On Wednesday, 18 December 2013 at 14:31:31 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
On 18 December 2013 14:29, Daniel Kozak <kozz...@gmail.com> wrote:

Is this a bug, by design, a temporary convenience? Please advise and
offer your suggestions?


IMHO it is not a bug. Even static arrays are dynamically allocated and then
convert to static.


Not anymore, they are not. It makes no sense to dynamically allocate
static arrays as they are passed around by value anyway...


Wow, I miss this change :). Good to know.

Reply via email to