Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-Cc: pkg-roundcube-maintain...@alioth-lists.debian.net
* Package name: roundcube-plugin-banner-ics
Version : 1.4.0
Upstream Contact: Varun Patil
* URL : https://github.com/pulsejet/banner-ics
* License : MIT
Programmi
Package: shotwell
Version: 0.30.15-1
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
When trying to publish some photos, shotwell complains that there aren't
any compatable publishing plugins enabled. Looking in Edit ->
Preferences -> Plugins, none appear.
From the terminal, the following errors occur:
(sh
tags 879182 + patch
thanks
Patch, taken from upstream attached.
Neil
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 12:07:59AM -0700, Paul Vojta wrote:
> Package: libsecret-1-0
> Version: 0.18.5-4
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> Approximately 1/256th of the time when using libsecret, it fails and prints
On Sat, May 05, 2012 at 11:32:38AM +0200, intrigeri wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Vagrant Cascadian wrote (01 May 2012 19:27:33 GMT) :
> > offlineimap continues to run, updating the screen, but seemingly
> > writing text to arbitrary locations on the screen, and it swiftly
> > becomes impossible to get any use
On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 05:45:42PM +0300, Ilias Tsitsimpis wrote:
> Thanks for reporting this. This is indeed a regression. I have created a
> patch[1] that hopefully fixes it.
>
Confirmed that the patch works.
Neil
On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 09:01:11PM +0100, Christian Neukirchen wrote:
>
> Please try the proposed fix at
> https://github.com/OfflineIMAP/offlineimap/issues/290#issuecomment-196036356
>
The fix with upstream does improve matters, but you can still
occasionally see corruption in the characters pr
On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 05:45:42PM +0300, Ilias Tsitsimpis wrote:
> Hi Neil,
>
> On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 08:14PM, Neil McGovern wrote:
> > After the last update in testing, it seems that the blinkenlights UI has
> > disappeared.
> > ERROR:root:UI 'Blinkenlight
Package: offlineimap
Version: 7.0.7+dfsg1-1
Severity: normal
After the last update in testing, it seems that the blinkenlights UI has
disappeared.
ERROR:root:UI 'Blinkenlights' does not exist, choose one of: machineui,
syslog, quiet, ttyui, basic
If this is deliberate, then man offlineimapui sho
Package: gnome-shell
Version: 3.20.3-1
Severity: normal
Hi,
It seems that there's an error in the mini calendar when the day starts
on a Monday, rather than a Sunday - there's an offset with the day of
the week.
See attached.
Neil
-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
APT prefers
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 10:26:06AM -0500, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Apr 2016, Sam Hartman wrote:
> > I vote A > B on the ballot recomminding Philip Hands.
>
> With this the outcome is no loner in doubt.
>
> The Technical Committee recommends that Philip Hands (philh) be
> appointed by the
severity 820003 minor
retitle 820003 SIGSEV when starting sparkleshare with already running instance
Ok, this seems to only happen when there's another sparkleshare instance
running. I guess this should be handled more cleanly, but downgrading.
Neil
--
Package: sparkleshare
Version: 1.5.0-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
After installing sparkleshare on a clean stretch system, it successfully
loads the initial setup screen. However, then trying to "sparkleshare
start" or "sparkleshare open" produces the attached log.
N
Hi,
On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 12:12:13PM +0100, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
> Control: tags 773041 security
> Control: severity 773041 grave
> Justification: causes remote denial of service
>
For info, I saw this a few days ago and reported it to the security
team. It is indeed available in the wild,
On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 03:24:18PM +0100, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Nov 2014, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
>
> > No, the ctte did not say that. We had a flamewar about that
> > interpretation before.
>
> That was almost word by word from
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2014/
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 04:23:19PM +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-11-26 at 14:46 +0000, Neil McGovern wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 09:29:28PM +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
> > > 1) Heavily advertise (release-notes?) that doing an up
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 09:29:28PM +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
> 1) Heavily advertise (release-notes?) that doing an upgrade from
> wheezy/etc to jessie will give you systemd as init system and inform
> about the apt pinning solution.
