Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: bonni...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:bonnie++
Please unblock package bonnie++
This upload fixes a bug in the test (missing allow-stderr restriction)
that cau
Hi Tiago,
The bug report below was apparently received by the source:sm
maintainer, so maybe you did not receive it as the source:screen-message
maintainer.
I'm explicitely notifying you since I care about keeping
screen-message in Debian testing/stable. If you don't have time to
handle this, ple
Source: flexml
Version: 1.9.6-5.1
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
Hi,
GNU Make now has a --shuffle option that simulates non-deterministic
ordering of dependencies. See
https://trofi.github.io/posts/238-new-make-shuffle-mode.html and also
previous work in Debian by Santiago Vila:
https://people.d
Source: swirc
Version: 3.5.4-1
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
Hi,
GNU Make now has a --shuffle option that simulates non-deterministic
ordering of dependencies. See
https://trofi.github.io/posts/238-new-make-shuffle-mode.html and also
previous work in Debian by Santiago Vila:
https://people.debi
Source: bedtools
Version: 2.31.1+dfsg-2
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
Hi,
GNU Make now has a --shuffle option that simulates non-deterministic
ordering of dependencies. See
https://trofi.github.io/posts/238-new-make-shuffle-mode.html and also
previous work in Debian by Santiago Vila:
https://pe
Source: libcache-memcached-fast-perl
Version: 0.28-2
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
Hi,
GNU Make now has a --shuffle option that simulates non-deterministic
ordering of dependencies. See
https://trofi.github.io/posts/238-new-make-shuffle-mode.html and also
previous work in Debian by Santiago Vila
Source: ddir
Version: 2025.0129-2
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
Hi,
GNU Make now has a --shuffle option that simulates non-deterministic
ordering of dependencies. See
https://trofi.github.io/posts/238-new-make-shuffle-mode.html and also
previous work in Debian by Santiago Vila:
https://people.d
Source: brltty
Version: 6.7-1
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
Hi,
GNU Make now has a --shuffle option that simulates non-deterministic
ordering of dependencies. See
https://trofi.github.io/posts/238-new-make-shuffle-mode.html and also
previous work in Debian by Santiago Vila:
https://people.debia
Source: nvi
Version: 1.81.6-23
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
Hi,
GNU Make now has a --shuffle option that simulates non-deterministic
ordering of dependencies. See
https://trofi.github.io/posts/238-new-make-shuffle-mode.html and also
previous work in Debian by Santiago Vila:
https://people.debian.o
Source: cross-toolchain-base-mipsen
Version: 32
Severity: important
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250428 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-randomly
Hi,
Your package fails to build randomly on amd64: In the exact same
environment, sometimes it builds fine, a
Source: golang-collectd
Version: 0.5.0+git20240104.26404de-1
Severity: important
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250428 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-randomly
Hi,
Your package fails to build randomly on amd64: In the exact same
environment, sometimes it b
Source: kissplice
Version: 2.6.7-1
Severity: important
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250428 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-randomly
Hi,
Your package fails to build randomly on amd64: In the exact same
environment, sometimes it builds fine, and sometimes
Source: crimson
Version: 0.5.3-1
Severity: important
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250428 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-randomly
Hi,
Your package fails to build randomly on amd64: In the exact same
environment, sometimes it builds fine, and sometimes it
Source: emacs
Version: 1:30.1+1-5
Severity: important
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250428 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-randomly
Hi,
Your package fails to build randomly on amd64: In the exact same
environment, sometimes it builds fine, and sometimes i
Source: openclonk
Version: 8.1-4
Severity: important
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250428 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-randomly
Hi,
Your package fails to build randomly on amd64: In the exact same
environment, sometimes it builds fine, and sometimes it
Source: golang-github-lestrrat-go-backoff
Version: 2.0.8-2
Severity: important
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250428 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-randomly
Hi,
Your package fails to build randomly on amd64: In the exact same
environment, sometimes it bui
Source: vamp-plugin-sdk
Version: 2.10.0-5
Severity: important
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250428 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-randomly
Hi,
Your package fails to build randomly on amd64: In the exact same
environment, sometimes it builds fine, and som
Source: mdanalysis
Version: 2.9.0-7
Severity: important
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250428 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-randomly
Hi,
Your package fails to build randomly on amd64: In the exact same
environment, sometimes it builds fine, and sometimes
Source: gittuf
Version: 0.9.0-5
Severity: important
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250428 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-randomly
Hi,
Your package fails to build randomly on amd64: In the exact same
environment, sometimes it builds fine, and sometimes it
Source: puppetserver
Version: 8.7.0-4
Severity: important
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250428 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-randomly
Hi,
Your package fails to build randomly on amd64: In the exact same
environment, sometimes it builds fine, and sometim
Source: qtcontacts-sqlite
Version: 0.3.20-3
Severity: important
