On 24 June 2014 11:46, Timo Sintonen via D.gnu <d.gnu@puremagic.com> wrote: > > While writing this it just popped to my mind: if volatile is not good, > could we reuse the 'system' word? Then it would be clear that this is for > accessing system resources and not for application level. > > There seems not to be much documentation about system. Tdpl says it may omit > some checks and the website says it is quite the same than not having any > other attributes. So: > What system means in general?
Not @safe. > What it currently means in gdc? Not @safe. > Could we use it instead of volatile? No.
