unch of external packages to get core
functionality to work.
- Rich
On Sat, Apr 20, 2024 at 8:33 PM Debian Bug Tracking System <
ow...@bugs.debian.org> wrote:
> This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
> which was filed against the rpm-common package:
>
> #99
gs.
Is there anything weird about how these objects were declared that
might have caused ld not to resolve them statically like it should? It
seems odd that these data symbols, but not any other ones, would be
left as symbolic relocations.
Rich
ust
> enabled it for the musl builds, as the security people
> like that more than normal static.
I seem to recall the musl-gcc wrapper does not handle static-pie
right. A real cross toolchain should. If there's an easy fix for the
wrapper I'd be happy to merge it.
Rich
I also encountered this problem after switching from Debian 10.9 to Debian
12.5. The Aten remote KVM provided by Supermicro motherboards relies on
JARs compressed by Pack200, so the application no longer works with
icedtea-netx and nvidia-openjdk-8-jre:
java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException: Pac
e
or produce a broken libc.so due to mismatched libgcc.a). This
probably needs attention too.
I'll try to take a look at this soon and see if the proposed wrapper
fix seems right for the mips situation, but the wrapper is generally
low-priority, and there's other stuff I'm trying to get to/finish
first.
Rich
/boot) and didn't.
So that's neat.
- Rich
On Mon, Jan 9, 2023 at 12:45 PM Rich Ercolani wrote:
> Package: grub-ieee1275-bin
> Version: 2.06-7
> Severity: normal
> X-Debbugs-Cc: rincebr...@gmail.com
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> I decided enough was enough and finally
from snapshot.debian.org,
installed it, and did the aforementioned grub-install dance...and it boots
great.
- Rich
-- Package-specific info:
*** BEGIN /proc/mounts
/dev/mapper/ogami--vgnew-newroot / xfs
rw,relatime,attr2,inode64,logbufs=8,logbsize=32k,noquota 0 0
/dev/sda1 /boot ext4 rw,rel
quot;
from QEMU / KVM and "Guest has not initialized the display (yet)." in
the KVM vconsole.
This is easy to workaround by creating the following symlink in
/usr/share/seabios:
ln -s vgabios-isavga.bin vgabios.bin
Thanks and regards,
Rich
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 11.5
APT
x27;s
impossible to install
right now without either reaching into the archive snapshots or building
yourself.
It would be nice if this wasn't breaking "apt upgrade".
- Rich
-- Package-specific info:
* /etc/samba/smb.conf present, but not attached
* /var/lib/samba/dhcp.conf p
what needs to change...
- Rich
nsistent, or people are just going to start having to add Debian-specific
hacks everywhere or just ignoring Debian's intended locations, and neither
strikes me as great for anyone.
- Rich
[1] -
https://ffy00.github.io/blog/02-python-debian-and-the-install-locations/
At least on my old Netra T1, SILO has never believed in booting vmlinuz,
only vmlinux, and faults similarly if you try.
So if it just recently started faulting that way for you, perhaps any glue
that knew to unpack vmlinuz into vmlinux isn't working?
- Rich
On Sun, Jan 23, 2022 at 1:30 PM
On Thu, Jan 6, 2022 at 5:22 AM Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On 2022-01-06 03:36, Rich wrote:
> > Hi Aurelien,
> > It's a VM running in qemu on an amd64 Debian bullseye system, no KVM
> > acceleration to be found here.
>
> Ok, that might be a QEMU issue then. Which CP
).
- Rich
On Thu, Jan 6, 2022 at 3:36 AM Rich wrote:
> Hi Aurelien,
> It's a VM running in qemu on an amd64 Debian bullseye system, no KVM
> acceleration to be found here.
>
> dmesg doesn't have any backtraces - the two messages that show up are
> py3compile segfaulting with
d it wants to upgrade libc to install. (I know I could go find
an appropriately old section of snapshots.debian.org, but haven't done that
yet...)
- Rich
On Thu, Jan 6, 2022 at 3:13 AM Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> control: tag -1 + help
> control: user debian-powe...@lists.debian.org
>
a login prompt or rescue
prompt, it just sits forever on a list of failed service starts.