>
> 3) Heavily advertise (again in release notes?) that y
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Dear lovely release team,
TL;DR:
# CVE-2014-4887
unblock wget/1.16-1
age-days 2 wget/1.16-1
wget 1.16 in unstable currently fixes CVE-2014-4887:
Absolute path traversal vulnerability in G
reassign #765069 nautilus
retitle #765069 nautilus: Displays svg pixmaps as giant icons
thanks
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 02:12:29PM -0400, James McCoy wrote:
> On Oct 23, 2014 1:33 PM, "Neil McGovern" wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 12:13:50PM +0200, Niklas Fiekas wrote:
&
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 07:56:25AM +, Gerrit Pape wrote:
> This essentially is a reintroduction of the package "runit-run", which
> was added to Debian end of 2002, and removed on request of the release
> team end of 2010, with the package name changed. Since then, a backward
> compatibility f
On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 07:33:55PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 7:16 PM, Neil McGovern wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 09:31:19AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> >> > If anyone reading this mail has the details already and can commit to
> >
tags 681501 +patch
thanks
On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 09:31:19AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > If anyone reading this mail has the details already and can commit to
> > the website CVS repository, please add Debian France there.
>
> ENOTIME sorry
>
Patch attached, I'll commit this later if ther
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 03:00:36PM +0200, Martin Lutz wrote:
> after upgrading blt to version 2.4z-9 the package python-matplotlib becomes
> unusable.
>
Ditto the package 'look' and presumeably quite a bit of stuff that uses
python-tk.
It seems that the lastest upload of blt ships libBLT.2.4.so.
On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 06:57:29PM +0200, Holger Wansing wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Neil McGovern wrote:
>
> > Debian, the producers of the Debian system, have adopted a code of
> > conduct
> > for paticipants to its mailinglists, IRC channels and other modes of
> &
On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 03:12:36PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > Debian, the producers of the Debian system, have adopted […]
>
> Looks very odd to me. “The Debian Project” maybe?
>
I copied that from the social contract, but that does sound better.
> Missing final dot.
> -i :)
>
Both upd
Tags: +patch
Thanks
On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 11:36:54AM +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Ma, 06 mai 14, 13:45:11, Brian Gupta wrote:
> > All kidding aside, is there a plan to post the CoC, and make it easy
> > to find from www.d.o? (Perhaps either in the "About" section, or on
> > the "about Debia
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 09:33:33AM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Given the Condorcet voting method is susceptible to tactical voting,
Hi Josselin,
I'm not sure what you mean here, could you care to elaborate?
Neil
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi Don,
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 11:05:18AM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
> Where feasible, software should interoperate with non-default init
> systems; maintainers are encouraged to accept technically sound
> patches to enable interoperation, even if it results in degraded
> operation.
>
On 30 Dec 2013, at 18:47, Russ Allbery wrote:
> However, I think it's the best available approach that balances our ideals
> as a project against the opportunities offered by a new init system. This
> approach does permit full use of new init system features for jessie
> except for eliminating /e
package evince
unarchive 658139
found 658139 3.8.3-2
thanks
It looks like the latest package upload did not ack the NMU. Which means
this bug is back.
Neil
On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 11:37:43AM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
> I have uploaded an NMU which fixes this bug to delayed/7. The diff for
> th
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 04:45:11PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> icedove 17.0.8-1~deb7u1 should be part of stable proper with the
> upcoming 7.2 point release, and may be copied to testing if 17.0.8-1 0
> doesn’t migrate in the mean time.
>
It doesn't seem to actually be migrating du
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 08:02:03PM +0200, Nicolas Patrois wrote:
> Today (07-14-2013), updating intel-microcode completely blocks
> aptitude (and dpkg as well).
Hi,
For info, this does not occur using apt-get on a Thinkpad X220.
Neil
--
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 10:04:23PM +0200, Michal Kitta wrote:
> Wheezy freezes sometimes by web browsing or by scrolling down
> documents in libreoffice. Never the same problem with other
> debian-based distro or with squeeze.
>
I believe I'm experiencing the same/similar issues on my Thinkpad X
Hi Marco,
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 04:14:13AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> Yes, but they are all trivial changes.
>
[...]
> OK, I suck as a maintainer and as a human being and I neglected my
> packages for most of the last year.
