Bug#1061503: tex-common configuration

2025-05-23 Thread Hilmar Preuße
On 28.03.25 14:48, James Van Zandt wrote: Hello, Here, configuration of many packages failed because tex-common could not be configured: $ sudo dpkg --configure tex-common Setting up tex-common (6.19) ... update-language: texlive-base not installed and configured, doing nothing! Running mktexl

Bug#1061503: tex-common failed to configure

2025-05-23 Thread Hilmar Preuße
On 25.01.24 16:23, richarda wrote: Hello, the missing *.map files were nowhere to be found on the system. I determined that texlive-latex-extra provided the missing files. I installed texlive-latex-extra and during that installation process, tex-common was configured. Could you remove texli

Bug#512307: texinfo: blank line inconsistency for multitable

2025-05-20 Thread Hilmar Preuße
On 20.05.25 18:00, Vincent Lefevre wrote: Hello, Control: found -1 7.1.1-1 And I forgot to say that 7.1.1-1 is still affected (my remarks concerning the documentation were for this version). Did you consider to test version 7.2 from experimental? H. -- Testmail OpenPGP_signature.asc Des

Bug#1104860: texlive-base: please update documentmetadata-support to version 1.0n

2025-05-16 Thread Hilmar Preuße
On 09.05.25 15:18, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: Hello Jonas, Would be awesome if you could then issue a newer snapshot of TeX Live to experimental, to at least have the functionality generally available for users of Debian unstable. Yes, I could do, but unfortunately I currently have other priori

Bug#1105117: Processed: retitle 1103801 to mimetex: CVE-2024-40445 CVE-2024-40446

2025-05-16 Thread Hilmar Preuße
On 16.05.25 22:46, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 10:03:38PM +0200, Hilmar Preuße wrote: On 21.04.25 21:09, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: Hello Salvatore, later I split off CVE-2024-40445 into Debian bug #1105117. Recently I learned that only Windows systems are

Bug#1105117: Processed: retitle 1103801 to mimetex: CVE-2024-40445 CVE-2024-40446

2025-05-16 Thread Hilmar Preuße
On 21.04.25 21:09, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: Hello Salvatore, later I split off CVE-2024-40445 into Debian bug #1105117. Recently I learned that only Windows systems are affected. No, I did not manage yet to get the source code of mimetex 1.77 from anywhere. So I'd close bug #1105117

Bug#1103801: CVE-2024-40446: code injection vulnerability

2025-05-09 Thread Hilmar Preuße
On 09.05.25 11:52, Shang-Hung, Wan wrote: Hello Shang-Hung, as you've noticed I've took my web page offline: running a web server carrying a vulnerable cgi script is probably not the best idea. ;-) There is a comment [1] that stated that he contacted the author John, and he said version 1.75

Bug#1104198: RFS: golf/479-1 [ITP] -- programming language for web services

2025-05-09 Thread Hilmar Preuße
On 09.05.25 18:53, Golf Team wrote: Hi, I presume you're referring to the GG_DEBIAN_BUILD variable in Makefile, which is used only to guard against including files (or to guard against specific actions) for Debian. It's not used to include anything specific for Debian or to do anything specific

Bug#1104860: texlive-base: please update documentmetadata-support to version 1.0n

2025-05-09 Thread Hilmar Preuße
Control: severity -1 wishlist On 07.05.25 22:06, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: Hello Jonas, I don't know, but am happy to test if you might perhaps be knowledable in guiding me in how to test it. I have tried fumble with tlmgr but without success. Shortly before the hard freeze I'd do a minimal

Bug#1104198: RFS: golf/479-1 [ITP] -- programming language for web services

2025-05-09 Thread Hilmar Preuße
On 07.05.25 05:29, Golf Team wrote: Hello, -std=gnu99 was used when we transitioned from a pure C language framework to Golf (which is still a C framework, but it's now also its own language). It just stayed even after we fixed the issues.> -std=gnu99 is now removed. I installed gcc 15 from d

Bug#1103801: CVE-2024-40446: code injection vulnerability

2025-05-08 Thread Hilmar Preuße
On 21.04.25 18:57, TaiYou wrote: Hello, A code injection vulnerability has been identified in MimeTeX, affecting version 1.76-1 and above. This issue has been assigned CVE-2024-40446. Are you sure that 1.76 and above is affected? I would rather think 1.76 and below is affected. Until now I

Bug#1104860: texlive-base: please update documentmetadata-support to version 1.0n

2025-05-07 Thread Hilmar Preuße
On 07.05.25 17:00, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: Hello Jonas, Please update documentmetadata-support to at least version 1.0n, released on 2025-03-26. Not even alle CTAN mirrors carry version 1.0p (the only one > 1.0j I found. Do you know if I can just update documentmetadata-support to the new

Bug#1104198: RFS: golf/479-1 [ITP] -- programming language for web services

2025-05-06 Thread Hilmar Preuße
On 05.05.25 01:17, Golf Team wrote: Hello, Removed dh_dwz override, it was there because lintian said that compression isn't beneficial, but it doesn't break anything, so it should be fine. Thanks for the changes for now. I don't really believe that lintian complains about this, hence I rat

Bug#1104198: RFS: golf/479-1 [ITP] -- programming language for web services

2025-05-04 Thread Hilmar Preuße
On 27.04.25 09:27, Golf Team wrote: Hello, Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal [wishlist] Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "golf": * Package name : golf Version : 479-1 I evaluated version 501. - there is no need to declare a BD libcurl4 (is

Bug#1097988: texlive-bin: ftbfs with GCC-15

2025-05-02 Thread Hilmar Preuße
On 17.02.25 18:56, Matthias Klose wrote: Hello Matthias, GCC 15 now defaults to the C23/C++23 standards, exposing many FTBFS. Other Common build failures are new warnings resulting in build failures with -Werror turned on, or new/dropped symbols in Debian symbols files. For other C/C++ related

Bug#1103893: Please switch to libpdfbox2-java

2025-05-02 Thread Hilmar Preuße
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/bastien-roucaries/latex-pax/issues/8 On 22.04.25 16:26, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: Hello, Your package build-depends on libpdfbox-java, which is a long EOLed version with open security issues of what is packaged as libpdfbox2-java for the current release

Bug#1103893: Please switch to libpdfbox2-java

2025-05-01 Thread Hilmar Preuße
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/bastien-roucaries/latex-pax/issues/8 On 22.04.25 16:26, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: Hello, Your package build-depends on libpdfbox-java, which is a long EOLed version with open security issues of what is packaged as libpdfbox2-java for the current releas

Bug#1083279: biber: can't build debian-package-book-* with pbuilder anymore because aof missing dependency

2025-05-01 Thread Hilmar Preuße
On 03.10.24 21:17, Mechtilde Stehmann wrote: Hello Mechtilde, While updating the package 'debian-package-book-*" https://salsa.debian.org/ddp-team/dpb I strumple about the following problem. Is that issue still present? H. -- Testmail OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital

Bug#1103981: proftpd-core: Does not start with default configuration (unknown configuration directive 'ShowSymlinks')

2025-04-23 Thread Hilmar Preuße
Hello, I'm wondering if the three modules mod_delay, mod_ls and mod_xfer are loaded in your file /etc/proftpd/modules.conf Hilmar 23.04.2025 15:06:10 David Prévot : > Package: proftpd-core > Version: 1.3.8.c+dfsg-3 > Severity: important > > Dear Maintainer, > > I was hoping this would be cau

Bug#1099851: ITS: dvi2ps

2025-03-09 Thread Hilmar Preuße
On 08.03.25 21:42, Andreas Tille wrote: Hello, I'm interested in salvaging your package dvi2ps, in accordance with the Package Salvaging procedure outlined in the Developers Reference[1]. Your package meets the criteria for this process, and I would love to assist in preserving and maintaining

Bug#1097656: proftpd-mod-case: ftbfs with GCC-15

2025-03-04 Thread Hilmar Preuße
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/Castaglia/proftpd-mod_case/issues/12 On 17.02.25 18:46, Matthias Klose wrote: Hello, Please keep this issue open in the bug tracker for the package it was filed for. If a fix in another package is required, please file a bug for the other package (or c

Bug#1097656: proftpd-mod-case: ftbfs with GCC-15

2025-03-04 Thread Hilmar Preuße
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/Castaglia/proftpd-mod_case/issues/12 On 17.02.25 18:46, Matthias Klose wrote: Hello, Please keep this issue open in the bug tracker for the package it was filed for. If a fix in another package is required, please file a bug for the other package (or

Bug#1085120: ghostscript: gs generates invalid PDF files on armel

2025-03-04 Thread Hilmar Preuße
On 26.11.24 00:00, Hilmar Preusse wrote: Hello, Extension error: Could not import extension sphinxcontrib.googleanalytics (exception: No module named 'sphinxcontrib.googleanalytics') make[1]: *** [debian/rules:63: execute_after_dh_auto_build-indep] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/hil

Bug#1098645: texinfo: src:sbcl FTBFS: /usr/bin/texi2dvi: 713: cd: can't cd to asdf.t2d/dvi/bak

2025-02-22 Thread Hilmar Preuße
On 22.02.25 06:52, Sean Whitton wrote: Hello Sean, It looks like the texinfo now in sid causes src:sbcl in sid to FTBFS. I'm filing a bug against texinfo because the output suggests that the problem is there, but perhaps src:sbcl is the place where changes are needed. Here's the tail of the bu

Bug#1098418: RFS: plog/1.1.10-1 [ITP] - C++ header-only logging library

2025-02-22 Thread Hilmar Preuße
On 22.02.25 09:25, Sébastien Noel wrote: Control: tags -1 -moreinfo Hi, On 21/02/25 22:07, Phil Wyett wrote: Control: tags -1 +moreinfo [...] I used to find value in your reviews, but i'm doubtful with this one... The package pass all your tests but you conclude that it "is not yet ready"

Bug#1094898: context: mtxrun running fails

2025-02-08 Thread Hilmar Preuße
On 07.02.25 06:45, Arthur Marsh wrote: Hello Arthur, *** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate *** * What led up to the situation? Not sure, but getting the illegal instruction error on mtxrun --generate as others have reported, and building and installing

