Bug#767648: openssh-server: "sshd -T" outputs wrong argument for UsePAM

2014-11-01 Thread Desmond O . Chang
Package: openssh-server Version: 1:6.7p1-2 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, The argument of UsePAM must be "yes" or "no", but "sshd -T" outputs "1" or "0". It causes "sshd -T" always fails on any file generated by "sshd -T". -- System Information: Debian Release: jessie/sid APT prefers uns

Bug#691363: RFS: stumpwm/1:20111204.gitb1271a9-1

2012-10-24 Thread Desmond O. Chang
ve bundled asdf.lisp . * debian/control + Upgrade Standards-Version to 3.9.3 -- Desmond O. Chang Tue, 23 Oct 2012 01:12:50 +0800 Regards, Desmond O. Chang -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trou

Bug#691361: RFS: common-lisp-controller/7.10

2012-10-24 Thread Desmond O. Chang
on (Closes: #690786). -- Desmond O. Chang Thu, 25 Oct 2012 01:34:43 +0800 Regards, Desmond O. Chang -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#673932: emacsen-common: emacs-snapshot installation failed with emacsen-common/2.0.2

2012-05-21 Thread Desmond O . Chang
Package: emacsen-common Version: 2.0.2 Severity: grave emacs-snapshot/2:20120521-1 cannot be installed on my system. Downgrading it to 2:20120510-1 also failed. Downgrading emacsen-common to 1.4.23 fixed this issue. The attachment is installation log. Install apel for emacs-snapshot install/ape

Bug#668375: RFS: common-lisp-controller/7.9

2012-04-11 Thread Desmond O . Chang
is command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/common-lisp-controller/common-lisp-controller_7.9.dsc Changes since the last upload: common-lisp-controller (7.9) unstable; urgency=low [ Desmond O. Chang ] * debian/control + update Standards-Version to 3.9.3 * deb

Bug#649707: stumpwm: StumpWM crashes after upgrade to GDM3

2011-12-13 Thread Desmond O. Chang
Deepak Tripathi writes: > Hi Tested the m.d.n version , its working now. Also tested clfwwm and > found that "Component" bug is still not fixed. I need to upgrade asdf. > > Can you make /debian/control file in such a way that it will take > upgraded version. >From stumpwm/1:20110819.gitca08e08-2

Bug#651034: override: stumpwm:x11/optional

2011-12-04 Thread Desmond O . Chang
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal stumpwm_20110819.gitca08e08-2_all.deb: package says section is x11, override says devel. Stumpwm is mainly used as a standalone window manager instead of a library. Please change the override. Thanks, Des -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dis

Bug#649707: stumpwm: StumpWM crashes after upgrade to GDM3

2011-11-30 Thread Desmond O. Chang
Deepak Tripathi writes: > Desmond, > Please find the information below. >> What's the value of this: >> >> (asdf::flatten-source-registry) >> > > * (asdf::flatten-source-registry) > > ((#P"/usr/lib/sbcl/" :RECURSE T :EXCLUDE > (".bzr" ".cdv" ".git" ".hg" ".pc" ".svn" "CVS" "RCS" "SCCS" "_darc

Bug#649707: stumpwm: StumpWM crashes after upgrade to GDM3

2011-11-29 Thread Desmond O. Chang
Deepak Tripathi writes: > Desmond, > > I don't think that this could be an issue, I have .sbclrc file with the > following information. > > (require 'asdf) > > Now if you run sbcl and type (find-package :asdf) it will return you > true. What's the value of this: (asdf::flatten-source-registry

Bug#649707: stumpwm: StumpWM crashes after upgrade to GDM3

2011-11-24 Thread Desmond O. Chang
Deepak Tripathi writes: > Package: stumpwm > Version: 1:20110819.gitca08e08-1 > Severity: grave > > Dear Maintainer, > I have updated my system to gdm3/gnome3 and after upgrading stumpwm has > not been functioning properly. At first glace i thought its a StumWm bug > but later when i installed fr

Bug#648415: clfswm executable fails to start

2011-11-11 Thread Desmond O. Chang
"Jose A. Ortega Ruiz" writes: > On Fri, Nov 11 2011, Desmond O. Chang wrote: > >> Jose Antonio Ortega Ruiz writes: >> >>> The following error: >>> >>>*** - LOAD: A file with name >>> /usr/share/common-lisp/source/cl-asdf/asdf

