Bug#344385: Work with latest version

I no longer see this bug feel free to close it. Grahame -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#344385: Works in iceweasel version 2.0.0.7-2

I'm happy for the bug to be closed, I no longer see this problem. Thanks for your time. Grahame -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#337701: gsnes9x: looks for a joystick at /dev/js0 when the defualt location seems to be at /dev/input/js0

On Sunday 06 November 2005 22:37, Alain Schröder wrote: > Am Samstag, den 05.11.2005, 20:47 + schrieb Grahame: > > I'm using udev but I'm not sure if it's that that is assigning the > > gamepad to > > /dev/input/js0 > > Since devfs there was a migration from /dev/js0 to /dev/input/js0. > Althou

Bug#328950: libhal-storage0: Fails to install

On Sunday 18 September 2005 12:31, you wrote: > On Sun, Sep 18, 2005 at 12:06:05PM +0100, Grahame wrote: > > Version 0.4.8-7 fails to upgrade with the following error: > > dpkg-query: parse error, in file `/var/lib/dpkg/status' near line 8587 > > package `libhal-storage0': `Depends' field, referenc

Bug#312412: [Logcheck-devel] Bug#312412: logcheck: Fails to read files under /var/log/mail/

On Tuesday 19 July 2005 18:04, maximilian attems wrote: > On Tue, 19 Jul 2005, Grahame White wrote: > > On Tuesday 19 July 2005 17:48, maximilian attems wrote: > > ok. > but does look like removed and not purged after install. > you can check the dpkg status, what does

Bug#312412: [Logcheck-devel] Bug#312412: logcheck: Fails to read files under /var/log/mail/

On Tuesday 19 July 2005 17:48, maximilian attems wrote: > On Tue, 19 Jul 2005, Grahame White wrote: > > > > I'm using exim4, and yes the change you suggested seems to have fixed > > the problem. > > > > > i guess so, as nobody uses that group the permis

Bug#312412: [Logcheck-devel] Bug#312412: logcheck: Fails to read files under /var/log/mail/

On Tuesday 19 July 2005 13:58, maximilian attems wrote: > On Tue, 19 Jul 2005, Grahame White wrote: > > On Tuesday 19 July 2005 13:06, you wrote: > > > On Tue, 19 Jul 2005, Grahame White wrote: > > > > > > > drwxrws--- 2 root smmsp 1024 Jul 19 06:30 /var

Bug#312412: [Logcheck-devel] Bug#312412: logcheck: Fails to read files under /var/log/mail/

On Tuesday 19 July 2005 13:06, you wrote: > On Tue, 19 Jul 2005, Grahame White wrote: > > On Tuesday 19 July 2005 12:07, maximilian attems wrote: > > > > > > > > On Wed, 08 Jun 2005, Grahame white wrote: > > > > > > Since upgrading from woody t

Bug#312412: [Logcheck-devel] Bug#312412: logcheck: Fails to read files under /var/log/mail/

On Tuesday 19 July 2005 12:07, maximilian attems wrote: > thanks for your further feadback. > > On Wed, 08 Jun 2005, Grahame White wrote: > > On Wednesday 08 June 2005 13:11, maximilian attems wrote: > > > On Wed, 08 Jun 2005, Grahame white wrote: > > > > Sinc

Bug#312194: Strace of k3b

I've attached the output of an strace of k3b. execve("/usr/bin/k3b", ["k3b"], [/* 32 vars */]) = 0 uname({sys="Linux", node="borgmania", ...}) = 0 brk(0) = 0x712000 mmap(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 0x2aabf000 access("/et

Bug#315979: Sample page as mentioned in previous message

This simple example was cut 'n pasted from the docs on the vlc website. I then modified it to point at a small sample avi instead of the example url that was included. I've check the avi and it plays fine in vlc so I don't think it's a problem there, but I can send the file if you want, it is p

Bug#312412: [Logcheck-devel] Bug#312412: logcheck: Fails to read files under /var/log/mail/

On Tuesday 21 June 2005 23:14, maximilian attems wrote: > thanks for your provided feedback. > saw no direct hint in the debug info there. > > but i had another idea of what could go wrong. > could you please send the output of belows command as root > # ls -l /var/lib/logcheck > Sure. # ls -l /v

Bug#312412: [Logcheck-devel] Bug#312412: logcheck: Fails to read files under /var/log/mail/

On Wednesday 08 June 2005 13:11, maximilian attems wrote: > On Wed, 08 Jun 2005, Grahame white wrote: > > Since upgrading from woody to sarge I've been getting the following > > apperaring in the reports sent by logcheck: > > > > E: File could not be read: /var/log

Bug#312412: logcheck: Fails to read files under /var/log/mail/

Package: logcheck Severity: normal Since upgrading from woody to sarge I've been getting the following apperaring in the reports sent by logcheck: E: File could not be read: /var/log/mail/mail.err E: File could not be read: /var/log/mail/mail.warn E: File could not be read: /var/log/mail/mail.in

Bug#305272: Further information

XFree86 Version 4.3.0.1 (Debian 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12 2005022119 [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Release Date: 15 August 2003 X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0, Release 6.6 Build Operating System: Linux 2.6.10-9-amd64-k8 x86_64 [ELF] Build Date: 20 February 2005 This version of XFree86 has been extensively mod

Bug#303813: bittornado-gui: Majority of downloads are failing with a corrupted error message

On Saturday 09 April 2005 20:57, you wrote: > Hmm, I had a friend with an amd64 machine try this out and he had no > problems at all (using the updated bittornado I had you try), he got > "download succeeded!" with the md5sum: 21f473605f8aabb8bb54e2ebb09d170b > > Micah I was checking to see what p

Bug#303813: bittornado-gui: Majority of downloads are failing with a corrupted error message

>OK, I've had a couple of torrents running all night and no corruption >errors have appeared so I'm going to say that the updated package fixes >the bug. > >Grahame D'oh, not five minutes after I sent the last message and one of my downloads corrupted. So no the new package doesn't fix the bug

Bug#303813: bittornado-gui: Majority of downloads are failing with a corrupted error message

On Saturday 09 April 2005 00:23, you wrote: > Hello, > > This seems to be a int.size bug on 64bit architectures... I know that > mainline doesn't have this problem, and I *think* that I've got a > patch that fixes this. > > Can you try installing the version of bittornado that is at > http://people

Bug#303813: bittornado-gui: Majority of downloads are failing with a corrupted error message

On Saturday 09 April 2005 00:23, you wrote: > Hello, > > This seems to be a int.size bug on 64bit architectures... I know that > mainline doesn't have this problem, and I *think* that I've got a > patch that fixes this. > > Can you try installing the version of bittornado that is at > http://people

Bug#294891: Just spotted this

>This is a bug in kernel-package 8.120: > >An upgrade to 8.121 will fix the issue. I just spotted this, thanks. Grahame -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#294889: kernel-package locks up when building

On Saturday 12 February 2005 06:28, C.Y.M wrote: > Manoj Srivastava wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Can't reproduce this. Do you have any additional details? Like > > a log of where the "lock up" happened? > > > > manoj > make: *** No rule to make target `conf.vars', needed by > `stamp-configur

Bug#289339: Might be GPL'd

I installed this game on a friend's windows PC and had to agree to a click-through GPL license during the install. This may mean the game is only GPL'd on windows but maybe not. There is no licence listed on the web page or in the source code itself. Grahame -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAI