in testing.
More information about this bug and the reason for filing it can be
found on
https://wiki.debian.org/ContinuousIntegration/RegressionEmailInformation
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2019/07/msg2.html
https://ci.debian.net/packages/o/opensaml/testing/amd6
m our infrastructure.
Paul
amd64 failure log:
https://ci.debian.net/packages/d/dulwich/testing/amd64/60285564/
127s ==
127s ERROR: test_fetch_pack_depth
(tests.compat.test_client.DulwichTCPClientTest.test_fetch_pack_depth)
> Ah, no, that's OK then -- apologies for the noise.
No worries Adam. Just double checking that there isn't a hidden gotcha with
mbstowcs that I'm not aware of
>
y idea how to
fix this elegantly?
Paul
On 11-03-2024 09:28, Azerttyu wrote:
Package: dbconfig-common
Links set at https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/dbconfig-common/dbconfig-
common-design.html are broken.
* " best practices for database applications " should target
https://www.de
th through that that means mbstowcs will not create a wsize output
buffer?
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Santiago Vila
Sent: 26 April 2025 15:53
To: Paul Marquess
Subject: Fwd: Bug#1077054: Charset conversion fails when zip is built with
_FORTIFY_SOURCE
Hi. I was afraid that the a
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 25-04-2025 21:28, Fabian Grünbichler wrote:
Please unblock package rustc
I appreciate this is a pre-approval request.
Please go ahead.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi Noah,
On 26-04-2025 10:03, Paul Gevers wrote:
For the record of this bug, there's a piuparts issue (tagged pending):
1104047.
Please also help the reverse dependencies to fix their autopkgtests
(filing bugs and/or providing patches). It seems that the new dovecot
requires an upda
against both packages. Can you please investigate the situation and
reassign the bug to the right package?
More information about this bug and the reason for filing it can be found on
https://wiki.debian.org/ContinuousIntegration/RegressionEmailInformation
Paul
[1] https://qa.debian.org
against both packages. Can you please investigate the situation and
reassign the bug to the right package?
More information about this bug and the reason for filing it can be found on
https://wiki.debian.org/ContinuousIntegration/RegressionEmailInformation
Paul
[1] https://qa.debian.org
packages. Can you please investigate the situation and
reassign the bug to the right package?
More information about this bug and the reason for filing it can be found on
https://wiki.debian.org/ContinuousIntegration/RegressionEmailInformation
Paul
[1] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 25-04-2025 11:53, Helmut Grohne wrote:
As a result, I argue that the risk of causing regressions here is quite
low.
Please go ahead.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
we
also don't just do rebuild because we can (maybe we should, but then I
think earlier in the release cycle), so I think we'd only want rebuilds
for known issues that are worth fixing, not just for newer versions
(which could trigger subtle bugs we haven't spotted yet).
Hi
On 23-04-2025 11:22, Ahmad Khalifa wrote:
hueplusplus is a small library needed for openrgb, which is also blocked
(separate bug being submitted).
I'm sorry, I'm not seeing a reason for an exception. We have to draw the
line somewhere and it missed the deadli
package is not listed in debian/control it bypassed any
sanity checks.
Can you elaborate? This sounds like a bug in dak as I would expect it to
reject uploads with binaries that are not listed in debian/control.
Is debian/control maybe generated during the build? That is not allowed [1].
Paul
[1
Hi
On 24-04-2025 18:20, Paul Gevers wrote:
With both of the issues out of the way, go ahead.
For the record of this bug, there's a piuparts issue (tagged pending):
1104047.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
particularly if they are conditional on the hardware.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
rds to the content or the
process, please reach out to me.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=python-xiaomi-ble
Current text from [2]:
Migration status for python-xiaomi-ble (0.30.2-3 to 0.36.0-1): BLOCKED:
Dear s390x porters,
This bug has your user tag already, but it wasn't X-Debbugs-CC to you,
you might want to help out. (Start of report below, full report from
https://bugs.debian.org/1103588)
Paul
On Sat, 19 Apr 2025 13:40:01 +0200 Chris Hofstaedtler
wrote:
Source: python-xiaom
ss, please reach out to me.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=python-xarray
Current text from [2]:
Migration status for python-xarray (2025.01.2-1 to 2025.03.1-2):
BLOCKED: Rejected/violates migrat
rds to the content or the
process, please reach out to me.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=python-djvulibre
Current text from [2]:
Migration status for python-djvulibre (0.9.0-7 to 0.9.1-1): BLOCKED:
from unstable and trixie, not
only from trixie. In that case this bug should be reassigned to
ftp.debian.org as trixie will follow when the package is removed from
unstable.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi
On 26-04-2025 00:15, Stefano Rivera wrote:
the host's serial devices are... whatever they are.
If I read the code correctly, the services loop over the devices they
know and use the first one they find. So I think more is needed than
just installing.
Paul
OpenPGP_signatur
Package: reportbug
Hello,
I had a bug to report but reportbug bugs with followinf messages :
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/reportbug", line 30, in
import requests
File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/requests/__init__.py", line 164, in
from .api import delet
could you modify the configuration on sh4 such that the kernel is
compressed with GZIP instead of XZ (and ZSTD) by default so that the
kernel package builds again on sh4?
Using XZ doesn't make sense on sh4 with its small image sizes anyway.
Thanks,
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adria
ersion of the Jetty server, on par
with the Tomcat package. The risk of regression is limited because the
full transition will not happen before Forky.
What is still left with for "full transition"?
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
7;t follow up with a bug report. I've now opened #1104033
for better visibility.
With both of the issues out of the way, go ahead.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
innodb main.check
Did you try reproducing the issue on stadler.debian.net? If it's an issue
with the host machine, you should be able to run the tests successfully
on the porterbox.
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer
`. `' Physicist
`-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
ocking the migration to testing [1]. Can
you please investigate the situation and fix it?
More information about this bug and the reason for filing it can be found on
https://wiki.debian.org/ContinuousIntegration/RegressionEmailInformation
Paul
[1] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=ruby-shoul
Hi,
On 24-04-2025 15:35, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 24/04/25 at 14:38 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
Hi,
On 24-04-2025 13:56, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
ruby-shoulda-context was updated and no longer build-depends on
ruby-pry-byebug. So ruby-pry-byebug could be removed (once
ruby-shoulda-context
same thing in a stable release. Why would we want to have jetty12 in
trixie?
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
deletions(-)
[ ] attach debdiff against the package in testing
(package is not yet in testing)
The second statement isn't true for vala-panel. For vala-panel-appmenu,
can you please prepare a debdiff against version 0.7.6+dfsg1-7?
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
d bug 1103808 are silent on that the
patch has been tested. I assume so, but I like the confirmation: there
is no (diffoscope) delta between the binaries before/after the patch,
particularly when building arch-specific binaries? Please drop the
moreinfo tag when you reply.
Paul
PS: I a
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi,
On 17-04-2025 08:43, Shengqi Chen wrote:
kleidiai is a new source package. I uploaded it on 13 Mar and it cleared NEW on
12 Apr, right before the soft freeze.
The changelog says 12 April, not 13 March. Care to fill in the missing
pieces?
Paul
8
You can see how that works out in practice:
https://qa.debian.org/dose/debcheck/testing_main
Paul
PS: does everybody know that bug submitters and people that reply don't
automatically get replies to the bug. (Just in case somebody expected me
to see the follow-up).
OpenPGP_signature.
Hi,
On 24-04-2025 13:56, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
ruby-shoulda-context was updated and no longer build-depends on
ruby-pry-byebug. So ruby-pry-byebug could be removed (once
ruby-shoulda-context migrates).
ruby-shoulda-context fails its own autopkgtest everywhere.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
when the
Breaks is added.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
cases (added to CC:).
See https://bugs.debian.org/1103162
This failure mode occasionally happens during regular transitions too
and we don't have an automated way to deal with it (because there's not
a general good solution).
I'll manually run the (hopefully) ri
o handle much more transitions than I do.
