Package: lintian
Version: 2.104.0
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
When building dhcpcd5 version 9.4.1-4 against Stable, Lintian 2.104.0 reports
the following:
I: dhcpcd-base: spelling-error-in-binary usr/sbin/dhcpcd addres address
$ grep -rw addres
$
i.e. not
Package: libx11-6
Version: 2:1.8.1-1
Severity: critical
When upgrading libx11 from 2:1.7.5-1 to 2:1.8.1-1 X will fail in a very
strange way immediately when a modal dialog starts (like pinentry).
I use fvwm and have focus follow mouse. When pinentry starts, the focus
still stays on the window tha
Source: ncbi-igblast
Version: 1.18.0-1
Severity: serious
Usertags: uploaders
ncbi-igblast 1.18.0-1 introduced an invalid Uploaders field, that is
missing a comma between David Miguel Susano Pinto and Steffen Moeller.
$ apt-cache showsrc ncbi-igblast | grep -E '^$|^Version|^Uploaders'
Versio
I managed to get 2.1.15 from the package working for now for putting
int(round()) around numbers in preferences.py and deckconf.py when they
were returning the unexpected float type error. For some reason, even
though it says the package is removed from testing, I am still able to
install the p
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: dog
Version : 0.1.0
Upstream Author : Benjamin Sago
* URL : https://dns.lookup.dog/
* License : EUPL-1.2
Programming Lang: Rust
Description : command-line DNS client with colorful output and support
for D
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: arna...@kali.org
Please remove golang-gopkg-gorethink-gorethink.v3. It currently has
no rdeps in main and has been superseded by golang-gopkg-rethinkdb-
rethinkdb-go.v6. Additionally, this package was identified as FTBFS
with the version of
Package: ovmf
Version: 2020.11-2+deb11u1
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-Cc: t...@mirbsd.de
Configuring a qemu/kvm amd64 VM in virt-manager with a SCSI controller
(lsilogic in my attempt, other people report¹ virtio-scsi to be affected
as well) makes the system not boot with EFI (BIOS boot works).
Package: python3-zeep
Version: 4.1.0-1
Severity: normal
Hey.
Without python3-platformdirs installed I get e.g.:
$ python3 -mzeep https://pki.pca.dfn.de/grid-root-ca/cgi-bin/pub/soap?wsdl=1
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/lib/python3.10/runpy.py", line 196, in _run_module_as_main
On Tue, 2022-07-19 at 09:25 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Hi Mathias,
>
> On 17/07/22 at 19:08 +, Mathias Gibbens wrote:
> > Thanks for the report. However, locally I haven't been able to
> > reproduce this FTBFS in my sid schroot. I've attached the complete
> > log
> > from a successful bu
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
On Mon, 01 Mar 2021 15:33:27 -0800 Forest wrote:
> Package: src:linux
> Version: 5.10.13-1
>
> When booting recent kernels on a RockPro64 board (rk3399), eth0 often fails
> to come up, leaving this headless box practically unusable without serial
> console intervention.
Hi Aloïs,
On Mon, 2022-07-25 at 13:47 +0200, Aloïs Micard wrote:
> > I've been unable to reproduce this locally, but have also seen
> > instances in the past where the buildds have difficulty running
> tests
> > that utilize IPv6.
> >
> > Maybe there's no "ip6-localhost" defined in /etc/h
Control: tags -1 + pending
The fix targeting sid is pending review on salsa.
My inclination is that this won't need a DSA and can wait for a bullseye point
release, but I'm open to other opinions.
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
Package: golang-github-pion-turn.v2
Version: 2.0.8-2
Severity: Serious
The package fails tests (see log of failing test below) when run on a
machine with limited network (in this case: Can only reach the
relevant APT repository server). This is a policy violation, which
says that package tests mus
package: unpaper
Version: 6.1-2
Severity: serious
Build log excerpt below. There is a new upstream version, but I'm not
sure if that builds cleanly against the new ffmpeg.
ffmpeg version: 7:5.0.1-3 (lbavformat-dev and friends)
dpkg-buildpackage
-
Command: dpkg-buildpackage --sa
Source: pythran
Followup-For: Bug #1016155
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/serge-sans-paille/pythran/issues/2011
ACK. Forwarded upstream.
