Source: pykafka
Version: 2.7.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules bu
Source: gir-to-d
Version: 0.22.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/bin
Source: opensaml
Version: 3.2.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[4]: Enter
Source: lombok-ast
Version: 0.2+ds-6
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: ruby-certificate-authority
Version: 1.0.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: gtk-d
Version: 3.10.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: capsule-maven-nextflow
Version: 1.0.3.1+dfsg-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: libpdfbox-graphics2d-java
Version: 0.35-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: switcheroo-control
Version: 2.4-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: gl-image-display
Version: 0.10-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> g++
Source: pidgin-librvp
Version: 0.9.7cvs-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: deepin-album
Version: 5.9.1+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/bi
Source: libio-async-ssl-perl
Version: 0.22-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> deb
Source: ignition-common3
Version: 3.14.0+dfsg-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /
Source: fis-gtm
Version: 6.3-014-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/bin
Source: casacore-data-sources
Version: 2-2.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> deb
Source: posterazor
Version: 1.5.1-10
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/bin/c++
Source: tclxml
Version: 1:3.2.7-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> gcc -DPACKAGE_N
Source: libqapt
Version: 3.0.5-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> cd /<>/o
Source: libbluray
Version: 1:1.3.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Enter
Source: pixz
Version: 1.0.7-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[4]: Enter
Source: gitless
Version: 0.8.8-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: netgen
Version: 6.2.2006+really6.2.1905+dfsg-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: oscrypto
Version: 1.2.1-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules bin
Source: olm
Version: 3.2.11~dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: ignition-physics
Version: 5.1.0+ds1-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/
Source: ruby-jwt
Version: 2.3.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> exp
Source: freeimage
Version: 3.18.0+ds2-6
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> x86_64-li
Source: colmap
Version: 3.7-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/bin/c++ -g
Source: emscripten
Version: 3.1.5~dfsg-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: power-profiles-daemon
Version: 0.10.1-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: veusz
Version: 3.3.1-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules cl
Source: qutemol
Version: 0.4.1~cvs2008-14
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> g++
Source: barbican
Version: 1:14.0.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: python-bitcoinlib
Version: 0.11.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> deb
Source: photoqt
Version: 2.6-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/bin/c++ -g
Source: voms-api-java
Version: 3.3.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/ru
Source: gamehub
Version: 0.16.1-2-master+ds-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> deb
Source: pygmsh
Version: 7.1.17-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules bu
Source: wxpython4.0
Version: 4.0.7+dfsg-13
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> faker
Source: deepin-image-viewer
Version: 5.8.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/
Source: skycat
Version: 3.1.2+starlink1~b+dfsg-6
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: nip2
Version: 8.7.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H
Source: ruby-image-science
Version: 1.3.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> :85
Source: libspring-java
Version: 4.3.30-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: opencascade
Version: 7.5.1+dfsg1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> cd /<
Source: adql
Version: 1.5-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Enter
Source: synaptic
Version: 0.90.2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> g++ -DHAVE_CONFI
Source: ruby-mechanize
Version: 2.7.7-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/
Source: imv
Version: 4.3.0-1.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> cc -o imv-wayland
Source: ruby-openid-connect
Version: 1.2.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: t4kcommon
Version: 0.1.1-10
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /bin/b
Source: freewheeling
Version: 0.6.4-1.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: ruby-json-jwt
Version: 1.13.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>Fail
Source: aptitude
Version: 0.8.13-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> g++ -DLOCALE
Source: apriltag
Version: 3.2.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/bin/cc -g
Source: kicad
Version: 6.0.5+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> cd /<&g
Source: python-apt
Version: 2.3.0
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> x86_64-linux-gnu-
Source: ignition-common
Version: 4.5.0+ds-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/bi
Source: ruby-ntlm
Version: 0.6.3-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> Failure/Er
Source: gmsh
Version: 4.8.4+ds2-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/bin/c++ -g
Source: networking-mlnx
Version: 1:16.0.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Source: ruby-rack-oauth2
Version: 1.19.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Source: oce
Version: 0.18.3-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/bin/ld:
> /u
On Thu, 26 May 2022 09:31:00 +0300
=?UTF-8?Q?Martin=2D=C3=89ric_Racine?=
wrote:
> I'd really like to know how anyone could ever come to the conclusion
> that a package that has nothing to do with graphic drivers needs to be
> auto-removed.
>
> Martin-Éric
>
> On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 9:01 AM Debian
I'd really like to know why a package that that nothing to do with
NVIDIA drivers came to be marked for auto-removal.
Martin-Éric
On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 9:04 AM Debian testing autoremoval watch
wrote:
>
> xserver-xorg-video-geode 2.11.20-9 is marked for autoremoval from testing on
> 2022-06-3
Package: wnpp
Owner: Andrius Merkys
Severity: wishlist
Control: block -1 by 1011507
* Package name: prodigy
Version : 2.0.0
Upstream Author : Computational Structural Biology Group at Utrecht
University
* URL : https://github.com/haddocking/prodigy
I'd really like to know how anyone could ever come to the conclusion
that a package that has nothing to do with graphic drivers needs to be
auto-removed.
Martin-Éric
On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 9:01 AM Debian testing autoremoval watch
wrote:
>
> upgrade-system 1.9.1.0 is marked for autoremoval from
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-ker...@lists.debian.org
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "open-ath9k-htc-firmware":
* Package name : open-ath9k-htc-firmware
Version : 1.4.0-106-gc583009+dfsg1-2
Upstream Author : ath9k_h
Control: retitle -1 O: casparcg-server -- layered real-time video compositor to
multiple outputs)
No-one showed any interest since I asked for someone to adopt this
package, so I guess it is time to orphan it.
--
Happy hacking
Petter Reinholdtsen
[M. Zhou]
> Source: casparcg-server
> Version: 2.2.0+dfsg-2.1
> Severity: important
>
> tbb -> onetbb transition breaks this package due to upstream overhaul.
Thank you for the heads up.
Note, casparcg-server currently have a request for adaptation in
https://bugs.debian.org/959124 > and I am con
On 2022-05-26 02:56, M. Zhou wrote:
> tbb -> onetbb transition breaks this package.
Relevant part from the build log:
[ 6%] Building CXX object
opensubdiv/osd/CMakeFiles/osd_cpu_obj.dir/tbbEvaluator.cpp.o
cd /<>/build/opensubdiv/osd && /usr/bin/c++
-DGLFW_VERSION_3 -DOPENSUBDIV_HAS_GLSL_COMPUTE
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Bart Martens
* Package name: gnucobol
Version : 3.1.2
Upstream Author : Roger While, Keisuke Nishida
* URL : https://www.gnu.org/software/gnucobol/
* License : GPL, LGPL
Programming Lang: C
Description : COBOL com
On 5/25/22 02:05, Samtinel wrote:
Are other GTK apps working?
Yes, dino-im starts successfully.
GTK 2
Uh, this I did not check. I will do that when I get to my terminal later. So
you happen to know a simple GTK 2 package I can test on?
I don't. So much stuff has moved to GTK 3 (or now GTK
Package: gnome-control-center
Version: 1:42.1-2
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: undef
Dear Maintainer,
Since at least Gnome Control Center 42 closing the network panel causes g-c-c
to hang. The following steps reliably reproduce the issue:
1. Open g-c-c -> Network.
2. Select a network and edit i
Faustin,
> I am not able to reproduce this with the latest
> mariadb-server-10.6-dbgsym version (10.6.8).
> Can you try with the latest version and tell me?
Yes, I tried 10.6.8-1 with the same result.
> Also, can you describe a bit better your setup? If this is a filesystem
> related issue, I
Hi Bastian,
Thanks for your detail review d/copyright.
I'd added the copyright infos as your suggestions.
The libs/protocol/network_protocol.h is mixed the third-party file and
upstream author's modify.
I add some comments on it:
Files: libs/protocol/network_protocol.h
Copyright:1995, 1996
On 2022-05-26 01:07:19 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> If I replace \u061c by \u200f above, I cannot reproduce the issue.
> U+200F is in the "combining" table, but it was already there in 2009.