> But I'd rather move on and fix what can still be fixed.
>
[...]
>
Package: enigma
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
Looks like Enigma 1.20 has been released!
Could the package be updated (probably after the freeze)?
Thanks,
Neil
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 7.0
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architect
user debian-rele...@packages.debian.org
usertags 678979 wheezy-will-remove
thanks
On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 12:44:15PM -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On Sat, 2013-03-16 at 11:38 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Sun, 2012-10-07 at 14:30 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> > > On 21/09/2012 04:58, Pete
tags 698117 moreinfo
user debian-rele...@packages.debian.org
usertags 671635 wheezy-will-remove
thanks
On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 02:51:36PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> The time spent by the RM and the maintainer to prepare and accept the tpu
> upload is higher than adding a simple unblock (assum
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 01:39:44PM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> On 27.02.2013 00:50, Chris Knadle wrote:
> > When this was brought up in the bug report, the response was
> > "network-manager
> > can be installed, then disabled", but how to do that wasn't documented
> > anywhere in the network-m
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 06:50:51PM -0500, Chris Knadle wrote:
> Instead the next suggestion was documenting this issue in the Wheey
> errata [2], but I don't see network- manager or wicd mentioned there,
> nor mentioned in the Installation Guide [3] for Wheezy.
>
I'm guessing that's because no on
ome other user may lack the
> knowledge how to correctly create init scripts.)
>
For clarity - considering this used to work without having the above, I
consider this to be a release critical issue for Wheezy. Thus, it needs
fixing somehow or isdnutils will be removed from the release.
Neil M
Control: tag -1 +wheezy-ignore
This doesn't seem to actually affect wheezy in a user-environment. Thus
adding wheezy-ignore tag.
Neil
--
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi,
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 04:26:53PM +, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
> The fix is to add missing dependency on xz-utils.
> Also a unit tests is added explicitly testing xz compressed deb.
>
This doesn't look clean due to changes in:
> --- unattended-upgrades-0.79.3/test/aptroot/var/log/apt/his
Control: tag -1 +wheezy-ignore
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 07:15:49PM +, Robert Lemmen wrote:
> b) the release team could decide to simply wheezy-ignore this bug since
> a fixed version is in unstable and this is "only" a DFSG-problem, i.e.
> something we *decide* we don't want in main rather than
Control: fixed #681138 4.0.4debian2-3.2
Apparently the below doesn't work. So I'm marking it as fixed. *sigh*
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 03:09:09PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Processing control commands:
>
> > notfound #681138 4.0.4debian2
> Bug #681138 {Done: Thomas Mueller } [ownc
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 12:39:35PM +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> On 11/11/2012 11:26 AM, intrigeri wrote:
> > Anything left to be done before filing an unblock request?
>
> like said, when live-build has been updated, syslinux-themes will be
> updated too, and then someone can ask for unblocks.
>
Control: notfound #681138 4.0.4debian2
I couldn't reproduce this in 4.0.4debian2, marking as such.
Neil
--
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 01:38:27PM +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> I simply haven't included any patches with any prior version of the
> package, so I haven't needed to rely on any 1.0 or 3.0 methods for
> including a patch
>
Again, I'm going to point at the freeze policy. Specifically Rule 1.
> I
Control: tag 570516 +wheezy-ignore
This probably isn't going to get fixed, even if it still exists. Tagging
wheezy-ignore.
Neil
--
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 12:42:14AM +0100, alberto fuentes wrote:
> Since its being a while without response and we are getting closer to
> release, i was thinking about requesting a wheezy-ignore for the bug or
> something to the release team
>
I'm not happy adding an ignore tag if there isn't an
Package: freevo
Severity: grave
Hi,
Youtube-dl is about to be removed from testing. As freevo depends on it,
it is also a candidate for removal. Please let
debian-rele...@lists.debian.org know how you plan on handling this
issue.
Thanks,
Neil
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 7.0
APT pre
Package: metacafe-dl
Version: 2008.07.23-2
Severity: grave
Hi,
metacafe-dl doesn't seem to work anymore, possibly due to #688997.
In any case, metacafe-dl is currently a candidate to be removed from
wheezy unless something is fixed.
