Hi,
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 05:44, Mehdi Dogguy <me...@dogguy.org> wrote:
> On 12/06/2010 07:17 PM, Desmond O. Chang wrote:
>>>
>>> And, it even (silently) turn the package into a source format 3.0
>>> which isn't acceptable at this point of the freeze.
>>
>> Do you mean it must be 1.0? But common-lisp-controller/7.4+nmu1 in
>> squeeze is 3.0 (native). Is 3.0 (native) different from 3.0
>> (quilt)?
>>
>
> Well, common-lisp-controller is already a 3.0 package in Squeeze but
> cl-asdf isn't yet and it would be great if it can stays a 1.0 package.
I will contact the author and let him decide.
>
> A debdiff on the packages shows:
>
> $ debdiff
> /srv/ftp.debian.org/mirror/pool/main/c/cl-asdf/cl-asdf_2.0{04,11}-1_all.deb
>
> Files in first .deb but not in second
> -------------------------------------
> -rwxr-xr-x root/root DEBIAN/prerm
> lrwxrwxrwx root/root /usr/share/common-lisp/systems/asdf.asd ->
> ../source/cl-asdf/asdf.asd
>
> Is it intentional to drop the symlink?
Yes. This symlink and prerm are created by dh-lisp for ASDF1, they're
needless now. In order to resolve the circular dependency, we no
longer use dh-lisp to build cl-asdf. So it's safe to remove them.
Thanks,
Des
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
