See upstream report
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib/-/issues/3095#note_1839091, which
will be fixed upstream for 2.78.0, which is due to be released in the
next couple of days.
Philip
On Wed, 2023-09-06 at 22:49 +, Michael Gold wrote:
> Package: libglib2.0-0
> Version: 2.77.3-1
> Severity
On Sat, 2023-01-14 at 21:15 +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> Thank you for adding looping in.
>
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 10:10:35AM +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > Control: tags -1 + security
> >
> > On Wed, 11 Jan 2023 at 16:37:01 +,
Package: glib2.0
Version: 2.66.8-1
Tags: security
Are there plans to backport the recent GVariant security fixes to
Debian Stable?
These are:
- https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib/-/issues/2782
- https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib/-/issues/2121
- https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib/-/issues/2
Package: evolution-data-server
Version: 3.38.3-1
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
Please consider backporting patches from Debian testing/unstable to stable to
switch Evolution and EDS to use CalDAV for accessing Google Contacts. The
current method of accessing it, the Google Contacts API,
This is https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib/-/issues/2332
On Thu, 2021-02-18 at 10:57 +0100, Michael Ott wrote:
> Package: libglib2.0-0
> Version: 2.67.4-1
> Severity: important
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> After update to 2.67.4 I cannot start GDM
>
> Output in syslog:
> Feb 18 05:14:25 k-c13 gnom
On Wed, 3 Feb 2021 12:26:23 + Simon McVittie
wrote:
> For now, GLib upstream has partially reverted that change, weakening
the
> security hardening in order to fix the regression, and I'm going to
do
> the same in Debian. This should stop msmtp from regressing in terms
of
> which features work
On Tue, 2020-06-16 at 02:44 +0200, Sergio Gelato wrote:
> control: tags -1 + patch
>
> * Philip Withnall [2020-06-15 23:25:18 +0200]:
> > https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib/-/issues/422
> >
> > Nobody has yet found time to work on it; merge requests are
> > w
On Tue, 2020-06-16 at 02:44 +0200, Sergio Gelato wrote:
> control: tags -1 + patch
>
> * Philip Withnall [2020-06-15 23:25:18 +0200]:
> > https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib/-/issues/422
> >
> > Nobody has yet found time to work on it; merge requests are
> > w
On Mon, 2020-06-15 at 23:17 +0200, Sergio Gelato wrote:
> Package: libglib2.0-0
> Version: 2.58.3-2+deb10u2
> Severity: important
>
> g_file_copy_attributes(), when invoked with G_FILE_COPY_ALL_METADATA
> on
> files in NFS, is prone to truncating the value of extended attribute
> system.nfs4_acl.
On Tue, 2019-08-13 at 23:16 +, brian m. carlson wrote:
> On 2019-08-13 at 06:12:30, Philip Withnall wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I can’t speak for the Debian project, but as an upstream GLib
> > developer
> > I can say such an environment variable would not be welc
Hi,
I can’t speak for the Debian project, but as an upstream GLib developer
I can say such an environment variable would not be welcome upstream.
Hiding such warnings makes them less likely to be fixed. It’s a way of
sweeping bugs under the carpet which I don’t want to encourage. Each
warning emi
On Wed, 2019-04-03 at 13:00 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Mar 2019 at 20:13:17 +0100, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 09:32:02PM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso
> > wrote:
> > > Version: 2.58.3-1
>
> Do we know for sure that 2.58.x is vulnerable? I've tried the
> repro
On Wed, 2018-09-12 at 22:32 +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> Package: libglib2.0-0
> Version: 2.58.0-3
> Severity: important
>
> Hi,
>
> one of the last releases in the last couple of weeks has broken the
> g_icon_to_string function. Previously, it did exactly what
> https://developer.gnome.org/gio/s
On Tue, 2018-06-19 at 16:20 -0400, Phillip Susi wrote:
> Package: glib2.0
> Version: 2.56.1-2
>
> I noticed while trying to build glib that it claims to build-depend
> on
> xterm, which is insane; no package should require xterm to build. I
> forced it to build anyway without xterm installed, and
14 matches
Mail list logo
