Re: D.2.062 merge

2013-02-21 Thread Iain Buclaw
On 20 February 2013 18:27, Iain Buclaw wrote: > On 20 February 2013 11:24, Iain Buclaw wrote: > >> On 20 February 2013 08:05, eles wrote: >> >>> On Tuesday, 19 February 2013 at 11:33:59 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote: >>> On 18 February 2013 08:16, Iain Buclaw wrote: I have it in the works

Re: D.2.062 merge

2013-02-20 Thread Iain Buclaw
On 20 February 2013 11:24, Iain Buclaw wrote: > On 20 February 2013 08:05, eles wrote: > >> On Tuesday, 19 February 2013 at 11:33:59 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote: >> >>> On 18 February 2013 08:16, Iain Buclaw wrote: >>> I have it in the works to replace these areas in >>> gdc (see thread on removin

Re: D.2.062 merge

2013-02-20 Thread Iain Buclaw
On 20 February 2013 08:05, eles wrote: > On Tuesday, 19 February 2013 at 11:33:59 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote: > >> On 18 February 2013 08:16, Iain Buclaw wrote: >> I have it in the works to replace these areas in >> gdc (see thread on removing toobj, typinf, and todt) - but it looks like >> things

Re: D.2.062 merge

2013-02-20 Thread eles
On Tuesday, 19 February 2013 at 11:33:59 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote: On 18 February 2013 08:16, Iain Buclaw wrote: I have it in the works to replace these areas in gdc (see thread on removing toobj, typinf, and todt) - but it looks like things will be worse before they start improving again on t

Re: D.2.062 merge

2013-02-19 Thread Iain Buclaw
On 18 February 2013 08:16, Iain Buclaw wrote: > I do believe I saw a new release mentioned in announcements. So this will > be a priority to get done first and finished as soon as possible. > > Regards > Iain. > Once again, this is proving to be an [expletive] pain. I know Walter has been tying

D.2.062 merge

2013-02-18 Thread Iain Buclaw
I do believe I saw a new release mentioned in announcements. So this will be a priority to get done first and finished as soon as possible. Regards Iain.