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250428 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-randomly
Hi,
Your package fails to build randomly on amd64: In the exact same
environment, sometimes it builds fine, and s
Source: haskell-stm-delay
Version: 0.1.1.1-5
Severity: important
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250428 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-randomly
Hi,
Your package fails to build randomly on amd64: In the exact same
environment, sometimes it builds fine, and
Source: ovn
Version: 25.03.0-1
Severity: important
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250428 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-randomly
Hi,
Your package fails to build randomly on amd64: In the exact same
environment, sometimes it builds fine, and sometimes it f
Source: nanoc
Version: 4.13.3-3
Severity: important
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250428 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-randomly
Hi,
Your package fails to build randomly on amd64: In the exact same
environment, sometimes it builds fine, and sometimes it
Source: agenda.app
Version: 0.47-1
Severity: important
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250428 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-randomly
Hi,
Your package fails to build randomly on amd64: In the exact same
environment, sometimes it builds fine, and sometimes
Source: puppetlabs-http-client-clojure
Version: 2.1.1-1
Severity: important
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250428 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-randomly
Hi,
Your package fails to build randomly on amd64: In the exact same
environment, sometimes it builds
Source: dovecot-antispam
Version: 2.0+20171229-1.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250429 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> cc -DHAV
Source: compyle
Version: 0.8.1-10
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250429 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules binary
> dh
Source: fiat-ecmwf
Version: 1.4.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250429 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> cd /build/reproducible-
Source: ruby-spy
Version: 1.0.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250429 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> +
Source: lvm2
Version: 2.03.31-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250429 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering directory
Source: email-reminder
Version: 0.8.3-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250429 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Entering d
Source: rtpengine
Version: 12.5.1.30-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250429 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[3]: Entering di
Source: metview
Version: 5.25.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250429 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> cd /build/reproducible-pa
Source: snek
Version: 1.11-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250429 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/lib/gcc/arm-none-eabi/14.
Source: rtorrent
Version: 0.9.8-1.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250429 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> checking for working nc
Source: flowgrind
Version: 0.8.2-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250429 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> cc -Wall -Wextra -Werror
Source: rdkit
Version: 202503.1-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250429 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules clean
> pg_
Source: perlimports
Version: 0.56-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250429 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Entering d
Source: ecmwflibs
Version: 2:0.6.3-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250429 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules binary
>
Source: ruby-android-key-attestation
Version: 0.3.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250429 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> +
Source: ectrans
Version: 1.6.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250429 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/bin/ld: /lib/x86_64-l
Source: xmlgraphics-commons
Version: 2.10-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250429 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules b
Source: metkit
Version: 1.13.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250429 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> cd /build/reproducible-pat
Source: fdb
Version: 5.15.12-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250429 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> cd /build/reproducible-path/
Source: libsys-cpuload-perl
Version: 0.32-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250429 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enteri
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: ruby-serialp...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:ruby-serialport
Please unblock package ruby-serialport.
This package was removed from testing a while back. Howev
Hi Filippo,
On 25/04/25 at 18:35 +0200, Filippo Giunchedi wrote:
> Package: cloud.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> X-Debbugs-Cc: fili...@debian.org
>
> Hello,
> with Trixie getting progressively more frozen, I'm testing (hah!) upgrades
> with
> Vagrant and debian/testing64. I noticed the current
On 24/04/25 at 17:11 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 24-04-2025 15:35, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > On 24/04/25 at 14:38 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On 24-04-2025 13:56, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > > > ruby-shou
On 24/04/25 at 14:38 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 24-04-2025 13:56, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > ruby-shoulda-context was updated and no longer build-depends on
> > ruby-pry-byebug. So ruby-pry-byebug could be removed (once
> > ruby-shoulda-context migrates).
