Le lun. 20 sept. 2021 à 06:03, Yadd a écrit :
> Le 19/09/2021 à 12:35, Bastien Roucariès a écrit :
> > Package: pkg-js-tools
> > Version: 0.9.66
> > Severity: important
> >
> > Dear Maintainer,
> >
> > According to a few cross build test (see for instance
> > https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/node
Hi Michael,
On 2021-09-18 21:28, Michael Banck wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 10:40:02AM +0300, Andrius Merkys wrote:
>> Thanks for clarification. I have just packaged the executable in a new
>> binary package, libinchi-bin, it how has to pass the NEW queue.
>
> A bit late, but maybe "inchi-bin
Control: tag -1 patch
I just filed a merge request¹ fixing the spurious message.
Thanks for considering.
-- Damyan
¹ https://salsa.debian.org/debian/man2html/-/merge_requests/1
On 9/19/2021 9:30 PM, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
On 9/19/2021 4:53 PM, Elliott Mitchell wrote:
On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 03:54:01PM -0400, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
On 9/19/2021 1:29 PM, Elliott Mitchell wrote:
Have you tried memory ballooning with PVH or HVM domains?
That combination has been relia
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Hello,
I want to request binNMU on amd64 for recently accepted new package, as
they cannot be migrated to testing due to missing builds on buildd.
nmu inchi_1.03+dfsg-4 . amd64 . unstable
Hi Dirk,
On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 03:45:57PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> | I'm thinking about a "fake-basilisk" like r-cran-bh or r-bioc-zlib.
>
> I had a similar thought. I am also friends with the author of it.
>
> They are doing 'The Right Thing' there for _their_ purposes at BioC in
On 9/19/2021 4:53 PM, Elliott Mitchell wrote:
On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 03:54:01PM -0400, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
On 9/19/2021 1:29 PM, Elliott Mitchell wrote:
Have you tried memory ballooning with PVH or HVM domains?
That combination has been reliably crashing Xen for me for a while.
Apparently
On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 01:05:56AM -0400, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
> xen hypervisor version: 4.14.2+25-gb6a8c4f72d-2, amd64
>
> linux kernel version: 5.10.46-4 (the current amd64 kernel
> for bullseye)
>
> Boot system: EFI, not using secure boot, booting xen
> hypervisor and dom0 bullseye with gru
Le 19/09/2021 à 12:35, Bastien Roucariès a écrit :
> Package: pkg-js-tools
> Version: 0.9.66
> Severity: important
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> According to a few cross build test (see for instance
> https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/node-re2/-/jobs/1960208)
>
> This package is a blocker.
>
> May be
Control: reassign 994714 kleborate/2.1.0-1
Étienne Mollier writes:
> At this point, I strongly suspect that, either makeblastdb does
> not output properly blastdb files on big endian systems, or
> kleborate is not able to decode properly an eventual blastdb
> database with big endian specific la
Package: brltty
Version: 6.3+dfsg-1
Severity: normal
Tags: a11y
Dear Maintainer,
When using sysvinit as the init system, brltty
shows "screen not in text mode" at the lightdm and gdm3 login screen.
This is because the /var/lib/BrlAPI/0 socket is missing at boot.
The fix is to add "$local_fs" to
Hello Gordon,
you've been active uploading several packages of the ipython stack in
the last few days: can you provide an update regarding ipywidgets too?
thanks
On Sun, Sep 12, 2021 at 12:01 PM Sandro Tosi wrote:
>
> Hello Gordon,
>
> On Sat, 21 Apr 2018 10:55:29 +0200 Tobias Hansen wrote:
> >
On Sun, 2021-09-19 at 12:05 +, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> * Clarify that --allow-reformatting will in some cases strip comments.
> Closes: #946744
Is it possible to avoid that stripping?
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally sig
Package: libtirpc3
Version: 1.1.4-0.4
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Dear Maintainer,
My NIS setup stops working occasionally.
The clients rely on subnet broadcast CALLIT requests to locate
the NIS servers.
The rpcbind process on the NIS server sees the requests but
fails to send the reply.
