On 04-04-2012 05:09, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
On 03/04/12 04:04, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
On 03-04-2012 01:19, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
On 03/04/12 00:48, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
The Waf meta build system has good support for both GDC and LDC.
I'm reluctant to use Waf due to
On 03/04/12 04:04, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
On 03-04-2012 01:19, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
On 03/04/12 00:48, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
The Waf meta build system has good support for both GDC and LDC.
I'm reluctant to use Waf due to the issues described here ... :-(
http://lists.debia
On 2012-04-03 22:36, Robert Clipsham wrote:
So use D! I use D for my build script, works just fine.
https://github.com/mrmonday/serenity/blob/master/build.d
In ~365 LoC that I hacked together and didn't put much effort in to it
builds a library and a binary, prints a coloured status update, sup
On 4/3/12, Robert Clipsham wrote:
> So use D! I use D for my build script, works just fine.
And for the user it's a simple call to 'rdmd script.d'. No need to
install anything. You could even use curl to automatically fetch
dependencies.
On 03/04/2012 03:35, Andrew Wiley wrote:
Unless you want someone else to build your software.
My biggest frustration with open source software and specifically with
meta build systems is that I don't want to learn a scripting language
So use D! I use D for my build script, works just fine.
htt
On 2012-04-03 17:20, Leandro Lucarella wrote:
Jacob Carlborg, el 3 de abril a las 16:45 me escribiste:
On 2012-04-03 12:56, Leandro Lucarella wrote:
People that don't like Make is people don't understand Make :)
I do have some understanding of Make. BTW, Rake is basically a Make
implementati
My votes on waf. So I think I'll share my experiences with it.
Several years ago I wanted a cross platform solution to handling project
builds. I had been using eclipse/CodeBlocks which worked OK for simple
project but the lack of binary libraries for D and Windows combined made
me desire so
Jacob Carlborg, el 3 de abril a las 16:45 me escribiste:
> On 2012-04-03 12:56, Leandro Lucarella wrote:
> >People that don't like Make is people don't understand Make :)
>
> I do have some understanding of Make. BTW, Rake is basically a Make
> implementation that uses Ruby for the makefiles, it'
On 2012-04-03 12:56, Leandro Lucarella wrote:
People that don't like Make is people don't understand Make :)
I do have some understanding of Make. BTW, Rake is basically a Make
implementation that uses Ruby for the makefiles, it's _a lot_ better
than Make.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
Jacob Carlborg, el 3 de abril a las 11:56 me escribiste:
> On 2012-04-03 11:06, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>
> >Make is fairly simple. What makes it the complex beast it is - IMO -
> >when used in conjunction with autotools. :-)
>
> I would say that Make is the most horrible build system I've ever
Pe
On 03-04-2012 11:06, Iain Buclaw wrote:
On 3 April 2012 09:23, Andrew Wiley wrote:
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 1:37 AM, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
On 03-04-2012 04:35, Andrew Wiley wrote:
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 9:04 PM, Alex Rønne Petersen
wrote:
On 03-04-2012 01:19, Joseph Rushton Wakeling
On 03-04-2012 10:23, Andrew Wiley wrote:
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 1:37 AM, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
On 03-04-2012 04:35, Andrew Wiley wrote:
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 9:04 PM, Alex Rønne Petersen
wrote:
On 03-04-2012 01:19, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
On 03/04/12 00:48, Alex Rønne Pete
On 2012-04-03 11:06, Iain Buclaw wrote:
Make is fairly simple. What makes it the complex beast it is - IMO -
when used in conjunction with autotools. :-)
I would say that Make is the most horrible build system I've ever used.
I guess I have most problem with the makefiles and their syntax.
On 3 April 2012 09:23, Andrew Wiley wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 1:37 AM, Alex Rønne Petersen
> wrote:
>> On 03-04-2012 04:35, Andrew Wiley wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 9:04 PM, Alex Rønne Petersen
>>> wrote:
On 03-04-2012 01:19, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
>
>
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 1:37 AM, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
> On 03-04-2012 04:35, Andrew Wiley wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 9:04 PM, Alex Rønne Petersen
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 03-04-2012 01:19, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
>>>
On 03/04/12 00:48, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
>
>
15 matches
Mail list logo