Trying to inspect manually by running
pytest-3 -v test_rosetta.py
I get a different error equivalent to:
$ x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc -pthread -Wno-unu
Hi Luca,
On 7/29/22 5:50 AM, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> Still a couple of Lintian warnings to fix, then you can finalize the
> changelog and I'll upload:
>
> I: pacman-package-manager source: duplicate-long-description libalpm-dev
> libalpm13 [debian/control]
> I: libalpm-dev: extended-description-i
Package: debhelper
Version: 13.8
Severity: wishlist
It would be very useful to have a variant of Dh_Lib's qx_cmd() that allows
setting environment variables (or a version of doit() that allows
capturing the output).
tags 1016230 + pending
thanks.
> LN == Lucas Nussbaum [2022-7-29]
[...]
LN> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
LN> on amd64.
Thanks for the report. It should be fixed by adding a
Build-Depends-Indep on texlive-latex-extra. I'll test and upload a
fixed pa
On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 5:09 PM Willem van den Akker
wrote:
> I am migrating one of my packages to gtk4. For this application
> libvte-2.91-dev
> is needed. However there is no gtk4 version in the repository.
What package are you converting?
I'll upload the gtk4 version now, but it will need to
Control: tags -1 unreproducible
Re: Lucas Nussbaum
> Source: thrift
> Version: 0.16.0-5
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS
> Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
> User: lu...@debian.org
> Usertags: ftbfs-20220716 ftbfs-bookworm
>
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package faile
Source: libsdl1.2
X-Debbugs-CC: t...@security.debian.org
Severity: important
Tags: security
Hi,
The following vulnerability was published for libsdl1.2.
CVE-2022-34568[0]:
| SDL v1.2 was discovered to contain a use-after-free via the XFree
| function at /src/video/x11/SDL_x11yuv.c.
https://gith
Source: yasm
X-Debbugs-CC: t...@security.debian.org
Severity: important
Tags: security
Hi,
The following vulnerability was published for yasm.
CVE-2021-33464[0]:
| An issue was discovered in yasm version 1.3.0. There is a heap-buffer-
| overflow in inc_fopen() in modules/preprocs/nasm/nasm-pp.c.
Attached is what ubuntu is doing.
diff --git a/debian/liblttng-ust-python-agent1.symbols b/debian/liblttng-ust-python-agent1.symbols
index 4ecb039..297a0cd 100644
--- a/debian/liblttng-ust-python-agent1.symbols
+++ b/debian/liblttng-ust-python-agent1.symbols
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
liblttng-ust-python-age
Hi,
* Heinrich Schuchardt :
when rebooting the system waits 50 seconds to synchronzize a disconnected
> iSCSI drive:
>
> [ 473.818361] connection1:0: ping timeout of 5 secs expired, recv timeout
> 5, last rx 4295008175, last ping 4295009472, now 422
> [ 473.824605] connection1:0: detected c
Control: tags -1 -moreinfo
Debian's Remmina package no longer builds the spice plugin so I'm
ready to begin this transition when approved.
Thank you,
Jeremy Bicha
Le ven. 29 juil. 2022 à 22:30, Paul Gevers a écrit :
> Hi Jérémy.
>
> On 22-07-2022 14:51, Graham Inggs wrote:
> > On Mon, 18 Jul 2022 at 19:09, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> >> nodejs 18.6.0 will soon be the active version of nodejs:
> >> https://nodejs.org/en/about/releases/
> >>
> >> I rebuilt and chec
Source: dovecot
X-Debbugs-CC: t...@security.debian.org
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Hi,
The following vulnerability was published for dovecot.
CVE-2022-30550[0]:
| An issue was discovered in the auth component in Dovecot 2.2 and 2.3
| before 2.3.20. When two passdb configuration entries exist
Hi,
I want to tackle this issue again - I really want to package cppzmq as a
separate package. Besides the already mentioned reason for not needing to
patch downstream build systems, there is also the advantage that you can
actually see from apt which version of cppzmq is in Debian.
