Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi,
On 16-06-2025 00:16, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
The version in testing is 2.47.2 while unstable had 2.49.0 for a while.
This makes diff rather huge (15MiB) therefore I am attaching the diff
against 2.49.0-1.
It seems to me that the only important bug in te
, Thorsten G. wrote:
Am Donnerstag, dem 12.06.2025 um 11:53 +0200 schrieb Paul Gevers:
Hi,
Reading bug 1082139 again I wonder, do you have the latest version of
webkit2gtk installed?
ii libwebkit2gtk-4.1-0:amd64 2.48.3-1
ii libwebkitgtk-6.0-4:amd64 2.48.3-1
That was and is the latest
Control: affects -1 jq
Hi,
On Sat, 14 Jun 2025 12:04:22 + Santiago Vila wrote:
During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build:
This currently shows up as a regression in jq [1], so very likely caused
by the upgrade.
Paul
[1] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.p
Source: paperwork
Version: 2.2.5-2
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: flaky
User: debian-s...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: s390x
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-s...@lists.debian.org
Dear maintainer(s),
I looked at the results of the autopkgtest of your package because it
showed up
Hi,
On Mon, 19 May 2025 19:33:19 +0300 =?UTF-8?Q?Martin=2D=C3=89ric_Racine?=
wrote:
Trixie DI RC1 does boot via UEFI so there's hope. However, I have no
idea of what change makes RC1 succeed where December's Alpha didn't.
If anyone knows, please do tell.
I'm not 100% sure I understand correc
Hi,
We're running out of time for trixie.
On 23-03-2025 11:01, Paul Gevers wrote:
On Thu, 27 Apr 2023 10:32:09 +0200 Sune Stolborg Vuorela
wrote:
To me it looks like 1032047 has been fixed with a solution that makes
this more likely to happen rather than list.
As far as I understan
Control: affects -1 debian-installer
Control: tags -1 d-i
As far as I can tell, also the debian-installer is involved.
Contents-udeb-amd64.gz has this:
usr/sbin/dhclient
debian-installer/isc-dhcp-client-udeb
usr/sbin/dhclient-script
debian-installer/isc-dhcp-client-udeb
Paul
OpenPGP_signa
Control: clone -1 -2
Control: reassign -2 release-notes
Control: tags -1 trixie-ignore
Hi,
On Sun, 8 Jun 2025 13:51:05 +0200 =?UTF-8?Q?Moritz_M=C3=BChlenhoff?=
wrote:
From my PoV this could also be handled by
- tag #1106121 trixie-ignore
- maybe add a specific note to the release notes to mak
Hi,
On 14-06-2025 13:05, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
Reverting doesn't help. Also rebuilding ocaml in trixie changes the hash
rendering the reverse dependencies uninstallable.
That's what I suspected.
We will probably want to rebuild and unblock everthing, but ocaml first
needs to be fixed on
Hi,
On Sun, 18 May 2025 09:32:40 +0200 Julian Andres Klode
wrote:
So when the fetcher stops (Pulse()=false cancels the update run), it runs the
Finished method on each item.
When the Finished() method of an InRelease file is called, it commits the transaction if it has started and there were
Control: block -1 by 1107773
Hi Stéphane,
On 13-06-2025 10:47, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
An unforeseen and unfortunate consequence is the change of the ABI hash
of libstdlib-ocaml-dev on (at least) amd64.
And a FTBFS on ppc64el (filed under #1107773).
With my current state of (non-)understandi
Control: tags -1 confirmed moreinfo
Hi,
On 07-06-2025 10:57, Andrew Bower wrote:
This is a pre-approval request. The changes have been merged in Salsa by a team
member with the intention of sponsoring an upload upon approval.
Thank you!
unblock acct/6.6.4-6
Go ahead. Please remove the more
Hi Joe,
Your email address bounced. This is a courtesy message to let you know
your bug report had follow up.
Paul
On 09-06-2025 15:27, Mail Delivery System wrote:
This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.
A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more
Hi,
On 13-06-2025 00:19, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
On 12/06/2025 at 13:32, Paul Gevers wrote:
I also forgot about this bug when I upgraded the ppc64el host of
ci.d.n last week (or the week before) and didn't do anything special.
How can I see where things go wrong?
Do you mean before or
Source: debian-edu
Version: 2.12.17
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: regression
Dear maintainer(s),
Your package has an autopkgtest, great. However, it fails since
recently. Can you please investigate the situation and fix it? I copied
some of the output at the bott
Hi,
On 12-06-2025 12:15, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
On Tue, 27 Aug 2024 17:12:34 +0200 Bastian Blank wrote:
After rebooting, you need to re-create all swap files or partitions.
They depend on the page size and will be not longer usable. See
mkswap(8) on how to do that.
Although I d
Hi,
On 09-06-2025 10:38, geier wrote:
If I use instead of
"Exec=WEBKIT_DISABLE_DMABUF_RENDERER=1 liferea %U"
"Exec=env WEBKIT_DISABLE_DMABUF_RENDERER=1 liferea %U"
it works for me.
Reading bug 1082139 again I wonder, do you have the latest version of
webkit2gtk installed? If yes, maybe we
Source: golang-github-azure-azure-sdk-for-go
Version: 68.0.0-2
Severity: wishlist
Tags: upstream
Hi,
I am looking into resource usage on ci.d.n and the autopkgtest of
golang-github-azure-azure-sdk-for-go shows up as needing a lot of disk
space (on tmpfs, so also memory). I'm suspecting and/or
Control: tags -1 trixie-ignore
Hi,
After checking with the security team, we have decided to add the
trixie-ignore tag.
I also would expect that the issues reported should get a CVE assigned,
such that they can be tracked outside of Debian too.
This should ideally be addressed upstream.
W
Control: severity -1 serious
On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 07:08:25 +0200 Paul Gevers wrote:
If the issue can't be
reproduced on the supported i386 configurations, I agree with the
severity important.
The issue is now reproduced on ci.debian.net on armhf:
https://ci.debian.net/data/autopk
Control: retitle -1 openbabel: autopkgtest uses large amounts of memory
Hi,
On 06-06-2025 18:51, Paul Gevers wrote:
It seems this doesn't only affect s390x, but ppc64el as well. Added a
block on that architecture too.
And arm64.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP di
Hi,
On Mon, 19 May 2025 19:48:47 +0200 Paul Gevers wrote:
The recent upload of breezy fails to build on s390x buildds (5 times
already).
And the sixth time it succeeded. That's a pretty bad score. I suggest to
disable the test (on s390x) or marked flaky until the issue is better
under
Hi Sylvestre,
On Fri, 25 Apr 2025 12:11:04 +0200 Sylvestre Ledru
wrote:
yeah, i was waiting to have more contents before upload but I will just go ahead
today.
Did this slip through the cracks? We're deep in the Hard Freeze, time is
running out for trixie.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Des
Hi,
On Wed, 30 Apr 2025 15:10:41 +0200 Ben Hutchings
wrote:
...
Any progress on this? We're now deep into the Hard Freeze. Time is
running out.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Chris,
On 09-06-2025 19:39, Chris Lamb wrote:
Please consider unblocking diffoscope 297. This is principally to fix
the use of potentially dangerous functionality in zipdetails
(addressed in diffoscope versions 295 and 206).
diffoscope isn't blocked, you only nee
Hi,
On Wed, 4 Jun 2025 21:05:35 -0400 Joe Nahmias wrote:
If the RT is leaning towards remaining on 1.3.17 for trixie, I would request
that we discuss this further so that I can better understand the perceived
risks that lead to that preference.
Keeping what we have means we know better what t
Hi
On 09-06-2025 09:24, Thorsten G. wrote:
"Exec=WEBKIT_DISABLE_DMABUF_RENDERER=1 liferea %U
### DBusActivatable=true"
The liferea entry in xfce4 menu disappears, also with
"Exec=WEBKIT_DISABLE_DMABUF_RENDERER=1 /usr/bin/liferea %U
### DBusActivatable=true"
In both cases I see in menuLibre a
Hi Stephen,
On 08-06-2025 17:13, Stephen Kitt wrote:
wine in testing/unstable is currently broken on i386, that is to say,
on i386 systems upgraded from Debian 12, wine doesn’t work. (See
#1104317 for details.) The i386 packages work fine on amd64.