Bug#648415: clfswm executable fails to start

2011-11-11 Thread Desmond O. Chang
Jose Antonio Ortega Ruiz writes: > The following error: > >*** - LOAD: A file with name > /usr/share/common-lisp/source/cl-asdf/asdf.lisp does not exist > > This happens with any invocation of clfswm, no need to call it via startx. Are you using clisp? Is cl-asdf installed? clfswm doesn't

Bug#647544: Component clfswm not found

2011-11-05 Thread Desmond O. Chang
Hi, Simon Chopin writes: > Package: clfswm > Version: 20111015.git51b0a02-1 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > > Hi, > > When trying to start clfswm, I just get this error message and then the > program exits : > > *** - Component "clfswm" not found > It's a bug f

Bug#625979: emms: Installation hangs if /root/.emacs.d/emms doesn't exist

2011-05-11 Thread Desmond O. Chang
[ CC the maintainer for emacs-snapshot. ] On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 11:31, Arnaud Fontaine wrote: > tags 625979 + unreproducible > thanks > > Hello, > > I cannot reproduce  the issue with the current version  of Emacs in Sid, > namely  23.3+1-1,  after  purging  the installed  package  and  removing

Bug#625979: emms: Installation hangs if /root/.emacs.d/emms doesn't exist

2011-05-07 Thread Desmond O . Chang
Package: emms Version: 3.0+20110418+1.4a15eea-1 Severity: important Emms installation hangs after the following messages: Setting up emms (3.0+20110418+1.4a15eea-1) ... emacsen-common: Handling install of emacsen flavor emacs emacsen-common: Handling install of emacsen flavor emacs-snapshot emacs

Bug#624636: stumpwm: sbcl hangs if asdf has already been loaded

2011-04-30 Thread Desmond O. Chang
Hi Kanru, On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 16:51, Kan-Ru Chen wrote: > > My meager patch attached. Thank you for your patch. But I decide to make a big change. I move those startup options into /usr/lib/stumpwm/load.lisp. I hope this can simplify /usr/bin/stumpwm. I have uploaded a new version to men

Bug#624472: stumpwm: Cannot run /usr/bin/stumpwm

2011-04-28 Thread Desmond O . Chang
Package: stumpwm Version: 1:20110313.gitb77c69a-1 Severity: important Some lisp implementations have dropped CLC package. This makes /usr/bin/stumpwm unusable. We should use ASDF facilities instead. -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'un

Bug#617501: clisp does not run, claims to be missing a required file

2011-03-18 Thread Desmond O. Chang
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 03:24, Agustin Martin wrote: > > Does this mean that this bug report really belongs to clisp? I think so. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#617501: clisp does not run, claims to be missing a required file

2011-03-11 Thread Desmond O. Chang
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 00:42, Peter Van Eynde wrote: > I'm all in favor of your work and I think that you are doing the right > thing, but I'm missing the following: > > - documenting what lisp packages should do > - documenting what lisp implementation should do > - documenting how users can us

Bug#616676: dh-lisp: Variable $implementation needs a declaration/initialization

2011-03-06 Thread Desmond O. Chang
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 03:42, Christoph Egger wrote: > "Desmond O. Chang" writes: >> dh_lisp doesn't work in 0.7.0.  The error message is: >> >> Global symbol "$implementation" requires explicit package name at >> /usr/bin/dh_lisp line 158.

Bug#616676: dh-lisp: Variable $implementation needs a declaration/initialization

2011-03-06 Thread Desmond O. Chang
Package: dh-lisp Version: 0.7.0 Severity: important dh_lisp doesn't work in 0.7.0. The error message is: Global symbol "$implementation" requires explicit package name at /usr/bin/dh_lisp line 158. Global symbol "$implementation" requires explicit package name at /usr/bin/dh_lisp line 158. Exe

Bug#616631: stumpwm: SBCL cannot load contrib/cpu.lisp in linux kernel 2.6.37

2011-03-05 Thread Desmond O. Chang
Package: stumpwm Version: 1:20110213.git34362e5-1 Severity: normal The error message is: The value NIL is not of type (OR (VECTOR CHARACTER) (VECTOR NIL) BASE-STRING PATHNAME FILE-STREAM). Since "/proc/acpi/thermal_zone/" has gone in linux kernel 2.6.37, the following sexp: (PATHNAME-D

Bug#616309: ITP: clfswm -- A(nother) Common Lisp FullScreen Window Manager

2011-03-03 Thread Desmond O. Chang
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: "Desmond O. Chang" * Package name: clfswm Version : 20110227.git98bbb72 Upstream Author : Philippe Brochard * URL : http://common-lisp.net/project/clfswm/ * License : GPL3 Programming Lang: Common Lisp D