Neil
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 7.0
APT prefers
Hi,
On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 02:46:29PM +0100, Anton Gladky wrote:
> thanks for looking into this bug. VCS of coin3d has a COPYING file, which
> is clearly BSD-license [1]. So this version should be packaged to fix
> the license issue properly. The current version of coin is GPL [2].
>
This does
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 09:56:08PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: rm
>
Removal hint added.
Neil
--
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Control: tag 540512 +wheezy-ignore
Control: tag 538822 +wheezy-ignore
This is obviously not going to get fixed this time. Adding ignore tags.
On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 08:40:58PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
> There has been a small discussion about dash RC bugs 538822 and 540512
> in the bts and the
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 10:35:16AM +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 09:54:36AM +0100, Anton Gladky wrote:
> > +netgen (4.9.13.dfsg-3.2) testing-proposed-updates; urgency=low
> > +
> > + * Non-maintainer upload.
>
> Have the maintainers commented on your proposed change?
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 10:20:56AM +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> If it is essential, I can make a 0.8.1-13 upload with the extra
> changelog detail against 0.8.1-11
>
Hi,
We won't accept any changes to packaging systems, and we won't review
anything without a diff. PLEASE go read
http://release.
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 09:26:37PM +0100, Thomas Girard wrote:
> Since my GPG key has expired, I will not be able to upload this in a
> timely fashion, so you can consider this email as a call for NMU.
>
For info, you can simply change the expiration date...
Neil
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to d
On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 02:40:25PM +, Barak A. Pearlmutter wrote:
> As I've stated previously, I don't believe that backporting fixes is
> really feasible. There are too many, they are mixed with
> non-security-related modifications, there would be enormous opportunity
> for error, and ongoing
Hi,
365 files changed, 23718 insertions(+), 14033 deletions(-)
This isn't something that can be reviewed, especially with the large
number of unrelated changes to (for example build system switch!) the
package.
The options remaining are:
* Backport specific fixes for the version in testing
* Re
On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 12:08:49PM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> Hallo,
> * Gabriele Stilli [Tue, Dec 25 2012, 10:10:36PM]:
>
> > any chance of having this fix backported to Wheezy? It's quite annoying
> > not being able to do proper upgrades when using http.debian.net with
> > (what will become) s
On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 12:08:49PM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> Hallo,
> * Gabriele Stilli [Tue, Dec 25 2012, 10:10:36PM]:
>
> > any chance of having this fix backported to Wheezy? It's quite annoying
> > not being able to do proper upgrades when using http.debian.net with
> > (what will become) s
tags 591969 + wheezy-ignore
thanks
On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 03:56:11PM +0100, Christian Welzel wrote:
> Am 05.12.2012 13:07, schrieb Neil McGovern:
>
> > Can someone explain: 1) Why there were no updates to the bug
> > between December 2010 and June 2012?
>
> The bug cou
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 08:01:58PM +0100, Tobias Hansen wrote:
> the discussion in RC bug #591969 ended with a call for a wheezy-ignore
> tag. The bug was also tagged squeeze-ignore. What does the release team say?
>
In general, I'm fairly loathed to add a *second* release ignore tag.
Can someon
tags 692614 + wheezy-ignore
tags 692619 + wheezy-ignore
tags 692624 + wheezy-ignore
tags 692625 + wheezy-ignore
tags 692627 + wheezy-ignore
tags 692628 + wheezy-ignore
tags 692629 + wheezy-ignore
tags 692630 + wheezy-ignore
tags 692631 + wheezy-ignore
tags 692613 + wheezy-ignore
tags 692615 + wheez
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 11:27:07AM -0400, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote:
> Emacs 24 has been in pre-release mode
So... not actually released then.
> Anyways, this doesn't answer my question, which I've asked thrice.
> Here it goes again: is this a done deal, and we're getting an ancient
> (yes, a
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 10:07:14PM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> On 07/30/2012 10:02 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > Or if you prefer, I can remove the package from
> > wheezy, that works just as well as far as I'm concerned, but I thought
> > I'd give it a chance.