&
On 24/04/25 at 11:37 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, 12 Apr 2025 00:58:12 +0530 Pirate Praveen
> wrote:
> > > Since ruby-shoulda-context Build-Depends ruby-pry-byebug this also
> > > affects #1054740.
> > I tried to update to new upstream version which has a fix for this, but
> > this
Control: severity 104 serious
Hi,
On 27/05/24 at 22:24 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Hi,
>
> An update on this:
>
> I plan to take care of the Debian vagrant package (in the framework of
> the Ruby team, as this is currently done). I uploaded the latest free
>
On 17/04/25 at 10:40 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> On 17 April 2025 at 09:33, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> |
> | On 17 April 2025 at 15:43, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> | | On 17/04/25 at 08:27 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> | | > Coincidentally got a patch via the BTS to
On 17/04/25 at 08:27 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> On 16 April 2025 at 15:35, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> |
> | On 16 April 2025 at 22:13, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> | | On 16/04/25 at 14:51 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> | | >
> | | > On 16 April 2025 at
Hi Paul,
On 17/04/25 at 09:12 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Control: tags -1 moreinfo
>
> Hi Lucas,
>
> [Release Team member hat on]
>
> I always appreciate your QA work on rebuilding Debian, but I'm wondering
> what the value is of filing out-of-memory FTBFS bugs on a 32 bit
> architecture for s
Hi Daniel,
On 17/04/25 at 06:56 +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> severity 1103358 important
> tag 1103358 + moreinfo
> thanks
>
> Hi,
>
> ceph builds fine on arm64 and I just did a successfull rebuild as well.
>
> Looking at the buildlog, it looks more like the issues comming from the
> crude cpu
On 16/04/25 at 23:30 +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> El 16/4/25 a las 23:07, Mike Hommey escribió:
> > The most relevant part of the log says: (signal: 9, SIGKILL: kill)
> >
> > This was OOM killed. IOW, not enough memory on the builder you used.
> >
> > Is this something that runs on buildds or so
On 17/04/25 at 06:07 +0900, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2025 at 08:40:14PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > Source: firefox-esr
> > Version: 128.9.0esr-2
> > Severity: serious
> > Justification: FTBFS
> > Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
> > User: lu...@debian
On 16/04/25 at 14:51 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> On 16 April 2025 at 21:27, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> | Source: rjava
> | Version: 1.0-11-1
> | Severity: serious
> | Justification: FTBFS
> | Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
> | User: lu...@debian.org
> | Usertags:
Source: freecontact
Version: 1.0.21-14
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250416 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in testing (trixie), your package failed
to build on armel.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]
Source: rjava
Version: 1.0-11-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250416 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in testing (trixie), your package failed
to build on armel.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> archiver:
Source: java3d
Version: 1.5.2+dfsg-18
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250416 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in testing (trixie), your package failed
to build on armel.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: libmypaint
Version: 1.6.0-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250416 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in testing (trixie), your package failed
to build on armel.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[5]: E
Source: libkolabxml
Version: 1.2.1-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250416 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in testing (trixie), your package failed
to build on armel.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[3]:
Source: gfan
Version: 0.7-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250416 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in testing (trixie), your package failed
to build on armel.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: fwupd
Version: 2.0.8-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250416 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in testing (trixie), your package failed
to build on armhf.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> cc -Iplugins/mo
Source: dosbox-x
Version: 2025.02.01+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250416 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in testing (trixie), your package failed
to build on armhf.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> gc
Source: selint
Version: 1.5.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250416 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in testing (trixie), your package failed
to build on armhf.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: r-cran-webgestaltr
Version: 0.4.6-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250416 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in testing (trixie), your package failed
to build on armhf.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> ma
Source: mdanalysis
Version: 2.9.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250416 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in testing (trixie), your package failed
to build on armhf.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> testsuite/
Source: openvdb
Version: 10.0.1-2.3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250416 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in testing (trixie), your package failed
to build on arm64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[3]: E
Source: thunderbird
Version: 1:128.9.0esr-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250416 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in testing (trixie), your package failed
to build on arm64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> ma
Source: python-msgspec
Version: 0.19.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250416 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in testing (trixie), your package failed
to build on arm64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debi
Source: kicad
Version: 9.0.1+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250416 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in testing (trixie), your package failed
to build on arm64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: E
