I am unable to reproduce this problem any more
this only happens if AT gets upgraded after RT, still investigating...
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 11:47 AM, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 02:39:38AM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> > Package: rt4-extension-assettracker
> > Version: 2.0.0~b2-4
> > Severity: serious
> > User: de
no objections here
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 2:58 PM, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 07:34:46PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 00:13:41 +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> >
> > > request-tracker3.8 represents an old (in deep maintenance
> > > mode by
I'm preparing a version with the relevant git patches. I guess it will
produce asset tracker binaries for both 3.8 and 4, at least as long as
rt3.8 is in wheezy.
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 9:33 AM, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> Source: rt-extension-assettracker
> Version: 2.0.0~b2-1
> Severity: normal
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Bradley Bell
* Package name: rt-extension-assettracker
Version : 2.0.0~b2
Upstream Author : Todd Chapman
* URL : https://github.com/chakatodd/rt-extension-assettracker
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Perl
Matthias Krüger wrote:
Package: razzle
Version: 970417-8
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
When I type "razzle" in a terminal and press enter it (the terminal) says:
"> svgalib: Cannot get I/O permissions."
and nothing more happens.
You'll get this message if you're running razz
severity 478664 normal
tags 478664 +wontfix
The only way to fix this would be to re-write xrootconsole, so if this
behavior is not acceptable, I recommend using root-tail instead.
-Brad
Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated e
Package: ftp.debian.org
Please remove the obsolete package orbit2cpp from unstable.
thanks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Riku Voipio wrote:
Hi,
I think it might be better to get rid of this unbuildable package than to
fix it. gtkmm2.0 has been superseded by gtkmm2.4. there are only 4 packages
using gtkmm2.0 anymore:
I have no problem with this.
-Brad
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subje
Guus Sliepen wrote:
On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 12:40:15PM -0700, Bradley Bell wrote:
I'm using gtkmm a lot these days and I noticed that upstream has already
released gtkmm 2.10.9. Is there a problem packaging it or are you
perhaps short on time? If you want I can help package gtkmm 2.10.9
Does it work with 2.10.5?
http://shelob.classrooms.washington.edu/~bradleyb/deb/glibmm2.4/
-brad
Simon Fuhrmann wrote:
Package: libgtkmm-2.4-dev
Version: 1:2.8.8-1
Severity: normal
I talked with Murray Cumming in IRC about some code which refuses to compile
after update of libgtkmm-2.4-dev.
ugfix.
+ * New upstream release with new soname (Closes: #330512, #349630, #315967)
+ * No longer build reference documentation, since it's included in tarball.
+ * Fix makefile so that docs/manual/html isn't deleted on clean.
+
+ -- Bradley Bell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sat, 10 Jun 200
You may do an NMU, I will be trying to find a new maintainer for these
packages soon.
-Brad
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
This bug explicitly build-depends on g++ 3.4 on arm, hppa and m68k
because of a bug that has been fixed a long time ago. This bug asking
you to move to gcc 4.x has been open for
Doesn't the 2.0 version need to be a new source and new -dev package, or
are we deliberately forcing the programs which use gtkextra 1.x to be
rewritten for the gtk 2 API?
-brad
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
package: ftp.debian.org
tags: experimental
libglademm2.3 is obsolete and superceeded by libglademm2.4
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nathanael Nerode wrote:
Package: libbonobomm1.3
Severity: wishlist
Replace the build-depends on
libgtkmm2.0-dev (>= 2.2.0-1)
with a build-depends on
libgtkmm2.4-dev
Upstream appears to believe that this works without changes.
This will allow the eventually removal of the obsolete gtkmm2.0 packa
I have rebuilt and uploaded this package to comply with both the "c2"
and "c2a" transitions.
-brad
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tags 340596 +pending
libgtkextra1.0-dev is still in the upload queue. Perhaps I should have waited
before uploading this one.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I should have it uploaded to unstable soon.
-brad
Philipp Kern wrote:
Hi Bradley,
now that atk 1.10 is in unstable (reported in [1]), what still speaks
against the incorporation of the new Gtkmm from experimental into
unstable?
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-b
Gtkmm 2.6.x requires libatk 1.9.x/1.10.x, which is only in experimental at
this time.
-Brad
> -Original Message-
> From: Philipp Kern [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, May 20, 2005 3:46 AM
> To: Debian Bug Tracking System
> Subject: Bug#309901: upload 2.6.x to unstable
>
> Packa
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
linux-wlan-ng is a set of drivers and utilities that is intended to
provide the full range of IEEE 802.11 MAC management capabilities for
use in user-mode utilities and scripts. The package currently supports
the Intersil 802.11b Prism2, Prism2.5, and Prism3 refere
That was entirely my fault, I shouldn't have uploaded this version to
unstable, as atk 1.9.x is still in experimental.
Is there any chance, Akira, that atk 1.9.x or its successor will be uploaded
to unstable very soon, or should I go ahead and force a downgrade of
libgtkmm?
-brad
> -Original
Joshua Kwan wrote:
Package: libgtkmm-2.4-1
Version: 2.6.0-1
Severity: serious
Hello,
Eager to make sure some of my work didn't somehow regress in the
transition from gtkmm 2.4 to 2.6, I tried to install the new libraries
out of incoming:
dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of libgtkmm-2
Gtkmm 2.5.5, which coaster needs, is now in experimental, so there should be
little in the way of packaging coaster now. You may want to have a look at
the coaster packaged here for reference: http://ubuntu.stufenseite.de/Repo/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "
Package: atk1.0
Severity: wishlist
I've had a request to package gtkmm 2.5 (required for coaster:
http://www.coaster-burn.org/) which depends on atk 1.9. If you could
release atk 1.9, (in experimental, probably) that would be great.
-Brad
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers
25 matches
Mail list logo
