Bug#328534: Patch committed to svn, tagging pending

On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 10:50:58PM -0700, Jurij Smakov wrote: > I have committed the patch for this problem to svn. The fix will be > included into the 2.6.12-7 upload of kernel packages. I hope you pulled the patch from the git archive. Bastian -- "We have the right to survive!"

Bug#328740: linux-source-2.6.12: xfs filesystem corruption

Package: linux-source-2.6.12 Version: 2.6.12-6 Severity: normal Hi, I'm not sure the kernel is responsible of this problem, this can be lvm as well. I've 2.6.12 with lvm over a software raid1. All the filesystems are xfs. The architecture is X86_64 on an athlon 64 3500+. The system has been crea

Bug#293492: [Pkg-shadow-devel] Bug#293492: useradd: by default creates user with unspecified shell, this causes problems

> Sorry, I was semi-offline because of problems with my e-mail > urgent job and a business trip to France. Dammit. And you didn't tell you were coming close to us? :-) > > I agree with you that the latter way is preferred. > > So I'll make the necessary changes. > > What I dislike, however, is

Bug#328739: packagesearch: crashes at end of "loading debtags plugin"

Package: packagesearch Version: 1.2 Severity: important For a few months I've been unable to start packagesearch on one system I use (but not the other!). I keep hoping the misbehavior will go away, but it hasn't. $ packagesearch & [1] 12326 $ Loaded plugin: Apt Plugins Loaded plugin: Debtags

Bug#328621: fvwm starts when other window manager is already active

Hi, At first blush, this does not appear to actually be a bug in fvwm: note that fvwm detects another version of fvwm running, so it does to window manager detection. -- __> fvwm [FVWM][SetupICCCM2]: <> another ICCCM 2.

Bug#328534: Patch committed to svn, tagging pending

tags 328534 pending thanks Hi, I have committed the patch for this problem to svn. The fix will be included into the 2.6.12-7 upload of kernel packages. Best regards, Jurij Smakov[EMAIL PROTECTED] Key: http://www.wooyd.org/pgpkey/ Key

Bug#119616: no more bedroom probs..

Seriously man.. There's really no need for those embarrassing, time consuming Dr. visits... We've got what you need (the real stuff) so you can rise to occasion whenever you want ;-) its never been easier.. http://uoz8zrzi020i1ccnzuunzcuc.misogyneabck.com/?curl -- no more of these notification

Bug#126753: no need for the clinic

Seriously man.. There's really no need for those embarrassing, time consuming Dr. visits... We've got what you need (the real stuff) so you can rise to occasion whenever you want ;-) its never been easier.. http://uoz8zrzi020i1ccnzuunzcuc.misogyneabck.com/?shod -- no more of these notification

Bug#328738: kaffeine: Kaffeine not loading Kaffeine Part

Package: kaffeine Version: 0.7.1-1 Followup-For: Bug #328738 The problem seems to stem from kaffeine-xine not having been installed during the upgrade of kaffeine. Once I installed kaffeine-xine, kaffeine is running fine. Dependencies for kaffeine show: kaffeine-gstreamer | kaffeine-xin

Bug#309370: bison: 'core dump' when receives incorrect grammar

I reproduced Debian bug 309370 with Bison 1.875d-1, which is currently the Debian stable version. The bug is fixed in Bison 2.1, which just came out . Thanks for reporting it. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsub

Bug#322533: Still present in 2.6.12-6

Steve has confirmed that this bug is still present in 2.6.12-6. Jurij Smakov[EMAIL PROTECTED] Key: http://www.wooyd.org/pgpkey/ KeyID: C99E03CC -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Conta

Bug#272680: bison: 'core dump' when receives incorrect grammar

I could not reproduce Debian bug 272680 with Bison 2.1, which just came out . Nor could I reproduce it with Bison 1.875d-1, which is currently the Debian stable version. Since the bug was reported against Bison 1.875a-1.1, and nobody has reproduced

Bug#196024: glr bison default actions broken

I could not reproduce Debian bug 196024 with Bison 2.1, which just came out . Nor could I reproduce it with Bison 1.875d-1, which is currently the Debian stable version. Since the bug was reported against Bison 1.875a-1, and nobody has reproduced it