The str
Control: retitle -1 libxml2: XHTML 1.0 validation is broken with
w3c-dtd-xhtml's xhtml-special.ent file
Control: tags -1 - unreproducible
This should be reproducible with w3c-dtd-xhtml's xhtml-special.ent file.
The summary of the actual issue is below.
On 2021-09-20 03:18:46 +0200, Vincent Lefev
Here is the backtrace I obtained using gdb, as per the HowToGetABacktrace
page on the Debian wiki:
Thread 1 "ghb" received signal SIGABRT, Aborted.
0x7371fce1 in raise () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
#0 0x7371fce1 in raise () at /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
#1 0x7f
Details to follow tomorrow (bisected already, how to reproduce)
On 2021-09-19 22:59:31 +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 09:45:19PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > On 2021-09-19 19:15:54 +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > > I can never manage to download DTDs from w3.org (how could you?!), so,
> > > taking your testcase and a copy of the sa
On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 11:55:53PM +0200, Olivier Girondel wrote:
> * Package name: lebiniou-data
> Version : 3.62.1-1
> Changes since the last upload:
>
> * New upstream release 3.62.1.
> * test/lebiniou-test.sh: Do not use $HOME for autopkgtest.
> * debian/source/lintian
Package: src:linux
Version: 5.10.46-4~bpo10+1
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)?
* What was th
Package: src:linux
Version: 5.10.46-4
Severity: important
Kernal oops:
[ 4895.690309] FAT-fs (sdd1): Directory bread(block 23326848) failed
[ 4895.690312] FAT-fs (sdd1): Directory bread(block 23326849) failed
[ 4895.690314] FAT-fs (sdd1): Directory bread(block 23326850) failed
[ 4895.690315] FAT-f
On 2021-09-19 22:33:09 +0200, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> It probably contains the ones for 1.0, but I found w3c-sgml-lib to
> not be sufficient in many ways and now use local files only…
which has always been the case, AFAIK. And the XHTML 1.0 related files
seem to be identical to the w3c-dtd-xhtml
On 9/19/2021 1:29 PM, Elliott Mitchell wrote:
On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 01:05:56AM -0400, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
I noticed this bug on bullseye ever since I have been
running bullseye as a dom0, but my testing indicates
there is no problem with src:linux but the problem
appeared in src:xen with t
Package: src:linux
Version: 5.10.46-4
Severity: critical
Hello,
After upgrading this laptop from buster to bullseye, I started to have
issues. The laptop uses a LUKS root, so it pauses before loading X to
prompt for a password. Therefore I know this problem is not just X.
Immediately after put
Package: miniupnpd-nftables
Version: 2.2.1-1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Dear Maintainer,
I have a manually-crafted set of firewall rules, currently using
iptables-nft but still heavily based on classic iptables way of doing
things.
On update from Debian 10 to 11, miniupnpd transitioned to the
Hi,
On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 3:11 PM Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>
> Now in the same spirit as in #993955, I am not sure you actually want to
> push maintainers to move libraries from /lib to /usr/lib
The purpose of this tag was never to push people toward usr-merge. It
only looks like that to glibc an
Control: tags 993899 - moreinfo
On Fri, 17 Sep 2021, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
Please go ahead, and remove the moreinfo tag from this bug when uploaded.
... and uploaded.
Thorsten
On Sun, 19 Sep 2021, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Please go ahead.
... and uploaded.
Thorsten
On Sun, 19 Sep 2021, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Please go ahead.
... and uploaded.
Thorsten
Package: fail2ban
Version: fail2ban
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Dear Maintainer,
After activating the exim jail in fail2ban I noticed many failed login attempts
continuing to clutter up my logs.
Eventually I figured out the current failregex includ a pattern for the %(pid)s
that my current exim
Package: ncbi-blast+
Version: 2.11.0+ds-1
Severity: important
Hi Aaron,
I am currently investigating kleborate failure to migrate to
testing. The failure is due to build time test suite failure on
s390x [1].
[1]:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=kleborate&arch=s390x&ver=2.1.0-1&s
"Extremely verbose" indeed - it can produce gigabytes of log data in a
single day. Before I applied the workaround below, it filled the root
disk of my home server system three times.
Unfortunately it looks like the version in Bullseye does not have the
"start_daemon" configuration file option
Control: tags -1 confirmed
Control: forwarded -1
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/proftpd-abi-1.3.7c.html
On 2021-09-19 23:48:49 +0200, Hilmar Preuße wrote:
> Am 30.08.2021 um 08:32 teilte Hilmar Preuße mit:
> > On 8/25/21 11:42 AM, Hilmar Preusse wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > > This transiti
reopen 994698
thanks
Hi,
Am 20.09.21 um 00:00 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
> Am 19.09.21 um 17:28 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
>> Whereas LO builds with g++ 11 since 1:7.1.0~rc1-1 in general Rico pointed me
>> to
>> https://git.launchpad.net/~libreoffice/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/commit/?h=ubuntu-impish
On 2021-09-19 13:03, Felix Lechner wrote:
> Hi Aurelien,
>
> On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 12:15 PM Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> >
> > My question is why this new breakout-link tag has been added
>
> The tag was implemented in response to Bug#243158. [1] I am not sure
> about Yann's original suggestion, bu
Le dim. 19 sept. 2021 à 21:57, Bastien ROUCARIES
a écrit :
>
> try to pass
> -fstack-protector-strong to the local version as cflags
>
> If it fail upstream does not take in acount stack protector
>
> Le dim. 19 sept. 2021 à 21:45, Bastien ROUCARIES
> a écrit :
> >
> > Le dim. 19 sept. 2021 à 21
try to pass
-fstack-protector-strong to the local version as cflags
If it fail upstream does not take in acount stack protector
Le dim. 19 sept. 2021 à 21:45, Bastien ROUCARIES
a écrit :
>
> Le dim. 19 sept. 2021 à 21:39, Bastien ROUCARIES
> a écrit :
> >
> > Le dim. 19 sept. 2021 à 21:36, Ond
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "lebiniou-data":
* Package name: lebiniou-data
Version : 3.62.1-1
Upstream Author : Olivier Girondel
* URL : https://biniou.net
* License : GPL
Am 30.08.2021 um 08:32 teilte Hilmar Preuße mit:
On 8/25/21 11:42 AM, Hilmar Preusse wrote:
Hi,
This transition was already started by the recent proftpd upload, but is
not caught caught automatically since it is a virtual package name that
has changed.
Ben file:
title = "proftpd-dfsg";
is_
Le dim. 19 sept. 2021 à 21:39, Bastien ROUCARIES
a écrit :
>
> Le dim. 19 sept. 2021 à 21:36, Ondrej Zary a écrit :
> >
> > I've reinstalled nodejs and libnode64 back to original Buster
> > 10.24.0~dfsg-1~deb10u1 and upgraded libuv1 to
> > libuv1_1.34.2-1~bpo9+1_i386.deb from http://snapshot.de
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Matteo F. Vescovi"
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, ma...@debian.org
* Package name: imath
Version : 3.1.3
Upstream Author : Academy Software Foundation
* URL : https://github.com/AcademySoftwareFoundation/Imath
* Li
Package: apt-show-versions
Version: 0.22.12
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: richard.lewis.deb...@googlemail.com
Dear Maintainer,
giving two arguments including one that is not a package shows there is a
syntax error somewhere around line 378:
$ apt-show-versions apt whatever
apt:amd64/bullseye 2
Le dim. 19 sept. 2021 à 21:36, Ondrej Zary a écrit :
>
> I've reinstalled nodejs and libnode64 back to original Buster
> 10.24.0~dfsg-1~deb10u1 and upgraded libuv1 to libuv1_1.34.2-1~bpo9+1_i386.deb
> from http://snapshot.debian.org
>
> It still segfaults!
>
> So it seems that the problem is not
I've reinstalled nodejs and libnode64 back to original Buster
10.24.0~dfsg-1~deb10u1 and upgraded libuv1 to libuv1_1.34.2-1~bpo9+1_i386.deb
from http://snapshot.debian.org
It still segfaults!