Did you try reproducing it in a i386 chroot?
Control: retitle -1 ocaml: FTBFS on arm64: test_dropped_events.ml flaky
Hi,
Both on the buildds and in the upstream bug report, this shows as a
flaky test. Let's make that clear in the title.
Can't this test be skipped for the time being (ideally only on arm64)?
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On Sun, 13 Apr 2025 18:34:32 +0200 Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Source: gdb-mingw-w64
During a rebuild of all packages in testing (trixie), your package failed
to build on arm64.
On 2025-05-09, this package was rebuild on the buildd network [1], but
obviously that happe
Hi,
On 08-06-2025 15:11, Thorsten G. wrote:
unfortunately problem still exists. The browser window SEEMS to be
empty but in reality it is not.
If I try to copy the (not showing) text in it, by left-mouse-button
pressed and drag, nothing will be highlighted but when I click with
middle-mouse-but
Hi,
On 08-06-2025 15:43, Santiago Vila wrote:
or without a change to the package.
For future
reference: What kind
of change to the package would help in cases like this one?
(Maybe we should invent a new control field to express "This is arch:all
but only
supported on such and such").
Hi,
On 08-06-2025 14:26, Santiago Vila wrote:
And there is indeed a question related to all this: If we
make a new upload of uncertainties which just adds a breaks
against old lmfit-py and old pymatgen, would that really
tell the testing migration machinery that they should not run
the old autop
user debian-ri...@lists.debian.org
usertag 1107430 riscv64
thanks
Hi risv64 porters,
I forgot to X-Debbugs-CC the riscv64 porters and usertag this bug. You
might be able to help.
Paul
On Sat, 7 Jun 2025 17:07:04 +0200 Paul Gevers wrote:
Source: octave-mapping
Version: 1.4.2-3
Severity
Hi
On Sat, 7 Jun 2025 17:09:17 +0200 Paul Gevers wrote:
Your package src:bluetooth-sensor-state-data has been
trying to migrate for 34 days [2], hence this bug report. The current
output of the migration software for this package is copied to the
bottom of this report and should list the
Source: assimp
Version: 5.2.5~ds0-1
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-s...@lists.debian.org
User: debian-s...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: s390x
Hi,
I was debugging performance issues on ci.debian.net today, and noticed
that assimp showed up in the journal for being killed by the oom-kille
Control: close -1 4:6.3.5-1
On 06-06-2025 10:28, Aurélien COUDERC wrote:
I’ve uploaded Plasma 6.3.5 + some further backported commits to unstable,
aiming for trixie.
Kwin 6.3.5 and upcoming 6.3.6 include a *lot* of fixes so maybe you could give
it another try ?
I've installed kwin-wayland a
Hi,
On 06-06-2025 18:29, Paul Gevers wrote:
With Bastian's patch was it fixed or is the issue still persisting?
I'm *guessing* that the problem is still there when I would boot into
the old kernel, as the kernel and its initramfs have not been updated.
However, maybe with the u
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/lwindolf/liferea/issues/611
On 08-06-2025 06:45, Fourhundred Thecat wrote:
I was looking at the upstream bug tracker. Is the description of your
problem capture here: https://github.com/lwindolf/liferea/issues/611 ?
