Hello Arnaud!
Could you please apply your patch on the
http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-mysql/mariadb-10.0.git master
branch and test it out?
I read the patch and it looks correct at least by syntax, but I don't
actually know about what is the best policy for plugin bundling and/or
activation.
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock latest version of package mariadb-10.0. It is a security update.
Changelog:
mariadb-10.0 (10.0.16-1) unstable; urgency=low
[ Julien Muchembled ]
* Fix inclusion of Mroon
Hi,
sure I can.
Anton
2015-02-05 8:08 GMT+01:00 Marco Balmer :
> Hi,
>
> I've uploaded again to mentors.debian.net.
>
> Anton: Maybe you can do that again for me?
>
> Thanks,
> Marco
>
> On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 12:30:14AM +, mentors.debian.net wrote:
> > Your package fadecut all versions h
Hi,
Le 05/02/2015 01:50, Laurent Fousse a écrit :
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 11:20 AM, Julien Puydt
wrote:
Hi,
Le 04/02/2015 20:04, Laurent Fousse a écrit :
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 10:46 AM, Julien Puydt
wrote:
Package: libecm-dev
Version: 6.4.4-2
While working on sagemath-on-debia
Hi,
I've uploaded again to mentors.debian.net.
Anton: Maybe you can do that again for me?
Thanks,
Marco
On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 12:30:14AM +, mentors.debian.net wrote:
> Your package fadecut all versions has been removed from mentors.debian.net
> for the following reason:
>
> Your package
Package: shadow
Version: 4.2.1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: l10n patch
Please apply it and commit!
Thanks,
--
Trần Ngọc Quân.
>From 6d4a2edd7bf01fe40e9e85381ee10318e11def18 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Tr=E1=BA=A7n=20Ng=E1=BB=8Dc=20Qu=C3=A2n?=
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2015 14:08:12 +0700
Subj
Package: easymp3gain-qt
Version: 0.5.0+svn135-5
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)?
* What was the
Package: kernel-package
Version: 13.014+nmu1
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
I was checking on the environment passed to make-kpkg by a script of mine,
finally using KBUILD_VERB
On Wednesday, February 04, 2015 20:25:33 Niels Thykier wrote:
> Please remove the "moreinfo" tag once the package has been uploaded to TPU.
Uploaded. Due to the revision change, it's now:
unblock: kwave/0.8.11-1-1+deb8u1
Thanks,
Scott K
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@l
Hi Roelof! I'm excited you want to work on this.
On Tuesday, February 3, 2015, Roelof Berg wrote:
>
> I developed this application as part of a scientific project. It offers 2D,
> grayscale, rigid image registration with a powerful
> derivative based approach and operates very fast and memory ef
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I request an adopter for the spectools package.
The package is in a good shape and there hasn't a new upstream release in
quite some time.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact list
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I request an adopter for the libhdhomerun package.
The package is in a good shape and the upstream developer is still active.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I request an adopter for the gifsicle package.
The package is in a good shape and there are regular upstream releases.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I request an adopter for the cowsay package.
The package is in a good shape and there are no more upstream releases of
it.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.deb
Hello,
On الأربعاء 4 شباط 2015 13:16, Gene Cooperman wrote:
> Hi Afif,
> Sorry for the delay in writing back. We talked about your request.
No problem. Thanks for considering
> We're hesitant to package the plugins in the _ contrib/ _ directory,
> because those are contributed by various p
I was planning on adopting this package a while ago, but haven't done
anything with it yet.
Therefore, I'm letting go of it in case someone else wants to take it over.
Francois
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Conta
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I would like to request an adopter for the python-whois package.
The package is in a good shape and rarely gets any bugs filed against it.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact list
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I request an adopter for the pdfresurrect package.
The package is in a good condition and the software is very well-maintained
upstream. It rarely has any bugs filed against it.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
Package: higan
Version: 094-5
Since higan provides accurate NES emulation, it should be included in the
virtual package nes-emulator.
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I would like to requester an adopter for letterize.
The package is in a good shape and it is still well-maintained upstream. It
rarely has any bugs filed against it.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscr
Package: live-build
Version: 5.0~a2-1
Tags: patch
The new file 'functions/chroot_bind_path.sh' added in v5.0~a2-1 has the
wrong permission mode - 644 instead of 755.
