On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 04:26:17PM +0200, Patrick Winnertz wrote: > this is not that bad than it sounds as lustre is a very very specific > kind of software, which is rarely/not at all used by normal users. >
Hi, I don't think this is RC from a FTBFS point of view, but I'm not entirely sure about if it would be policy compliant. The simplest way of fixing this would be to move it from main to contrib - would you be willing to do this as maintainer? Thanks, Neil --
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
