On Wednesday, 18 December 2013 at 14:31:31 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
On 18 December 2013 14:29, Daniel Kozak <kozz...@gmail.com> wrote:Is this a bug, by design, a temporary convenience? Please advise andoffer your suggestions?IMHO it is not a bug. Even static arrays are dynamically allocated and thenconvert to static.Not anymore, they are not. It makes no sense to dynamically allocatestatic arrays as they are passed around by value anyway...
Wow, I miss this change :). Good to know.