Bug#608017: closed by doch...@gmail.com (Desmond O. Chang) (Bug#608017: fixed in stumpwm 1:20110213.git34362e5-1)

2011-03-01 Thread Desmond O. Chang
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 15:25, servilio wrote: > On 1 March 2011 02:56, Desmond O. Chang wrote: >> Hi servilio, >> >> On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 18:58, servilio wrote: >>> >>> This is a problem in the clisp package, CLX works in 2.48, but not in >&g

Bug#608017: closed by doch...@gmail.com (Desmond O. Chang) (Bug#608017: fixed in stumpwm 1:20110213.git34362e5-1)

2011-02-28 Thread Desmond O. Chang
Hi servilio, On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 18:58, servilio wrote: > > This is a problem in the clisp package, CLX works in 2.48, but not in > 2.49 even with clisp-module-clx installed: How do you start stumpwm? If you exec /usr/bin/stumpwm, it should work. If you load stumpwm in repl, you have to (r

Bug#614571: SBCL goes into repl after stumpwm exits

2011-02-22 Thread Desmond O. Chang
Package: stumpwm Version: 1:20100709.gitf6262b0-1 Severity: normal This causes that X cannot exit after stumpwm exits. The command should have "--eval '(quit)'" at the end. -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i38

Bug#609047: ITP: ccl - Clozure CL

2011-01-12 Thread Desmond O. Chang
Hi Darren, On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 03:16, Darren Hoo wrote: > * URL             : http://www.clozure.com/clozurecl.html I think http://ccl.clozure.com/ provides more information. > For now I have built the packages that can work with > Common Lisp Controller setup ie, install-clc, remove-clc >

Bug#607910: ITP: libfixposix -- Replacement for inconsistent parts of POSIX

2010-12-23 Thread Desmond O. Chang
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: "Desmond O. Chang" * Package name: libfixposix Version : 20101223.git080e618 Upstream Author : Stelian Ionescu * URL : http://common-lisp.net/project/iolib/ * License : BSL Programming Lang: C D

Bug#560963: cl-cffi: Loading cffi fails

2010-12-21 Thread Desmond O. Chang
forcemerge 560781 560963 thanks This bug should be closed since it's the same as #560781. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#568062: Prompted for "changed" configuration file /etc/lisp-config.lisp

2010-12-21 Thread Desmond O. Chang
forcemerge 601957 568062 thanks This bug should be closed since it's the same as #601957. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#606785: stumpwm: package fails to upgrade properly from lenny

2010-12-21 Thread Desmond O. Chang
Hi gregor, On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 23:28, gregor herrmann wrote: > On Mon, 20 Dec 2010 23:15:55 +0800, Desmond O. Chang wrote: > >> > What surprises me is that common-lisp-controller _does_ depend on >> > adduser. Do we need a Pre-Depends here since adduser is used in

Bug#606785: stumpwm: package fails to upgrade properly from lenny

2010-12-20 Thread Desmond O. Chang
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 04:15, gregor herrmann wrote: > > What surprises me is that common-lisp-controller _does_ depend on > adduser. Do we need a Pre-Depends here since adduser is used in the > .preinst? Or moving adduser to 'postinst configure'? Which one is right? Thanks, Des -- To UNSU

Bug#606067: unblock: cl-asdf/2:2.011-1

2010-12-18 Thread Desmond O. Chang
On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 23:29, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > Most of his answer seemed to be about why we should accept the newer > version of cl-asdf rather than the source format change; "lintian didn't > like the empty diff.gz" and "people on IRC told me to do it" aren't the > greatest of reasonin

Bug#606067: unblock: cl-asdf/2:2.011-1

2010-12-18 Thread Desmond O. Chang
> > It seems that both you and Mehdi don't receive the author's mail.  His > mail has been sent to debbugs.  Do I need to forward it to you? Hi, I have to confirm again. Did you receive the mails from the author and me? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with

Bug#606067: unblock: cl-asdf/2:2.011-1

2010-12-12 Thread Desmond O. Chang
Hi Adam, On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 03:40, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 10:35 +0800, Desmond O. Chang wrote: >> >> I will contact the author and let him decide. > > Any news on that? It seems that both you and Mehdi don't receive the author's m