Anything that would be helpful to debug this? I have a snapshot of the VM
before this began, so I can
just roll it back and repeat the exercise.
- Rich
-- System Information:
Debian Release: bookworm/sid
gured I'd ask, since the alternative is that I carry my own elfutils packages
until bookworm...
- Rich
[1] - https://github.com/osandov/drgn
[2] -
https://sourceware.org/git/?p=elfutils.git;a=commit;h=828024afc517e266f3226b469ba33f372b401821
[3] - https://github.com/osandov/drgn/issues/130
One more addendum - just the clm_blob alone from
https://github.com/RPi-Distro/firmware-nonfree/commit/dc406650e840705957f8403efeacf71d2d7543b3,
not even the sdio.bin with it, on top of the stock bullseye
firmware-brcm80211, works for me.
- Rich
On Sun, Nov 21, 2021 at 1:16 PM Rich wrote:
>
I appear to have just been burned by this setting up my new Pi 4B 4GB.
I likewise found that stealing just cyfmac43455-sdio.clm_blob (which
brcmfmac43455-sdio.clm_blob is a symlink to on my system) from
20210315-3+rpt3 and reloading the driver made everything happy and
functional...
- Rich
Ah, no, using this patch is a bad idea.
It worked fine for most of the day, but then I tried pushing a TB over
NFS, and it died with watchdog timeouts and indefinite hangs.
That's sad. I guess I'll go for the backup option...
- Rich
On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 3:19 AM Rich wrote:
>
e and scribble on your face with sharpie while you sleep,
just that I'm running it at the moment without such fires yet.
- Rich
On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 2:59 AM Rich wrote:
>
> I found the following patch generated against 5.14.0 helps and hasn't
> burned the hous
I found the following patch generated against 5.14.0 helps and hasn't
burned the house down in testing so far.
---
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/sun/niu.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/sun/niu.c
index 860644d182ab..70c08acd3ee5 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/sun/niu.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/s
then warm reboot, even "bad" kernel revisions will
function normally until a cold power cycle, so presumably there's some state
initialization that is no longer being done (correctly) in recent kernels?
Will continue to investigate...
System otherwise functions as expected if you apply
I see, so "kernel package in oldstable-backports is unusable" is not a bug.
Is there any way I can view why it's been sitting for so long that
this happened, or any estimate on how much longer it'll be broken?
h?keywords=5.10.0-0.bpo.8-cloud-arm64
https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=5.10.0-0.bpo.9-cloud-arm64
Thanks,
- Rich
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 10.11
APT prefers oldstable-updates
APT policy: (500, 'oldstable-updates'), (500, 'oldstable')
Architecture:
(Well, the column is labeled BYTES, but you get the point, I imagine.)
On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 9:45 AM Debian Bug Tracking System
wrote:
>
> Thank you for filing a new Bug report with Debian.
>
> You can follow progress on this Bug here: 996961:
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bu
copy to try a couple
of
solutions; it's broken on unmodified biosnoop.)
- Rich
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 11.1
APT prefers stable-updates
APT policy: (1000, 'stable-updates'), (1000, 'stable-security'), (1000,
'stable'), (901, 'proposed-
certainly broke some expectations.
- Rich
:
these macros are also best maintained by people closer to the languages
in question, as has been done with all the newer languages predating
perl and python. rpm-extras exists as the place for maintaining and
collaborating on such material.
- Rich
[1] - https://rpm.org/timeline.html
[2] -
https
.260523] twice on console to return to the boot prom
[101125.409302] ---[ end Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill init!
exitcode=0x0009 ]---
I've done this workload a bunch, so I'm not really sure why it happened now
and not any time before, but here we are.
If you've got
anging out in their IRC
channel, and nobody seems to be getting turned away for running older
or distro versions, just gently suggested that it might be resolved
already.)
Thank you again for your work, and I'm sorry that I came across as an
ungrateful entitled person.
- Rich
[1] - https:
Debian buster, but in that case, the
vanishing /dev/sda was a SATA disk, and was not / or mounted.
- Rich
-- Package-specific info:
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 11.0
APT prefers stable-security
APT policy: (500, 'stable-security'), (500, 'stable')
Architect
shion,
which seems to still be true.
So...don't use GRUB, I guess?
- Rich
On Sun, Aug 22, 2021 at 4:03 AM Rich wrote:
>
> ...well that's _fascinating_.
> # grep -C3 nouveau /var/log/Xorg.0.log
> [30.712] (II) modeset(0): Initializing kms color map for depth 24, 8 bpc.
&g
if you disable gfxterm, it works with GRUB, too...
Seems GRUB screws up the world when it makes the pretty menu.
- Rich
On Sat, Aug 21, 2021 at 1:29 PM Rich wrote:
>
> https://forums.developer.nvidia.com/t/error-loading-nvidia-kernel-module-with-macbookpro3-1/39313
>
> I found other t
ggled their vBIOS out that
way, I'll see what I can do...
On Sat, Aug 21, 2021, 6:00 AM Rich wrote:
> Okay, so, I did just reboot and verify this...
>
> * kernel command line "... ro quiet":
> displays a blinking cursor in the top-left for a couple seconds and
> t
but none match those in the config file.
(EE)
error:
(EE) no screens found(EE)
(EE)
(Full logs attached, .old is the one from "...ro" boot that didn't
display, the other is from a boot with nomodeset)
Can provide other information as useful.
- Rich
On Sat, Aug 21, 2021 at 4:28 AM Ri
Also (I've never used this before, so I might be holding it wrong, but...):
$ isenkram-lookup
cheese
ethtool
pcscd
scdaemon
$
On Sat, Aug 21, 2021 at 4:15 AM Rich wrote:
>
> Hi Salvatore,
> I used firmware-11.0.0-amd64-netinst.iso. And yes, I did not manually
> install firm
2:28:06 struth kernel: [2.385518] ata1.00: ATAPI: HL-DT-ST
DVDRW GSA-S10N, AP09, max UDMA/33
Aug 21 02:28:06 struth kernel: [2.457249] usb 4-1: new high-speed
USB device number 2 using ehci-pci
--
On Sat, Aug 21, 2021 at 4:03 AM Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
>
> Control: tags -1 + moreinf
Sorry, as was pointed out to me, MacBookPro3,1 - not Macbook3,1.
Whoops.
- Rich
On Sat, Aug 21, 2021 at 2:48 AM Rich Ercolani wrote:
>
> Package: src:linux
> Version: 5.10.46-4
> Severity: normal
> X-Debbugs-Cc: rincebr...@gmail.com
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> (I h
ppose.
I'll try fiddling with kdump and non-journald logging so I can get a better
idea what might be happening when it stops outputting...
- Rich
-- Package-specific info:
** Version:
Linux version 5.10.0-8-amd64 (debian-ker...@lists.debian.org) (gcc-10 (Debian
10.2.1-6) 10.2.1 20210110, G
e no longer available to infer from module load.
- Rich
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 10.10
APT prefers stable-updates
APT policy: (1000, 'stable-updates'), (1000, 'stable'), (900,
'testing-debug'), (900, 'testing'), (800, 'unstable-debug&#
int unit s print
and the following history of commands you entered.
Also include any additional information about your setup you
consider important.
Assertion (bios_geom->cylinders == (PedSector) (dev->length / cyl_size)) at
../../../libparted/labels/sun.c:191 in function sun_alloc() failed
ortunate.
If you're just saying this because it's qemu upstream's opinion, well,
I knew that. :)
On Sun, Jul 4, 2021 at 7:18 AM Michael Tokarev wrote:
>
> 04.07.2021 02:45, Rich Ercolani wrote:
> > Package: qemu-system-misc
> > Version: 1:5.2+dfsg-9~bpo10+1
&
nd time, from yet another source
file that built fine on successive runs, but I'm not sure how readily useful it
is. I'll upload it if it would be helpful.
- Rich
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 10.10
APT prefers stable-updates
APT policy: (1000, 'stable-updates'), (1
I'm
reporting it, it appears to have been broken all buster.)
- Rich
s the first commit where it works reliably. Which is unfortunate, as
cherrypicking that looks a bit more invasive than is probably
reasonable.