Source: firefox-esr
Version: 128.9.0esr-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250416 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in testing (trixie), your package failed
to build on arm64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make
Source: ceph
Version: 18.2.4+ds-13
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250416 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in testing (trixie), your package failed
to build on arm64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[4]: En
Source: mdds
Version: 2.1.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250414 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in testing (trixie), your package failed
to build on i386.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[8]: Entering
Source: r-cran-dbitest
Version: 1.8.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250414 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in testing (trixie), your package failed
to build on i386.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian
Source: etlcpp
Version: 20.39.4+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250414 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in testing (trixie), your package failed
to build on i386.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> cd /buil
On 15/04/25 at 11:47 +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 4/14/25 17:33, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > My logic here is: arch:all can be used on all architectures. It's not
> > always easy, from a build failure, to understand if failing to build
> > translates to failing to wor
Source: pytest-regressions
Version: 2.5.0+ds-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250414 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in testing (trixie), your package failed
to build on i386.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: r-cran-lubridate
Version: 1.9.4+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250414 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in testing (trixie), your package failed
to build on i386.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: terminaltexteffects
Version: 0.12.0+ds-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250414 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in testing (trixie), your package failed
to build on i386.
Relevant part (hopefully):
Source: rosbags
Version: 0.10.6-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250414 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in testing (trixie), your package failed
to build on i386.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules
Source: golang-github-henrydcase-nobs
Version: 0.1+git20200305.7d891c7-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250414 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in testing (trixie), your package failed
to build on i386.
Rel
Hi,
On 14/04/25 at 16:35 +0200, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> not the maintainer, but having two questions:
>
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 01:28:57PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > Source: gnocchi
> > Version: 4.6.5-1
>
> > During a rebuild of al
Source: r-cran-rstanarm
Version: 2.32.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250414 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in testing (trixie), your package failed
to build on i386.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[
Source: golang-github-teris-io-shortid
Version: 1.0+git20171029.771a37c-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250414 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in testing (trixie), your package failed
to build on i386.
Re
Source: r-cran-themis
Version: 1.0.3-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250414 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in testing (trixie), your package failed
to build on i386.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/
Source: r-cran-tidyverse
Version: 2.0.0+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250414 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in testing (trixie), your package failed
to build on i386.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: golang-github-xorcare-pointer
Version: 1.2.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250414 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in testing (trixie), your package failed
to build on i386.
Relevant part (hopefu
Source: damo
Version: 2.7.5-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250414 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in testing (trixie), your package failed
to build on i386.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Hi Sebastian,
On 14/04/25 at 11:54 +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
>
> > severity 1103109 important
> Bug #1103109 [src:rust-imagepipe] rust-imagepipe: FTBFS in testing/i386:
> dh_auto_test: error: /usr/share/cargo/bin/cargo test --all
Source: libbioparser-dev
Version: 3.1.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250414 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in testing (trixie), your package failed
to build on i386.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[
Source: valijson
Version: 1.0.3+repack-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250414 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in testing (trixie), your package failed
to build on i386.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[3
Source: parallel-hashmap
Version: 1.4.1+ds-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250414 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in testing (trixie), your package failed
to build on i386.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /u
Source: eigen3
Version: 3.4.0-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250414 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in testing (trixie), your package failed
to build on i386.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> cd
> /build/re
Source: golang-google-api
Version: 0.61.0-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250414 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in testing (trixie), your package failed
to build on i386.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: rust-wide
Version: 0.7.32-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250414 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in testing (trixie), your package failed
to build on i386.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rul
Source: golang-github-go-kit-kit
Version: 0.13.0-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20250414 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in testing (trixie), your package failed
to build on i386.
Relevant part (hopefully)
1 - 100 of 10195 matches
Mail list logo