Bug#1093247: texlive-extra: Migration blocker

2025-02-08 Thread Hilmar Preuße
On 08.02.25 09:49, Bastian Germann wrote: On Thu, 16 Jan 2025 23:08:47 +0100 Hilmar Preusse wrote: Hello, the package should not migrate to testing for now. Can you please explain why? This is blocking mupdf from migrating as well. I would like to see tl-base, tl-extra & tl-lang to migrate

Bug#1094898: context: mtxrun running fails

2025-02-01 Thread Hilmar Preuße
On 01.02.25 18:55, Kip Warner wrote: On Sat, 2025-02-01 at 18:46 +0100, Hilmar Preuße wrote: Hi Kip, I was afraid, that something like this could happen. On [1] I've put a luametatex package, which is linked statically with mimalloc. Could you try if it solves your issue? Hilmar, j

Bug#1094898: context: mtxrun running fails

2025-02-01 Thread Hilmar Preuße
On 01.02.25 06:30, Damir R. Islamov wrote: Hello, context cannot be installed due to error: ... Running mktexlsr. This may take some time... done. Running mtxrun --generate. This may take some time... mtxrun --generate failed. Output has been stored in /tmp/mtxrun.2M4VZ7Yl Please include this f

Bug#1036873: Don't Depend on transitional package ghostscript-x

2025-01-27 Thread Hilmar Preuße
Control: severity -1 grave On 27.01.25 19:44, Hilmar Preusse wrote: Package: gv Version: 1:3.7.4-2 Followup-For: Bug #1036873 Control: severity -1 grave -- Testmail OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#1093957: ITS: latexila

2025-01-25 Thread Hilmar Preuße
On 25.01.25 23:24, Jeremy Bícha wrote: Hello, Could I be added to Uploaders for latexila and given Salsa permissions for it? My username is jbicha I've sent you an invitation. You should be able yourself do commits to the repo. Hilmar -- Testmail OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: Open

Bug#1093957: ITS: latexila

2025-01-25 Thread Hilmar Preuße
On 25.01.25 17:49, Andreas Tille wrote: Hello Andreas, If you do not like those packages in Debian TeX maintainers I can move to Debian Science team (where I care in the same level as described above). No, that's fine with me. I just wanted to clarify your expectations to our group. As you

Bug#1093957: ITS: latexila

2025-01-24 Thread Hilmar Preuße
On 24.01.25 10:17, Andreas Tille wrote: Hello Andreas, I'm interested in salvaging your package latexila, in accordance with the Package Salvaging procedure outlined in the Developers Reference[1]. Your package meets the criteria for this process, and I would love to assist in preserving and ma

Bug#1092062: pod2texi.1: Some remarks about this man page

2025-01-18 Thread Hilmar Preuße
On 08.01.25 09:17, Hilmar Preusse wrote: On 07.01.25 Bjarni Ingi Gislason (bjarn...@simnet.is) wrote: Hello, I do not use this generator. Me neither. However it is always wrong to modify a file, which is generated...unless the statement (that it is generated) is wrong. I can't be sure a

Bug#1092062: pod2texi.1: Some remarks about this man page

2025-01-05 Thread Hilmar Preuße
Control: tags -1 + wontfix On 04.01.25 10:45, Bjarni Ingi Gislason wrote: Hello, * What led up to the situation? Checking for defects with a new version The header of this file says: hille@rasppi3:/export/storage/home/hille/devel/TeXLive/github/texinfo/man $ head -n 5 pod2texi.1

Bug#1091785: pdfjam.1: Some remarks and a patch with editorial changes for this man page

2025-01-02 Thread Hilmar Preuße
On 02.01.25 23:38, Reuben Thomas wrote: Hello, Also, I have had several reports that don’t apply to my project, because the faulty markup was generated by help2man. In this case I did not find a mark in the manual page "generated by xyz", hence I could forward the patch. Since a PR was ope

Bug#1091785: pdfjam.1: Some remarks and a patch with editorial changes for this man page

2025-01-02 Thread Hilmar Preuße
On 02.01.25 14:21, Norbert Preining wrote: On Wed, 01 Jan 2025, Bjarni Ingi Gislason wrote: Hi Norbert, I do not send e-mails to upstream if I have to acquire an account. Then your patches will just end up in the bit nirvana. They do not, but the processing can be delayed heavily (years

Bug#1091785: pdfjam.1: Some remarks and a patch with editorial changes for this man page

2025-01-02 Thread Hilmar Preuße
Control: tags -1 + fixed-upstream On 01.01.25 22:42, Bjarni Ingi Gislason wrote: Hello Bjarni, I do not send e-mails to upstream if I have to acquire an account. I don't like too, to have thousand accounts for every kind of bugtracker, but I wouldn't think so much about an account on gith

Bug#1087428: hyperref broke cleveref - get bugfix from upstream

2024-11-17 Thread Hilmar Preuße
On 13.11.24 13:36, Joachim Wuttke wrote: Hello, Since the latest upgrade, in a manuscript using hyperref and cleveref, all cross-references are broken. From the log: ``` I've uploaded another CTAN snapshot recently. Let me know, if it solved the issue. Hilmar -- Testmail OpenPGP_sig