yes, that looks like my bug
Ok, so
Source: lava
Version: 2023.01-2
Severity: normal
Hi,
I was inspecting failures in stable triggered by (test) dependency
changes and noticed that the test fails on:
767s E lava_common.exceptions.InfrastructureError: Unable to
fetch git repository 'https://git.linaro.org/lava-team/refa
Source: quickjs
Version: 2024.01.13-5
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 2025.04.26-1
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30 d
Source: megatools
Version: 1.11.3-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 1.11.4-1
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30 days as
Source: gawk
Version: 1:5.2.1-2
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 1:5.3.2-1
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30 days as ha
Source: lomiri-mediaplayer-app
Version: 1.1.0+dfsg-3
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 1.1.1+dfsg-1
Tags: sid trixie ftbfs
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
User: debian-s...@lists.debian.org
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-s...@lists.debian.org
Dear maintainer(s),
The Re
Source: zigpy
Version: 0.78.0-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 0.80.1-1
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30 days as hav
Source: bluetooth-sensor-state-data
Version: 1.7.5-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 1.9.0-1
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more
Source: octave-mapping
Version: 1.4.2-3
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 1.4.3-1
Tags: sid trixie ftbfs
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 3
Hi
On 06-06-2025 09:07, Andrius Merkys wrote:
Certain modes of operation of openbabel are known to leak memory
It seems this doesn't only affect s390x, but ppc64el as well. Added a
block on that architecture too.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi,
On 06-06-2025 11:10, Pranav P wrote:
So sorry for the late reply.
3.5 days and you call that late? Welcome to Debian, where we're not
supposed to be surprised if we need to wait weeks or months.
After an upgrade which triggered `update-initramfs`, I was also having the
issue where th
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Dear ftp masters,
Like every release cycle, we'd like to have the Release Team key
mentioned on https://ftp-master.debian.org/keys.html
The key can be found in
/usr/share/keyrings/debian-archive-trixie-stable.pgp
in the `debian-archive-keyring` package.
Hi László,
On Sat, 12 Apr 2025 16:46:52 +0200
=?UTF-8?B?TMOhc3psw7MgQsO2c3rDtnJtw6lueWkgKEdDUyk=?= wrote:
I do not see risks, using it on my machine without problems. The fixes
were done by RedHat and they are already using those on their
distribution.
The autopkgtests of node-expat and pyth
Source: openbabel
Version: 3.1.1+dfsg-12
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-s...@lists.debian.org
User: debian-s...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: s390x
Hi,
I was debugging performance issues on ci.debian.net today, and noticed
that s390x was running into memory problems. openbabel quickly be
Hi Chris,
There is a way out where you get what you want and I don't need to
approve your request. Your package is not key and we're not yet in the
Hard Freeze. If mlmmj has a (non superficial) autopkgtest that passes on
all architectures mlmmj still can migrate.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.as
Hi,
On 31-05-2025 19:58, Fourhundred Thecat wrote:
I was looking at the upstream bug tracker. Is the description of your
problem capture here: https://github.com/lwindolf/liferea/issues/611 ?
Unfortunately upstream wasn't able to reproduce (and fix) that issue.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Control: clone -1 -2
Control: reassign -2 sysconfig-hardware
Control: found -2 0.0.14+nmu2
Control: retitle -2 udev rules are in the wrong directory
On 03-06-2025 21:30, Paul Gevers wrote:
That file doesn't exist, but I found that /usr/lib/lib/udev/rules.d/85-
sysconfig-hardware.rules e
Control: severity -1 serious
Hi,
On 03-06-2025 21:40, Paul Gevers wrote:
On 03-06-2025 21:30, Paul Gevers wrote:
That file doesn't exist, but I found that /usr/lib/lib/udev/
rules.d/85- sysconfig-hardware.rules exists (note the double lib).
Looks like a bug in sysconfig-hardware
Hi waldi,
On 03-06-2025 20:10, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Tue, Jun 03, 2025 at 06:36:25PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
I experience a very similar problem when I try to boot into a trixie kernel
after dist-upgrading the s390x ci.debian.net host.
NVMe is not DASD and is configured completely
Control: merge -1 1015954
On 03-06-2025 08:03, Paul Gevers wrote:
I could have sworn that I checked this, but is seems that lsinitramfs
doesn't work on the symlink, but does work on the actual file.
Interesting for initrd.img (the new one) it doesn't matter if I point at
the syml
Hi,
[I'm suspecting that bug 1100733 is a duplicate of this bug].