Paul
[1] popcon suggest > 5% of dovecot installs use it, if we remove it I
guess it's worth documenting in release-notes
[2] I think it would have been nice to its maintainer and potential
users that look at the BTS if you would have filed a bug rep
he progress here? Maybe it's best to revert src:pry to the
version we have in testing? It seems that it was updated too late in the
trixie release cycle.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi,
On 24-04-2025 10:32, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
My perference was to leave 4.3.0. in unstable, but given the valgrind
issue, it looks like an upload 4.3.0_really4.2.1 is needed. Anyone think
differently?
I agree that a 4.3.0_really4.2.1 looks best at this moment.
Paul
in d/control?
You don't need to restrict the archs in d/control, as long as kitty
continues to ftbfs on s390x.
Fully agree. See also [1].
Or do you think I should just go ahead w disabling tests for this arch
for now?
Not Paul or RT, but I think it makes sense to keep the tests fai
rustc_codegen_gcc or the Rust frontend (gccrs) in GCC in the future.
Adrian
> [1] https://people.debian.org/~glaubitz/debian-ports-todo.txt
> [2] https://rust-for-linux.com/rustc_codegen_gcc
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer
`. `' Physicist
`-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
pile Farm account
if they haven't done so yet. I assume they would be interested to test their
software on the various architectures offered there as well. And maybe they
can also just use the Solaris 11.4 SPARC M8 to fix the sparc64 crashes.
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Gla
your package is unable to migrate to testing due to
issues beyond your control, don't hesitate to contact the Release Team.
This bug report has been automatically generated and has only been sent
manually. If you have any comments with regards to the content or the
process, please reach out to
ss, please reach out to me.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=python-mastodon
Current text from [2]:
Migration status for python-mastodon (2.0.0-2 to 2.0.1-1): BLOCKED:
Rejected/violates migration policy/in
On Sun, 19 Jul 2020 13:32:24 +0800 Paul Wise wrote:
> Some web browsers support passing mailto: links to various webmail
> providers. It would be good to have a MUA option for each of these web
> browsers so folks can send bug reports via their preferred webmail MUA.
On Sun, 19 Jul 2020
On Wed, 2025-04-23 at 01:12 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> gnupg2 is BD-Unstallable on a number of architectures because it now depends
> on swtpm which is not available on all architectures due to various reasons:
>
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=gnupg2
various reasons:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=gnupg2
Can you disable swtpm on these architectures?
Thanks,
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer
`. `' Physicist
`-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
aragraph that starts with
"Interestingly").
Does it help to change that dbc_install=false to dbc_install=true and
run dpkg-reconfigure again?
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
equin
didn't block them. It's only the unstable version of those packages that
depend on harlequin.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
don't make it to testing until
apache arrow is in Debian).
I'll add a removal hint already.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
this bug by those bugs such that you (and bystanders like me)
can keep track of progress.
Documenting your findings so far might also be nice, e.g. some
autopkgtest failures seem flaky (have bugs been filed?), but not all.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
the soft freeze, it's better to fix things
sooner rather than later.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi Daniel,
On 21-04-2025 10:09, Daniel Baumann wrote:
On Sat, 12 Apr 2025 10:22:02 +0200 Paul Gevers wrote:
> Do you mean it depends on it, but it doesn't Depends on it?
yes - harlequin depends on the python parts of apache arrow which is not
packaged for Debian yet.
I didn
Hi Jérémy,
Thanks for the reply.
On 20-04-2025 13:21, Jérémy Lal wrote:
Good question ! The answer is that it's not needed:
nodejs 20.19.0 can "require(esm)" [1] so a CJS module is no longer
locked out using ESM modules.
The other way around (import a CJS module form an ES module) has always
Hi Guillem,
On Sun, 2025-04-20 at 13:53 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> is there a way to just turn these checks off globally?
>
> I have observed that even old versions of dupload now randomly try to
> verify the signature which means I'm being spammed with failure ma
I have:
target_link_libraries(mytarget PRIVATE Botan::Botan)
and I get the following error:
ninja: error: '/usr/lib/libbotan-3.so.7', needed by 'mytarget', missing and no
known rule to make it
According to apt-file (and it is also there on the file system), the real
locat
ase I just want to turn these checks off.
I have seen that there is an environment variable called DUPLOAD_SKIP_HOOKS
but there doesn't seem to be an option which I can just add to /etc/dupload.conf
or ~/.dupload.conf.
