On 1 December 2013 13:15, Johannes Pfau wrote:
> Am Sun, 24 Nov 2013 12:50:43 +0100
> schrieb "Iain Buclaw" :
>
>>
>> Apparently it's working as per C semantics, which means the
>> behavior is undefined. I've mentioned that it makes no sense
>> that documentation/code don't match comments. But al
Am Sun, 24 Nov 2013 12:50:43 +0100
schrieb "Iain Buclaw" :
>
> Apparently it's working as per C semantics, which means the
> behavior is undefined. I've mentioned that it makes no sense
> that documentation/code don't match comments. But all I've heard
> back is that you shouldn't use convert
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=78
Johannes Pfau changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||johannesp...@gmail.com
AssignedTo
Am Tue, 24 Sep 2013 16:02:11 +0200
schrieb "eles" :
[...]
Damn, I hate shell scripts / Makefiles:
https://github.com/jpf91/GDC/commit/d9a6e38dd140b9a98ce694b2073714983c7af6a3
BTW: We could make this more failsafe by using "find" to search the
source directory recursively. This way we wouldn't ha
On Dec 1, 2013 8:25 AM, "Mike" wrote:
>
> I finally got a GDC cross-compiler compiled, and I'm currently trying to
test it. My simple "hello world" program does not use any D runtime
features, and I was able to compile it with LDC -noruntime -nodefaultlib.
>
> However, when I try to use GDC, I ge
I finally got a GDC cross-compiler compiled, and I'm currently
trying to test it. My simple "hello world" program does not use
any D runtime features, and I was able to compile it with LDC
-noruntime -nodefaultlib.
However, when I try to use GDC, I get...
"cannot find source code for runtime