On Sun, 9 Feb 2025 21:56:45 +0800 "hcp...@gmail.com"
wrote:
I am writing to report an issue I encountered on Debian 13 testing
("Trixie"). I installed the system using the installation media
debian-trixie-DI-alpha1-amd64-DVD-1.
Hi,
On 03-06-2025 07:54, Paul Gevers wrote:
On 03-06-2025 00:33, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Are you quite sure this is actually the old, working, initramfs? (What
is that a xymlink to?)
I could have sworn that I checked this, but is seems that lsinitramfs
doesn't work on the symlink, but
Control: tag -1 - moreinfo
Hi,
On 03-06-2025 00:33, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Are you quite sure this is actually the old, working, initramfs? (What
is that a xymlink to?)
root@ci-worker-s390x-01:~# ls -al /boot/
total 106288
drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 4096 Jun 1 19:58 .
drwxr-xr-x 19 root roo
Package: initramfs-tools-core
Version: 0.147
Severity: normal
File: /usr/bin/lsinitramfs
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-s...@lists.debian.org
User: debian-s...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: s390x
Hi,
Two days ago, I upgraded the s390x ci.debian.net host from bookworm to
trixie. The system was already running
Package: s390-tools
Version: 2.35.0-1
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-s...@lists.debian.org
User: debian-s...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: s390
Dear s390x people,
Two days ago, I upgraded the s390x ci.debian.net host from bookworm to
trixie. The system was already running the kernel from b
Hi Santiago,
On 01-06-2025 14:24, Santiago Vila wrote:
gcc-12-cross
gcc-12-cross-ports
gcc-13-cross
gcc-13-cross-mipsen
gcc-13-cross-ports
gcc-14-cross
gcc-14-cross-mipsen
gcc-14-cross-ports
I think we should try to get rid of all packages above the line,
as no package in D
Control: tags -1 confirmed - moreinfo
Hi.
On 31-05-2025 20:24, Harlan Lieberman-Berg wrote:
I've pushed up a -2 that simply drops the bad B-D into
sid; debdiff attached.
Ack, thanks. Looks a bit weird though, that you can just drop a build
dependency like that. But as it wasn't there before
Control: reassign -1 src:rust-transmission-client
Control: affects -1 src:fragments
On Mon, 26 May 2025 21:04:43 + Debian FTP Masters
wrote:
Closes: 1106237
Changes:
rust-transmission-client (0.1.5-2) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Team upload.
* Package transmission-client 0.1.5 fro
Hi Jelmer,
On Sat, 19 Apr 2025 16:31:06 + Jelmer =?utf-8?Q?Vernoo=C4=B3?=
wrote:
Is this repeatable or perhaps a flaky test?
Any progress on this bug? The FTBFS is hindering the migration to
testing of the fix for RC bug 1099121. We're running out of time for trixie.
Mind you, I very
Hi Chris,
On 24-05-2025 22:11, Chris Knadle wrote:
To me the idea of uploading "1.5.0 but not really 1.5.0 at all" is just
lying.
I'll admit that I was a bit blown away by this reply, hence it took me a
while to reply. Using the +really version is a very well established way
to repair uploa
Hi
On 31-05-2025 07:14, Fourhundred Thecat wrote:
I did run liferea from the terminal with strace.
I was more thinking about running under gdb than under (s|)trace, but
the log inspired on question:
Can you reproduce the issue if you run
export WEBKIT_DISABLE_DMABUF_RENDERER=1 ; liferea
P
Control: reopen -1
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi,
On 26-05-2025 19:32, Harlan Lieberman-Berg wrote:
unblock python-certbot-dns-google/4.0.0-1
The latest version has a new build depends on a package that can't
migrate (python-oauth2client). Can that B-D be dropped or fixed
otherwise? Current
Hi,
On 30-05-2025 21:32, Chris Lamb wrote:
For example, python-redis (6.1.0-1, 6.1.0-2), python-fakeredis
(2.29.0-1 through 2.29.0-4), and fixes for libtest-redisserver-perl
and python-hypothesis (they reverse-depend on Redis in its tests).
