On Thursday, 24 October 2019 at 11:05:21 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote:
ld: c.o: in function `_DT16_D1b1B8__mixin24getSMFZPv':
c.d:(.text+0x27): multiple definition of
`_DT16_D1b1B8__mixin24getSMFZPv'; b.o:b.d:(.text+0x38): first
defined here
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92216
On Thursday, 24 October 2019 at 11:05:21 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote:
ld: c.o: in function `_DT16_D1b1B8__mixin24getSMFZPv':
c.d:(.text+0x27): multiple definition of
`_DT16_D1b1B8__mixin24getSMFZPv'; b.o:b.d:(.text+0x38): first
defined here
BTW. DMD does not incl
I have been trying to compile gtkd with gdc but without success.
I always end up with some duplicates symbols when gdc try to link
final binary [https://github.com/gtkd-developers/GtkD/issues/282]
I have tried it with ldc and dmd too, and both are working fine.
So I guess there is some symbolge
On Monday, 19 August 2019 at 14:02:37 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 at 15:30, Daniel Kozák via D.gnu
wrote:
On Monday, 19 August 2019 at 10:54:09 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>
> Optimal code sometimes needs a bit of coercing. You
> shouldn't need to pass weird options though.
Yes
On Tuesday, 20 August 2019 at 02:18:42 UTC, James Blachly wrote:
As a broader point, though, do you think it would help improve
adoption of GDC (and perhaps the D ecosystem overall) if one
could `tar xfvz gdc-9.tar.gz && export PATH gdc/bin` in the
same way we do with DMD and LDC?
Yes, I do
On Monday, 19 August 2019 at 03:47:04 UTC, James Blachly wrote:
I hope that there are plans for
convenient binary installs (rather than through package
managers which tend to be outdated, and cannot be installed on
managed systems) as there are with DMD and LDC.
Kudos to the GDC team.
which
On Monday, 19 August 2019 at 03:47:04 UTC, James Blachly wrote:
I got around to finally compiling my project (processing high
throughput sequencing data) and found GDC compiled code
executed TWICE as fast as LDC compiled code, which itself was
faster than DMD. I am truly surprised.
Can't test
On Wednesday, 14 August 2019 at 05:34:48 UTC, dangbinghoo wrote:
hi all,
in Archlinux, I tried to build gdc-10(git version), but it
failed:
...
the gdc used to building GDC10-git is gdc-9.1.0 static version
from Archlinux AUR package gdc-static.
Thanks!
---
binghoo dang
Hi I am the one
https://godbolt.org/g/tFU9v4
On Wednesday, 18 December 2013 at 14:31:31 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
On 18 December 2013 14:29, Daniel Kozak
wrote:
Is this a bug, by design, a temporary convenience? Please
advise and
offer your suggestions?
IMHO it is not a bug. Even static arrays are dynamically
allocated and then
IMHO it is not a bug. Even static arrays are dynamically
allocated and then convert to static.
I mean everytime when you write [something, something else, ...]
even if all members are known at compile time, it will create
dynamic array.
Is this a bug, by design, a temporary convenience? Please
advise and offer your suggestions?
IMHO it is not a bug. Even static arrays are dynamically
allocated and then convert to static.
You can write this:
uint[3] message;
message[0] = 2;
message[1] = cast(uint)"hello\r\n".ptr;
message[
12 matches
Mail list logo