Bug#1086251: proftpd-dev: #include breaks several packages

2024-10-30 Thread Hilmar Preuße
Hi, am I correct, that in this case one normally schedules an binNMU to solve the issue? In our specific case this is not sufficient, b/c the test suite is broken; fix is on salsa: rev -3. I can't do anything before Saturday b/c the local WLAN does not allow SSH connections to anywhere. H. 3

Bug#1082326: Supplemental Group Inheritance Grants Unintended Access to GID 0

2024-10-07 Thread Hilmar Preuße
On 22.09.2024 15:41, Brian Ristuccia wrote: Hi DBTS, Thank you. Do you know who might be responsible for requesting / issuing a CVE number for this issue? Not sure about this, I'll try to clarify. The upstream author provided a patch for this for the 1.3.9 line. I've created a Debian sourc

Bug#1083279: biber: can't build debian-package-book-* with pbuilder anymore because aof missing dependency

2024-10-03 Thread Hilmar Preuße
Control: severity -1 important On 03.10.2024 22:14, gregor herrmann wrote: Hi all, Which confirms my hunch that the problem is not with biber and not with libencode-perl. Thanks for the information. For now I lower the severity. H. -- Testmail OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP

Bug#974724: no useful documentation of pdfjam commands

2024-09-06 Thread Hilmar Preuße
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/rrthomas/pdfjam/issues/30 Control: tags -1 - wontfix Am 14.11.2020 um 11:17 schrieb Eduard Bloch: Hi, Even the --help output is not helping. It tells a few things about options but it does NOT mention what the actual operations are. Tried to explain thi

Bug#621504: Testmail from haka2

2024-09-03 Thread Hilmar Preuße
Ignore -- Testmail

Bug#1074976: fweb: ftbfs with GCC-14

2024-08-02 Thread Preuße
On 03.07.2024 14:27, Matthias Klose wrote: Hi Yann, The package fails to build in a test rebuild on at least amd64 with gcc-14/g++-14, but succeeds to build with gcc-13/g++-13. The severity of this report will be raised before the trixie release. Here are the first two patches in case you are

Bug#1077439: Fwd: Bug#1077439: latex-cjk-japanese-wadalab: FTBFS: wftodm.c:57:1: error: return type defaults to ‘int’ [-Wimplicit-int]

2024-08-02 Thread Preuße
On 01.08.2024 14:30, Danai SAE-HAN (韓達耐) wrote: Hi Danai, sounds rather like a wacky solution, as we hide the code issues, instead of solving them However as explained: the code is never used by the end user, hence the quality does not matter. I checked with diffoscope, everything fine. Go

Bug#1077439: Fwd: Bug#1077439: latex-cjk-japanese-wadalab: FTBFS: wftodm.c:57:1: error: return type defaults to ‘int’ [-Wimplicit-int]

2024-07-31 Thread Preuße
Control: tags -1 + help On 31.07.2024 10:48, Danai SAE-HAN (韓達耐) wrote: Hi Danai, When compiling wftodm.c from the latex-cjk-japanese-wadalab package, I get a bunch of warnings with GCC 13 (see also below Lucas' output). To me, these seems just fairly benign warnings based on deprecated C89 c

Bug#1077282: libxaw: Uploading latest upstream version will cause FTBFS

2024-07-30 Thread Preuße
On 30.07.2024 09:32, Thomas Dickey wrote: On Tue, Jul 30, 2024 at 12:45:09AM +0200, Hilmar Preusse wrote: On 28.07.24 Thomas Dickey (dic...@his.com) wrote: On Sat, Jul 27, 2024 at 11:31:33PM +0200, Hilmar Preusse wrote: Hi Thomas, Source: libxaw Version: 2:1.0.14-1 1.0.16 is the latest ve

Bug#1077253: RFS: tty-clock/2.3-git.2021.11.21.f2f847c-1 [ITA] -- simple terminal clock

2024-07-27 Thread Preuße
Control: merge -1 1077252 On 27.07.2024 13:16, EiPiFun wrote: Hello, Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "tty-clock": I guess this is a duplicate of 1077252. Merging. H. -- sigfault OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#1077073: texlive-bin FTBFS on 32-bit with gcc 14

2024-07-26 Thread Preuße
Control: forwarded -1 https://tug.org/pipermail/tex-live/2024-July/050773.html On 25.07.2024 21:18, Adrian Bunk wrote: Hi, https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=texlive-bin&ver=2024.20240313.70630%2Bds-3 I've forwarded the issue for now. H. -- sigfault OpenPGP_signature.asc Des

Bug#1076675: Broken french locale/babel setting (Undefined control sequence / Missing \begin{document})

2024-07-24 Thread Preuße
On 24.07.2024 15:35, Alexis Bienvenüe wrote: Hello Alexis, It seems that \FBCompactItemize@setup is called from line 1189 of /usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/generic/babel-french/french.ldf but this function is defined as \FB@CompactItemize@setup (with an extra @) at line 1281. Removing the

Bug#1076675: Wrong macro definition in french.ldf?

