Bug#870490: RFS: fizsh/1.0.9-1 (already in Debian)

2017-08-02 Thread Guido van Steen
fizsh": * Package name: fizsh Version : 1.0.9-1 Upstream Author : Guido van Steen (myself) * URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/fizsh/ * License : Modified BSD License Section : shells It builds those binary packages: fizsh - Friendly I

Bug#704863: fizsh: New version available

2014-10-24 Thread Guido van Steen
Package: fizsh Followup-For: Bug #704863 -- System Information: Debian Release: 7.7 APT prefers stable-updates APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.16-0.bpo.2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_U

Bug#745135: Top 10 reasons you should sponsor MariaDB 10.0 into Debian this weekend (Re: Bug#745135: RFS: mariadb-10.0/10.0.13-1 [ITP] -- Latest version of worlds most popular non-Oracle database)

2014-09-23 Thread Guido van Steen
> You are talking about: > E: mariadb-10.0 source: missing-build-dependency dpkg-dev (>= 1.16.1~) I had not looked into it yet. Your explanation about this convinces me. Moreover, the following Lintian bug has been reported more than a year ago: see https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bu

Bug#745135: Top 10 reasons you should sponsor MariaDB 10.0 into Debian this weekend (Re: Bug#745135: RFS: mariadb-10.0/10.0.13-1 [ITP] -- Latest version of worlds most popular non-Oracle database)

2014-09-23 Thread Guido van Steen
Dear Otto, I would like Mariadb to be accepted before the freeze as well. However I am not a DD, so I cannot sponsor it myself. In order to get Mariadb sponsored you might handle at least the Lintian error (https://lintian.debian.org/tags/build-depends-on-obsolete-package.html, http://labs.serav

Bug#759742: (RFS: tkinfo/2.8-5 [ITA, RC])

2014-08-31 Thread Guido van Steen
Hi Peter, } I've now used a sed extract for changelog.gz, as I want to preserve the } upstream README as originally named. } (If I copy it intact I get a duplicate file warning) This solution sounds sane to me. Best wishes, Guido

Bug#759742: (RFS: tkinfo/2.8-5 [ITA, RC])

2014-08-30 Thread Guido van Steen
should install this specific README file (in which upstream records its changes) as "/usr/share/doc/tkinfo/changelog.gz". Best wishes, Guido van Steen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#752301: RFS: fizsh/1.0.7-1 (already in Debian)

2014-06-22 Thread Guido van Steen
Upstream Author : Guido van Steen (myself) * URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/fizsh/ * License : Modified BSD License Section : shells It builds those binary packages: * fizsh - Friendly Interactive ZSHell The Fizsh packages provides an easy interface to Zsh

Bug#751048: Sponsorship of newer Fizsh package

2014-06-16 Thread Guido van Steen
Hi Axel, } Thanks for the notice. Maybe this was the cause of this unexpected } closing of this bug report... Then again "Package fizsh has been } removed from mentors." sounded as if it was removed from mentors and } not updated... This may have happened because the original bug report explicitl

Bug#751048: Sponsorship of newer Fizsh package

2014-06-16 Thread Guido van Steen
Hi Axel, I noticed some bugs in version 1.0.6 of fizsh. Most of them were related to my treatment of autoconf and friends. Therefore, I decided to release version 1.0.7, which corrects these bugs. I have also uploaded the new version to mentors: > dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/mai

Bug#751048: Sponsorship of newer Fizsh package

2014-06-11 Thread Guido van Steen
kage to have > the version 1.0.6-1, too.) > > On Sun, Jun 08, 2014 at 11:21:03AM +0200, Guido van Steen wrote: > > I have just uploaded a new version of Fizsh to Sourceforge. This is > version > > 1.0.6. I have also uploaded the corresponding Debian source package to >

Bug#751048: RFS: fizsh/1.0.6-1 (already in Debian)

2014-06-09 Thread Guido van Steen
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "fizsh". * Package name: fizsh Version : 1.0.6-1 Upstream Author : Guido van Steen (myself) * URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/fizsh/

Bug#658478: tesseract: no tesseract-ocr-dev -> libtesseract-dev upgrade path

2012-02-27 Thread Guido van Steen
>>3) Users who have tesseract-ocr-dev installed will be left with their >>old version on upgrade, unless they install libtesseract-dev manually. > >Correct me if I am wrong, but won't apt-get dist-upgrade also take >care of this? I have a Replaces line in the new package. What else >would you sugge

Bug#575881: Dbus generates an empty hex string in /var/lib/dbus/machine-id

2012-02-26 Thread Guido van Steen
This bug still exists after more nearly two years. Is the maintainer willing to do something about it? Thanks! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#658204: RFS: bibtool -- tool for BibTeX database manipulation

2012-02-15 Thread Guido van Steen
> I tried to fix the warnings emitted by lintian, but the lintian on my > boxdoes not report the one above: > how can I reproduce this report. Use the Lintian version in backports (or in Sid). Do not use the version in Stable. It is not updated. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-req

Bug#599045: Get tesseract to compile with configure --disable-multiple-libraries

2011-10-26 Thread Guido van Steen
> If you want I can provide my compile log for reference. Thank you. I would be interested. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#526402: bash: syntax highlighting would be pretty and useful

2011-09-17 Thread Guido van Steen
The developers of bash never showed a lot of interest for the feature you request (http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash/2009-08/msg00019.html). You might try fizsh instead, which provides a zsh implementation of syntax-highlighting. Fizsh is available in Debian unstable ( http://packages.deb

Bug#641203: olpc-powerd: does not provide a man page

2011-09-11 Thread Guido van Steen
Thanks for explaining the difference between "should" and "must" to me! It was the English version, which is not my native language. Still, I should have read better. Best wishes, Guido

Bug#641203: olpc-powerd: does not provide a man page

2011-09-11 Thread Guido van Steen
Dear Adam, On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 9:50 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Violations of "should" directives in policy are not RC bugs. You are the release manager, so you must be right about this. However, I was guided by reportbug, which told me that violations of "should" directives are serious. I

Bug#641204: olpc-powerd: should list the "dialog" package (at least) as a suggested package

2011-09-11 Thread Guido van Steen
Package: olpc-powerd Version: 23-2 Severity: important 1) "sudo powerd-config" yields: [sudo] password for nerd: powerd-config: the 'dialog' program isn't available, quitting. Use a text editor to edit profiles under /etc/olpc-powerd, and (re)activate them with: 'powerd-config profilename'

Bug#641203: olpc-powerd: does not provide a man page

2011-09-11 Thread Guido van Steen
Package: olpc-powerd Version: 23-2 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 12.1 See subject -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0.2 APT prefers stable-updates APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)

Bug#611084: ITP: fizsh -- Friendly Interactive ZSHell

2011-01-25 Thread Guido van Steen
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Guido van Steen * Package name: fizsh Version : 1.0.1-1 Upstream Author : Guido van Steen * URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/fizsh/ * License : BSD Programming Lang: Shell Description : Friendly Interactive