Thanks,
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
Hi,
On Sat, 19 Apr 2025 19:28:11 +0200 Paul Gevers wrote:
I was struggling to package the latest version of `liferea` because I
didn't want to use the upstream vendored purify (and handlebars). It
turns out that the Debian version of node-dompurify is too old. Is it
reasonable to up
ample...
I suggest asking debian-ment...@lists.debian.org for help then.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
problem. It should fail the test instead. Good to
know this isn't a regression in autopkgtest (at least less obvious if it
is).
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
nable to upgrade?
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
e release?
Nothing, wait for the bug to be fixed. Or do you think there's something
else we could do? You wouldn't want me to change code in grub.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2023/01/msg00346.html
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
in testing. So the right package from src:orthanc should have
a *versioned* Depends on the right package from src:dcmtk.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ease reach out to me.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=orthanc-wsi
Current text from [2]:
Migration status for orthanc-wsi (3.0+dfsg-1 to 3.2+dfsg-1): BLOCKED:
Rejected/violates migration policy/in
out to me.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=rsplib
Current text from [2]:
Migration status for rsplib (3.4.4-1.1 to 3.5.1-1.1): BLOCKED:
Rejected/violates migration policy/introduces a regression
Issues
Hi Martin-Eric,
On 18-04-2025 18:10, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
I would really hope the release team to step in on this one.
And what do you expect from the Release Team?
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
7;).
For those looking at the BTS for RC bugs, let's make the title a bit
clearer.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
f has unsatisfiable dependency
Which should mean that the version of sch-rnd-core in testing is
installable on those architectures while the version in unstable
wouldn't be installable.
On armel, the package depends on librnd4 but that doesn't exist.
Paul
[1] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?
y here. So, I'm
wondering if the failure happens during dbconfig-common or afterwards.
Maybe you can try what happens if you install rsyslog-pgsql and opt-out
of dbconfig-common help (I recall that's the first question).
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
/RegressionEmailInformation
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2019/07/msg2.html
https://ci.debian.net/packages/p/pymatgen/testing/arm64/59950546/
2398s autopkgtest [12:46:34]: test test-pymatgen-net:
[---
2398s running network tests with NET_TEST_LIST
Hi,
On 17-04-2025 12:49, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
On 4/17/25 12:16 PM, Paul Gevers wrote:
To avoid having to do this on the package side, I (ci.d.n maintainer
hat on) could add your package to the ci.d.n reject_list
That doesn't sound like a good idea because then two people need
ly. If you have any comments with regards to the content or the
process, please reach out to me.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=kitty
Current text from [2]:
Migration status for kitty (0.39.1-1 t
e
process, please reach out to me.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=git
Current text from [2]:
Migration status for git (1:2.47.2-0.1 to 1:2.49.0-1): BLOCKED:
Rejected/violates migration policy/in
user debian-s...@lists.debian.org
usertag 1102106 s390x
thanks
Dear s390x porters,
Can you please have a look at bug 1102106? (Copied in full below for
your convenience)
Paul
On Sat, 5 Apr 2025 07:20:13 +0200 Matthias Klose wrote:
Package: src:git
Version: 1:2.49.0-1
Severity: serious
ach out to me.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=libfabric
Current text from [2]:
Migration status for libfabric (1.17.0-3.1 to 2.1.0-1): BLOCKED:
Rejected/violates migration policy/introduces a regressi
out to me.
Paul
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2023/06/msg1.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=sch-rnd
Current text from [2]:
Migration status for sch-rnd (1.0.7-1 to 1.0.8-2): BLOCKED:
Rejected/violates migration policy/introduces a regression
Issues
your package is unable to migrate to testing due to
issues beyond your control, don't hesitate to contact the Release Team.
This bug report has been automatically generated and has only been sent
manually. If you have any comments with regards to the content or the
process, please reach out to
rrently can only
switch needs-internet per architecture and I consider that a too big
hammer for arm64 (release team member hat on).
Paul
[1] https://salsa.debian.org/ci-team/debci/-/issues/166
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
uring the freeze. For trixie, the ship has
sailed. For forky, the first year after the trixie release is the ideal
period to do this.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
packages
relationships (maybe we should generalize something like Depends:
unsupported-architecture [i386]).