Bug#327684: FTBFS on GNU/kFreeBSD

Eric Wong a écrit : Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Package: mpd Severity: important Tags: patch Hi, The current version of mpd fails to build on GNU/kFreeBSD, because the build-dependency on libasound2-dev, which is Linux specific, could not been satisfied. Please find attached a

Bug#328738: kaffeine: Kaffeine not loading Kaffeine Part

Package: kaffeine Version: 0.7.1-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable I just upgraded kaffeine from 0.6.1 to 0.7.1-1. Upon running it, the Kaffeine 0.7.1 Installation Wizard pops up with an installation check. The installation check says: "Kaffeine Part... Part not found. Ple

Bug#70001: Suitable for All Occasions

Replica Handbags http://airdrops.pq4.net/replica/lib/ All men by nature desire knowledge. [Poetry] is the lava of the imagination whose eruption prevents an earthquake. No one goes there nowadays, it's too crowded. A day without sunshine is like, you know, night. I like this pl

Bug#321837: Intent to NMU

On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 04:31:57PM -0600, dann frazier wrote: > As these bugs have been open for a month without a response from the > maintainers, I plan to NMU these packages in 1 week (or sooner, at the > maintainers' request). feel free, as long as you dont break it. I prepare a new maintainer

Bug#328732: [Pkg-octave-devel] Bug#328732: please update octave2.1-headers's dependencies

On 17 September 2005 at 04:37, Rafael Laboissiere wrote: | * Aaron M. Ucko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-09-16 21:54]: | | > Package: octave2.1-headers | > Version: 2.1.71-3 | > Severity: important | > | > In general, octave2.1-headers's dependencies should probably reflect | > octave2.1's build-dep

Bug#328732: please update octave2.1-headers's dependencies

Rafael Laboissiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Thanks for spotting this problem. Besides the gfortran vs g77 > incompatibility, I see other dependencies that can also cause problems: Thank you for taking the time to take a closer look. > refblas3-dev | atlas3-base-dev > lapack3-dev |

Bug#328563: libgal23

If you have been using libgal-dev (the gnome 1 version of libgal), then know that I am going to continue to make this package available. The source package name will be different, but you can continue to Build-Depends against libgal-dev as before if you wish to. Thomas (the gnucash maintainer, in

Bug#312245: mailutils 1:0.6.90-2 doesn't solve problem

> I will try > restoring one of the mbox files from before the migration and test it > locally to see if the problem is present then. I'll let you know what > happens. Just to confirm, I restored one of the old mbox files onto my local system today and was unable to reproduce the problem. Perhaps

Bug#328737: coreutils: the total for ls -l (and df too) is miscalculated

Package: coreutils Version: 5.2.1-2.1 Severity: important ls -l and df miscalculate the total file size. see the sample output below. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /b

Bug#126519: info

Did you know that you could cut your food right down to 1000 calories and still gain weight? Eat 1000, burn only 800 and you will gain weight- eventhough you're constantly hungry. On the other hand, you could eat say 3,000 calories and loose a lot of weight- If you burn 3,500 which has less t

Bug#328562: Please upgrade your package

Takuo KITAME <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > New gal pacakge provides libgal2.4-0 and libgal2.4-dev. Ok, then I have just uploaded gal0.x, which provides libgal-dev, libgal23, and libgal-data. Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact

Bug#328736: installation-reports: Installation report for i386 business card on 2005-09-16

Package: installation-reports Severity: normal Package: installation-reports Debian-installer-version: debian-testing-i386-businesscard, 2005-09-16 daily build uname -a: Linux beast 2.6.12-1-k7-smp #1 SMP Tue Sep 6 17:04:08 UTC 2005 i686 GNU/Linux Date: 2005-09-16 Method: Business card CD, def

Bug#328735: ftp.debian.org: Please remove gal2.2, gtkhtml3.1 and gtkhtml3.2

Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal They are no longer used. can be removed. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kern