- Rich
am not subscribed. Also please update the
> FAQ entry.
I haven't really looked at it since, so I don't have any immediate
opinion. I think it's something we could revisit for evaluation.
Rich
plete.
(I neglected to mention this in #989714, but these are all on VirtualBox-backed
VMs.)
Please let me know if there's anything further I can do to help debug this.
- Rich
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 10.9
APT prefers stable-updates
APT policy: (500, 'stable-updat
be we need different defaults on at least x86_64 systems?
(I specify x86_64 because using 512M-:192M breaks crashkernel more on my i386
testbeds.)
- Rich
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 10.9
APT prefers stable-updates
APT policy: (1000, 'stable-updates'), (1000, 'stab
I have learned after someone else pointed it out to me that this bug
got a CVE - CVE-2019-13045.
")
The fact that the original report on this particular bug was using a
VDI as well makes me suspect it might be a problem with handling VDIs
- I'm going to try converting it and report back...
- Rich
; the
fix[1] is in 1.2.1 and newer, but it'd be nice if people using buster
weren't stuck with this until they upgraded.
(Nevermind the slightly off Version string; I quickly shoved the patch from
1058 into the package and rebuilt it to confirm the problem went away.)
- Rich
[
#x27;s quite difficult to find documentation
on how to do this properly.
- Rich
-- Package-specific info:
** Kernel log: boot messages should be attached
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 11.0
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: sh4
Kernel: Linux 4.19.0-16-
e this way in
qemu-system-hppa
5.2 (I cannot readily upgrade the buster server running the VM to running 6.0).
- Rich
-- System Information:
Debian Release: bullseye/sid
APT prefers testing-security
APT policy: (500, 'testing-security'), (500, 'testing-debug'), (500,
'test
that broke differently, so I'll be reporting
that next.)
- Rich
-- System Information:
Debian Release: bullseye/sid
APT prefers testing-security
APT policy: (500, 'testing-security'), (500, 'testing-debug'), (500,
'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Ar
Sure.
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213143
- Rich
On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 1:16 AM Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
>
> Hi Rich,
>
> On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 12:14:49AM -0400, Rich wrote:
> > So it reproduces identically on 5.10.28 and 5.12.4 vanilla, but
&g
So it reproduces identically on 5.10.28 and 5.12.4 vanilla, but
5.13.0-rc2 fails differently, so I'm going to report that.
On Sun, May 16, 2021 at 11:13 AM Rich wrote:
>
> Sure, I'll try 5.12.4 once I'm done with the build I'm running. (I
> have no idea how long t
ease LMK if I can do anything to be helpful in further investigating this.
- Rich
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 10.9
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (1000, 'stable'), (900, 'testing-debug'), (900, 'testing'), (800,
'unstable-debug'), (800
Sure, I'll try 5.12.4 once I'm done with the build I'm running. (I
have no idea how long that'll be, though, I've never built it
before...)
- Rich
On Sun, May 16, 2021 at 11:08 AM Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
>
> Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
>
> Hi,
>
&g
Package: src:linux
Version: 5.10.28-1
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: rincebr...@gmail.com
Dear Maintainer,
(This might also affect upstream, I haven't built a vanilla kernel to
experiment.)
On my (qemu-provided) alpha system, attempting to boot with the SMP kernel
yields the following message du
boot, and running find after systemctl status dbus reported dying with
SEGV, but I don't see any cores, in the path I set with core_pattern
or otherwise. :(
- Rich
On Sat, May 15, 2021 at 11:31 AM Simon McVittie wrote:
>
> On Sat, 15 May 2021 at 10:42:55 -0400, Rich wrote:
> > I ca
alphatest 5.10.0-6-alpha-generic #1 Debian 5.10.28-1
(2021-04-09) alpha GNU/Linux
$ dpkg -l | grep dbus
ii dbus 1.13.18-2
alphasimple interprocess messaging system (system message
bus)
[...]
- Rich
gs in
/include/... and
/sbin/...
I've created a patch, which I'm not entirely happy with, that fixes it for the
test case I was
reproducing it on (generating deb packages from the upstream zfsonlinux source
packages, which
use alien to turn their generated rpms into debs).
