09-23 Thread Roman Zippel
Package: gjdoc Version: 0.7.7-3 Severity: important Hi, I'm in the process of getting Java fixed for m68k and since gjdoc is blocking a large number of packages, I'm using it for testing. With my changes to gcj it currently aborts with this message: $ gjdoc --help Exception in thread "main" java

Bug#388000: [m68k] Assembler: FATAL: can't close cl_MI.o: No error

2006-09-18 Thread Roman Zippel
Hi, On Tue, 19 Sep 2006, Richard B. Kreckel wrote: > Roman Zippel wrote: > > > I checked the compile failure and it seems to be an assembler problem, > > but the constructor/desctructor hack is not completely blameless. > > It seems the assembler doesn't know how

Bug#375519: [m68k] Assembler: FATAL: can't close cl_MI.o: No error

2006-09-17 Thread Roman Zippel
Hi, I looked at it and it's not really a gcc bug, it's more of a binutils bug, but cln plays some rather weird games, which finally confuses as, so it's not completely faultless. I submitted a patch to cln (#388000) which avoids the problem, so this bug can be closed. bye, Roman -- To UNSUB

Bug#388000: [m68k] Assembler: FATAL: can't close cl_MI.o: No error

2006-09-17 Thread Roman Zippel
Package: cln Severity: important Tags: patch Hi, I checked the compile failure and it seems to be an assembler problem, but the constructor/desctructor hack is not completely blameless. It seems the assembler doesn't know how to generate the GOT entry for the duplicated jump destination. Luckily

Bug#387996: subversion: [m68k] fix for the failing ruby tests

2006-09-17 Thread Roman Zippel
Package: subversion Version: 1.4.0 Severity: serious Tags: patch Justification: no longer builds from source Hi, I looked at the failing self tests. The first one is a bug in the created wrapper. The basic problem is that in svn_delta.c:_wrap_svn_txdelta_apply_wrapper() the value of temp3 is not

Bug#385917: glibc: [m68k] fix deadlock with pthread_spinlock

2006-09-03 Thread Roman Zippel
Package: glibc Severity: important Tags: patch Hi, stlport currectly produces a deadlock in its testsuite, due to a deadlock in __pthread_spin_lock(). The attached patch fixes it. bye, Roman -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unst

Bug#378837: subversion_1.3.2-4(m68k/unstable): test suite fails

2006-08-27 Thread Roman Zippel
Hi, I attached a slighty different version of the previous patch, which simply tries to open the port. It also correctly waits for a possible exit of the server. bye, Romandiff -ur subversion-1.3.2.org/subversion/bindings/swig/ruby/test/util.rb subversion-1.3.2/subversion/bindings/swig/ruby/te

Bug#383817: fix libgc for m68k

2006-08-19 Thread Roman Zippel
Package: libgc Severity: important Tags: patch Hi, The attached patch fixes a few bugs, which keeps the package from working properly on m68k. - the thread suspend handler has to save all registers - change STACKBOTTOM to LINUX_STACKBOTTOM so it works with 2.6 kernel - reenable MPROTECT_VDB, it s

Bug#322027: (no subject)

2006-08-04 Thread Roman Zippel
Tags: patch Hi, The attached patch adds the missing m68k support and seems to work fine according to the self test. bye, Roman- align AO_t - fix AO_test_and_set_full: it operates on bytes, better asm constraints - add AO_compare_and_swap_full and AO_or_full Index: libatomic-ops-1.1/src/atomic_

Bug#323016: ICE while compiling tin on m68k

2005-09-18 Thread Roman Zippel
Hi, On Sun, 14 Aug 2005, Marco d'Itri wrote: > Compiling tin 1.7.10+20050727 on m68k fails. > > gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../include -I/usr/include > -DLOCALEDIR=\"/usr/share/locale\" -I../include -DUSE_CANLOCK -D_GNU_SOURCE > -g -O2 -c ./save.c > ./save.c: In function 'uudecode_line': > .

Bug#327782: ICE while building flac on m68k

2005-09-18 Thread Roman Zippel
Hi, Joshua Kwan wrote: > gcc-4.0 ICEs on m68k while trying to build flac 1.1.2-3. This bug is fixed by this patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-07/msg01677.html Bugs 318292, 322532, 328453, 323016 are basically all caused by this problem. bye, Roman -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EM