2024-07-24 Thread Preuße
Dear Daniel, down here in the Debian bug tracking system we got a bug report [1], which points to a possible bug in french.ldf. I don't really have a minimal example for problem reproduction, except the code at the beginning of the report, which is far form being minimal. More interesting is

Bug#1061152: asymptote: autopkgtest should test installed package

2024-07-20 Thread Preuße
On 03.04.2024 12:54, Julian Gilbey wrote: Hi Julian If Sven's patch works, you would also be able to drop most of the test-time dependencies and depend only on asymptote itself (and maybe one or two other packages), as you would not need to build asymptote. I did for most of them [1]. The mo

Bug#1061152: asymptote: autopkgtest should test installed package

2024-07-20 Thread Preuße
On 03.04.2024 12:54, Julian Gilbey wrote: Hi Julian, On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 06:07:56PM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote: [...] Hello, Your package's autopkgtest runs the upstream test suite which is nice. However, it first builds the program and then tests that, rather than the package from the a

Bug#1076010: texlive-latex-base: regressions using babel+hebrew in luatex

2024-07-16 Thread Preuße
On 09.07.2024 13:02, Nick Black (Public gmail account) wrote: Hi, Beginning sometime this year, using Hebrew with babel in LuaTeX results in positioning errors. 2023.20240207-1 worked properly, but one of the three 2024 updates introduced these regressions. I'm not sure which. I can look into

Bug#1076010: texlive-latex-base: regressions using babel+hebrew in luatex

2024-07-09 Thread Preuße
On 09.07.2024 13:02, Nick Black (Public gmail account) wrote: Hi, This seems independent of surrounding text and placement on the page. Like I said, I'm preparing a true minimum viable example. Let me know what else I can provide. I don't really have the time to care about upstream issues. I

Bug#1038937: nq package out of date with upstream, 0.5 was released more than a year ago

2024-07-05 Thread Preuße
On 19.05.2024 14:14, Preuße, Hilmar wrote: On 03.05.2024 21:47, Christoph Biedl wrote: Hi, nq 0.5 was released March 26, 2022 and contains several bug fixes and improvements. nq 0.3.1 was released March 7, 2018, and is what is in all of stable, testing, and unstable. Please update this

Bug#1074343: src:texlive-bin: fails to migrate to testing for too long: unresolved RC issue

2024-06-26 Thread Preuße
On 26.06.2024 22:25, Paul Gevers wrote: Hi, The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing and unstable for more than 30 days as having a Release Critical bug in testing [1]. Your package src:texlive-bin has been trying to migrate for 31 days [2]. Hence, I am filing

Bug#1005961: nq,fq: trying to overwrite '/usr/bin/fq', which is also in package nq 0.3.1-4

2024-06-21 Thread Preuße
On 04.06.2024 17:29, Stephen Gelman wrote: On May 29, 2024 at 4:04:13 PM, Bastian Germann mailto:b...@debian.org>> wrote: Hi, I suggest fq renames the binary because it was introduced over 4 years later and has only been in one release so far. Both packages have very low usage acc to popcon

Bug#1071576: bugs.debian.org: bug subscription no longer possible: no "Please confirm subscription" e-mail

2024-06-21 Thread Preuße
On 21.06.2024 10:40, Vincent Lefevre wrote: Hi, I've tried again with Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2024 09:56:17 +0200 For me bug subscription works again fine. No clue what is the difference to your setup. Hilmar -- sigfault

Bug#1072828: Work-around is ineffective on !amd64

2024-06-20 Thread Preuße
Control: reassign -1 texlive-base Control: found -1 2024.20240401-2 Control: tags -1 + pending patch On 19.06.2024 13:19, Adrien Nader wrote: Hello, I found https://tug.org/svn/texlive?revision=71214&view=revision this morning. It only touches the win32 implementations however. I did somethin

Bug#1072828: Work-around is ineffective on !amd64

2024-06-18 Thread Preuße
On 18.06.2024 23:01, Adrien Nader wrote: Hi Adrien, I've straced the build and the file seems generated and I see some interesting things. I've heavily edited the output because the original is already 11M. The file is created and written to but it's in "/build/therion-oW9QKw/therion-6.2.1/bui

Bug#1072828: Work-around is ineffective on !amd64

2024-06-18 Thread Preuße
On 18.06.2024 15:26, Adrien Nader wrote: Hi Adrien, I hit that issue while working on the vtk9 9.3 transition in Ubuntu and I also tried to add 'texlive-fonts-recommended' as a dependency (at least temporarily so that the transition can finish). Unfortunately it only works on amd64. On arm64, a

Bug#1072682: luametatex: context 2024.04 and luametatex 2.11 no longer build PDF via Pandoc. (+ workaround)

2024-06-15 Thread Preuße
Control: reassign -1 luametatex Control: tags -1 + pending On 06.06.2024 15:17, Gijs Hillenius wrote: Hello, Context 2024.04.01.20240428+dfsg-2 and Luametatex 2.11.02+ds-4 no longer let me build PDFs from Emacs Org-Mode files via Pandoc. After downgrading to luametatex 2.11.01 (from 2.11.02)

Bug#1072682: luametatex: context 2024.04 and luametatex 2.11 no longer build PDF via Pandoc. (+ workaround)