So it seems that the problem is not libuv version but its linking (included in
node or external). Or c
Le dim. 19 sept. 2021 à 21:25, Bastien ROUCARIES
a écrit :
>
> Le dim. 19 sept. 2021 à 21:15, Ondrej Zary a écrit :
> >
> > Added back --shared-zlib: works.
> > Added back also --shared-cares: works.
> >
> > So you're right: --shared-libuv is the problem.
> > Upstream seems to include libuv 1.34.
Package: unattended-upgrades
Version: 2.8
After upgrading to bookworm/testing, my unattended-upgrade cron job
started giving output like this:
tar: .remove-on-upgrade /etc/xdg/okular.categories: Not found in archive
tar: Exiting with failure status due to previous errors
I downgraded okular a
Le dim. 19 sept. 2021 à 21:15, Ondrej Zary a écrit :
>
> Added back --shared-zlib: works.
> Added back also --shared-cares: works.
>
> So you're right: --shared-libuv is the problem.
> Upstream seems to include libuv 1.34.2.
> Buster has 1.24.1-1.
Do you have valgrind ?
If so and if it work (tes
Hi Felix,
Felix Lechner wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 7:12 AM Axel Beckert wrote:
> > Huh? This should be obvious from the binary package version number.
>
> It isn't. A well-known example is python-defaults [1], which is native
> even though the version number suggests otherwise.
I see. Whi
Added back --shared-zlib: works.
Added back also --shared-cares: works.
So you're right: --shared-libuv is the problem.
Upstream seems to include libuv 1.34.2.
Buster has 1.24.1-1.
--
Ondrej Zary
Le dim. 19 sept. 2021 à 21:03, Jérémy Lal a écrit :
>
>
>> Le dim. 19 sept. 2021 à 22:33, Bastien Roucariès
>> a écrit :
>>
>> Source: nodejs
>> Severity: serious
>> Tags: patch
>> Justification: base arch
>> Forwarded:
>> https://chromium.googlesource.com/v8/v8.git/+/e825c4318eb2065ffdf9044aa6
Le dim. 19 sept. 2021 à 22:33, Bastien Roucariès <
roucaries.bast...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> Source: nodejs
> Severity: serious
> Tags: patch
> Justification: base arch
> Forwarded:
> https://chromium.googlesource.com/v8/v8.git/+/e825c4318eb2065ffdf9044aa6a5278635c36427
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> lib
Le dim. 19 sept. 2021 à 22:27, Bastien ROUCARIES <
roucaries.bast...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> Le dim. 19 sept. 2021 à 19:33, Jérémy Lal a écrit :
> >
> >
> >
> > Le dim. 19 sept. 2021 à 18:54, Bastien Roucariès <
> roucaries.bast...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> >>
> >> Package: nodejs
> >> Version: 12.22
On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 09:45:19PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2021-09-19 19:15:54 +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > I can never manage to download DTDs from w3.org (how could you?!), so,
> > taking your testcase and a copy of the same DTD:
>
> The DTD is provided by Debian, no need to downl
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for xfonts-terminus (versioned as 4.48-3.1) and
uploaded it. Hope this is fine with you.
Cheers Jochen
diff -Nru xfonts-terminus-4.48/debian/changelog xfonts-terminus-4.48/debian/changelog
--- xfonts-terminus-4.48/debian/changelog 2020-05-25 11:16:29.000
On 19 September 2021 at 16:09, Andreas Tille wrote:
| On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 05:31:14PM +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote:
| >
| > But I do wonder if more packages in future might as well end up needing
basilisk too.
|
| I'm thinking about a "fake-basilisk" like r-cran-bh or r-bioc-zlib.
I had a sim
Le dim. 19 sept. 2021 à 20:21, Ondrej Zary a écrit :
>
> On Sunday 19 September 2021 20:13:47 Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > So you work on oldstable.
> >
> > Could you check for stable/testing/unstable/experimental ? And mark
> > the bug with found /not found.
>
> Unfortunately I can't.
