Package: nscd
Version: 2.7-10
I think I have found a couple closely related long-standing bugs related
to flushing the caches in the init script for nscd:
1. Can't flush the cache when nscd isn't running
Using /etc/init.d/nscd reload|restart is supposed to invalidate, or
flush, the caches for t
Hi Stephan,
On Fri, 13 Jul 2007, Stephen Gran wrote:
Most of the work has been done. It's a little hamepered by the fact
that I'm in the middle of a 6K mile trip right now, but as soon as I get
somewhere with reasonable upload speed, I plan to upload.
That's wonderful news, thanks so much fo
Package: clamav
Version: 0.90.3-2
Severity: wishlist
Hello,
You're probably already aware of this, but v0.91 has been released which
among other things fixes the incredibly slow startup time of clamscan.
Would you please package it at your earliest convenience? Thank you
very much for your
Package: mailscanner
Version: 4.58.9-2
Severity: wishlist
Hello,
I'd really like to try out the built-in support for clamd that newer
versions of Mailscanner contain. It looks like 4.59.4 is the latest
"stable" version that should do the trick. It's probably already on
your radar, but just
Hi David & Sylvain,
On Sat, 26 Aug 2006, david.cobac wrote:
a new version is available with english support.
But...only sources are available.
The .deb will appear as soon as Sylvain has time to produce it !
Thanks very much guys, that's great!
Jason
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROT
Hi Sylvain,
On Wed, 23 Aug 2006, Sylvain Beucler wrote:
Slipped my mind! :)
Currently the UI is in French only, but I contacted David about l10n.
Great, thanks for confirming that I'm not doing something wrong. I'll
leave this one in your capable hands.
Jason
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Package: page-crunch
Version: 0.9.5-1
Severity: important
Tags: l10n
Hello,
I just read the latest Debian Weekly News newsletter and eagerly
installed page-crunch, looking forward to a nice front-end. Thanks
for taking the time to package it up for us!
When I ran the program though I was gre
Hi Bdale,
FYI, you mistyped the bug number for this one. It's 361716, not 361715.
So your email got appended to a GCC bug. More info below...
On Thu, 1 Jun 2006, Bdale Garbee wrote:
I have several questions for those of you seeing this problem, to try
and get to the root cause. I don't us
Hi Colin,
I'm no Debian bugs expert but it appears to me that you mistyped the bug
number when you tried to reassign this one to 'xorg'. If that's the case
would you please try again so it gets on the radar of the Xorg developers?
Thanks!
Jason
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
Hello,
I'm seeing what seems like the same problem. Everything was fine with
v2.4.5 and the only part of our configuration that I changed was to use
the tape splitting support. When 'amcheck -m ' runs via a file in
/etc/cron.d/ then no email is sent. The cron job is being run as verified
b
Debian packages? Is the official maintainer
going to help you out? No offense, but I'm little leery of using
someone's first ever Debian packages for our organization's backup system.
:)
Jason Maas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscrib
Package: amanda
Severity: normal
Hello,
I'm submitting this request to get one into the BTS about the latest
version. Please package v2.5 of AMANDA at your earliest convenience.
It sounds like this new version is a major new release and we're
particularly interested in the media spanning ca
Hello,
I can recreate this problem using the latest Debian Balsa and UW-imap
packages which both depend on 'libssl0.9.8' I can also recreate this
problem using Pine built against libssl0.9.8. I think this bug isn't
really a Balsa bug but rather it's libssl0.9.8 bug #338006. Here is a
link:
Hello,
I'm seeing SSL problems which I believe are caused by the bug in this
report. I'm using Pine built w/OpenSSL 0.9.8 via the 'pine-tracker'
package and I'm getting all sorts of SSL errors when connecting to the
latest 'uw-imapd' and 'postfix' servers, all from the sid distribution.
The
Hello,
I had another thought about the OOo v2.0.0 situation which has probably
been mentioned before, but I'll toss it out there anyway:
What about continuing to package both v1 and v2 of OOo for the time being?
(and ideally allowing them to both be installed) That way people could
choose b
Hi Rene,
On Tue, 25 Oct 2005, Rene Engelhard wrote:
Yes, you are the fourth person now writing a bug for that
Thanks for the quick reply! I'm sorry that I reported a duplicate bug. I
did look around at some of the Debian packages but I didn't see anything
reported against the new v2.0
Package: openoffice.org-help-en
Severity: important
Thanks so much for your quick work packaging the final release of OOo
2.0! I installed it and everything looks really nice, except that the
online help seems to be missing. If I'm doing something wrong then I
apologize in advance.
It seems th
17 matches
Mail list logo
