On 1 December 2013 13:15, Johannes Pfau <nos...@example.com> wrote: > Am Sun, 24 Nov 2013 12:50:43 +0100 > schrieb "Iain Buclaw" <ibuc...@ubuntu.com>: > >> >> Apparently it's working as per C semantics, which means the >> behavior is undefined. I've mentioned that it makes no sense >> that documentation/code don't match comments. But all I've heard >> back is that you shouldn't use convert_to_integer in the front >> end (except maybe through convert() - which I am 90% certain is >> the case with us), and to implement our own semantics if we say >> that pointer to integer conversion is clearly defined in D. >> >> Regards >> Iain. > > We actually use convert_to_integer directly
d_convert_basic is called as the default for convert() so the statement is pretty much correct. ;-) Yeah, we just need to apply our own semantics before falling back to convert_to_integer.
