Hi,
On 01/30/2016 02:35 AM, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
Please try again with the 15.12 driver that is now available in
unstable, testing, and jessie-backports.
I'm sorry to say that according to bug #767673, I still can't run
gnome-shell with fglrx, so I can't retest this issue.
Sorry,
Jozsef
On 01/30/2016 02:47 AM, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
On 2014-11-01 20:45, MARTON Jozsef wrote:
Package: fglrx-driver
Version: 1:14.9+ga14.201-2
Clean Jessie install with fglrx and linux-image-3.16-3 amd64 as of 2014-11-01,
using DI-7.7 Beta 2.
Please try again with the 15.12 driver that is now
On 11/02/2014 11:06 AM, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
And why should this be a bug in fglrx?
fglrx works without gnome-shell (i.e. xfce4 runs smoothly). gnome-shell
works without fglrx. So the problem should be somewhere at their
interaction.
I don't much of RRChangeOutputProperty, but I thought t
On 09/24/2014 10:01 PM, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
Am 04.03.2014 um 09:46 schrieb Jozsef Marton:
If I preload libgtk-x11-2.0.so, amdcccle works, but software
acceleration check fails and the following messages are produced on the
terminal.
root@:/# LD_PRELOAD=/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgtk
If I preload libgtk-x11-2.0.so, amdcccle works, but software
acceleration check fails and the following messages are produced on the
terminal.
root@:/# LD_PRELOAD=/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
amdcccle
(gnome-session-check-accelerated:11091): Gtk-ERROR **: GTK+ 2.x symbo
ncpmount (and possibly other components from ncpfs) needs to be
installed setuid root to function correctly when run as ordinary user.
running ncpmount as ordinary user leads to the error message:
ncpmount must be installed suid root
The same for ncpumount:
ncpumount must be installed suid roo
On 2012-12-18 00:08, Roger Leigh wrote:
A fixed version of sysvinit has now been uploaded. Note that it's
much simpler than the above patch. All you need to do is add an
entry for /dev/shm in /etc/fstab as documented in fstab(5), i.e.
tmpfs /dev/shm tmpfs nosuid,nodev,size=40%,mode=17
0:14:51PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 11:45:48PM +0100, Jozsef Marton wrote:
How is Oracle testing for the presence of /dev/shm? Their check is
obviously broken, but it would be helpful to know what exactly they
are doing. strace would be useful here.
strace showed the foll
Package: initscripts
Version: 2.88dsf-32
Severity: important
Tags: patch
After the transition to /run/shm from its previous location at /dev/shm, a
symlink was created for compatibility reasons:
/dev/shm -> /run/shm
In this configuration Oracle Database 11g XE refuses to start with the
followin
9 matches
Mail list logo