== Quote from Daniel Gibson (metalcae...@gmail.com)'s article
> Am 15.04.2011 19:38, schrieb dsimcha:
> > I've just had the unexpected misfortune of having my work computer break,
> > and
> > then the unexpected fortune of being told I'm getting an 8 core with 24 gigs
> > of RAM to replace it. However, I strongly prefer Windows as my desktop OS.
> > Therefore, I've started caring a lot more lately about 64-bit Windows
> > support.
> >
> > How far away are we from getting a reasonably stable/usable MinGW GDC for
> > Win64? I've noticed that GDC for Linux has made tremendous strides lately
> > and
> > almost "just works" for the code I've been testing it on. (Thanks to Iain
> > for
> > his hard work.) I've also noticed that GDC has been ported to Windows using
> > MinGW (thanks to Daniel Green), but as far as I can tell it only supports
> > 32.
> > Are there any major, fundamental roadblocks to 64 support or are we a few
> > bug
> > fixes away?
> (I don't know anything specific, the following is just a guess)
> Probably Phobos would need a lot of fixes, because I guess everything in
> version(Win32) blocks will have to be rewritten?
> Probably new Versions ("Win" and "Win64") will be needed: "Win" for
> generic stuff that works on win32 and win64 and Win64 for win64 specific
> stuff.
> But this is just a guess, I'm not really familiar with Windows programming.
> Cheers,
> - Daniel
Interesting. This is good in that it's something I could help out with. I have
neither the time nor the desire to get deep into compiler implementations, but I
already know the Phobos codebase pretty well and could fix up these issues.
However, I would need a reasonably working barebones compiler to test my work.