2024-06-09 Thread Preuße
Control: reassign -1 context Control: severity -1 grave On 06.06.2024 15:17, Gijs Hillenius wrote: Hello, Context 2024.04.01.20240428+dfsg-2 and Luametatex 2.11.02+ds-4 no longer let me build PDFs from Emacs Org-Mode files via Pandoc. I set that bug to grave and assume it is in the context

Bug#1072828: texlive-binaries upgrade breaks therion build

2024-06-08 Thread Preuße
On 08.06.2024 16:09, Adrian Bunk wrote: Hi, https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=therion&arch=amd64&ver=6.2.1-1%2Bb1&stamp=1717847632&raw=0 ... FAILED: thbook/thbook.pdf /<>/build/thbook/thbook.pdf I can confirm that the failing command works fine on a normal computer..this is a ch

Bug#1072743: texlive-extra-utils: pdfxup: --pages option fails if page range omits start or end of range

2024-06-08 Thread Hilmar Preuße
08.06.2024 10:25:00 Sanjoy Mahajan : > Yes, I'll be happy to discuss it with upstream. > Should I CC you?  Or just update the Debian bug as needed? > > -Sanjoy > > On 2024-06-07 15:48, Preuße, Hilmar wrote: > >> On 07.06.2024 13:09, Sanjoy Mahajan wrote: >

Bug#1072743: texlive-extra-utils: pdfxup: --pages option fails if page range omits start or end of range

2024-06-07 Thread Preuße
On 07.06.2024 13:09, Sanjoy Mahajan wrote: Hi, The man entry for pdfxup says that --pages can handle an omitted start or end of range, e.g. "--pages 2-" or "--pages -5". However, using the following pdf file as a test (it's one page long) gives an error if either the start or end of the range

Bug#1072682: luametatex: context 2024.04 and luametatex 2.11 no longer build PDF via Pandoc. (+ workaround)

2024-06-06 Thread Preuße
On 06.06.2024 16:03, Gijs Hillenius wrote: Hi Gijs, The log tells me what I reported: " Running pandoc with args: (-f org -t context -o /path/somedocument.pdf --standalone /path/somedocument.tmp44bTvt.org) I can run the same command in a non Emacs terminal: Are you able to compile a minimal

Bug#1072682: luametatex: context 2024.04 and luametatex 2.11 no longer build PDF via Pandoc. (+ workaround)

2024-06-06 Thread Preuße
On 06.06.2024 15:17, Gijs Hillenius wrote: Hello, Context 2024.04.01.20240428+dfsg-2 and Luametatex 2.11.02+ds-4 no longer let me build PDFs from Emacs Org-Mode files via Pandoc. the error I get : Running pandoc with args: (-f org -t context -o (path to org file) --standalone (path to input

Bug#1072211: marked as done (texlive-base: pdflatex very slow after upgrading to texlive 2024.20240401-2)

2024-05-31 Thread Preuße
Control: reopen -1 On 31.05.2024 23:57, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > Your message dated Fri, 31 May 2024 21:54:34 +> with message-id and subject line Bug#1072211: fixed in texlive-lang 2024.20240401-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1072211, regarding texlive-base: pdflatex very

Bug#1072211: texlive-base: pdflatex very slow after upgrading to texlive 2024.20240401-2

2024-05-30 Thread Preuße
On 30.05.2024 13:23, J.L.G. Pallero wrote: Hi, After the last upgrade of texlive packages in Sid, from 2023.20240207-1 to 2024.20240401-2, I found pdflatex very slow in the compilation. The same documents compiled with the 2023.20240207-1 version were built quicker. Is it a problem on my side o

Bug#1071649: mflua.1: some remarks and editorial changes for this man page

2024-05-26 Thread Preuße
On 26.05.2024 23:46, Karl Berry wrote: Hello Karl, FYI, I sent in a report to bug-help2man. If the output can be made usable, I'll add it to TL, else maybe give up on help2man and just fix it by hand as Bjarni wrote originally. We'll see what happens. -k Thanks for the report. Do they have a

Bug#1071893: sagetex: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependencies

2024-05-26 Thread Preuße
Control: reassign -1 python3-ipywidgets Control: found -1 8.1.1-5 Control: affects -1 src:sagetex On 25.05.2024 19:22, Santiago Vila wrote: Hello, If this is really a bug in one of the build-depends, please use reassign and affects, so that this is still visible in the BTS web page for this pa

Bug#1071649: mflua.1: some remarks and editorial changes for this man page

2024-05-24 Thread Preuße
On 24.05.2024 22:35, Bjarni Ingi Gislason wrote: Hello Bjarni, mflua --help | groff -man -ww -b -z Not sure, what you're trying to do here. To use help2man you have to call something like "help2man -N mflua > mflua.1" This gives you a file: hille@rasppi2:~ $ file mflua.1 mflua.1: troff o

Bug#1071647: mendex.1: some remarks and editorial changes for this man page

2024-05-23 Thread Preuße
Control: tags -1 - patch On 23.05.2024 22:18, Bjarni Ingi Gislason wrote: On Thu, May 23, 2024 at 09:32:32AM +0200, Preuße, Hilmar wrote: On 23.05.2024 00:24, Bjarni Ingi Gislason wrote: Hello Bjarni, here are some notes and editorial fixes for the manual. The patch is in the attachment

