On 20 February 2013 08:05, eles <e...@eles.com> wrote: > On Tuesday, 19 February 2013 at 11:33:59 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote: > >> On 18 February 2013 08:16, Iain Buclaw <ibuc...@ubuntu.com> wrote: >> I have it in the works to replace these areas in >> gdc (see thread on removing toobj, typinf, and todt) - but it looks like >> things will be worse before they start improving again on this instance. >> > > Won't be better to merge rather smaller increments? For example, > merging one commit (from dmd) at a time? > > That way, the gdc will follow the dmd commit by commit, and not > only release by release. I hope this would bring easier merging, > as less code changes are required. > > What do you think? >
That's mid to long term goal (we currently do the same with gcc development, for instance). But not until have dropped the remainder dmd backend dependencies from the frontend. Regards -- Iain Buclaw *(p < e ? p++ : p) = (c & 0x0f) + '0';