Or Build-Depends? For if the package works, but the build doesn't.
So, unless you ask me to stop doing so, I will continue to file such
bugs; I will file them as severity
failing without changes to the list of installed packages,
are causing people unrelated to your package to spend time on these
tests.
Don't hesitate to reach out if you need help and some more information
from our infrastructure.
Paul
https://ci.debian.net/packages/o/ogdi-dfsg/t
Control: tag 1084069 sid trixie-ignore
Hi
I have marked bug 1084089 as trixie-ignore [1], so this bug can be
ignored for trixie too. If it can be done within the freeze policy
constraints, fixing this is still on the table and doesn't need to wait.
Paul
[1] https://bugs.debian.org/cg
you can see from my response, I'm
inclined to do that.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
;s browserify that fails, but as I don't know
the ecosystem well, it could be something below that. Reassigning for
further inspection.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
failed, waiting for other jobs to finish...
AIUI, there isn't anything that a source package that only builds
arch:all binaries can do about this. I'm very sure this is related to
bug #1095862.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
I mean it shouln't respect the screen power saving time, so to surpress it
during video playback
Package: firefox-esr
Version: 128.9.0esr-1~deb12u1
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: jphkont...@gmail.com
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (o
time.
Hope the above makes some sense.
Cheers, Paul
--
Paul Szabo p...@maths.usyd.edu.au www.maths.usyd.edu.au/u/psz
School of Mathematics and Statistics University of SydneyAustralia
Join the Union and fight for a better University: www.nteu.au/join
Of course what I meant is that utime is wrong (not btime).
Source: pyopencl
Version: 2025.1-1
Severity: important
Hi,
With the upload of version 2025.1-1, reproducible-builds.d.n reports
your package as no longer reproducible. The diff seems to be in file
properties as installed.
Paul
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg
z Tue Apr 15 19:38:40 2025 grep -E psz.*grep|USER
Surely worth re-opening, and fixing anytime in the next 20 years?
Thanks, Paul
--
Paul Szabo p...@maths.usyd.edu.au www.maths.usyd.edu.au/u/psz
School of Mathematics and Statistics University of SydneyAustralia
r 15 19:14:50 2025 grep -E psz.*grep|USER
Maybe you could kindly re-open?
Thanks, Paul
--
Paul Szabo p...@maths.usyd.edu.au www.maths.usyd.edu.au/u/psz
School of Mathematics and Statistics University of SydneyAustralia
tice to satisfy the Recommends as
most people don't have that enabled. In my view this bug is about the
question if not having the debug symbols readily available (installed)
with valgrind is an RC problem. I would expect not, otherwise it feels
like it should be a Depends. I read that Michael
rated.
(I believe the RC policy includes unavailable packages in
Recommends: ...)
But that's the other RC bug against valgrind. I was explicitly
interested if the lack of *a* debug symbols package in Recommends is to
be considered RC in itself.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Descriptio
soon?
I think the ship to update the rocm stack for trixie has sailed. As
llvm-toolchain-17 remains a key package because of several rocm
packages, I have marked the llvm-toolchain-17 "don't ship in stable" as
trixie-ignore. That means it also applies here.
Paul
OpenPGP_signa
() to emit a
warning on stderr, thereby causing your autopkgtest to fail. The
tests should be unaffected otherwise.
I have uploaded an NMU to DELAYED/5 with dgit adding the allow-stderr
restriction to the autopkgtest, to work around the regression. The NMU
changes are attached.
Paul
From
Hi,
On 11-04-2025 15:19, Jeremy Bícha wrote:
We have now uploaded bustle to Unstable. I didn't notice that bustle
wasn't in Testing so I did another upload today. Please consider
hinting bustle in faster since I'm not sure whether there are 5 days
left before the Soft Freeze.
Note that bustle i
debian-installer/-/blob/master/debian/control?ref_type=heads#L155
and
https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/debian-installer/-/blob/master/build/config/x86.cfg?ref_type=heads#L124
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
just removing win32-loader use in d-i and filling of this bug report?
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
1 - 100 of 12122 matches
Mail list logo
