Hi Michael, On 2021-09-18 21:28, Michael Banck wrote: > On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 10:40:02AM +0300, Andrius Merkys wrote: >> Thanks for clarification. I have just packaged the executable in a new >> binary package, libinchi-bin, it how has to pass the NEW queue. > > A bit late, but maybe "inchi-bin" or even juust "inchi" would be also > appropriate?
I agree, I should have discussed the new binary name with you. I followed conventions of packages such as src:fftw3 and bin:libfftw3-bin, but surely 'inchi' or 'inchi-bin' would have been more evident for the end-user. Should I initiate binary package rename? Best, Andrius