As you noticed, I've been watching out too.
At the
Source: actiona
Version: 3.10.1-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 3.11.1-1
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30 days as h
Control: reopen -1
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi,
On Sat, 26 Apr 2025 22:06:13 + Debian FTP Masters
wrote:
ompl (1.6.0+ds1-4) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Version for unstable (Closes: #1103164)
Please don't close unblock requests (or other bugs against the
release.debian.org psued
Source: mini-buildd
Version: 2.2.8
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 2.4.0
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30 days as hav
Control: fixed -1 1.16~rc3-2
Hi,
On 30-05-2025 12:19, Fourhundred Thecat wrote:
Package: liferea
Version: 1.14.4-3
in my feed list, I have few folders with feeds inside. When I move a
feed from a folder one level above (by grabing the icon with my mouse,
ie drag-and-drop), liferea crashes an
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi,
On Tue, 27 May 2025 22:23:00 +0200 Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta
wrote:
[x] attach debdiff against the package in testing
I suspect the diff was too large to get accepted by the list as I don't
see this message in my mail client nor in the list archives (that's a
Hi,
On 09-05-2025 09:28, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
Benjamin, what is your take on this? Without explicit coordination, I'd
think it's too late for trixie and this should be revisited for forky.
Explicit coordination didn't happen and we're 20 days further in the
freeze process. Let's revisit
Hi,
On 23-05-2025 13:13, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
The version currently in unstable is a newer upstream point release
containing the following non-translation fixes from the version in
trixie :
- PyFalkon: port away from deprecated API [1]
- Fix crash when creating bookmarks toolbar. [2] (kde#4
Source: jupyterhub
Version: 5.2.1+ds1-4
Severity: normal
Dear maintainer(s),
With the upload of 5.2.1+ds1-4 the reproducible-builds infrastructure
[1] reports your package as no longer building reproducible. You might
want to have a look. /usr/share/jupyterhub/jupyterhub_config.py seems to
de
Control: tags -1 confirmed - moreinfo
Hi,
On 29-05-2025 09:00, Stephen Kitt wrote:
I’ve simplified the patch so that the
package never rebuilds debian/control automatically, see the attached
debdiff.
Please go ahead.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi,
On 29-05-2025 13:51, Stephen Kitt wrote:
Thinking about this more, do you mean that there’s no point in issuing an
unblock for wine unless #1104317 is fixed too?
That's not what I meant, but if 1104317 needs an upload (i.e. the bug
isn't going to be downgraded or triaged to be a non-issu
Hi,
On 29-05-2025 01:20, Lucas Kanashiro wrote:
Right, it is not. I ran diffoscope against the two versions, you can
see the output attached. From what I can see, there are just the
changes I already presented via debdiff plus some timestamp changes in
some files.
I was more thinking of a dif
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On 28-05-2025 08:59, Stephen Kitt wrote:
I've tested rebuilds in various scenarios, forcing debian/control
rebuilds and checking that regular package rebuilds don't result in a
debian/control rebuild.
What happens during a binNMU? As I understand it, binNMU's inject
Hi,
On 28-05-2025 10:56, Helmut Grohne wrote:
I uploaded 0.4.2 limiting concurrency to 4 CPUs at most.
Thanks. Only later I realized that while amd64 has 64 cores, e.g.
ppc64el and s390x also have quite some cores available (16 resp. 10),
but there we haven't seen the fallout.
I schedule
Hi,
On Fri, 23 May 2025 22:05:43 +0200 Paul Gevers wrote:
Currently this regression is blocking the migration of redis to testing
[1]. Due to the nature of this issue, I filed this bug report against
both packages. Can you please investigate the situation and reassign the
bug to the right
Control: tags -1 trixie-ignore
Hi,
On 26-05-2025 01:01, Santiago Vila wrote:
There was a bug in debian/rules which made the package not to build ok
in the arch:all autobuilders (see Bug #1103714). This is now fixed.
That's the risk of uploading during the freeze.