>
> feel free to do so if you thi
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 01:51:32PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > If it's the solution that the TC decide on to resolve the issue, it
> > sounds like something we could work with, at least imho, from what I've
> > seen so far. I've CCed -release for any further comments, as I don't
> > know how
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 11:45:42PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> If a missing mime file would mean an RC bug, this would instantly make
> 514 packages RC buggy.
> Interestingly, the particular section in the Debian policy is a should
> directive, not a must, so I don't understand the reasons f
s
decision.
Thanks,
Neil
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 04:34:35PM -0600, Neil McGovern wrote:
> Hence, I consider this bug serious and thus RC, and am reassigning to evince.
>
> Feel free to pop it over to tech-ctte if you don't agree.
>
> Thanks,
> Neil
>
>
> --
&g
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 04:26:17PM +0200, Patrick Winnertz wrote:
> this is not that bad than it sounds as lustre is a very very specific
> kind of software, which is rarely/not at all used by normal users.
>
Hi,
I don't think this is RC from a FTBFS point of view, but I'm not
entirely sure abo
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 12:19:04PM +0300, Jari Aalto wrote:
> 2012-07-10 20:00 Neil McGovern :
> | Hi,
> |
> | On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 12:58:53PM +0300, Jari Aalto wrote:
> | > | > The Fix
> | > | > Add required font package to debian/control
> | >
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 12:58:53PM +0300, Jari Aalto wrote:
> | > The Fix
> | > Add required font package to debian/control::Depends
> | >
> +Recommends: xfonts-100dpi
> + .
> + NOTE: If you experience problems with the F1 help key, please
> + make sure you have package xfonts-100dp
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 02:45:14PM +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
> 2012/6/27 Julien Cristau :
> > On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 08:45:03 +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I am still correcting FTBFS.
> >> However, almost packages can shift to libpng 1.5.
> >> May I upload libpng 1.
Package: colorhug-client
Version: 0.1.9-2
Severity: grave
Hi!
Colourhug 0.1.9 has an issue with colorhug-ccmx where it fails to update
the stored calibration data on the device. This leads to 'aperture
closed' messages when attempting to calibrate.
This has been fixed upstream at 0.1.10, see
htt
Hi!
Name: debian-sprints
Rationale:
The debian sprint work is being delegated out from the DPL role. Thus a
mailing list is needed for coordination.
Short description: Discussion and coordination for Sprints
Long description:
Discussion and coordination for Debian Sprints. Sprints allow sets of
Package: lists.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi,
As we (the release team) are trying to improve the visibility of
experimental, could you please create a debian-experimental-changes
mailing list?
Thanks,
Neil
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0.1
APT prefers squeeze-updates
APT polic
Package: lists.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi,
As the debian sprint work is being delegated out from the DPL role, can
you please create a debian-sprints mailing list.
Thanks,
Neil
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0.1
APT prefers squeeze-updates
APT policy: (500, 'squeeze-updates')
On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 03:14:05PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> I think that if you want to change the NMU procedures described in
> dev-ref, you should at least discuss the proposals in a similar forum
> than the one where the current recommendations were discussed, i.e
> debian-devel@ or debian
On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 12:31:20PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Didier Raboud (04/05/2011):
> > The proposed wording doesn't imply this IMHO; I read it as "if you
> > can't find an action from the maintainer on the buglog in the last 7
> > days, you can 0-day NMU".
> >
> > What we want is more
On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 08:58:57AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 03/05/11 at 15:38 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > I agree that the resulting wording of patch is suboptimal, and that
> > recommending 0-day NMUs is not the way to go. We are rarely in need for
> > action in less than a couple of
On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 06:57:13AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Tue, May 03, 2011 at 09:22:46PM +0100, Neil McGovern a écrit :
> >
> > Yes. If a maintainer is taking more that for a *RC* bug fix, then they
> > *should* keep the buglog updated with status.
>
> Tal
On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 03:11:07PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Neil McGovern , 2011-05-03, 13:25:
> >+Upload fixing only release-critical bugs older than 7 days, without
> >maintainer activity for 7 days: 0 days
> >+
> >+
> >+
> >+
>
> Oh dear, pleas
Package: developers-reference
Tags: patch
Hi,
As announced in the recent mail[0], please find attached a patch to
dev-ref changing the NMU policy.
