ion. Since the XDG spec is so inadequate, that
could very well be expected to match a very large number of specialist
applications.
> > I'll happily take a look (next weds) to see how best to do this.
Again, I've not got time until next week to drive this further.
> Talk to itais
On Fri, 2010-03-12 at 13:51 +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Peter Clifton]
> > not a variant which introduces a vast number of its own menus.
>
> What are you talking about here?
I don't use Debian Edu, so I could well be mistaken.. but I downloaded
the meta-packag
ematic design which fits
nicely with the PCB package you have.)
Since you are already fiddling with menus in Debian Edu, it isn't much
of a problem at all to fix the problem there.
We SHOULD NOT add bogus categories to .desktop files.
--
Peter Clifton
Electrical Engineering Division,
Engi
e
an uphill battle to keep these menus consistent.. every new upload in
pkg-electronics from a different developer gets another "fix", patching
in new bogus menu categories, often in contravention with a well thought
out upstream policy on its .desktop file - just because Lintian is
compla
msgmerge, or with your favourite .po
file editor.
If you get stuck, email me or the geda-user list and we will help get
the existing work merged against the current translation templates.
--
Peter Clifton
Electrical Engineering Division,
Engineering Department,
University of Cambridge,
9, JJ
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=536307
#53607
I'll admit that a "Depends" on extra-xdg-menus is wrong.
--
Peter Clifton
Electrical Engineering Division,
Engineering Department,
University of Cambridge,
9, JJ Thomson Avenue,
Cambridge
CB3 0FA
Tel: +44 (0)77
On Fri, 2010-03-12 at 00:31 +, Peter Clifton wrote:
pkg-electronics maintainers, can someone kill this NMU, and upload a
package changing the extra-xdg-menus depends into a "Recommends" please?
Also, I'm strongly of the opinion that "Development" needs to be removed
tall desktop. This is not our bug to fix, it is theirs.
It should be possible to add category based catch-alls which dump
"Electronics" programs into the "Education" category should you want to
do something horrid like that.
Regards,
--
Peter Clifton (the guy who wrote extra
Hi Bdale,
I was wondering if you could confirm whether this bug can now be closed.
Neither Ahmed or I can reproduce it, and I think I have a plausible
explanation for why the problem was occurring previously.
Best regards,
Peter C.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.
On Thu, 2010-02-04 at 17:30 +, ahornbri...@yahoo.co.in wrote:
> Peter Clifton sandte am 04.02.10 14:38 Uhr:
> > It isn't present in Ubuntu.
> >
> > I don't think this is something we'll be able to fix easily. I can't
> > find any setlocale() cal
On Thu, 2010-02-04 at 17:30 +, ahornbri...@yahoo.co.in wrote:
> Peter Clifton sandte am 04.02.10 14:38 Uhr:
> > It isn't present in Ubuntu.
> >
> > I don't think this is something we'll be able to fix easily. I can't
> > find any setlocale() cal
On Wed, 2010-02-03 at 00:47 +, ahornbri...@yahoo.co.in wrote:
> Sorry, I had this line.gtkrc-2.0.mine:
>
> include /usr/share/themes/Qt4/gtk-2.0/gtkrc
>
> which loads qt4engine. I commented out this line and screen and
> PostScript output is alright.
I'd still like to get to the bottom of t
On Tue, 2010-02-02 at 23:13 +, ahornbri...@yahoo.co.in wrote:
> I am using gtk2-engines-qtcurve.
Just using this engine doesn't give me the ability to reproduce. (I also
set up my language and locale environment to match yours)
Btw.. I doubt the strace debug stuff will catch the issue. I was
On Tue, 2010-02-02 at 06:24 +0200, أحمد المحمودي wrote:
> Peter, is 1.6.1 going to be released soon ? Or shall we just apply this
> patch now for 1.6.0 Debian package ?
I'd not like to promise, but I would have thought 1.6.1 will be released
with the next couple of weeks.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On Tue, 2010-02-02 at 02:23 +, ahornbri...@yahoo.co.in wrote:
> Peter Clifton wrote:
> > either of the following patches make any difference?
> > http://git.gpleda.org/?p=gaf.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=5d130060e694cfd3b3be177f1fae4a576728ff25
> > or
> > http://
On Tue, 2010-02-02 at 00:03 +, ahornbri...@yahoo.co.in wrote:
> Luckily I managed to reproduce the bug, when I changed my gtk-theme settings.
Do you have any specific details, so I might try to reproduce it on my
machine?
> gschem says at startup:
> (gschem:9078): Pango-CRITICAL **: pango_fon
This should hopefully fix the issue, but I've not build-tested it
(sincen I don't have access to ia64).
geda-gaf_1.6.0-4.debian.tar.gz
Description: application/compressed-tar
geda-gaf_1.6.0-4.dsc
Description: PGP signature
geda-gaf_1.6.0-4_source.changes
Description: PGP signature
Package: geda-gaf
Version: 1.6.0-1
gEDA 1.6.0-* fails to build from source in ia64, due to a left over
(incorrect) dependency on guile 1.6, rather than guile 1.8 on that
platform.
See the build log here:
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37472401/buildlog_ubuntu-lucid-ia64.geda-gaf_1:1.6.0-3_FAILEDT
On Tue, 2009-12-22 at 08:14 +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> Thanks! I see now that it's trying to write logs into ~/.gEDA which won't
> work with an unwritable/non-existent $HOME.
Perhaps we will be able to fix this upstream (for 1.6.1?).
Hamish.. is there any way we can work around the issue fo
In Ubuntu, we have a patch which fixes this. (A back-port of a change
from the gEDA 1.6.0 version).
You can find the Ubuntu package here:
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/geda-gattrib/1:1.4.3-2ubuntu1
In any case, this Debian bug is likely to be closed by the impending
upload of the gEDA 1.
On Thu, 2009-12-10 at 11:20 +0200, أحمد المحمودي wrote:
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 09:52:38AM +0100, Bdale Garbee wrote:
> > The gattrib command seg faults on every one of my designs in this
version.
> ---end quoted text---
>
> We are almost done with packaging the new version 1.6 of gattrib,
could
gEDA now requires guile 1.8.x, and as far as I know, all gnetlist
backends have been fixed to work with it. The FAQ entry referring to
bugs against Guile 1.8.X is probably out of date, and a red-herring.
This bug "probably" relates to a back-end which has poor recursion
practice, and ends up using
On Sun, 2009-11-22 at 23:03 +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 10:16:11AM +0200, أحمد المحمودي wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > 1) The reporter did not tell which *particular* symbol, that when
> > deleted, causes the crash.
> > 2) The reporter has not replied Hamish regarding
On Sat, 2009-11-21 at 09:54 +0200, أحمد المحمودي wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Should that be solved by adding something like the following in
> Depends ?
>
> geda-symbols (<< 1.{major_release+1}~)
I'm not sure, but I suspect that my "dist upgrade" issues might be
related to geda-symbols.
gEDA
Package: libgeda
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 12.5
The copyright file claims that the libgeda portion of the gEDA suite is
distributed under an LGPL licence. This is incorrect - All of gEDA is
licensed GPLV2 or later, except where explicitly noted in the sources.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
Package: geda-gnetlist
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 12.5
The copyright file claims that the libgeda portion of the gEDA suite is
distributed under an LGPL licence. This is incorrect - All of gEDA is
licensed GPLV2 or later, except where explicitly noted in the sources.
--
To UNSUB
Package: geda
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 12.5
The copyright file claims that the libgeda portion of the gEDA suite is
distributed under an LGPL licence. This is incorrect - All of gEDA is
licensed GPLV2 or later, except where explicitly noted in the sources.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, e
Package: geda-symbols
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 12.5
The copyright file claims that the libgeda portion of the gEDA suite is
distributed under an LGPL licence. This is incorrect - All of gEDA is
licensed GPLV2 or later, except where explicitly noted in the sources.
--
To UNSUBS
Package: geda-utils
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 12.5
The copyright file claims that the libgeda portion of the gEDA suite is
distributed under an LGPL licence. This is incorrect - All of gEDA is
licensed GPLV2 or later, except where explicitly noted in the sources.
--
To UNSUBSCR
Package: geda-gsymcheck
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 12.5
The copyright file claims that the libgeda portion of the gEDA suite is
distributed under an LGPL licence. This is incorrect - All of gEDA is
licensed GPLV2 or later, except where explicitly noted in the sources.
--
To UNSU
Package: geda-examples
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 12.5
The copyright file claims that the libgeda portion of the gEDA suite is
distributed under an LGPL licence. This is incorrect - All of gEDA is
licensed GPLV2 or later, except where explicitly noted in the sources.
--
To UNSUB
Package: geda-gschem
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 12.5
The copyright file claims that the libgeda portion of the gEDA suite is
distributed under an LGPL licence. This is incorrect - All of gEDA is
licensed GPLV2 or later, except where explicitly noted in the sources.
--
To UNSUBSC
Package: geda-doc
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 12.5
The copyright file claims that the libgeda portion of the gEDA suite is
distributed under an LGPL licence. This is incorrect - All of gEDA is
licensed GPLV2 or later, except where explicitly noted in the sources.
--
To UNSUBSCRIB
nt to having a
completely open-source driver which does un-told magic by poking
un-documented registers in a complex chip. Think Intel graphics before
they released documentation for (some of) their chips.
--
Peter Clifton
Electrical Engineering Division,
Engineering Department,
University of Cambr
x27;t get any email you sent prior to the NMU.
I'm not a Debian developer, and had been working via Hamish Moffatt,
uploaded my previous versions. I suspect Hamish has been busy (or didn't
receive my last email with these fixes), but hadn't chased up on it.
Best wishes,
--
Peter
.desktop and icon file (install now does this)
+ * Added call to dh_icons, and bumped debhelper build-depends to 5.0.51
+
+ -- Peter Clifton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mon, 11 Feb 2008 15:35:47 +
+
gerbv (2.0.1-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream release
diff -u gerbv-2.0.1/debian/c
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/11848710/geda-xgsch2pcb.debdiff
--
Peter Clifton
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This didn't make it for the new 1.4.0 release, but it will be fixed in
all future releases.
--
Peter Clifton
Electrical Engineering Division,
Engineering Department,
University of Cambridge,
9, JJ Thomson Avenue,
Cambridge
CB3 0FA
Tel: +44 (0)7729 980173 - (No signal in the lab!)
-
Attached is a debdiff which fixes the bug.
There is a bashism (== in a test) in debian/rules.
--
Peter Clifton
Electrical Engineering Division,
Engineering Department,
University of Cambridge,
9, JJ Thomson Avenue,
Cambridge
CB3 0FA
Tel: +44 (0)7729 980173 - (No signal in the lab!)
diff -u
Just FYI, there is a fix upstream for this, and the latest Ubuntu has a
similar patch to upstream. I've also fixed / worked around a crash with
overlay video after switching VTs.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-intel/+bug/127101
--
Peter Clifton
Elect
Attached is a patch fixing the problem.
** Attachment added: "Patch fixes the problem. (Line numbers may be off, as it
is against SuSE source)"
http://librarian.launchpad.net/7497623/fix_xvnc_xdmx.patch
** Bug watch added: Novell/SUSE Bugzilla #268074
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.c
41 matches
Mail list logo