Thanks,
Whoops, applied the patch to blib/lib/Alien/Package/Deb.pm when it
should have been Alien/Package/Deb.pm.
Oh well, it's a two character patch, I'm sure whoever fixes this can
apply it correctly, unlike me. :)
will apply this at some point, though I'm aware alien is
currently unmaintained.
- Rich
[1] - cf. https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/issues/11650
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 10.8
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (1000, 'stable'), (900, 'testing-debug'), (900
Hello Sales,
My name is Maxwell Rich and i would like to know if you carry exit devices in
stock for sale. Please contact me back with the models and pricing for the exit
devices.Thank you and will wait to hear from you soon...
Best Regards
Maxwell Rich...
Hello Sales,
My name is Maxwell Rich and i would like to know if you carry exit devices in
stock for sale. Please contact me back with the models and pricing for the exit
devices.Thank you and will wait to hear from you soon...
Best Regards
Maxwell Rich...
Hello Sales,
My name is Maxwell Rich and i would like to know if you carry exit devices in
stock for sale. Please contact me back with the models and pricing for the exit
devices.Thank you and will wait to hear from you soon...
Best Regards
Maxwell Rich...
Hello Sales,
My name is Maxwell Rich and i would like to know if you carry exit devices in
stock for sale. Please contact me back with the models and pricing for the exit
devices.Thank you and will wait to hear from you soon...
Best Regards
Maxwell Rich...
Hello Sales,
My name is Maxwell Rich and i would like to know if you carry exit devices in
stock for sale. Please contact me back with the models and pricing for the exit
devices.Thank you and will wait to hear from you soon...
Best Regards
Maxwell Rich...
Hello Sales,
My name is Maxwell Rich and i would like to know if you carry exit devices in
stock for sale. Please contact me back with the models and pricing for the exit
devices.Thank you and will wait to hear from you soon...
Best Regards
Maxwell Rich...
Hello Sales,
My name is Maxwell Rich and i would like to know if you carry exit devices in
stock for sale. Please contact me back with the models and pricing for the exit
devices.Thank you and will wait to hear from you soon...
Best Regards
Maxwell Rich...
Hello Sales,
My name is Maxwell Rich and i would like to know if you carry exit devices in
stock for sale. Please contact me back with the models and pricing for the exit
devices.Thank you and will wait to hear from you soon...
Best Regards
Maxwell Rich...
Package: gufw
Version: 17.04.1-1.1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)?
* What was the outcome of t
Package: gdebi
Version: 0.9.5.7+nmu1
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)?
* What was the outcome
Ben,
I'm pretty sure you're not having the same problem as the original
person. They were reporting getting a Perl error out of the
enum-extract script, you're reporting that it's passing the wrong
location to the enum-extract script to try and find the header.
- Rich
ggests over 50% have
installed, and 42% have used parts of recently, in the case of
insserv) on trying to upgrade a minor version.
- Rich
On Tue, Jan 1, 2019 at 2:22 PM Richard Laager wrote:
>
> On 12/31/18 6:34 PM, Rich wrote:
> > It seems like what we might want is an OR dependen
-- Forwarded message -
From: Rich
Date: Mon, Dec 31, 2018 at 8:16 AM
Subject: Re: zfsutils-linux: Upgrading to 0.7.12 breaks during dpkg --configure
To: Mo Zhou
Heh. It being installed was not, AFAIK, a deliberate choice.
Attempting to remove it, though, looks...frought
eaders location should be
fixed already [1], it's possible you're having a separate problem;
that error output is just what happens when enum-extract.pl doesn't
output what's expected.
- Rich
[1] - https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/issues/7358
dpkg -l | egrep '^ii perl-' and ls -l
/usr/share/perl/5.28*/Getopt/Std.pm have to say?
(Regardless of what they have to say, there should definitely be an
explicit perl dep in zfs-dkms now, since that definitely won't work
without it.)
- Rich
Package: zfsutils-linux
Version: 0.7.12-1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
Tried upgrading from stretch-backports 0.7.11 to testing 0.7.12, because
the package hadn't landed in backports yet, and discovered it broke on
dpkg --configure :
Setting up zfsutils-linux (0.7.12-1) ...
insserv: Service
on
enough to make an official Debian package? :)
Thanks!
