Yeah, I'm sure this case was just never considered, and needs to be supported. I had a suspicion it wouldn't work ;)
On 28 May 2013 17:36, Johannes Pfau <nos...@example.com> wrote: > Am Tue, 28 May 2013 08:37:12 +1000 > schrieb Manu <turkey...@gmail.com>: > > > Not sure what you mean... > > Using template specialisation for each attribute permutation or > > something? > > > > > > On 27 May 2013 23:20, David Nadlinger <s...@klickverbot.at> wrote: > > > > > On Monday, 27 May 2013 at 12:02:28 UTC, Manu wrote: > > > > > >> On 27 May 2013 21:40, Iain Buclaw <ibuc...@ubuntu.com> wrote: > > >> > > >>> Looks like the frontend rejects this - will find out whether this > > >>> is a bug or intentional... > > >>> > > >>> > > >> Yep, I saw that coming a mile off! >_< > > >> I can't imagine any good reason why it shouldn't be supported. > > >> Just that nobody ever considered it in the context of UDA's. > > >> > > > > > > Does it work if you spell out the template and put the attribute on > > > the function? Might be good as a workaround for testing. > > > > > > David > > > > > > > http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/5f8f5a7a > > (But it seems using getAttribute on that template results in an > internal error in dmd.) >
