[Bug 56] Error with gcc.builtins and ARM neon.

http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 57] Comparing small structs fails

http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57 --- Comment #4 from Iain Buclaw 2013-05-28 21:55:44 UTC --- Update: https://github.com/D-Programming-GDC/GDC/commit/58f03823aeb72109a69673f111092548aca081f5 Actually got both cases in one hit this time... --- static struct Foo { static Fo

[Bug 57] Comparing small structs fails

http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 57] Comparing small structs fails

http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57 --- Comment #2 from Iain Buclaw 2013-05-28 20:24:17 UTC --- Can't post patch here as it's on another computer but it's essentially: -- AssignExp::toElem remove sle->fillHoles code. -- StructLiteralExp::toElem Put fillHoles code here and create

[Bug 57] Comparing small structs fails

http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57 --- Comment #1 from Iain Buclaw 2013-05-28 20:17:30 UTC --- Incidentally, I actually thought about this earlier when looking at another test using empty structs. The fix didn't work for that, but it just so happens that it works for this... --

[Bug 57] Comparing small structs fails

http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57 Johannes Pfau changed: What|Removed |Added CC||johannesp...@gmail.com -- Configure bugm

[Bug 57] New: Comparing small structs fails

http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57 Bug #: 57 Summary: Comparing small structs fails Classification: Unclassified Product: GDC Version: development Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Seve

Re: Changing "target" parameter via attribute

Yeah, I'm sure this case was just never considered, and needs to be supported. I had a suspicion it wouldn't work ;) On 28 May 2013 17:36, Johannes Pfau wrote: > Am Tue, 28 May 2013 08:37:12 +1000 > schrieb Manu : > > > Not sure what you mean... > > Using template specialisation for each attrib

Re: Changing "target" parameter via attribute

Am Tue, 28 May 2013 08:37:12 +1000 schrieb Manu : > Not sure what you mean... > Using template specialisation for each attribute permutation or > something? > > > On 27 May 2013 23:20, David Nadlinger wrote: > > > On Monday, 27 May 2013 at 12:02:28 UTC, Manu wrote: > > > >> On 27 May 2013 21:4