On Fri, Mar 21, 2025 at 09:31:26AM -0500, Nicolas Mora wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Le 2025-03-16 à 22 h 27, Ben Collins a écrit :
> >
> > Might be best if I disable mbedtls for now.
> >
> Yet, if I disable MbedTLS, I still have an error on jwt_jwks. The expected
> err
On Fri, Mar 21, 2025 at 09:31:26AM -0500, Nicolas Mora wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Le 2025-03-16 à 22 h 27, Ben Collins a écrit :
> >
> > Might be best if I disable mbedtls for now.
> >
> Yet, if I disable MbedTLS, I still have an error on jwt_jwks. The expected
> err
ch one compiled in.
I have a fix submitted to mbedtls for the rsapss case, but it's been
sitting as a pull-request in GitHub for awhile. Haven't looked into the
one ed curve.
Might be best if I disable mbedtls for now.
--
Ben Collins
https://libjwt.io
https://github.com/benmcollins
--
3EC9 7598 1672 961A 1139 173A 5D5A 57C7 242B 22CF
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 10:55:35AM -0500, Nicolas Mora wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Le 2025-02-13 à 12 h 07, Ben Collins a écrit :
> >
> > I've made these changes.
> >
> Thanks, another set of feedbacks:
>
> ## Source
> The branch debian/unstable is not co
utopkgtests, etc. See
> https://salsa.debian.org/debian-iot-team/oauth2/libjwt/-/pipelines/767178
> for example.
I plan to move to that for the packaging when I get some time.
Thanks again
--
Ben Collins
https://libjwt.io
https://github.com/benmcollins
--
3EC9 7598 1672 961A 1139 173A 5D5A 57C7 242B 22CF
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ben Collins
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: libjwt14
Version : 3.0.0
Upstream Contact: Ben Collins
* URL : https://libjwt.io
* License : MPL-2.0
Programming Lang: C
Description : The
just wanted to have this in Debian
too, so we can make sure we aren't off-by-one on debian/control.
Thanks
On Jul 16, 2012, at 3:22 PM, Christoph Egger wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Ben Collins writes:
>> Package: sbcl
>> Version: 2:1.0.57.0-2
>>
>> I was able to
Package: sbcl
Version: 2:1.0.57.0-2
I was able to bootstrap powerpc without problems using the binaries downloaded
from sbcl.org for linux-ppc. Please bootstrap this and enable powerpc builds.
Thanks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubs
On Wed, 2007-02-28 at 11:09 -0500, Ari Johnson wrote:
> On 2/28/07, Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2007-02-28 at 09:40 -0500, Ari Johnson wrote:
> > > Package: sxid
> > > Version: 4.0.5
> > > Severity: normal
> > >
> >
On Wed, 2007-02-28 at 09:40 -0500, Ari Johnson wrote:
> Package: sxid
> Version: 4.0.5
> Severity: normal
>
> The sxid program e-mails a list of files every day that it claims have
> changed md5sums. The list appears to include every suid or sgid file on
> my system, suggesting that the md5sum co
On Sat, 2006-10-07 at 18:51 +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 27, 2006 at 11:09:55PM +0200, Ben Collins wrote:
> > IMO, the best way to handle this would be just like sshd. It does not
> > generate an RSA on first connection, it does it when the package is
> > insta
Seems to me this really is a bug about how the server installs itself.
IMO, the best way to handle this would be just like sshd. It does not
generate an RSA on first connection, it does it when the package is
installed.
Either generate this initial key at install, or detect that TLS is
enabled in
Package: ssmtp
Version: 2.61-7
Severity: wishlist
Please enable cram-md5 (using the --enable-md5auth configure option) in
ssmtp.
Thanks
--
Ubuntu - http://www.ubuntu.com/
Debian - http://www.debian.org/
Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/
SwissDisk - http://www.swissdisk.com/
--
On Thu, 2006-06-01 at 16:35 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Package: silo
> Version: 1.4.11-0.2
> Severity: serious
>
> The silo bootloader package build-depends on gcc-2.95 at the version
> currently in unstable, making it the only package of any substance which
> does so. The gcc-2.95 package it
ad to prepare a
> fixed package, which you or Frans Pop could upload.