Thanks,
Neil
[0] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2011/03/msg00016.html
--
dpkg: shut up
No, I won't, and you can't make me. :P
hah.
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 12:27:44AM +, brian m. carlson wrote:
> I see the problem described in 604680 (or what I think is the same
> problem) in all terminals using libvte9, and consequently, I filed bug
> 616392 there. Could you try with evilvte or some other vte-based
> terminal and see if i
On Sat, Mar 05, 2011 at 11:35:15PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Neil McGovern (14/12/2006):
> > This bug still exists in the latest version of Xorg. Setting depth
> > to 8 alleviates this, but nothing higher will work.
>
> just checking… what's t
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 02:58:41PM +0200, Teodor MICU wrote:
> 2011/1/3 Mehdi Dogguy :
> > On 01/03/2011 11:31 AM, Teodor wrote:
> >>
> >> Please unblock package mercurial-server. The two RC bugs for this
> >> package were fixed so it should get back for inclussion in Debian 6.0
> >> (squeeze).
> >
Hia,
I'm currently wondering why #598135 is RC. Would someone care to
explain what I'm missing? :)
Thanks,
Neil
--
[local irc server has just been brought up]
suddenly there's quite some silence in the hacklab
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subj
Hi Peter, thanks for getting in touch
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 02:13:56PM +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Thanks for your efforts towards great Debian releases!
>
> I've made some
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 05:00:00PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le mardi 23 novembre 2010 à 13:15 +0000, Neil McGovern a écrit :
> > It seems that since the last testing update there's occasionally some
> > nasty corruption appearing with text in gnome-terminal. I haven&#
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 10:47:54PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> As it stands, it's unreasonable to even try working on the 0.30.x branch
> for Squeeze, given the short amount of time remaining. I feel very sad
> about it, but as there's no way to convince the RT that the 0.32.x
> branch is in a v
the "this week in Debian" podcast. It was
> fun. I wish I was living in Cambridge with 9 other DDs, I feel alone
> here in Shanghai (lucky, Li Daobing lives here now)! :)
>
> Neil McGovern wrote:
> > Hi Thomas,
> >
> > Firstly, please accept my apologies for
On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 12:54:57PM -0500, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 12:36:41PM -0400, Camm Maguire wrote:
> > Greetings! I uploaded a fix for 591862 together with a minor upstream
> > point release that just missed the freeze. Would it be possible to
> > permit the f
This mail should be sent to the debian-release mailing list, copying in.
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 12:32:57AM +0200, Erik Schanze wrote:
> please let me kindly ask for setting squeeze-ignore tag for
> serious Bug #509287.
>
> Afio has a problematic license, but in my opinion it should
> not block t
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 03:07:59PM +, Gerrit Pape wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 05:07:22PM +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 10:54:12PM -0400, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > > Release team: if you think this bug makes runit-run unreleaseable,
> > &
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 07:58:06PM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 07:15:14PM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 10:16:52PM +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
> >
> > > Ok, please upload.
> >
> > Changes commi
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 04:25:29PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> Sorry...
>
> On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 02:59:07AM -0300, Rogério Brito wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > On 08/21/2010 02:39 AM, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> > > On Sat, Aug 07, 2010 at 05:08:04PM +0100, Neil McGovern w
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 09:33:19PM +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 04:13:34PM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
> > Personally I am okay with doing it and it is the intention of the Java
> > Team to make openjdk the default on all architectures. The question is
>
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 04:13:34PM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Personally I am okay with doing it and it is the intention of the Java
> Team to make openjdk the default on all architectures. The question is
> if we should do it now or after Squeeze (CC'ed the release team) for
> their comments.
>
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 01:04:49PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> The request is, therefore, not for an advance freeze exception (since
> I know you'll want to look at the package as uploaded), but for an
> indication of whether such a new release has a reasonable chance of being
> accepted if it is
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 09:54:36PM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 07:56:52PM +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 11:32:06AM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> > > I think the best thing to do at this stage is probably to split out
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 12:20:44PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Neil McGovern writes:
>
> > As per bug 592071, it seems that deborphan shoudn't be in squeeze
> > without a maintainer who'll take care of it. I'm ccing the maintainers
> > of the depending pac
1 - 100 of 302 matches
Mail list logo