Bug#328732: please update octave2.1-headers's dependencies

* Aaron M. Ucko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-09-16 21:54]: > Package: octave2.1-headers > Version: 2.1.71-3 > Severity: important > > In general, octave2.1-headers's dependencies should probably reflect > octave2.1's build-dependencies. In particular, building octave2.1 against > gfortran causes mk

Bug#328562: Please upgrade your package

Takuo KITAME <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Takuo KITAME <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> >> Takuo KITAME <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> >> >> > No. It'll belibgal2.4-dev and it provides libgal-2.4.{so,la} >> >> > But source package name is just 'gal' then libgal-dev >> >> > (it cames from s

Bug#143973: no need for the clinic

Seriously man.. There's really no need for those embarrassing, time consuming Dr. visits... We've got what you need (the real stuff) so you can rise to occasion whenever you want ;-) its never been easier.. http://uoz8zrzi020i1ccnzuunzcuc.misogyneabck.com/?septennial -- no more of these notifi

Bug#328562: Please upgrade your package

> Takuo KITAME <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >> Takuo KITAME <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> > >> >> Takuo KITAME <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> >> > >> >> > No. It'll belibgal2.4-dev and it provides libgal-2.4.{so,la} > >> >> > But source package name is just 'gal' then libgal-dev > >> >>

Bug#328562: Please upgrade your package

> Takuo KITAME <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >> Takuo KITAME <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> > >> > No. It'll belibgal2.4-dev and it provides libgal-2.4.{so,la} > >> > But source package name is just 'gal' then libgal-dev > >> > (it cames from same source name 'gal') will be removed. > >> > >

Bug#328734: ftp.debian.org: Please remove gal2 and gtkhtml3.0

Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal Thease pacages are no longer required. Please remove it. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked t

Bug#328733: FTBFS: Unsatisfiable build-dependency on r-cran-gmodels

Package: gregmisc Version: 2.0.8-1 Severity: serious gregmisc fails to build because it cannot satisfy its build-dependency on r-cran-gmodels: > -> Considering r-cran-gmodels >-> Trying r-cran-gmodels >-> Cannot install r-cran-gmodels; apt errors follow: > Reading package lists... >

Bug#328562: Please upgrade your package

Takuo KITAME <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Takuo KITAME <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> > No. It'll belibgal2.4-dev and it provides libgal-2.4.{so,la} >> > But source package name is just 'gal' then libgal-dev >> > (it cames from same source name 'gal') will be removed. >> > >> > If you need o

Bug#328562: Please upgrade your package

> Takuo KITAME <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > No. It'll belibgal2.4-dev and it provides libgal-2.4.{so,la} > > But source package name is just 'gal' then libgal-dev > > (it cames from same source name 'gal') will be removed. > > > > If you need old 0.x gal, you can pacakge it as gal0.x > > So

Bug#328562: Please upgrade your package

Takuo KITAME <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > No. It'll belibgal2.4-dev and it provides libgal-2.4.{so,la} > But source package name is just 'gal' then libgal-dev > (it cames from same source name 'gal') will be removed. > > If you need old 0.x gal, you can pacakge it as gal0.x So you're happy if I

Bug#206364: What's in your louis vuitton handbag?

Replica Handbags http://Copernican.pi11.com/rep/dir/ To follow by faith alone is to follow blindly. I prefer complexity to certainty, cheerful mysteries to sullen facts. He is able who thinks he is able. Nothing exists except atoms and empty space;everything else is opinion. The

Bug#328562: Please upgrade your package

Takuo KITAME <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Well, that's perfectly annoying. Do you have a good reason for >> churning around the names? Why not just keep the names you have? > > Really annoying thing is GNOME1 programs. I hate keeping old. ORPHAN THE DAMN PACKAGES. Nobody expects you to keep

Bug#116376: something is coming up..

Seriously man.. There's really no need for those embarrassing, time consuming Dr. visits... We've got what you need (the real stuff) so you can rise to occasion whenever you want ;-) its never been easier.. http://uoz8zrzi020i1ccnzuunzcuc.misogyneabck.com/?snowy -- no more of these notificatio

Bug#328562: Please upgrade your package

> > I'm sorry if this is difficult, but you simply MUST participate in > conversation beyond single-word answers. > > All I can do is guess at what you mean, since you don't really SAY, > you just give vague hints and assume I'll figure it out. > > Are you saying that you are going to churn a

Bug#328562: Please upgrade your package

> Takuo KITAME <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >> Takuo KITAME <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> > >> > Package: gnucash > >> > Version: 1.8.10-18 > >> > Severity: important > >> > > >> > libgal23 will be remove from archive when libgal2.4-0 hits unstable. > >> > Currently it go to experimental bu

Bug#328562: Please upgrade your package

Takuo KITAME <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> > Takuo KITAME <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> > >> >> Package: gnucash >> >> Version: 1.8.10-18 >> >> Severity: important >> >> >> >> libgal23 will be remove from archive when libgal2.4-0 hits unstab

Bug#328562: Please upgrade your package

Takuo KITAME <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Takuo KITAME <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> > Package: gnucash >> > Version: 1.8.10-18 >> > Severity: important >> > >> > libgal23 will be remove from archive when libgal2.4-0 hits unstable. >> > Currently it go to experimental but into unstable in n

Bug#328731: [dpatch-maintainers] Bug#328731: dpatch-edit-patch should fail when no patchname specified

Hi, > When no patchname is specified, dpatch-edit-patch edits the patch > ".dpatch", which ends up becoming a hidden file. > > Either it should fail, or provide a menu of existing patches to edit > (failing is just fine). That would be good. Patch welcome. It will involve making a new testsuite

Bug#328730: [dpatch-maintainers] Bug#328730: dpatch-convert-diffgz and dpatch-edit-patch should have consistent syntax

Hi, > For the sake of consistency, either: > > 1) dpatch-convert-diffgz should take a single parameter (01_first) > > or > > 2) dpatch-edit-patch should be modified to accept patchno as a > parameter. > > It seems to me that option #1 is preferable: always have the user > specify the complete

Bug#328562: Please upgrade your package

> Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Takuo KITAME <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > >> Package: gnucash > >> Version: 1.8.10-18 > >> Severity: important > >> > >> libgal23 will be remove from archive when libgal2.4-0 hits unstable. > >> Currently it go to experimental but into u

Bug#328562: Please upgrade your package

> Takuo KITAME <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Package: gnucash > > Version: 1.8.10-18 > > Severity: important > > > > libgal23 will be remove from archive when libgal2.4-0 hits unstable. > > Currently it go to experimental but into unstable in near future. > > > > So, please upgrade your packag

Bug#328400: [dpatch-maintainers] Bug#328400: dpatch-convert-diffgz creates inconsistant 00list

hi, > > 2) Assuming that .dpatch continues to be the default extension, you > > should (in my opinion) ensure that the behavior of dpatch-convert-diffgz > > is consistent with the sample 00list files in the documentation. > > Oh, one other minor (related) issue: > > dpatch-convert-diffgz create

Bug#327608: bugs.debian.org: for me also the BTS doesn't send followups to bugs I reported

On Sat, Sep 17, 2005 at 03:33:54AM +0200, Miernik wrote: > For example for bug 327608 and a bunch of other bugs before, the > followups where never sent to me. However for a couple of bugs, the > followups did get sent to me. I meant bug 322236, sorry. -- Miernik

Bug#328732: please update octave2.1-headers's dependencies

Package: octave2.1-headers Version: 2.1.71-3 Severity: important In general, octave2.1-headers's dependencies should probably reflect octave2.1's build-dependencies. In particular, building octave2.1 against gfortran causes mkoctfile to refer to gfortran and its development libraries, whereas oct

Bug#327173: See bug 327510

See bug 327510 : http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=327510 Jean -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#327510: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Bug#327510: seems to have broken ABI w/o soname change]

On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 09:27:45AM -0700, jt wrote: > On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 12:04:08AM +0200, Guus Sliepen wrote: > > Hello Jean, > > > > It appears programs using libiw28 break with the latest version of > > wireless-tools, unless you recompile them. Now, I know that 27 is the > > stable versio

Bug#328397: [dpatch-maintainers] Bug#328397: dpatch-convert-diffgz should work without dpkg-buildpackage

> > Especially given the dpatch-edit-patch -b flag, dpatch-convert-diffgz > > should not be limited to running with dpkg-buildpackage. Some obvious > > alternatives would be: > > > > a) process an existing .diff.gz (probably good even if b is done as well) > > b) allow the build command to be cu

Bug#327684: FTBFS on GNU/kFreeBSD

Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Package: mpd > Severity: important > Tags: patch > > Hi, > > The current version of mpd fails to build on GNU/kFreeBSD, because > the build-dependency on libasound2-dev, which is Linux specific, could > not been satisfied. Please find attached a patch

Bug#327608: bugs.debian.org: for me also the BTS doesn't send followups to bugs I reported

Package: bugs.debian.org Followup-For: Bug #327608 For example for bug 327608 and a bunch of other bugs before, the followups where never sent to me. However for a couple of bugs, the followups did get sent to me. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable AP

Bug#328730: dpatch-convert-diffgz and dpatch-edit-patch should have consistent syntax

Package: dpatch Version: 2.0.14 Severity: wishlist Hi again, It is confusing that dpatch-convert-diffgz and dpatch-edit-patch have different syntaxes. From their manpages: dpatch-convert-diffgz patchno patchname dpatch-edit-patch [options] command dpatchname However if my patch is 01_firs

Bug#328708: debian-reference: various corrections/suggestions

On 09/16/2005 07:06 PM, Osamu Aoki wrote: >>Another example that is obsolete and should be removed: >>5.1. Upgrading from Potato to Woody > > > These gives some insight to other upgrades but I am leaning toward > removing or reshaping most of Chapter 5. I need to make this document > as mu

Bug#328400: [dpatch-maintainers] Bug#328400: dpatch-convert-diffgz creates inconsistant 00list

> 2) Assuming that .dpatch continues to be the default extension, you > should (in my opinion) ensure that the behavior of dpatch-convert-diffgz > is consistent with the sample 00list files in the documentation. Oh, one other minor (related) issue: dpatch-convert-diffgz creates patches where the

Bug#328731: dpatch-edit-patch should fail when no patchname specified

Package: dpatch Version: 2.0.14 Severity: normal When no patchname is specified, dpatch-edit-patch edits the patch ".dpatch", which ends up becoming a hidden file. Either it should fail, or provide a menu of existing patches to edit (failing is just fine). Charles -- System Information: Debian

Bug#328400: [dpatch-maintainers] Bug#328400: dpatch-convert-diffgz creates inconsistant 00list

> > The dpatch manpage gives a sample 00list that contains .dpatch suffixes > > on all patches, while dpatch-convert-diffgz creates a list that doesn't > > include .dpatch suffixes. The two should at least be consistent. :-) > > HMm... I cannot find a documentation that [.dpatch] is the default >

Bug#328400: [dpatch-maintainers] Bug#328400: dpatch-convert-diffgz creates inconsistant 00list

> The dpatch manpage gives a sample 00list that contains .dpatch suffixes > on all patches, while dpatch-convert-diffgz creates a list that doesn't > include .dpatch suffixes. The two should at least be consistent. :-) HMm... I cannot find a documentation that [.dpatch] is the default extention fo

Bug#328397: [dpatch-maintainers] Bug#328397: dpatch-convert-diffgz should work without dpkg-buildpackage

Hi, > Especially given the dpatch-edit-patch -b flag, dpatch-convert-diffgz > should not be limited to running with dpkg-buildpackage. Some obvious > alternatives would be: > > a) process an existing .diff.gz (probably good even if b is done as well) > b) allow the build command to be customize

Bug#328288: [dpatch-maintainers] Bug#328288: dpatch: man pages reference inexistant README

Hi, > > > The man pages for dpatch-convert-diffgz, dpatch-edit-patch, and > > > dpatch-list-patch all contain references to /usr/share/doc/dpatch/README > > > which does not exist. > > > > Hmm... I thought there original was a tutorial document of some sort > > somewhere, and now I look I can't f

Bug#328557: twiki: TWiki Remote Command Execution Vulnerability

Sven, > why are you running a totally outdated twiki package? Because I am an idiot, with a badly mis-configured APT! (That I inherited this machine recently is no excuse.) Thanks for putting me on the right path: now all fixed. Sorry about the wasted bandwidth. Please close this bug. Cheers,

Bug#328729: debian-installer: [i386] Floppy installations fail

Package: debian-installer Severity: important When loading the boot floppy from 20050916 build, you get the following errors in the console: modprobe: exec of insmod: No such file or directory (this error is repeated a number of times) /usr/sbin/usb-discover: 73: uname: not found /usr/sbin

Bug#328728: libqt3-mt: Multiple apps segfault in QShared::deref()

On Friday 16 September 2005 07:27 pm, Bob Tanner wrote: > Package: libqt3-mt > Version: 3:3.3.4-8 > Severity: important > > > Recently upgrade from 3.3.3 to 3.3.4-8 and I have several application > that all segfault in the same class and method. > > [KCrash handler] > #3 0xb6c35f34 in QShared::der

Bug#327477: bash & udev

Sorry to the both of you, sincerely. I really did not mean for my email to sound like a rant, or pointing fingers. I was merely excited to pinpoint the problem that many of my friends have been ranting to _me_ about, and my misplaced enthusiasm, coupled with the fact that it was 4am (when I'm mos

Bug#328561: buildd m86k: libdbi-perl failed due to clock screw on host q650

On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 10:40:01AM +0200, Christian Hammers wrote: > On 2005-09-15 Steve Langasek wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 07:58:57AM +0200, Christian Hammers wrote: > > > Please rebuild libdbi-perl_1.48-2 as it failed due to a problem on the > > > host q650. Thanks! > > I don't understa

Bug#328637: dhcp3: FTBFS on GNU/kFreeBSD

On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 04:28:23PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > Package: dhcp3 > Version: 3.0.3-3 > Severity: important > > Hi, > > I have seen that in version 3.0.3-3 of dhcp3, you have split the file > file debian/patches/00list in 00list and 00list.kfreebsd, the > GNU/kFreeBSD specific patc

Bug#328728: libqt3-mt: Multiple apps segfault in QShared::deref()

Package: libqt3-mt Version: 3:3.3.4-8 Severity: important Recently upgrade from 3.3.3 to 3.3.4-8 and I have several application that all segfault in the same class and method. [KCrash handler] #3 0xb6c35f34 in QShared::deref (this=0x34343942) at qshared.h:50 #4 0xb702fcc6 in QString::deref (th

Bug#328573: feed2imap: IMAP protocol incompatibility

On 16/09/05 at 03:24 -0400, Ove Kaaven wrote: > Package: feed2imap > Version: 0.4-4 > Severity: important > > feed2imap doesn't work on a Cyrus IMAP server, because Cyrus rejects > malformed messages. It requires proper CR/LF line endings in them, > not just LF. > > F, [2005-09-16T03:13:18.063970

Bug#328708: debian-reference: various corrections/suggestions

On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 05:28:09PM -0400, ralph wrote: > Package: debian-reference > Version: CVS, So Jun 19 20:38:31 UTC 2005 > Severity: normal Thanks for good review. If possible, can you help me with giving answers to my comment below. > First, thank you for helping me fully utilize debian.

Bug#328727: xmms freezes on the desktop

Package: xmms Version: 1.2.10+cvs20050209-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable xmms when opened as an application, immediately crashes and ceases to function. Clicking the "play" applet in xmms, causes xmms to freeze to the desktop after which xkill must be invoked to delete

Bug#328726: mysql-server-4.1: Database-specific privileges do not handle longer usernames

Package: mysql-server-4.1 Version: 4.1.13a-3 Severity: normal Table mysql.db contains column User of type char(5). It should be type char(16) as is in table mysql.user. I don't know where this mistake was introduced. Longer usernames such as 'wikiuser' are accepted when setting database-specific

Bug#328725: mercurial: Upstream has released 0.7 - please package

Package: mercurial Version: 0.6c-1 Severity: normal There is new version at upstream, please package -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1

Bug#318713: oops; forgot to close

Version: 1.2-7.2 Oops; I forgot to add a bug closure to the changelog. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#318657: oops; forgot to close

Version: 0.2.2-2.1 Oops; I forgot to add a bug closure to the changelog. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#308264: Intent to NMU

As this bug has been open for a number of months without a response from the maintainer, I plan to NMU this package in 1 week (or sooner, at the maintainer's request). -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#328724: initng: wrong xdm path in /etc/initng/daemon/xdm.i

Package: initng Version: 0.1.8-1 Severity: normal Tags: experimental in the following file, in 5 line there is wrong path to the xdm: "daemon = /usr/bin/xdm" it fails running xdm and stops initng (but system is usable to work). the correct path is /usr/bin/X11/xdm of course regards, Karol Ossows

Bug#328723: poedit: use libgtkspell for spell checking

Package: poedit Version: 1.3.3-5 Severity: wishlist Hi, please activate the internal spell checking of poedit by adding libgtkspell-dev to the build-depends. Regards, Bastian -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (900, 'unstable'), (800,

Bug#328695: sylpheed-claws-maildir-plugin is uninstallable in Sid

reassign 328695 sylpheed-claws thanks On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 10:03:47PM +0200, Horacio wrote: > sylpheed-claws-maildir-plugin is uninstallable in Debian/Sid. It gives > the following error when trying to install it: > The following packages have unmet dependencies: > sylpheed-claws-maildir-plu

Bug#328684: g++-4.0: 4.0.1-7 chokes on code that compiles fine on 4.0.1-6

Matthias Klose wrote: yes, known. will be fixed in 4.0.1-7 Matthias You mean 4.0.1-8 ? 4.0.1-7 has the bug, 4.0.1-6 has not. Sorry for the incorrect Version-header -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#328039: FTBFS: Uses unsupported -fwritable-strings option

Hi Matt! Thanks for your bugreport. I'll look into this, as soon as I come back home from England (end of September) and after I have cought up with all my other work (probably middle of October). It this takes too long and if you want to fix it yourself, please go ahead and feel free to make

Bug#321837: Intent to NMU

As these bugs have been open for a month without a response from the maintainers, I plan to NMU these packages in 1 week (or sooner, at the maintainers' request). -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#328722: Frequent Mozilla crashes after updating to 1.7.8-1sarge1

Package: mozilla Version: 1.7.8-1sarge1 Since updating to 1.7.8-1sarge1 from the sarge release in around May I have experienced frequent crashes when using Messenger and Mozilla browser window. Below is a backtrace I managed to recover from gdb of the last crash. Kind regards JG (Gecko:3432

Bug#325447: Workaround

As a quick workaround, it is possible to execute: touch /var/games/gtkballs-scores This will allow purging of the package. -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://familiasanchez.net/~roberto pgpwcHMDhOe4N.pgp Description: PGP signature

Bug#316112: NMU uploaded to DELAYED/5-day

I've uploaded an NMU with the following patch to the DELAYED/5-day queue. You can prevent this upload from making it to unstable by performing an MU sometime during this 5 day period. diff -urN orig.vflib3-3.6.13/configure vflib3-3.6.13/configure --- orig.vflib3-3.6.13/configure2005-09-16

Bug#328719: fcron: Empty mails getting sent

Package: fcron Version: 2.9.6-2 Severity: normal After my recent upgrade from sarge to etch, I started getting empty emails from fcron. But not every email. The emails generated from the "root" and "wohler" fcrontabs look fine. It's only the emails generated from the actions in the "systab" fcront

Bug#328721: dwww: find error in cron.daily script

Package: dwww Version: 1.9.24 Severity: normal After a recent upgrade from sarge to etch, I've observed the following: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:995]$ sudo run-parts --report /etc/cron.daily /etc/cron.daily/dwww: find: warning: you have specified the -maxdepth option after a non-option ar

Bug#328720: Incorrect package name, should be ocaml-mode-el

Package: ocaml-mode Severity: normal It is customary to name Debian Emacs package with name: -el Like in numerous: anthy-el - A Japanese input method (elisp fronted) aplus-fsf-el - XEmacs lisp for A+ development apt-howto-el - example-based guide to APT (Greek) aspell-el - Gr

Bug#328718: ftp.debian.org: lib64stdc++6 incorrectly upgraded from optional to important?

Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal lib64stdc++6 very recently changed from being optional to important and is therefore now installed by default on all systems by debootstrap. IMO it is broken to have a 64 bit library installed by default on 32 bit systems. [16:19:59] Anybody know why lib

Bug#328717: lastlog save unaware of charset

Package: irssi Version: 0.8.9-3 Severity: normal Coin, Using "/lastlog -file foo.txt" save file with iso-8859-1 charset without taking care of selected user charset. Result is nearly unreadable of course. -- Marc Dequènes (Duck) pgphUyQfUnXYH.pgp Description: PGP signature

Bug#226588: NMU uploaded to DELAYED/5-day

I've uploaded an NMU with the following patch to the DELAYED/5-day queue. You can prevent this upload from making it to unstable by performing an MU sometime during this 5 day period. diff -urN orig.gnome-iconedit-1.2.0/debian/changelog gnome-iconedit-1.2.0/debian/changelog --- orig.gnome-iconed

Bug#327982: konserve: uninstallable; needs rebuild for the Qt/KDE transition

El Viernes, 16 de Septiembre de 2005 14:01, escribió: > > http://darkshines.net/debian/dists/unstable/konserve/ > > The patch 01_admin_update.diff doesn't appear to apply cleanly to the > sources. Are you aware of this? No, I don't know how I missed this. I built the package two times (one with

Bug#315105: [Pkg-shadow-devel] Processed: reassign to passwd, error in remove-shell?

tags 315105 moreinfo thanks To original poster: I tried `apt-get dist-upgrade` to _testing_ today and didn't see what you described. Could you please specify more details in order for me to be able to reproduce your problem? // preferably in chroot... -- WBR, xrgtn -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t

Bug#328716: Files missing on www.debian.org/releases/stable/powerpc

package: www.debian.org version:   http://www.us.debian.org/releases/stable/powerpc/ch03s03.html.en   The three links at the top of the page, to http://www.us.debian.org/releases/stable/powerpc/install.en.txt , http://www.us.debian.org/releases/stable/powerpc/install.en.html and http://www.us.debi

Bug#328715: gnuserv: debian-pkg-add-load-path-item in 50gnuserv.el

Package: gnuserv Version: 3.12.7-1 Severity: normal File: /etc/emacs21/site-start.d/50gnuserv.el 50gnuserv.el modifies load-path directly, but part 9 of /usr/share/doc/emacsen-common/debian-emacs-policy.gz requires the use of debian-pkg-add-load-path-item these days. -- System Information: Debia

Bug#328714: dictem: debian-pkg-add-load-path-item in 50dictem.el

Package: dictem Version: 0.0.5-1 Severity: normal File: /etc/emacs/site-start.d/50dictem.el 50dictem.el modifies load-path directly, but part 9 of /usr/share/doc/emacsen-common/debian-emacs-policy.gz requires the use of debian-pkg-add-load-path-item. -- System Information: Debian Release: testin

Bug#328713: dictionary-el: debian-pkg-add-load-path-item in 50dictionary-el.el

Package: dictionary-el Version: 1.8.7-2 Severity: normal File: /etc/emacs/site-start.d/50dictionary-el.el 50dictionary-el.el modifies load-path directly, but part 9 of /usr/share/doc/emacsen-common/debian-emacs-policy.gz requires the use of debian-pkg-add-load-path-item these days. -- System Inf

Bug#328712: dpkg-dev-el: use of cl `substitute' in 50dpkg-dev-el.el

Package: dpkg-dev-el Version: 24.11-1 Severity: normal File: /etc/emacs/site-start.d/50dpkg-dev-el.el I notice 50dpkg-dev-el.el calls `substitute' to mung the load-path, but I think that function is in the cl package, which in emacs21 is not normally loaded at that point. An error can be provoked

  1   2   3   4   5   >