Bug#1071647: mendex.1: some remarks and editorial changes for this man page

2024-05-23 Thread Preuße
On 23.05.2024 00:24, Bjarni Ingi Gislason wrote: Hello, Dear Maintainer, here are some notes and editorial fixes for the manual. The patch is in the attachment. Unfortunately the patch not match to the manual page from TL204 [1]. Could you adapt to that version? Thanks! Hilmar [1]

Bug#1071649: mflua.1: some remarks and editorial changes for this man page

2024-05-23 Thread Preuße
Control: tags -1 + pending On 23.05.2024 01:07, Bjarni Ingi Gislason wrote: Hello, Dear Maintainer, here are some notes and editorial fixes for the manual. The patch is in the attachment. Applied. Hilmar -- sigfault OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#1038937: nq package out of date with upstream, 0.5 was released more than a year ago

2024-05-19 Thread Preuße
Control: block -1 by 1005961 On 03.05.2024 21:47, Christoph Biedl wrote: Hi, nq 0.5 was released March 26, 2022 and contains several bug fixes and improvements. nq 0.3.1 was released March 7, 2018, and is what is in all of stable, testing, and unstable. Please update this package. Upon req

Bug#1057407: texworks: Intent to drop poppler-qt6 on i386

2024-05-19 Thread Preuße
On 04.12.2023 14:43, Jeremy Bícha wrote: Hi Jeremy, As the maintainer of Debian's poppler source package, I would like to drop poppler's Qt6 packages on i386. I just uploaded texworks 0.6.9 and for i386 the status on the buildd is Dependency installability problem for texworks on i386: texw

Bug#1070331: RFS: nq/0.5-0.1 [NMU] -- Lightweight queue system

2024-05-12 Thread Preuße
On 11.05.2024 09:08, Tobias Frost wrote: Hi, Please also announce the NMU / RFS to the package maintainer, preferable as bug reported against it. Thanks! The package is flagged as

Bug#1070802: texlive-latex-extra: (regression) acro no longer compiles

2024-05-09 Thread Preuße
On 10.05.2024 08:07, Manny wrote: X-Debbugs-Cc: cont...@mychemistry.eu Hello Manny, normally I don't have time to care about issues like this. Are you willing to report this issue to the upstream author? The upstream project is in MS Github which is a non-starter for me. I’ll go as far as /

Bug#1070802: texlive-latex-extra: (regression) acro no longer compiles

2024-05-09 Thread Preuße
09.05.2024 14:12:32 Manny : Hi Manny, normally I don't have time to care about issues like this. Are you willing to report this issue to the upstream author? Hilmar Package: texlive-latex-extra Version: 2022.20230122-4 Severity: normal Tags: upstream X-Debbugs-Cc: debbug.texlive-latex-ex.

Bug#1070802: texlive-latex-extra: (regression) acro no longer compiles

2024-05-09 Thread Hilmar Preuße
09.05.2024 14:12:32 Manny : > Package: texlive-latex-extra > Version: 2022.20230122-4 > Severity: normal > Tags: upstream > X-Debbugs-Cc: debbug.texlive-latex-ex...@sideload.33mail.com > > After an upgrade from Bullseye to Bookworm, the acro package breaks > compilation even if no acronyms are ev

Bug#1070331: RFS: nq/0.5-0.1 [NMU] -- Lightweight queue system

2024-05-04 Thread Preuße
Control: block -1 by 1005961 On 03.05.2024 23:45, Christoph Biedl wrote: Hi, That would be necessary - although I don't know how to solve this in a sensible way. Sorry for disturbing your best intentions to bring nq back in shape - but this problem will not disappear by ignoring it. Complet

Bug#1005961: nq,fq: trying to overwrite '/usr/bin/fq', which is also in package nq 0.3.1-4

2024-05-04 Thread Preuße
Control: found -1 fq/0.9.0-2 Control: found -1 nq/0.3.1-4 On 18.02.2022 08:39, Axel Beckert wrote: Hello, Trying to install fq fails for me as follows: Preparing to unpack .../archives/fq_0.0.4-2_amd64.deb ... Unpacking fq (0.0.4-2) ... dpkg: error processing archive /var/cache/apt/archives/f

Bug#1070331: RFS: nq/0.5-0.1 [NMU] -- Lightweight queue system

2024-05-03 Thread Preuße
On 03.05.2024 22:29, Christoph Biedl wrote: Hilmar Preusse wrote... Hi Christoph, Changes since the last upload: nq (0.5-0.1) unstable; urgency=medium . * Non-maintainer upload. . * New upstream version (Closes: #1038937). * Bump Standards and dh compat version, no chang

Bug#1070150: texlive-latex-extra: performance regression under emulation with 2023.20240207-1

2024-05-02 Thread Preuße
Control: reassign -1 texlive-binaries Control: severity -1 important On 01.05.2024 00:19, Steev Klimaszewski wrote: Hi all, Since the 2023.20240207-1 release, there is a major performance regression when running the tex-common postinst hook in an arm64 chroot on amd64 host. I assume this is

