According to https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1357323 ,
this bug should no longer affect Firefox 55 and 56, as the gonk code was
removed from the tree.
Please confirm.
Source: dnprogs
Version: 2.65
Tags: patch
User: helm...@debian.org
Usertags: rebootstrap
dnprogs fails to cross build from source for many reasons. The packaging
runs plain make without passing any cross toolchain, so it ends up using
the build architecture toolchain. Indirecting that through dh_a
Package: samba
Version: 2:4.7.0+dfsg-1
Severity: normal
Hi,
samba fails to build from source with cmocka 1.0, please adjust the
build-dependencies to require >= 1.1.
Regards,
Daniel
Package: cross-gcc-dev
Severity: important
User: helm...@debian.org
Usertags: rebootstrap
Please add support for gcc-8. That can have multiple forms, each of
which has its own benefit:
a) Just copy the gcc-7 patches to gcc-8 and hope for the best.
b) Make the patches apply to the gcc-8 source pac
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Johannes Schauer
* Package name: orocos-bfl
Version : 0.8.0
Upstream Author : Tinne De Laet, Klaas Gadeyne
* URL : http://www.orocos.org/bfl
* License : LGPL-2.1+
Programming Lang: C++
Description : Orocos Bayesia
[Julia Longtin]
> Hey, This is Julia Longtin, one of the ImplicitCAD maintainers. I'd like to
> see this in debian as well, but have no idea how to handle the haskell
> dependencies.
I see nothing much happened after this. May I suggest you join the 3D-printer
packaging team on IRC and discuss ho
Control: tags 853585 + patch
Control: tags 853585 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for opal (versioned as 3.10.10~dfsg2-2.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/10. Please feel free to tell me if I should
cancel it.
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked su
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
svgpp (1.2.3+dfsg1-3) unstable; urgency=medium
...
* [834c29e] Mark libsvgpp-dev as arch: all.
-- Anton Gladky Thu, 21 Sep 2017 20:43:06 +0200
Thank you wery much :-) It would be great if tis new version would be
available for the Stretch too in the backports repository.
Package: gnome-shell
Version: 3.26.1-1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
This bug:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=788666
was recently patched upstream. I can confirm that Debian is also
affected. It would be nice if the fix made it into the Debian packages.
Thanks!
Andreas
-- Sy
Package: icewm-common
Version: 1.4.3.0~pre-20171002-2
Severity: wishlist
File: /usr/share/doc/icewm-common/html/icewm.html
Too many identical looking Theme(s) sections in document:
$ w3m -dump file:///usr/share/doc/icewm-common/html/icewm.html|grep '• Theme'
• Theme
• Theme Settings
• Themes
على الخميس 12 تشرين الأول 2017 17:44، كتب Sebastian Andrzej Siewior:
> Hi,
>
> this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
> remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
> of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens
Upstream helped identify the problem and solution:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/scm-discuss/2017-10/msg9.html
I've tested and the cherry-picked patch fixes the test problem on a 32-bit
x86 virtual machine; I have a 5f2-2 with the patch in mentors.d.n.
--bryan
On Sun, 3 Sep 2017,
There's a new upstream for moonshot-trust-router that I believe should
work with openssl 1.1.
Realistically, I should be able to deal with moonshot-gss-eap #848680
within a month.
I think it may be more like two months to deal with both
moonshot-gss-eap and moonshot-trust-router, both of which have
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Please remove the *SOURCE* package prosper as prosper is now
incorporated into TeX Live, and src:texlive-base builds a
transitional package prosper.
Thanks
Norbert
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
zp[1][2] and zpaq[3][4] are orphan, have the same upstream and were
introduced in Debian by Jari Aalto, in 2010. They have a very very
very similar source code. The mcdiff command is useful to see it.
Important considerations:
- Current zp revision is
forwarded https://jira.mongodb.org/browse/CDRIVER-2325
Thanks, we'll fix for 1.8.1.
X-Debbugs-CC: a...@debian.org sebast...@breakpoint.cc
在 2017年10月12日星期四 CST 下午11:44:37，Sebastian Andrzej Siewior 写道：
> Hi,
>
> this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
> remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
> of this bug to serious
On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 11:44:51PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
> remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
> of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
I'm
found 821269 52.4.0esr-1~deb9u1
thanks
Right. Under the assumption that myspell is replaced by hunspell, the
same change should occur in firefox. As of today, it is still not the case.
Leon
Source: gpyfft
Version: 0.7.0-1
Severity: important
Tags: upstream
Justification: fails to build from source
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Builds of gpyfft for kFreeBSD (admittedly not a release architecture)
have been failing:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "setup.py", line 39
Source: collectd
Version: 5.7.2-1
Severity: serious
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/collectd.html
...
checking for LIBSIGROK... no
...
configure:40804: checking for LIBSIGROK
configure:40811: $PKG_CONFIG --exists --print-errors "libsigrok < 0.4"
Requested 'libsi
Control: tag -1 + pending
Axel Beckert wrote:
> Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > Some recent change in unstable makes unburden-home-dir FTBFS and Debci fail:
>
> *sigh* According to the output, this is caused by
> https://bugs.debian.org/813164
Nope. I already covered that.
But "mv" seems to emit the wor
Source: supercollider
Version: 1:3.8.0~repack-1
Severity: serious
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=supercollider&arch=armel&ver=1%3A3.8.0~repack-1&stamp=1507298859&raw=0
...
cd "/<>/obj-arm-linux-gnueabi/external_libraries" && /usr/bin/c++
-DBOOST_CHRONO_HEADER_ONLY -DBOOST_NO_AUT
Source: supercollider
Version: 1:3.8.0~repack-1
Severity: serious
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=supercollider&suite=sid
...
c++: error: unrecognized command line option '-msse'; did you mean '-fdse'?
c++: error: unrecognized command line option '-msse'; did you mean '-fdse'?
c++:
Package: selinux-policy-default
Version: 2:2.20161023.1-10
Severity: important
User: hlieber...@debian.org
Usertags: selinux_desktop
Hello maintainers,
I'm seeing a bug in the policy around NetworkManager. It seems that
there are a lot of problems with NetworkManager; I'm seeing lots of
denied r
Package: libaugeas-dev
Version: 1.9.0-1
Severity: serious
Control: affects -1 src:lua-augeas
lua-augeas FTBFS:
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/lua-augeas.html
...
debian/rules override_dh_auto_build
make[1]: Entering directory '/build/1st/lua-augeas-0.1.1'
/
Hi Adrian,
thanks for the bug report.
Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Some recent change in unstable makes unburden-home-dir FTBFS and Debci fail:
*sigh* According to the output, this is caused by
https://bugs.debian.org/813164
Will see that I "fix" this by extending the regular expression to
match old an
Package: libmongoc-dev
Version: 1.8.0-1
Severity: serious
Control: affects -1 src:syslog-ng
syslog-ng FTBFS:
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/syslog-ng.html
...
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lsnappy
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
...
Makefile:7259: recip
Okay, that sounds reasonable, of course.
Surely, it's better to have packages containing only what people really
need.
Sorry, if I am not familiar with the processes involved in packaging as
this is my first usage of the Debian reporting system. Thus, I also
apologize for the duplicate #878263,
Package: diffoscope
Version 87
Severity: important
Today I tried to manually run diffoscope over a build of src:wine to see
whether we could get a usable diff.
Unfurtunately, diffoscope died with ENSPC after 3 hours and half. The
partition had ~50 GB free when I started diffoscope, and after it d
Package: librem-dev
Version: 0.5.2-1
Severity: serious
Control: affects -1 src:baresip
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/baresip.html
...
CC [M] build-x86_64/modules/g726/g726.o
gcc -DRELEASE -Wall -Wmissing-declarations -Wmissing-prototypes
-Wstrict-prototype
Control: tag -1 patch pending
Hi Gerald,
Gerald Turner (2017-06-15):
> In preparation for upgrading several hosts from jessie to stretch, my
> colleague and I discovered that phpldapadmin was removed from stretch
> due to this bug.
>
> Attached is a trivial one-line patch that solves the piupar
Control: severity -1 wishlist
Am 12.10.2017 um 15:05 schrieb Andrey Gursky:
> Source: mediathekview
> Version: 3.0.2-2
>
> Dear maintainer,
>
> a new version 13.0.3 has been released on October, 10 2017. Though it is
> only a "hotfix" patch release, now okhttp3 (com.squareup.okhttp3:okhttp)
> li
Package: libmariadbclient-dev-compat
Version: 10.1.26-0+deb9u1
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
I'm trying to compile a software that requires a mysql client library. CMake
is unable to detect that libmariadbclient-dev-compat package is installed on my
system, and running pkg-config against t
Package: golang-github-nbutton23-zxcvbn-go-dev
Version: 0.0~git20170830.0.f4cd9f5-1
Severity: serious
Control: affects -1 src:golang-github-chzyer-readline
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/golang-github-chzyer-readline.html
...
# github.com/nbutton23/zxcvbn-go
sr
Control: tags 873780 + unreproducible help
On Wed, 30 Aug 2017 at 22:38:39 -0400, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
> Version: 52.3.1-3
>
> The build of mozjs52 for kfreebsd-amd64 (admittedly not a release
> architecture) failed:
>
> TEST-KNOWN-FAIL | ecma_7/TypedObject/memory.js | (args: "") | (SKIP)
>
Hi Sebastian,
On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 11:44:58PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> Please react before that happens.
This is being tracked upstream. I made initial efforts to port it to
OpenSSL 1.1 and sent them upstream (see second comment in the upstream
bug), but things are complicated
Hi,
Apparently I forgot to subscribe to bugs for distributed so missed this
one.
And it appears yes I did forget to declare the dependency on sphinx-
rtd-theme.
Thank you for letting me know. I'll try to fix it tongight.
Diane
Source: gcc-defaults
Version: 1.173d1
Severity: serious
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/gcc-defaults.html
...
dh_compress -s -Ncpp-aarch64-linux-gnu -Ncpp-arm-linux-gnueabi
-Ncpp-arm-linux-gnueabihf -Ncpp-doc -Ncpp-mips-linux-gnu
-Ncpp-mips64el-linux-gnuabi64
On Thu, 12 Oct 2017 at 01:31:08 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> powerpc64 (pizzetti) gets the same test failures as s390x (zelenka),
> suggesting that they are something that happens on big-endian 64-bit.
> hppa doesn't seem to have a porterbox and sparc64's (notker) was
> unresponsive, so I can't c
Hi,
2016-10-30 22:14 Helmut Grohne:
Package: x11-xkb-utils
Version: 7.7+3
Tags: patch
User: helm...@debian.org
Usertags: rebootstrap
Control: affects -1 + src:cinnamon-settings-daemon src:libwx-perl
src:libxkbcommon src:openjdk-8 src:xdotool
The affected packages transitively depend on x11-xkb
On Thu, 12 Oct 2017 at 08:08:42 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Oct 2017 at 01:31:08 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > I've left mozjs52
> > compiling on mips (minkus) overnight to see whether both big-endian
> > 32-bit architectures behave the same.
>
> Unfortunately mips has new and exc
Source: node-grunt-contrib-concat
Version: 1.0.1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: buster sid
https://ci.debian.net/packages/n/node-grunt-contrib-concat/unstable/amd64/
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/node-grunt-contrib-concat.html
...
debian/rules override_dh_auto_t
On Thu, 12 Oct 2017 at 01:37:51 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On mips64el there are a couple of timeouts (knowing mips*, probably
> an arbitrary timeout is just too short):
>
> TEST-UNEXPECTED-FAIL | js1_5/Array/regress-157652.js | (args: "") | (TIMEOUT)
> TEST-UNEXPECTED-FAIL | js1_5/Regress/reg
2017-04-13 16:35 Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo:
Hi,
2016-03-06 21:08 Helmut Grohne:
Control: block -1 by 807516
[...]
The attached patch implements that proposal. Please consider applying
it. The ":native" is supported in apt and dpkg since wheezy. If in
doubt, don't hesitate to ask for detai
Source: unburden-home-dir
Version: 0.4.0.1
Severity: serious
Tags: buster sid
Some recent change in unstable makes unburden-home-dir FTBFS and Debci fail:
https://ci.debian.net/packages/u/unburden-home-dir/unstable/amd64/
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/history/unburden-home-dir.html
Source: haskell-x509-util
Version: 1.6.1-3
Severity: serious
Tags: buster sid
Some recent change in unstable makes haskell-x509-util FTBFS:
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/history/haskell-x509-util.html
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/haskell-x509-u
Hi,
2016-01-21 20:29 Ian Jackson:
Helmut Grohne writes ("Bug#812229: adns FTCBFS: does not support
DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nocheck"):
Source: adns
Version: 1.5.0~rc1-1
Tags: patch
User: helm...@debian.org
Usertags: rebootstrap
...
ands fails to cross build from source, because the test suite does
Hi,
> TL;DR...
Yes, I knew about that risk. But shorter messages have failed to draw
attention to a supposedly "important" bug.
I expected that the original patch was good to go, but I somehow forgot
that a 720+ day old patch is subject to bitrot. Please correct me if
I'm wrong, but wouldn't we
Package: catdoc
Version: 1:0.95-4
Tags: patch
This issue happens when running 'xls2csv' on XLS files containing
international characters (mainly from the ISO-8859-1 or CP1252 sets) and
when the default source charset is not apropriate to convert the characters.
You can reproduce it with the a
Source: tree-puzzle
Version: 5.2-9
Severity: important
Tags: patch
dh compat 10 defaults to parallel building, which frequently
causes FTBFS like:
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/tree-puzzle.html
...
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I. -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOU
Package: linux-armmp-lpae
Version: 4.12+85~bpo9+1
Severity: important
Hi,
starting with kernel 4.12 (but I also tested 4.13 from sid). My Raspberry pi 2
hangs at boot with this. All I get at boot is this:
U-Boot 2017.09+dfsg1-3 (Oct 09 2017 - 22:14:03 +)
DRAM: 998 MiB
RPI 2 Model B (0xa010
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
Hello maintainer(s),
2017-01-11 11:51 Helmut Grohne:
Source: nasm
Version: 2.12.01-1
Tags: patch
User: helm...@debian.org
Usertags: rebootstrap
nasm fails to cross build from source, because it does not pass --host
to ./configure. The easiest way of doing so is letting dh_auto_configure
handle
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
Phil kindly gave me access to his OpenRD rig earlier today and I've been
able to get this working.
Firstly, the change needs to be made for ftdi_channel to be 0 instead of
1.
Secondly the changes at the start of the bug report regarding
ftdi_device_desc and adapter_khz need to be made (though I o
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
Hi,
this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to
remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity
of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55
Sebastian
1 - 100 of 322 matches
Mail list logo