Hi Daniel,
Le Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 10:13:59PM +0200, Daniel Leidert a écrit :
> Am Sonntag, dem 19.09.2021 um 17:31 +0200 schrieb Cédric Boutillier:
> > I have been looking at the bugs on ruby-nokogiri before trying to update
> > it to the new upstream version.
> >
> > Using the gem install layou
On Sun, 19 Sep 2021, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> I can see that xhtml1-strict.dtd is provided by the w3c-dtd-xhtml
> package.
Not quite.
https://packages.qa.debian.org/w/w3c-dtd-xhtml/news/20160107T183823Z.html
--- Reason ---
RoQA; superseded by w3c-sgml-lib
---
Source: nodejs
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Justification: base arch
Forwarded:
https://chromium.googlesource.com/v8/v8.git/+/e825c4318eb2065ffdf9044aa6a5278635c36427
Dear Maintainer,
libv8 need sse2 on i386 since 2017...
I asked upstream better communication with us, but we must depends on
ss
Le dim. 19 sept. 2021 à 19:33, Jérémy Lal a écrit :
>
>
>
> Le dim. 19 sept. 2021 à 18:54, Bastien Roucariès
> a écrit :
>>
>> Package: nodejs
>> Version: 12.22.5~dfsg-2
>> Severity: serious
>>
>> Dear Maintainer,
>>
>> README.source should document the deps directory.
>>
>> It will be better to
On 9/19/2021 10:56 AM, Elliott Mitchell wrote:
On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 01:05:56AM -0400, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
On Sat, 11 Sep 2021 13:29:12 +0200 Salvatore Bonaccorso
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 06:47:12PM -0700, Elliott Mitchell wrote:
> > An experiment lead to a potential alter
Am Sonntag, dem 19.09.2021 um 17:31 +0200 schrieb Cédric Boutillier:
> Hi,
>
> I have been looking at the bugs on ruby-nokogiri before trying to update
> it to the new upstream version.
>
> Using the gem install layout is not enough to have the
> ext/nokogiri/nokogiri.h installed. As I understand
On Sunday 19 September 2021 20:13:47 Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
> Hi,
>
> So you work on oldstable.
>
> Could you check for stable/testing/unstable/experimental ? And mark
> the bug with found /not found.
Unfortunately I can't. I'm trying to get gitlab 11.11.8+dfsg-1+fto10+2 to work.
Then I can u
Package: devscripts
Version: 2.21.4
File: /usr/bin/checkbashisms
Regarding
possible bashism in (stdin) line 1 ('((' should be '$(('):
for (( k=1 ; k<8 ; k++ )) ; do echo $k ; done
OK, but
$ for (( k=1 ; k<8 ; k++ )) ; do echo $k ; done
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
$ for $(( k=1 ; k<8 ; k++ )) ; do echo $k ; d
Package: alsa-utils
Version: 1.2.5.1-1
Severity: wishlist
File: /usr/share/man/man1/alsactl.1.gz
Mention something like
An exit status of zero indicates success, and a nonzero value
indicates failure.
Else one cannot tell if e.g.,
# alsactl --debug restore; echo $?
alsa-lib parser.c:2372:(l
Hi Aurelien,
On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 12:15 PM Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>
> My question is why this new breakout-link tag has been added
The tag was implemented in response to Bug#243158. [1] I am not sure
about Yann's original suggestion, but I hope the tag is useful to
prevent links to /opt, for e
On 2021-09-19 21:45:19 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2021-09-19 19:15:54 +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > I can never manage to download DTDs from w3.org (how could you?!), so,
> > taking your testcase and a copy of the same DTD:
>
> The DTD is provided by Debian, no need to download it.
I c
On 2021-09-19 19:15:54 +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> I can never manage to download DTDs from w3.org (how could you?!), so,
> taking your testcase and a copy of the same DTD:
The DTD is provided by Debian, no need to download it.
> mattia@warren /tmp/tmp/xml % l
> total 68
> -rw-r--r-- 1 mattia
Hi Samuel
On 2021/09/19 20:47, Samuel Henrique wrote:
I'd like to update this package to the latest upstream version in
order to support Gnome 40 over the next few days.
I'm also planning to push the pristine-tar and upstream branches[0],
as well as adding the upstream code to the master branch
Le dim. 19 sept. 2021 à 19:37, Jérémy Lal a écrit :
>
>
>
> Le dim. 19 sept. 2021 à 20:18, Bastien ROUCARIES
> a écrit :
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> So you work on oldstable.
>>
>> Could you check for stable/testing/unstable/experimental ? And mark
>> the bug with found /not found.
>>
>
> Interestingly, the
Le dim. 19 sept. 2021 à 20:18, Bastien ROUCARIES <
roucaries.bast...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> So you work on oldstable.
>
> Could you check for stable/testing/unstable/experimental ? And mark
> the bug with found /not found.
>
>
Interestingly, the copy of zlib in nodejs source has several pa
Le dim. 19 sept. 2021 à 18:54, Bastien Roucariès <
roucaries.bast...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> Package: nodejs
> Version: 12.22.5~dfsg-2
> Severity: serious
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> README.source should document the deps directory.
>
> It will be better to remove some libs from deps. Why libz is need
Control: severity -1 serious
Hi Reiner,
On 19-09-2021 16:08, Reiner Herrmann wrote:
> @Paul / Release Team: I'm lowering the severity, as the failure is
> not a regression of awesome, but a test regression caused by another
> package. Solutions for this regression are mentioned above.
> If you di
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: debichem-de...@alioth-lists.debian.net
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hello,
Could you please remove the binary package jmol-applet from unstable?
It is one of the four binary packages built from src:jmol.
I am asking this
Package: lintian
Version: 2.106.1
Severity: normal
Since recently, I get the following lintian error message on the glibc
package:
E: glibc source: unpack-message-for-orig glibc_2.32.orig.tar.xz ar failed for
glibc-2.32/htl/libpthread.a
E: glibc source: unpack-message-for-orig glibc_2.32.orig.ta
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/mlpack/ensmallen/issues/321
Hi Graham,
On Thu, 2 Sep 2021 14:27:51 +0200 Graham Inggs wrote:
> Your package uses a vendored copy of catch.hpp. It will FTBFS once
> glibc is upgraded to 2.34 due to MINSIGSTKSZ and SIGSTKSZ no longer
> being defined.
>
>
On 2021-09-16 16:56, Felix Lechner wrote:
> Hi Aurelien,
>
> On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 4:00 PM Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> >
> > Why is that supposed to be an issue?
>
> I do not know, but the relocation error shows that the shared library
> installed in /lib by libgpg-error0 is not found unless
> lib
Source: ignition-math
Version: 6.8.0+ds-2
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs sid bookworm
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
X-Debbugs-Cc: sramac...@debian.org
| 98% tests passed, 1 tests failed out of 51
|
| Total Test time (real) = 127.49 sec
|
| The follow
Hello Jonathan,
I'd like to update this package to the latest upstream version in
order to support Gnome 40 over the next few days.
I'm also planning to push the pristine-tar and upstream branches[0],
as well as adding the upstream code to the master branch, and adding
myself as an Uploader (so t
Hi,
So you work on oldstable.
Could you check for stable/testing/unstable/experimental ? And mark
the bug with found /not found.
Thanks
Bastien
Le dim. 19 sept. 2021 à 18:03, Ondrej Zary a écrit :
>
> There's no such patch in 10.24.0~dfsg-1~deb10u1
>
> --
> Ondrej Zary
Source: isa-support
Version: Please add armv6 support
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
Could you add an armv6 abi check for armel ?
It will help nodejs
Bastien
Package: lintian
Version: 2.106.1
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
Hello.
A package with 'empty package' in its long description is nevertheless
reported by lintian as an empty-binary-package.
This is inconsistent with the tag description.
See the 'gnat' package for an example.
The following trivial
I think the severity of this bug should really be set to critical per
debian's definitions (breaks unrelated software on the system)
In buster this package worked fine with gnome, in bullseye it breaks
other packages. This includes at lease uuidd-runtime upower and parts
of gnome (gnome settings c
Hi Norwid,
On Sat, Sep 18, 2021 at 09:03:45PM +, Norwid Behrnd wrote:
> On Sat, 18 Sep 2021 20:28:30 +0200
> Michael Banck wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 10:40:02AM +0300, Andrius Merkys wrote:
> > > Control: owner -1 !
> > > Control: tags -1 + pending
> > >
> > > Hi Norwid,
> > >
> > >
There's no such patch in 10.24.0~dfsg-1~deb10u1
--
Ondrej Zary
Hello!
Thanks for looking into the issue and for submitting a fix suggestion
in the form of a patch!
It would be easier to process the patch if it was an actual git commit
with explanation of why you think this is the correct solution, how it
has been tested to verify that it does indeed fix kFre
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: bullseye
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-gtk-gn...@lists.debian.org
[ Reason ]
User request on #990618
[ Impact ]
If #990618 is not fixed, users who have previously selected an aerial
map (which is n
Le dim. 19 sept. 2021 à 17:40, Ondrej Zary a écrit :
>
> Upstream node rebuilt in Debian works. So it's not a compiler or libc problem.
Does removing the debian patch
large_pages_assembly_gnu_stack.patch
Changes something ?
Bastien
> The Debian (buster) i386 version 10.24.0~dfsg-1~deb10u1 alr
Hello!
Thanks for the report and the fix suggestion. Would you like to send
it as a Merge Request at
https://salsa.debian.org/mariadb-team/mariadb-10.5 ?
Even though this is just an onliner, please write a good git commit
message and reference the upstream bug report or commit that fixed it.
If i
On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 06:23:14AM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 09:06:22PM -0400, James McCoy wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 11, 2021 at 09:26:04AM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > > The following vulnerability was published for vim.
> > >
> > > CVE-202
Upstream node rebuilt in Debian works. So it's not a compiler or libc problem.
The Debian (buster) i386 version 10.24.0~dfsg-1~deb10u1 already contains SSE2
instructions - it does not work on Pentium 3:
$ node
Illegal instruction
So I doubt that changing -march would help.
--
Ondrej Zary
Package: pulseaudio
Version: 15.0+dfsg1-2
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
I have several customizations in /etc/pulse/system.pa and the latest
upgrade of pulseaudio therefor prompted me what to do with it.
The new last lines of /etc/pulse/system.pa are as follows
Package: checksecurity
Version: 2.0.16+nmu2
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-Cc: richard.lewis.deb...@googlemail.com
Dear Maintainer,
Please consider moving /etc/checksecurity.conf inside /etc/checksecurity/
this would make it easier to keep all config files in a single git repository
thanks for co
Adding pkg-xen-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org into the loop.
Chuck Zmudzinski replied to the bug and later replied to his own reply.
To give full context, I've added the original reply in full and Chuck's reply
to that (as it only quoted part of the context there).
On zondag 19 september 2021 07
On Mon, 11 May 2015 14:28:12 +0200 Willem Mulder <
will...@scintilla.utwente.nl> wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
>
> * Package name: google-drive-ocamlfuse
> Version : 0.5.15
> Upstream Author : Alessandro Strada
> * URL : http://gdfuse.forge.ocamlcore.org/
Control: tag -1 unreproducible
On Sat, Sep 04, 2021 at 03:40:17AM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> After the upgrade to 2.9.12+dfsg-3, XHTML 1.0 validation is broken.
> There was no such issue with 2.9.10+dfsg-6.7.
Actually, I can't reproduce it.
And, honestly, I think that if really didn't work I
Package: lintian-brush
Version: 0.113
Followup-For: Bug #917381
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Greetings,
I'm just curious to hear if any progress is being made on this item?
Martin-Éric
- -- System Information:
Debian Release: bookworm/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy:
On 9/19/21 6:29 PM, Anders Jonsson wrote:
> I saw this is marked pending, but hopefully there is time for a minor
> fix. The attached file fixes a minor typo (paktet -> paketet).
Thanks. Also applied.
Kind Regards,
Bas
--
GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1
Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 614
Package: libnode-dev
Version: 12.22.5~dfsg-2
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
It will be nice if libnode-dev ship header on arch triplet instead on directly
include path
Bastien
1 - 100 of 227 matches
Mail list logo