The attached patch corrects this.
commit e64c30dfc4d23fd7df39a4bd53d2cac5342dec72
Author: jnqnfe
Date: Thu Feb 5 03:54:54 2015 +
Package: localepurge
Version: 0.7.3.2
Severity: normal
aisleriot and *some* other GNOME stuff appears to now install to
/usr/share/help, not /usr/share/gnome/help:
bash4$ apt-file search /usr/share/help | wc -l
43771
bash4$ apt-file search /usr/share/gnome/help | wc -l
11188
Package: rsyslog
Version: 5.8.11-3+deb7u2
When attempting to remove or replace rsyslog during an upgrade with
systemd installed, the job to stop rsyslog is cancelled immediately and
rsyslog does not shutdown. This is on a system with the default journald
forward to syslog behavior enabled.
Inves
On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 02:58:03AM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
> Time to RTFK then.
>[...]
> Thus: on Debian's kernels, any i386 or x32 process will get a 32-bit field.
> Ie, my version of the patch is needed. On kernels compiled without
> CONFIG_COMPAT, Peter Jones' version (reading uname -m) is
On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 06:04:00PM -0600, D. Jared Dominguez wrote:
> In other words, 32-bit efivar/efibootmgr on 64-bit kernel is going
> to get the same value from the kernel as 64-bit efivar/efibootmgr on
> 64-bit. With the x32 ABI, you're going to see the same value on a
> 64-bit kernel (throug
On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 06:04:00PM -0600, D. Jared Dominguez wrote:
> In other words, 32-bit efivar/efibootmgr on 64-bit kernel is going
> to get the same value from the kernel as 64-bit efivar/efibootmgr on
> 64-bit. With the x32 ABI, you're going to see the same value on a
> 64-bit kernel (throug
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package povray
This update fixes incorrect conffile references to /usr/local/etc in
some scripts (reported in Ubuntu) and some followup fixes to make
these scripts work as in
Hi Joey, Hans,
has anyone actually tested this patch?
cheers,
Holger
As a sidenote and as you said you were new to packaging, Hans: I don't think
it's wise to raise severity just because there is a patch or even because it's
somehow privacy/security related: the latter is good in prin
severity 774195 important
tags 774195 + security
thanks
Fixed in NSS 3.17.4:
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/Projects/NSS/NSS_3.17.4_release_notes
https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=437733#c12
I'm bumping severity and adding the "security" tag because this does
control: severity -1 important
control: retitle -1 systemctl complains no shorewall.service
Hi,
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=776680#10 explains that
starting and stopping the firewall still works as it should, thus downgrading
the severity accordingly: shorewall is still us
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 11:20 AM, Julien Puydt
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Le 04/02/2015 20:04, Laurent Fousse a écrit :
>
> Hi,
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 10:46 AM, Julien Puydt
>> wrote:
>>
>> Package: libecm-dev
>>> Version: 6.4.4-2
>>>
>>> While working on sagemath-on-debian, I met the following iss
control: retitle -1 unblock: debian-edu-config/1.817
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
x-debbugs-cc: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Dear release team,
this is an unblock request for debian-edu-config fixing an
important bug #776763 (completly broken PXE installatios from the mai
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
x-debbugs-cc: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Dear release team,
This is an pre-upload unblock approval request for debian-edu fixing
an important bug (which sadly wasn't filed. It breaks the
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package bowtie, that was missing its core programs in /usr/bin.
unblock bowtie/1.1.1-2
Here is the full debdiff.
diff -Nru bowtie-1.1.1/debian/bowtie.install bowtie-1.1.1/d
On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 09:47:02AM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Jan 2015, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > I vote
> >
> > A > FD.
>
> On Mon, 26 Jan 2015, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > I vote A > FD.
>
> The 1 week constitutional voting period has now closed; with two votes,
> we meet quorum, an
On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 05:54:41PM -0600, Dominguez, Jared wrote:
On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 05:40:28PM -0600, Adam Borowski wrote:
On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 05:36:06PM -0600, D. Jared Dominguez wrote:
On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 05:25:59PM -0600, Adam Borowski wrote:
>On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 05:12:09PM
Hello, I can confirm this is still a problem on Iceweasel 35.
Switching to Mozilla's Location Services seems the best way forward.
They currently do not require a valid API key
(https://location.services.mozilla.com/v1/geolocate?key=test does work,
though the Debian Mozilla team could reach them
On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 05:40:28PM -0600, Adam Borowski wrote:
On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 05:36:06PM -0600, D. Jared Dominguez wrote:
On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 05:25:59PM -0600, Adam Borowski wrote:
>On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 05:12:09PM -0600, D. Jared Dominguez wrote:
>>On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 04:57:5
On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 05:25:59PM -0600, Adam Borowski wrote:
On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 05:12:09PM -0600, D. Jared Dominguez wrote:
On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 04:57:52PM -0600, Adam Borowski wrote:
>If I read that correctly, #773412 fixed i386 on an i386 kernel. As you can
>see in the dumps above,
On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 05:36:06PM -0600, D. Jared Dominguez wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 05:25:59PM -0600, Adam Borowski wrote:
> >On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 05:12:09PM -0600, D. Jared Dominguez wrote:
> >>On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 04:57:52PM -0600, Adam Borowski wrote:
> >>>If I read that correctl
On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 05:12:09PM -0600, D. Jared Dominguez wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 04:57:52PM -0600, Adam Borowski wrote:
> >If I read that correctly, #773412 fixed i386 on an i386 kernel. As you can
> >see in the dumps above, i386 userland on an amd64 kernel receives a 32-bit
> >field
Ok, 776753 is the same bug as this one:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=539617
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 04:57:52PM -0600, Adam Borowski wrote:
On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 04:48:23PM -0600, D. Jared Dominguez wrote:
On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 04:40:16PM -0600, Adam Borowski wrote:
I'm not convinced that this doesn't break the use case in #773412
[1] since you're looking to define t
Hi,
i have this bug on a fresh install of jessie/testing.
and the workaround simply is not working.
--
Dipl.-Inf. Univ. Florian Reitmeir
E-Mail: n...@multi24.com
Tel: +43 650 2661660
Fax: +43 650 2661660
HP: http://net.multi24.com
Amraserstr 23
6020 Innsbruck / Austria
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Control: retitle -1 unblock: torbrowser-launcher/0.1.9-1
Control: tags -1 - confirmed moreinfo
# only v0.1.8-1 was confirmed... though see below :)
Hi Niels,
On Dienstag, 27. Januar 2015, Niels Thykier wrote:
> > this is a pre-approval unblock request to upload a new upstream verion of
> > torbro
On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 04:40:16PM -0600, Adam Borowski wrote:
Package: efivar
Version: 0.15-3
Severity: serious
I'm afraid the patch 07-num_bits.patch breaks the case of 32-bit userland
on a 64-bit kernel. As far as I know, this is how i386 would get installed
on any non-ancient machine if d-i
On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 04:48:23PM -0600, D. Jared Dominguez wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 04:40:16PM -0600, Adam Borowski wrote:
> >Package: efivar
> >
> >I'm afraid the patch 07-num_bits.patch breaks the case of 32-bit userland
> >on a 64-bit kernel. As far as I know, this is how i386 would g
Hi,
this bug is gone, but users users might be affected from a fall-out from it:
upgrades to alpha/beta versions have appearantly modified the the users config
to prefer such releases, so that even with newer versions this bug seems still
to be there, while indeed the bug is now in the user's co
Hello,
Thanks for the patch. It looks like it has the correct solution, using
the Debian abstraction layer over the alternative init systems.
However, I've found a problem with it using the "puppet resource"
command. Could you see if you find what causes it?
With puppet 3.7.22-1:
,
| root
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Russ Allbery
* Package name: python-moto
Version : 0.4.0
Upstream Author : Steve Pulec
* URL : https://github.com/spulec/moto
* License : Apache 2.0
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Mock framework for boto A
Hi Michael,
On 04.02.2015 18:40, Michael Jeanson wrote:
I've talked to upstream
Thanks for talking to upstream!
and they don't have any hppa hardware on hand.
They would like to have a look at the output log of "make regtest" and
"make bench" before applying the patch.
Ok.
If you have ac
Control: severity -1 grave
Hi again,
I'm going to raise this bug severity, as PDF printing is one of evince's
main features. I think that if we release jessie without PDF printing in
the default desktop, it should be because of a deliberate decision,
rather than because this bug flew under the ra
On Wed, 04 Feb 2015, Bill Allombert wrote:
> My understanding was and is still that the CTTE overrided the release
> team on this point.
That's incorrect. At least recently, when the CTTE is overriding people,
we have been very explicit about the fact that they are being
overridden. [This is impor
> probably involves some poking at the dpkg source code
> to figure out if there is a config switch or a
> environment variable to stop dpkg from showing this progress.
dpkg just does "isatty(1)", nothing fancy
http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/dpkg/dpkg.git/tree/lib/dpkg/progress.c
> That sounds pl
Hello Maintainer
An other way to solve this problem is:
Go to "Tools","Macros","Organize macros", "LibreOffice Basic..."
Go to "My Macros and dialog box","Standard","Module1" (a blanc module)
in the Widows "Macros LibreOffice Basic", press "Edit".
After going with the mousse in the a macro a d
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
On Tue, 03 Feb 2015 10:20:42 +0100 Rafal Pietrak wrote:
> Package: kernel-package
> Version: 13.014+nmu1
This is not the right package name. The kernel is packaged as
linux-image-3.16.0-4-586 (and other names). What version of that
package do you have installed?
> Sev
Package: sweethome3d
Version: 4.5+dfsg-2
Followup-For: Bug #777082
Dear Maintainer,
I just checked and this problem is only happening in one of my computers, with
an Intel Graphic Card.
I tried in my laptop with an Nvidia card and it works fine, as expected.
-- System Information:
Debian Rele
Hi Afif,
Sorry for the delay in writing back. We talked about your request.
We're hesitant to package the plugins in the _ contrib/ _ directory,
because those are contributed by various people, and we're not yet
ready to guarantee our normal standards for those plugins.
So, at this stage,
Package: isdnutils
Version: 1:3.25+dfsg1-6
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
isdnutils/experimental needs porting a lot of changes from sid to be
buildable again.
https://buildd.deb
On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 07:12:57PM +, Martín Ferrari wrote:
> Although this is not the right solution (as the XDG vars might point to
> some other location), the problem with the systemd-related mounts is
> solved if instead of using bind-mounts one uses rbind-mounts (recursive
> bind).
We del
+++ Martín Ferrari [2015-02-04 19:12 +]:
> Although this is not the right solution (as the XDG vars might point to
> some other location), the problem with the systemd-related mounts is
> solved if instead of using bind-mounts one uses rbind-mounts (recursive
> bind).
I found another circumsta
Package: klibc-utils-floppy-udeb
Version: 2.0.4-2
Severity: wishlist
Tags: d-i patch
Hi!
Please enable building the floppy udeb on x32.
While I did not test whether it works (how do you use floppies these days?),
it does build, and as x32 is an x86 architecture, there's no real reason it
would no
Hi,
Le 04/02/2015 15:34, Adam D. Barratt a écrit :
> Please go ahead, thanks.
Uploaded and accepted, thanks.
Regards
David
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Package: lilo
Version: 1:24.1-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: d-i patch
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: port-x32 di-x32
Hi!
Please enable building lilo on x32. All that needs to be done is adding it
to the Architectures: line in debian/control
It works for me with no further changes, if y
Package: tcl8.5-dev
Version: 8.5.11-2
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Fix tcl8.5 aclocal macros locating tclConfig.sh
Wheezy tcl8.5-dev package installs tclConfig.sh in /usr/lib/tcl8.5/,
but the included aclocal macros omit that directory in the search.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 7.7
Package: open-iscsi-udeb
Version: 2.0.873+git0.3b4b4500-4
Severity: wishlist
Tags: d-i patch
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: port-x32 di-x32
Hi!
Please add x32 to the list of architectures the udeb for open-iscsi is built
on:
diff -Nru open-iscsi-2.0.873+git0.3b4b4500/debian/control
Package: sweethome3d
Version: 4.5+dfsg-2
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
When I run Sweethome3D from CLI or menu entry, it works fine. I can create my
"sweet home" and save the project to an sh3d file.
But, if I try to open it from the File->Open menu of the program or running
"sweethome3d
On Wed, 2015-02-04 at 21:27 +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> dput complained that wheezy-proposed-updates wasn't a valid codename, it
> ran successfully when I changed this to stable-proposed-updates
>
> Please let me know if this is correct
They're both fine. As are "stable" and "wheezy", amongst o
Package: kopete
Version: 4:4.14.1-2
Severity: normal
I just noticed that kopete installs a mozilla browser plugin. There
seems to be little information on what this plugin does. In particular,
the kopete package description does not give any hint about this.
Since this greatly increases the attac
On 2015-02-04 19:48:27 [+], Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Please go ahead.
Done, thanks.
>
> Regards,
>
> Adam
>
Sebastian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 09:28:18PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 08:54:16PM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
> > I am sorry you feel that way. I assumed that you were aware, given that
> > you replied to the tech-ctte decision in which our statement was
> > included (in fact, y
On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 08:54:16PM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
> I am sorry you feel that way. I assumed that you were aware, given that
> you replied to the tech-ctte decision in which our statement was
> included (in fact, you retained it in quoted part of your reply).
My understanding was and
On 04/02/15 20:32, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 -moreinfo +confirmed
>
> On Wed, 2015-02-04 at 16:16 +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>> On 04/02/15 14:58, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>>> Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
>>>
>>> On 2015-02-04 13:02, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> [...]
The package vp
On 2015-02-04 20:54, Niels Thykier wrote:
> I believe this makes sense, as decision of the release only affects
> testing. Accordingly, there is nothing preventing multiple
> implementations of libjpeg in testing or unstable.
Sorry, I made a mistake here. That last part should have read:
"Accor
On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 04:27:06PM +0100, Ondřej Jirman wrote:
> it's ok to rename the tool. In megatools 2.0 there will be only a
> single megatools binary called 'megatools' anyway, so there will be
> no conflict.
I was thinking that, since megatools 2 is going to solve this problem
and I don't
Package: gwenview
Version: 4:4.8.4-2
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
I wished to create a calendar containing a picture which I had.
The picture was in jpeg format.
My computer has about 500 MB of memory, and
was not connected to the Internet at the time.
It was running KDE,but was somewhat slo
Source: jython
Version: 2.5.2-1
Severity: important
Tags: security upstream
Hi
Several issues were mentioned in Red Hat Bugzilla at [0] referencing
the issue which creates executables class files with wrong permissions
with CVE-2013-2027.
At least it seems present in the Debian package that the
Package: libsidplay1
Version: 1.36.59-6
Severity: minor
Dear Maintainer,
The package libsidplay1 suggests xsidplay, but this package seems to
have been
removed from Debian some time back. Since the package no longer exists,
I believe it can be remove from the list of suggestions.
$ apt show l
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hi Release Team!
unzip/6.0-15 had already an unblock so far, but unfortunately the
original patch for CVE-2014-8139 was defective, and caused
regressions, see #775640. The update to unstabl
Package: mbr-udeb
Version: 1.1.11-5
Severity: wishlist
Tags: d-i patch
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: port-x32 di-x32
Hi!
Please enable building of the udeb on x32. It's a new architecture, that
works on x86 (like i386, amd64 and lpia). All that needs to be done is
adding it to debi
On 2015-02-02 00:04, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 08:02:38AM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> I am afraid I do not see how removing libjpeg9 from testing is
>> inconsistent with the tech-ctte decision.
>
> You need to reread the full decision in context.
>
>> The very first item
Package: syslinux
Version: 3:6.03+dfsg-5
Severity: wishlist
Tags: d-i patch
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: port-x32 di-x32
Hi!
Please enable building syslinux on x32. All that needs to be done is
adding it to the control file, both on packages and in depends for i386
build tools (gcc
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Mon, 2015-02-02 at 22:11 +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> Please unblock the new clamav release which is a security release +
> embedded libsmspack security release.
> This is what we have in unstable without the systemd support and
> "clamdscan" package sp
Hi,
Le 04/02/2015 20:04, Laurent Fousse a écrit :
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 10:46 AM, Julien Puydt
wrote:
Package: libecm-dev
Version: 6.4.4-2
While working on sagemath-on-debian, I met the following issue : the
sample code below, when compiled against sage's ECM tells me 1 is a factor
of
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Wed, 2015-02-04 at 08:51 -0400, David Prévot wrote:
> Please consider this update that fixes two security issues (marked as
> no-DSA, so I didn’t bother the security team for it).
Please go ahead, thanks.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-d
Control: tags -1 -moreinfo +confirmed
On Wed, 2015-02-04 at 16:16 +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> On 04/02/15 14:58, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
> >
> > On 2015-02-04 13:02, Daniel Pocock wrote:
[...]
> >> The package vpim in wheezy is broken, wheezy has Ruby 1.9 but the
>
Package: efibootmgr
Version: 0.11.0-3+x32
Severity: wishlist
Tags: d-i patch
Hi!
Please enable building efibootmgr on x32. All that needs to be done here is
adding x32 to the list of architectures in debian/control.
Of course, this assumes efivar gets enabled on x32 as well, but that's a
differe
Control: tags -1 confirmed moreinfo
On 2015-02-03 01:06, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package kwave
>
> The attached debdiff fixes a FTBFS for kwave that has it pendin
I want to add that I am having the same issue. Something will start the
colord daemon inside the chroot, in a different namespace. It does not
get killed on session end, and then you get these weird device busy
errors on rmdir.
A friend of mine reported to me the same kind of issues.
--
Martín Fe
Although this is not the right solution (as the XDG vars might point to
some other location), the problem with the systemd-related mounts is
solved if instead of using bind-mounts one uses rbind-mounts (recursive
bind).
I changed my desktop/fstab file and now I get sound with no errors:
/dev
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 10:46 AM, Julien Puydt
wrote:
> Package: libecm-dev
> Version: 6.4.4-2
>
> While working on sagemath-on-debian, I met the following issue : the
> sample code below, when compiled against sage's ECM tells me 1 is a factor
> of 1 ; and "No factor found" when compiled aga
Control: merge 595485 777043
Hi Goswin,
On 2015-02-04 13:37, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> * Package name: libshark
> Version : 3.0.11
> Upstream Author : Institut fuer Neuroinformatik, Ruhr-Universitaet Bochum
> * URL : http://image.diku.dk/shark/
> * License
Package: libecm-dev
Version: 6.4.4-2
While working on sagemath-on-debian, I met the following issue : the
sample code below, when compiled against sage's ECM tells me 1 is a
factor of 1 ; and "No factor found" when compiled against debian's...
Snark on #debian-science
#include
int
main(i
Package: maxima
Version: 5.35.1-1
Severity: minor
While working on sage+maxima+ECL, I discovered a few strange precision
issues : sometimes debian's maxima (GCL-based) seems to give a lesser
precision that what sage (using it's own ECL-based maxima) expects.
For example: tanh(1.0);
sage: 0.
Package: apt
Version: 1.0.9.6
Tags: patch
User: helm...@debian.org
Usertags: rebootstrap
Consider a system with native architecture amd64 and foreign
architecture i386. Then consider the following empty packages
(generateable with equivs):
Package: foo
Architecture: all
Provides: bar:i386
Packag
Control: severity -1 important
Control: retitle -1 nsd fails to start on boot binding to a specific IP
Hi,
on current jessie nsd still fails to start properly.
This is the host's config:
| root@buran:~# cat /etc/nsd/nsd.conf
| server:
| ip-address: 37.247.55.151
| ip-address: 2a
Hi,
On Debian, the 'Recommends:' should really be "cron | cron-daemon | anacron".
There will certainly a transition going this way after Jessie is released.
https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2014/10/msg00474.html
This virtual package 'cron-daemon' is not used by the ubuntu-* meta-packages;
Hi!
On Wed, 2015-02-04 at 14:40:45 +0200, Alex Potapenko wrote:
> Package: dpkg
> Version: 1.17.23
> Severity: minor
> While trying to cross-compile dpkg for an arm-uclibc target without
> sys_siglist,
Without sys_siglist nor strsignal()? Hmmm.
> I encountered the issue of failing to build libc
Control: notfound -1 2.9.2+dfsg1-3
Control: found -1 2.9.2+dfsg1-2
The buildd log linked used libxml2-dev version 2.9.2+dfsg1-2. The
missing dependency was fixed with the upload of 2.9.2+dfsg1-3, per bug
#776741.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subje
1 - 100 of 187 matches
Mail list logo