In the Debian package, if I add "{ 0x061C, 0x061C }," to
the "combining" table in encoding.c, this makes
> On 2022-04-26, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> TS == Thomas Schmitt wrote:
TS> So if we exclude S_IFSOCK, S_IFLNK, S_IFDIR, S_IFIFO there
TS> remain only S_IFREG, S_IFBLK, S_IFCHR with the latter on Linux
TS> behaving like S_IFREG with 0 bytes of content. (As said on
TS> FreeBSD it could be
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mo Zhou
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: mujoco
Version : 2.2.0
Upstream Author : DeepMind
* URL : https://mujoco.org/
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang: C
Description : A general
On 2020-11-12 09:12:49, Gürkan Myczko wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
>
> * Package name: gomuks
> Version : 0.2.1
> Upstream Author : Tulir Asokan
> * URL : https://github.com/tulir/gomuks
> * License : AGPL-3+
> Description : terminal based Ma
Hi Marco,
Marco d'Itri (2022-05-26):
> The currently packaged release is over one year old.
>
> https://github.com/crowdsecurity/crowdsec/releases/
I'm working on the many modules that are required for newer releases,
and checking how upgrades are affecting existing packages and their
reverse d
On Sun, 2022-05-01 at 13:20 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> Control: outlook -1 blocked by
> https://github.com/oracle/oci-python-sdk/issues/444
Oracle have updated their embedded code copies to versions that are
available in Debian unstable, except for idna, which is still outdated,
and httpsig_cffi,
Package: groff
Version: 1.23.0-1
Severity: wishlist
I apologize for filing this bug report a bit prematurely, but I've been
working on building groff in a bullseye chroot lately to prepare for
groff 1.23.0.rc2, and I wanted to document some findings while they were
fresh in my mind.
Here is the c
Package: crowdsec
Version: 1.0.9-4
Severity: wishlist
The currently packaged release is over one year old.
https://github.com/crowdsecurity/crowdsec/releases/
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
This is the most uneasy transition I've ever handled. There was
massive upstream code overhaul breaking basically everything.
Build system has changed so I rewritten the d/rules, this took
me a while.
Going through NEW due to upstream rename took a while.
Then only amd64 does not FTBFS. I wrote
First, thanks for welcoming suggestions and taking the time to explain
your concerns.
I have rebased the remaining suggestions, split them in smaller
commits, and adapted some.
1 is a matter of taste.
2 should be consensual, but may need a rebase if 1 is not
> > Subject: [PATCH 5/8] debhelper: g
Control: tags -1 -moreinfo
Reverse-Build-Depends
* blender [irrelevant; ftpfs, no matching function for call to openvdb... ]
#1011653
* bowtie [ok]
* bowtie2 [ok]
* casparcg-server [ftbfs, TBB not found during cmake] #1011654
* deal.ii [ftbfs, cmake could not find tbb] #1011655
* embree [ok]
* f
Source: salmon
Version: 1.4.0+ds1-1
Severity: important
tbb -> onetbb transition breaks this package.
Source: slic3r-prusa
Version: 2.4.2+dfsg-1
Severity: important
tbb -> onetbb transition breaks this package.
Source: tiny-dnn
Version: 1.0.0a3+ds-2
Severity: important
tbb -> onetbb transition breaks this package.
Source: r-cran-markovchain
Version: 0.8.6-1
Severity: important
tbb -> onetbb transition breaks this package.
Source: opensubdiv
Version: 3.4.4-2
Severity: important
tbb -> onetbb transition breaks this package.
Source: opencascade
Version: 7.5.1+dfsg1-2
Severity: important
tbb -> onetbb transition breaks this package.
https://github.com/mvo5/squid-deb-proxy/blob/main/apt-avahi-discover
has been converted to use asyncio.
Source: libpmemobj-cpp
Version: 1.13.0-3
Severity: important
tbb -> onetbb transition breaks this package.
Source: gazebo
Version: 11.10.2+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
I was testing rdeps for onetbb transition but found this issue.
Source: flexbar
Version: 1:3.5.0-4
Severity: important
tbb -> onetbb transition breaks this package.
Source: casparcg-server
Version: 2.2.0+dfsg-2.1
Severity: important
tbb -> onetbb transition breaks this package due to upstream overhaul.
Source: deal.ii
Version: 9.3.2-1
Severity: important
tbb -> onetbb transition breaks this package.
1 - 100 of 209 matches
Mail list logo