Re: 2.064 status, ARM status

2013-12-14 Thread Ellery Newcomer
On 12/14/2013 02:21 PM, Johannes Pfau wrote: Hi Ellery, it seems like crosstool-NG can't compile recent gcc-4.9 snapshots. It's not a D or crosstool problem actually, GCC-4.9 for some reason can't bootstrap glibc. I personally use this branch to test the cross-compiler: https://github.com/jpf9

Re: 2.064 status, ARM status

2013-12-14 Thread Johannes Pfau
Am Sat, 14 Dec 2013 22:16:13 + schrieb Iain Buclaw : > On 14 December 2013 20:21, Ellery Newcomer > wrote: > > On 12/09/2013 06:25 AM, Johannes Pfau wrote: > >> > >> I updated the ARM patches to the latest master version. I have to > >> admit I was pleasantly surprised that going from 2.063 t

Re: 2.064 status, ARM status

2013-12-14 Thread Johannes Pfau
Am Sat, 14 Dec 2013 12:21:06 -0800 schrieb Ellery Newcomer : > On 12/09/2013 06:25 AM, Johannes Pfau wrote: > > I updated the ARM patches to the latest master version. I have to > > admit I was pleasantly surprised that going from 2.063 to 2.064 did > > not cause any failing test cases in the test

Re: 2.064 status, ARM status

2013-12-14 Thread Iain Buclaw
On 14 December 2013 20:21, Ellery Newcomer wrote: > On 12/09/2013 06:25 AM, Johannes Pfau wrote: >> >> I updated the ARM patches to the latest master version. I have to admit >> I was pleasantly surprised that going from 2.063 to 2.064 did not cause >> any failing test cases in the test suite or f

Re: 2.064 status, ARM status

2013-12-14 Thread Ellery Newcomer
On 12/09/2013 06:25 AM, Johannes Pfau wrote: I updated the ARM patches to the latest master version. I have to admit I was pleasantly surprised that going from 2.063 to 2.064 did not cause any failing test cases in the test suite or failing unit tests. So ARM on 2.064 is also good to go now and i