Also, I added
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "lsb-release-minimal":
* Package name: lsb-release-minimal
Version : 0.4-1
Upstream Author : Gioele Barabucci
* URL : https://gioele.io/lsb-release-minimal
*
Hi Jérémy.
On 22-07-2022 14:51, Graham Inggs wrote:
On Mon, 18 Jul 2022 at 19:09, Jérémy Lal wrote:
nodejs 18.6.0 will soon be the active version of nodejs:
https://nodejs.org/en/about/releases/
I rebuilt and checked all reverse-build-deps of libnode-dev/nodejs,
and dealt with most of the reg
Hi Jérémy.
On 29-07-2022 22:17, Jérémy Lal wrote:
I don't see how artificially adding migration days will improve debian
quality in any way.
We're not adding days, we're just not giving the bounty for success on
all architectures where we run autopkgtests, which was the rule for the
bounty.
Le ven. 29 juil. 2022 à 22:00, Debian Bug Tracking System <
ow...@bugs.debian.org> a écrit :
> Hi Jérémy,
>
> On 29-07-2022 19:36, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> > when a package pass all autopkgtests it can migrate in 2 days,
> > however if it depends on an architecture that reports "Not a regression",
> >
Source: fonttools
Version: 4.32.0-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 4.34.4-1
Tags: sid bookworm
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Control: block -1 by 1013363
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and un
Control: reassign -1 src:mesa 22.1.3-1
Control: affects -1 + src:gtk4
Control: forcemerge 1015039 -1
On Fri, 29 Jul 2022 at 20:21:09 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
> on amd64.
> > ▶ 11/681
> > ERROR:../../../testsuite/gdk/memo
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stephan Lachnit
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, stephanlach...@debian.org,
gor...@chronitis.net, g...@debian.org
* Package name: cppzmq
Version : 4.8.1
Upstream Author : Gudmundur Adalsteinsson
* URL : https://gith
Le ven. 29 juil. 2022 à 20:27, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit :
> Source: nodejs
> Version: 18.6.0+dfsg-3
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS
> Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
> User: lu...@debian.org
> Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm
>
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your pack
Source: pycorrfit
Version: 1.1.7+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enteri
Source: siscone
Version: 3.0.5-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Entering dire
Source: stealth
Version: 4.03.01-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering di
Source: pgloader
Version: 3.6.6-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Entering dir
Source: pyscanfcs
Version: 0.3.6+ds-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: libncursesada
Version: 6.3.20211021-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]:
Source: openssh
Version: 1:9.0p1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering di
Source: apertium-fra-frp
Version: 1.0.0-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Ente
Source: node-promise
Version: 8.1.0-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: libgnatcoll-bindings
Version: 22.0.0-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/
Source: apertium-mlt-ara
Version: 0.2.0~r62623-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1
Source: muse-el
Version: 3.20+dfsg-6
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[3]: Entering
Source: gap
Version: 4.11.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering directo
Source: dvdisaster
Version: 0.79.5-10
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Entering
Source: gdcm
Version: 3.0.13-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Entering direct
Source: generate-ninja
Version: 0.0~git20220314.bd99dbf-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
Source: libreoffice
Version: 1:7.3.5~rc2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Ent
Source: mandelbulber2
Version: 2.20-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: cctbx
Version: 2021.12+ds1-7
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: apertium-oci-fra
Version: 0.3.0-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Ente
Source: node-bluebird
Version: 3.7.2+dfsg1+~3.5.36-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> ma
Source: node-jest
Version: 28.1.3~ds+~cs70.48.28-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make
Source: gnuplot
Version: 5.4.2+dfsg2-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Enterin
Source: boost1.74
Version: 1.74.0-16.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> xslt-xsltproc bu
Source: node-undici
Version: 5.8.0+dfsg1+~cs18.9.16-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: apertium-cy-en
Version: 0.1.1~r57554-9
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]:
Source: apertium-crh-tur
Version: 0.3.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Ente
Source: libtexttools
Version: 2.1.0-21