Rich
that requesting its
inclusion here might be a decent way to shake out any objections first.
If you have any suggestions for improvement or would like to see me just submit
it to upstream, I'd be happy to.
Thanks,
- Rich
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 9.5
APT prefers stable-d
buildtime and libnl{-genl,}-3-200 at runtime, but is quite
useful sometimes.
(The package version is because I cut a local package build with the above
changes to be sure it was that simple and functioned appropriately.)
Thanks,
- Rich Ercolani
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 9.5
APT
Package: fetchmail
Version: 6.3.26-3
Severity: important
Tags: patch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
When using sslcertck with a GMAIL server, the check fails since GMAIL now
requires a Server Name Indication (SNI). This is fixed in Experimental
(6.4.0~beta4-1) but you may want to
v/dri/by-path:
total 0
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 8 May 28 16:47 pci-:01:00.0-card -> ../card0
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 13 May 28 16:47 pci-:01:00.0-render -> ../renderD128
video:x:44:rich
OpenGL and NVIDIA library files installed:
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 15 May 28 15:12 /etc/alternativ
Package: cdrom
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
*** Please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
i did install Debian Wheezy on a AMD APU A10-9700 APU;
installation process went correctly,
booting process is ok,
shows this bootmessage
This should probably get changed to 0.7.8, because nobody[1] should use 0.7.7.
[1] - https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/issues/7401
- Rich
he form
0.X.Y-g[git shorthash], and you _definitely_ don't want to mix across
those).
Maybe just exact version matching for now (for both module/userland and
userland/dependent libraries) and an upstream enhancement request to notify
people they might set their house on fire if they mix differing
lling the above with
those pinnings will result in this.)
- Rich
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 9.2
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (1000, 'stable'), (900, 'testing'), (800, 'unstable'), (500,
'stable-updates')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kerne
Package: nvidia-driver
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
*** Please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
installed debian wheezy on imac
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)?
could not instal
forward to a solution.
Rich Stegura
i am running debian stable / gnome / stretch and amule package crashes,
whereas if i use amule from oldstable /jessie , it runs fine.
Thanks to Santiago José López Borrazás
Just like to confirm that your solution in
/usr/share/kernel-package/ruleset/targets/headers.mk
work very well for my compile of kern-4.10 under Stretch
Thank you very much!
Rich
Package: denyhosts
Version: 2.10-2
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
If you have IPTABLES support enabled in denyhosts, then it will happily add
hosts to the iptables DROP rules, but it does not remove those entries when
it garbage collects old blocks from hosts.deny (and friends), leaving them
i
. by pressing the dedicated key i am able to rotate
the screen 90 degree. This is awesome.
Unfortunately this functionaltiy is not found when installing Base Jessie
System with KDE instead of Gnome.
Would someon please implement this function also for KDE?
Thank you very much.
Anchors
Rich
${dkms_tree}/${PACKAGE_NAME}/${PACKAGE_VERSION}/build\"
]; then cp ...;fi"
POST_BUILD="cp ..."
?
- Rich
On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 1:20 AM, Petter Reinholdtsen
wrote:
>
> Hi, and thank you for bringing up this issue.
>
> [Rich]
> > I tried building and installing
Package: spl-dkms
Version: 0.6.5.8-1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
I tried building and installing the new spl-dkms from testing/unstable on my
Jessie system, which built fine, and reportedly installed fine.
Unfortunately, the fix for #836578 breaks the package for DKMS < 2.2.1.0,
resulting
I am not sure what to suggest. This conversation is bouncing across two ticket
systems and is all about a legacy certificate format that is, what, outdated
since 2002?
I am hard-pressed to see why OpenSSL 1.1 has to do anything other than what
Richard proposed.
I am not sure what to suggest. This conversation is bouncing across two ticket
systems and is all about a legacy certificate format that is, what, outdated
since 2002?
I am hard-pressed to see why OpenSSL 1.1 has to do anything other than what
Richard proposed.
--
Ticket here: http://rt.open
1 - 100 of 291 matches
Mail list logo
