Package: libzipios++-doc
Version: 0.1.5.9+cvs.2007.04.28-4
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
The current documentation is unreadable as the directory of the package
manager is hardcoded in all the html files. Also, files were renamed,
replacing any internal '.' by '_8'. I don
Julien Cristau a écrit :
On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 10:03:52 +, Pierre Barbier de Reuille wrote:
While installing the package, I get this error:
Unpacking replacement libgl1-mesa-glx ...
dpkg: error processing
/var/cache/apt/archives/libgl1-mesa-glx_7.0.2-3_i386.deb (--unpack):
unable
Package: libgl1-mesa-glx
Version: 7.0.2-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
While installing the package, I get this error:
Unpacking replacement libgl1-mesa-glx ...
dpkg: error processing
/var/cache/apt/archives/libgl1-mesa-glx_7.0.2-3_i386.deb (--unpack):
unable to crea
Domenico Andreoli a écrit :
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 10:01:36PM -0600, Pierre Barbier de Reuille wrote:
While compiling unit tests using the unit_test_suite facility, the
linker report:
/usr/lib/gcc/i486-linux-gnu/4.1.3/../../../../lib/crt1.o: In function
`_start': (.text
Package: libboost-test-dev
Version: 1.34.0-1+b1
Severity: important
While compiling unit tests using the unit_test_suite facility, the
linker report:
/usr/lib/gcc/i486-linux-gnu/4.1.3/../../../../lib/crt1.o: In function
`_start': (.text+0x18): undefined reference to `main'
The same error occur
Yes, once more sorry about following up on that bug. I just thought it
was related...
I will try to remove (and purge) xmltex !
-- Pierre
Norbert Preining wrote:
On Mit, 23 Mai 2007, Ralf Stubner wrote:
I guess we can close this bug? Do you agree?
Careful; Pierre posted to
on of xmltex and now it seems to be working properly.
Thanks,
-- Pierre
Ralf Stubner wrote:
Pierre Barbier de Reuille wrote:
Package: texlive-base-bin
Version: 2007-7
Followup-For: Bug #421969
Why do you think this is related to #421969?
While trying to upgrade this package, a
Package: texlive-base-bin
Version: 2007-7
Followup-For: Bug #421969
While trying to upgrade this package, a huge number of etex and pdfetex
sub-processes were created. Probably hundreds of them ! It ate all my
memory (i.e. more than 2GB of RAM) and I had to kill them by hand to
regain control over
restarting dbus.
Pierre Barbier de Reuille
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.14ibm
Locale: [EMAI
Package: mozilla-firefox
Version: 1.0.6-5
Severity: important
Randomly, when validating a dialog box, Firefox will crash.
It happened on a "Remember password", "Accept this cookie", on various
extension configurations. Somtimes I can reproduce it a few times, but
it's very seldom. However, it n
Ok, thanks !
As a work-around you can disabled the swf file handling in the
preferences of the program !
Pierre
* Emilian Nowak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [17/06/05 - 01:16]:
> Pierre Barbier de Reuille wrote:
>
> > When launching gqview I get this messages :
> >
> &
Package: gqview
Version: 2.0.0-1
Severity: important
When launching gqview I get this messages :
$ gqview
SWFDEC: ERROR: swfdec_font.c(158): tag_func_define_font_2: langcode 1
SWFDEC: ERROR: swfdec_font.c(158): tag_func_define_font_2: langcode 1
SWFDEC: ERROR: swfdec_font.c(158): tag_func_define
* Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [08/05/05 - 17:28]:
> On Sunday 08 May 2005 10:12 am, Pierre Barbier de Reuille wrote:
> > I selected packages for update. Then, it automatically selected packages
> > for deletion (till now everything is normal even if I would rath
(number #308030) to the
libmlchat-ocaml-dev package manager.
Regards,
Pierre Barbier de Reuille
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.0
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (80, 'testing'), (40, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTE
Package: libmlchat-ocaml-dev
Version: 1.3-4
Severity: important
I selected package for update. Then, it automatically selected packages
for deletion. I quit and restarted aptitude. When I noticed the packages
were still marked for deletion I marked them for installation instead
(in order to keep
15 matches
Mail list logo