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules bi
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-gtk-gn...@lists.debian.org
Owner: jeremy.bi...@canonical.com
Package Name: gnome-shell-extension-gsconnect
Version: 50
Upstream Author: Andy Holmes
License: GPL-2+
Programming Lang: JavaScript (and a Python extens
Source: twisted
Version: 22.4.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering dir
Source: asn1c
Version: 0.9.28+dfsg-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> PASS: check-Genera
Source: liblexical-accessor-perl
Version: 0.013-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[
Source: node-espree
Version: 9.3.1~dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> not ok 691 ec
Source: raft
Version: 0.14.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[3]: Entering direct
Source: riseup-vpn
Version: 0.21.11+ds-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Enter
Source: node-astw
Version: 2.2.0-8
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules binary
Source: gpgme1.0
Version: 1.17.1-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[6]: Entering di
Source: gtk4
Version: 4.6.6+ds-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering dire
Source: ruby-text-format
Version: 1.0.0-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules
Source: nodejs
Version: 18.6.0+dfsg-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> not ok 1778 paral
Source: pyraf
Version: 2.2.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules binary
> d
Source: coq-hierarchy-builder
Version: 1.2.1-11
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[3]
Source: stompserver
Version: 0.9.9gem-4.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> fakeroot deb
Source: reprotest
Version: 0.7.20
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering dir
Source: node-immutable-tuple
Version: 0.4.10-9
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: mkautodoc
Version: 0.1.0-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering di
Source: clapper
Version: 0.5.2-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> ==
Source: libstatgen
Version: 1.0.15-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: flint
Version: 2.9.0-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[3]: Entering direct
Source: libconfig-model-openssh-perl
Version: 2.9.0.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: pocl
Version: 3.0-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering directory
Package: openssl
Version: 3.0.5-1
Severity: serious
Control: forward -1 https://github.com/openssl/openssl/issues/18912
Control: affects -1 libnet-dns-sec-perl
It appears the EC code is broken for ed25519/ed448 on s390x.
Sebastian
Source: spoa
Version: 4.0.7+ds-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering dire
Source: ruby-metaid
Version: 1.0-8.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> fakeroot debian/r
Source: python-inotify
Version: 0.2.10-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules
Package: nautilus-share
Version: 0.7.3-2+b1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
I upgraded the package nautilus-share with bullseye-backports.
After that the access to my nas won't work anymore.
I get after trying to access my NAS under 'Other localtions' a general
Unable to access location - Fa
Hi!
On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 03:25:12PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> There should be a provision to work on systems when /dev/urandom is not
> available, as there is for MY_HOSTID.
It seemed like /dev/urandom was the universal fallback,
so I didn't write a fallback originally.
Attaching updated
Package: pulseaudio-dlna
Version: 0.6.4.1-0.1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
The pulseaudio-dlna program prints a backtrace at start and then does
nothing.
It appears to be some incompatibility with python3-pychromecast.
$ pulseaudio-dlna
07-29 18:37:20 pulseaudio_dlna.n
Ok got it working: qt6-wayland was missing
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: britney
Hi,
when a package pass all autopkgtests it can migrate in 2 days,
however if it depends on an architecture that reports "Not a regression",
it seems that the bonus is lost and the package
Package: firmware-misc-nonfree
Version: 20210315-3
Severity: normal
Hello,
When invoking update-initramfs (e.g., after a kernel update), I'm
getting a bunch of warnings:
Configurando linux-image-5.10.0-16-amd64 (5.10.127-2) ...
/etc/kernel/postinst.d/initramfs-tools: update-initramfs: Generatin
Source: mpdscribble
Version: 0.24-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> c++ -Impdscribble.p
Source: onetbb
Version: 2021.5.0-12
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/bin/c++ -I/<>
Source: qcoro
Version: 0.6.0-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220728 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> cd /<>/build-Qt6/tests/t
1 - 100 of 214 matches
Mail list logo