I've just told Alberto (the
Hi
On 25-05-2025 07:21, Urs Fleisch wrote:
I tested it with kid3-qt. I would say that using the attached
Kid3.conf with `KID3_CONFIG_FILE=~/Downloads/Kid3.conf kid3-qt` should
be enough to reproduce the issue, but I never could (neither with
copying the configuration to ~/.config/Kid3/Kid3.conf)
Hi,
On Sat, 24 May 2025 15:22:18 +0200 Urs Fleisch
wrote:
Thanks for the report. However, I am not able to reproduce it. I am running
Debian Testing with the latest updates, which seems to be the version the
reporter mentioned, but I cannot see a crash. I also tried with Debian
Stable and with
Hi,
On 24-05-2025 21:13, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
There are a few new binaries on s390x blocked on magics++. If there are
new builds or uploads that are blocked, a revert of magics++ would be
appreciated.
Might be a good idea to get the maintainers of magics++ involved and ask
them for a re
Hi,
On 24-05-2025 19:20, Chris Knadle wrote:
An upload to Experimental of MLMMJ "1.5.0-1+really" which disables the
For avoidance of confusion I meant a 1.5.0+really-1.3.0 to *unstable*
dropping the php binaries and a 1.5.0.+really-1.5.0 to experimental
keeping the binaries.
Paul
OpenP
Hi,
On 21-05-2025 03:44, Lucas Kanashiro wrote:
There was a reproducible builds issue because this package was not
rebuilt for 2 years and a half at least. The tooling changed and a
simple rebuild was needed to fix it.
I'm curious, can you elaborate a bit more?
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi,
On 21-05-2025 03:46, Lucas Kanashiro wrote:
The risk is that something changed in the new debhelper that made it
behave differently. I, personally, did not spotted any issue, but
that's
the only risk that I foresee.
Please show with a diffoscope output that the
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi,
On 21-05-2025 03:45, Lucas Kanashiro wrote:
However, the changes applied
were cosmetic (bump debhelper version, Stadards-Version, and add a new
runtime dependency for ${ruby:Depends}). There is no code change.
debhelper version bumps are not cosmetic and are not
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi,
On 19-05-2025 20:33, Daniel Baumann wrote:
* this is the only difference between 0.56 and 0.57, as can be seen
here:
https://forgejo.debian.net/python/jinjax/
commit/067f4dc8b639767b83048f1dcedd12cb438270b0
Can you please provide this as a debdiff in t
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 15-05-2025 23:00, NoisyCoil wrote:
bindgen generates Rust bindings starting from C headers. bindgen:arch1 will
usually generate different bindings than bindgen:arch2. As such, bindgen's
interface is not arch-independent as required by the upcoming M-A policy, and
sh
Hi,
On 21-05-2025 10:34, Guillem Jover wrote:
So, I'd like to prepare a dpkg 1.22.20 release with the two attached
patches (and some further translation updates)
This looks OK.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Source: debvm
Version: 0.4.1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: flaky
Dear maintainer(s),
I looked at the results of the autopkgtest of your package because it
was showing up in the excuses for dpkg. I noticed that it regularly
fails on amd64. Maybe you need to wait l
Hi Chris,
On 22-05-2025 16:58, Chris Knadle wrote:
Other than that as far as
I'm aware the mailing list code still works. The configuration for MLMMJ
is via text files, so it's possible to configure it without using mlmmj-
php-web and mlmmj-php-web-admin.
Maybe not what you were looking for
Hi,
On 26-04-2025 08:48, Paul Gevers wrote:
python-xiaomi-ble autopktests fail on s390x:
I have uploaded an NMU fixing this issue using dgit. Please also find
the changes attached to this mail.
Paul
From e56eebaa11ee68d6e0809864b04969f94ae3b636 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Bastian
Hi,
[Release Team member hat on]
On Tue, 29 Apr 2025 11:15:01 +0100 "Rebecca N. Palmer"
wrote:
My understanding of this policy is that you *can* download *data*, but
can't download and run executable code
It is my understanding of the ftp-master FAQ that indeed *running* stuff
that's down
1 - 100 of 2393 matches
Mail list logo