Would be even nice if I could do the upload. Someone will have to NMU
it.
--
Ben Collins
Kernel Developer - Ubuntu Linux
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ns people can't boot their
systems.
--
Ben Collins
Kernel Developer - Ubuntu Linux
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 2006-01-16 at 19:36 -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> Steve downgraded this bug from RC to normal, but the fact is that
> installing debsig-verify does seem to break the whole package
> management system, at least when that system is used with the existing
> Debian archive. Is there a reason not to
hecks for $vars needs better
checking for where spurious $'s.
--
Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Developer
Ubuntu Linux
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Feel free, to take over the package. I was only doing it temporarily since
no one else was at the time.
On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 01:52:57AM -0300, Marcio Teixeira wrote:
> Hi
>
> First release with new upstream available. These are sources.list lines:
>
> deb http://pkg-freebob.alioth.debian.org/
On Mon, Jul 04, 2005 at 03:07:58PM +0200, Piotr Roszatycki wrote:
> On Monday 04 of July 2005 15:03, you wrote:
> > reopen 316573
> > thanks
> >
> > wait, it's broken with the new dpkg-architecture in unstable. Don't
> > depend on the DEB_GNU-* variables in build files, use the DEB_ARCH*
> > variab
And the real question is, why did an NMU change it in the first place.
On Sat, Jul 02, 2005 at 01:11:48AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Package: libnss-db
> Version: 2.2-6.3
> Severity: grave
>
> The last NMU moved /var/lib/misc/Makefile to /var/lib/db/Makefile.
> It's not mentioned in the chang
+0200, frank wrote:
> reopen 311843
> thanks
>
> Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > This was fixed with latest dpkg a long time ago.
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 03, 2005 at 09:09:57PM +0200, Frank Kuester wrote:
> >> Package: debsig-verify
> &g
libncurses5 for sparc64 has been around for a long time. I don't use
anything other than menuconfig, so I can't speak for other ui interfaces.
> There also does not exist the necessary 64-bit versions of the
> graphical libraries needed to use the graphical kernel configurator.
> But one can overr
On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 01:32:54AM -0400, Jim Crilly wrote:
> > >
> > > Make the login environment be sparc32 by default. Doesn't that
> > > solve the problem? And for die-hard 64-bit people like me they
> > > can undo this via some configuration mechanism.
> > >
> > > It is one option.
> >
>
On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 07:27:22PM -0700, David S.Miller wrote:
> From: Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 20:21:57 -0400
>
> > But (and this but is for David), that means users can't simply do
> > "apt-get source foo; cd foo-1.1; dpkg
You're right. Didn't get down that far. As far as I'm concerned, the
default 64-bit is the right thing. But it's hard to convince long time
users that a machine that is 99% 32-bit userspace, should compile 64-bit
binaries by default, when 99% of the time, those same people are going to
want 32-bit.
22, 2005 at 05:30:55AM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> > Can the silo I just uploaded go into testing atleast? It does fix some
> > bugs. In fact, it may fix some of the rc silo bugs, but I need testing
> > with it to make sure (didn't want to claim the bugs were fixed without
&g
Can the silo I just uploaded go into testing atleast? It does fix some
bugs. In fact, it may fix some of the rc silo bugs, but I need testing
with it to make sure (didn't want to claim the bugs were fixed without
testing by others first).
On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 02:54:12AM -0800, Steve Langasek wr
> RC3 is not yet released. Anyway, I don't believe that this is an installer
> problem. After looking at sample tree nodes and discover1 code I came to
> the conclusion that detection fails because it does not handle correctly
> the situation in which there are multiple sbus nodes present in the
Maybe someone could have included me on this bug discussion. The date of
my filing the bug, I downloaded the install-sparc/current/ image to use.
I'm not sure what version that is.
I believe it is rc3, but it may be rc2 (when was rc3 released?). I do know
that I used 2.6 images, and maybe that it
Package: debian-installer
Initial boot worked:[O]
Configure network HW: [E]
Config network: [O]
Detect CD: [O]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives: [E]
Partition hard drives: [O]
Create file systems:[O]
Mount partitions: [O]
Install base system:
31 matches
Mail list logo
