On 4/27/2011 12:03 AM, Brad Roberts wrote:
You should file bug reports with the appropriate patches.
The patches are diffed from GDC sources, is it recommended to apply them
to the phobos/druntime trunk or leave them as is. I can't test them
against DMD. I do not know how GDC and DMD phobos
On 4/26/2011 7:47 PM, Daniel Green wrote:
> MinGW-w64 D1 with phobos has been successfully compiled. Phobos contained 3
> errors. Two were Windows function calls.
> Phobos uses size_t but Win64 uses uint. The other was with the GC relating
> to Windows stack information. Several
> functions
MinGW-w64 D1 with phobos has been successfully compiled. Phobos
contained 3 errors. Two were Windows function calls. Phobos uses
size_t but Win64 uses uint. The other was with the GC relating to
Windows stack information. Several functions in the GC expect uint
which causes warnings and sh
Thought I'd post an update. I spent last weekend building the support
libraries for MinGW-w64. I also took the opportunity to automate the
build process from start to finish.
I had to do this inside VirtualBox which not only adds significantly to
compiling, the latest version(4.0.4) kept loc
== Quote from Daniel Green (ven...@gmail.com)'s article
> On 4/15/2011 1:38 PM, dsimcha wrote:
> > How far away are we from getting a reasonably stable/usable MinGW GDC for
> > Win64? I've noticed that GDC for Linux has made tremendous strides lately
> > and
> > almost "just works" for the code I
On 4/15/2011 1:38 PM, dsimcha wrote:
How far away are we from getting a reasonably stable/usable MinGW GDC for
Win64? I've noticed that GDC for Linux has made tremendous strides lately and
almost "just works" for the code I've been testing it on. (Thanks to Iain for
his hard work.) I've also
== Quote from Daniel Gibson (metalcae...@gmail.com)'s article
> Am 15.04.2011 19:38, schrieb dsimcha:
> > I've just had the unexpected misfortune of having my work computer break,
> > and
> > then the unexpected fortune of being told I'm getting an 8 core with 24 gigs
> > of RAM to replace it. Ho
Am 15.04.2011 19:38, schrieb dsimcha:
> I've just had the unexpected misfortune of having my work computer break, and
> then the unexpected fortune of being told I'm getting an 8 core with 24 gigs
> of RAM to replace it. However, I strongly prefer Windows as my desktop OS.
> Therefore, I've starte
Iain Buclaw wrote:
Mostly ./configure && make, after all the patching was done ?
Like this: http://gdcwin.sourceforge.net/gcc-3.4.5-build.sh
As far as I'm aware, for GCC4 on MinGW, you need to build MPFR and GMP first to
link against the compiler, else it just won't run. I'd be interested to kn
Iain Buclaw wrote:
As far as I'm aware, for GCC4 on MinGW, you need to build MPFR and GMP first to
link against the compiler, else it just won't run.
Seems like it was changed in GCC 4.3.0. For GCC 4.2.1, you only needed
to include MPFR and GMP if you were building the Fortran frontend...
Easi
== Quote from Anders F Björklund (a...@algonet.se)'s article
> >> I'm thinking of working on getting GDC MinGW binaries up somewhere. I
> >> understand the MinGW build process is highly non-trivial, and I'm
> >> trying to
> >> decide if it's worth the effort. What is the status of MinGW for 64-bit
I'm thinking of working on getting GDC MinGW binaries up somewhere. I
understand the MinGW build process is highly non-trivial, and I'm
trying to
decide if it's worth the effort. What is the status of MinGW for 64-bit
Windows? Is there any theoretical reason why 64-bit GDC for MinGW
shouldn't
work
Am 14.11.2010, 20:30 Uhr, schrieb dsimcha :
== Quote from Daniel Gibson (metalcae...@gmail.com)'s article
dsimcha schrieb:
> I'm thinking of working on getting GDC MinGW binaries up somewhere. I
> understand the MinGW build process is highly non-trivial, and I'm
trying to
> decide if it's wo
== Quote from Daniel Gibson (metalcae...@gmail.com)'s article
> dsimcha schrieb:
> > I'm thinking of working on getting GDC MinGW binaries up somewhere. I
> > understand the MinGW build process is highly non-trivial, and I'm trying to
> > decide if it's worth the effort. What is the status of Min
dsimcha schrieb:
I'm thinking of working on getting GDC MinGW binaries up somewhere. I
understand the MinGW build process is highly non-trivial, and I'm trying to
decide if it's worth the effort. What is the status of MinGW for 64-bit
Windows? Is there any theoretical reason why 64-bit GDC for
15 matches
Mail list logo
