On Tuesday, 24 June 2014 at 14:14:18 UTC, Johannes Pfau wrote:
Am Tue, 24 Jun 2014 10:46:11 +
schrieb "Timo Sintonen" :
To keep this thread going, I had a quick look at the reference
material of the dip and picked some thoughts.
In some languages volatile has a stronger meaning, like
gua
Am Tue, 24 Jun 2014 10:46:11 +
schrieb "Timo Sintonen" :
> To keep this thread going, I had a quick look at the reference
> material of the dip and picked some thoughts.
>
> In some languages volatile has a stronger meaning, like
> guaranteeing an atomic access. In some languages it may not
On 24 June 2014 11:46, Timo Sintonen via D.gnu wrote:
>
> While writing this it just popped to my mind: if volatile is not good,
> could we reuse the 'system' word? Then it would be clear that this is for
> accessing system resources and not for application level.
>
> There seems not to be much d
To keep this thread going, I had a quick look at the reference
material of the dip and picked some thoughts.
In some languages volatile has a stronger meaning, like
guaranteeing an atomic access. In some languages it may not
guarantee anything.
In this proposal volatile is only for optimizat