Bug#1070226: rubber -Wrefs seems broken due to a bad regexp in converters/latex.py

2024-05-02 Thread Preuße
Control: forwarded -1 https://gitlab.com/latex-rubber/rubber/-/issues/15 On 02.05.2024 10:22, Pierre Letouzey wrote: Hello, Issue already reported upstream: https://gitlab.com/latex- rubber/rubber/-/issues/15 The provided 2-line patch appears to solve this issue. Thanks for the report. Mar

Bug#1070150: texlive-latex-extra: performance regression under emulation with 2023.20240207-1

2024-05-01 Thread Preuße
On 01.05.2024 22:46, Steev Klimaszewski wrote: Hi, May 01 14:28:46 catcodes, registers, parameters, May 01 14:28:46 LaTeX2e <2024-06-01> pre-release-0 (develop 2024-5-1 branch) May 01 14:28:46 (/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/l3kernel/expl3.ltx May 01 14:51:15 (/usr/share/texlive/tex

Bug#1052298: metafun broken?

2024-04-30 Thread Preuße
Control: reassign -1 context-modules Control: tags -1 + pending On 30.04.2024 18:28, Preuße...@buxtehude.debian.org, Hilmar wrote: Hi *, I'll upload a context-modules package to Debian experimental, which will contain the legacy mkii packages. This will bring back metafun.mpii, but

Bug#1052298: metafun broken?

2024-04-30 Thread Preuße
On 23.02.2024 23:31, Hilmar Preuße wrote: On 27.10.23 22:31, Siep Kroonenberg wrote: Hi Stéphane, The standalone context is mostly free from mkii, but cont-tmf.zip still has most of the legacy stuff, which will mostly be added back in, in the form of a context-legacy package for TL. I find

Bug#1057407: texworks: Intent to drop poppler-qt6 on i386

2024-04-26 Thread Preuße
On 04.12.2023 14:43, Jeremy Bícha wrote: Hi Jeremy, As the maintainer of Debian's poppler source package, I would like to drop poppler's Qt6 packages on i386. I filed Bug#1068672 and you probably should be able to drop poppler-qt6 on i386. My package will turn either into "not-installable" or

Bug#1061546: srcpd: installs file into aliased location

2024-04-19 Thread Preuße
Control: tags -1 + pending On 26.01.2024 23:01, Preuße...@buxtehude.debian.org, Hilmar wrote: On 26.01.2024 09:35, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote: Hi, Please move /lib/udev/rules.d/10-liusb.rules into /usr/lib before srcpd reaches testing. hille42@hz:~/devel/srcpd$ dpkg-deb -c srcpd_2.1.6

Bug#1057407: texworks: Intent to drop poppler-qt6 on i386

2024-04-10 Thread Preuße
On 08.04.2024 00:08, Preuße...@buxtehude.debian.org, Hilmar wrote: On 20.12.2023 15:25, Jeremy Bícha wrote: On Sat, Dec 16, 2023 at 6:02 PM Hilmar Preuße wrote: Hi Jeremy, As no package depend on texworks, I'll drop i386 as requested. If you have a patch for me I'll be glad.

Bug#1067614: texlive-latex-extra: pdfcomment docs reference the cloud instead of local files; also font option broken

2024-04-09 Thread Preuße
Control: tags -1 + wontfix On 24.03.2024 18:29, Manny wrote: Hi Manny, thanks to Norbert for explaining, why we can't solve this issue. I tag that bug wontfix. If only the Debian-specific bug is worked and the rest of this report is closed, perhaps that’s fair enough. I’ve gone as far as I’

Bug#1057407: texworks: Intent to drop poppler-qt6 on i386

2024-04-07 Thread Preuße
On 20.12.2023 15:25, Jeremy Bícha wrote: On Sat, Dec 16, 2023 at 6:02 PM Hilmar Preuße wrote: Hi, As no package depend on texworks, I'll drop i386 as requested. If you have a patch for me I'll be glad. My plan is to first get a newer poppler from Experimental into Unstable.

Bug#1068419: perdition: dependencies unsatisfiable after binnmu for time64 transition.

2024-04-04 Thread Preuße
Control: tags -1 + patch On 04.04.2024 21:57, Peter Green wrote: Hi, After being rebuilt for the time64 transition, perdition depends on both libvanessa-socket2 and libvanessa-socket2. As a result it is uninstallable. Interesting in this case, the uninstallability seems to apply to all archi

Bug#1065876: texlive-extra-utils: The shebang of script de-macro invokes 'python' rather than 'python3'

2024-04-03 Thread Preuße
Control: tags -1 + pending On 10.03.2024 17:28, Diego Caraffini wrote: Hi, I have a paper written in LaTeX that the publisher required to not contain any user macro, so I used de-macro to produce a distributable version with a Makefile target. Fixed in git, will be part of next upload. H. -

Bug#1061152: asymptote: autopkgtest should test installed package

2024-04-03 Thread Preuße
On 03.04.2024 12:54, Julian Gilbey wrote: On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 06:07:56PM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote: Hi Julian, nice. However, it first builds the program and then tests that, rather than the package from the archive. This is not very useful, as changes in reverse dependencies could cause

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >