Am Sat, 14 Dec 2013 12:21:06 -0800 schrieb Ellery Newcomer <ellery-newco...@utulsa.edu>:
> On 12/09/2013 06:25 AM, Johannes Pfau wrote: > > I updated the ARM patches to the latest master version. I have to > > admit I was pleasantly surprised that going from 2.063 to 2.064 did > > not cause any failing test cases in the test suite or failing unit > > tests. So ARM on 2.064 is also good to go now and it's probably a > > good idea to start merging the fixes. > > (Code is here: https://github.com/jpf91/GDC/commits/arm ) > > > > One question related to the 2.064 merge: I see one failing test in > > the test suite, file runnable/template9.d. It fails with linker > > errors. Is this a known problem or could it be the gcc snapshot > > version I'm using (gcc-4.9-20131201)? This happens on x86/64 and > > ARM. > > > > I would love to play with this, but I have had no luck getting it to > build, either with crosstools or as a native build (I think my board > is running out of memory, and I know of no way to attach any sort of > hard disk to it for swap space). > > Today I am going to attempt to build it on my dev box with a > crosstools-built gcc, but I don't expect much. Hi Ellery, it seems like crosstool-NG can't compile recent gcc-4.9 snapshots. It's not a D or crosstool problem actually, GCC-4.9 for some reason can't bootstrap glibc. I personally use this branch to test the cross-compiler: https://github.com/jpf91/GDC/commits/arm-old It's a quick & dirty backport of the arm branch for gcc-4.8. It should work as well as the arm branch (it might produce slightly bigger binaries though, but I couldn't confirm that yet)