Bug#606067: unblock: cl-asdf/2:2.011-1

2010-12-06 Thread Desmond O. Chang
Hi, On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 05:44, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: > On 12/06/2010 07:17 PM, Desmond O. Chang wrote: >>> >>> And, it even (silently) turn the package into a source format 3.0 >>> which isn't acceptable at this point of the freeze. >> >> Do you m

Bug#606067: unblock: cl-asdf/2:2.011-1

2010-12-06 Thread Desmond O. Chang
Hi Mehdi, On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 17:06, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: > > I might have skipped something. Could you please explain why it's > important to have this version in Squeeze? and which rc-bugs does it > fix? (It looks like "none" but I could be wrong). The upstream author uses the rolling releas

Bug#606068: unblock: common-lisp-controller/7.5

2010-12-05 Thread Desmond O. Chang
cl-asdf (>= 2:2.009-1) + Suggests: darcs for 'clc-clbuild setup' (Closes: #578740). -- Desmond O. Chang Wed, 24 Nov 2010 20:37:16 +0800 common-lisp-controller (7.4+nmu2) unstable; urgency=high * Non-maintainer upload. * Same as 7.4+nmu1, but also when preinst is invoked

Bug#606067: unblock: cl-asdf/2:2.011-1

2010-12-05 Thread Desmond O. Chang
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package cl-asdf cl-asdf (2:2.011-1) unstable; urgency=low * Mostly same as 2.010.9: several minor tweaks and bug fixes since 2.010. * Will be happier: users of implemen

Bug#601957: pending NMU

2010-11-10 Thread Desmond O. Chang
Hi Serafeim, On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 05:28, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote: > Hi again, > > On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 10:31:29AM +0800, Desmond O. Chang wrote [edited]: >> I have a question about the patch.  If I remove (not purge) c-l-c >> first, I will also encounter the confli

Bug#601957: pending NMU

2010-11-06 Thread Desmond O. Chang
Hi Serafeim, Is it a reasonable patch for the conffile conflict? I think it will delete the file even if user has modified it. I'm looking for the solution about that too. If you ensure your patch is correct, would you please merge it into our git repo? Thanks, Des On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 06:3

Bug#593179: common-lisp-controller: clbuild with ccl fails to use user-writable cache for compiled files

2010-08-19 Thread Desmond O. Chang
What is the value returned by (asdf::compute-output-translations) ? Could you provide your operation? On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 08:32, John Foerch wrote: > Package: common-lisp-controller > Version: 7.2 > Severity: normal > > When clbuild is configured to use ccl (instead of sbcl), during > autoc

Bug#590104: sbcl: fails to install on a xen vps

2010-07-23 Thread Desmond O. Chang
Package: sbcl Version: 1:1.0.18.0-2 Severity: important SBCL falls into LDB when I install it on a xen vps. Here is the output from aptitude: Unpacking sbcl (from .../sbcl_1%3a1.0.18.0-2_i386.deb) ... Processing triggers for man-db ... Setting up sbcl (1:1.0.18.0-2) ... /usr/lib/common-lisp/bin/

Bug#589185: common-lisp-controller - clc:list-systems is missing.

2010-07-21 Thread Desmond O. Chang
2010/7/16 António P. P. Almeida : > Package: common-lisp-controller > Version: 7.2 > Severity: normal > > > The (clc:list-systems) function is not provided in my currently > installed version of clc. Looking at the code I see that the symbol > in question is not exported and there's no function imp

Bug#588294: dh-lisp: fails to link the ASD file

2010-07-06 Thread Desmond O. Chang
Package: dh-lisp Version: 0.6.4 Severity: normal dh_lisp will fails to link the ASD file if the file name has perl regex metacharacters, e.g., the plus character in cl+ssl.asd. Here is a patch: diff --git a/dh_lisp b/dh_lisp index 3ed88bc..e425a4b 100644 --- a/dh_lisp +++ b/dh_lisp @@ -156,7 +15

Bug#587345: Calling `slime-changelog-date' returns nil

2010-06-27 Thread Desmond O. Chang
Package: slime Version: 1:20100605-1 Severity: normal If cl-swank does not exist when I install slime, slime-changelog-date will return nil. Also slime-protocol-version will be nil in the compiled file. This causes that I will be asked for a confirmation when I call slime-connect. I think slime

Bug#546205: cl-asdf: infinite loop in defsystem

2009-09-11 Thread Desmond O. Chang
Package: cl-asdf Version: 1:20090819-2 Severity: important Function parse-component-form invoked by defsystem falls in an infinite loop when it evaluate function %define-component-inline-methods. My patch is included in attachment. -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefer