On 2014-11-06, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
> I'd like to propose a more pythonic way to declare function pointer
> types, namelye
>
> type0 (*[ident])(type1, type2, type3)
>
> would instead become
>
> (type1, type2, type3) -> type0 [ident]
>
> I have a pull request up at https://github.com/cyth
On 10 November 2014 20:23, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 6:25 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>> On 2014-11-06, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>>> I'd like to propose a more pythonic way to declare function pointer
>>> types, namelye
>>>
>
Hi,
certainly we did something with Sage on cygwin to work around these...
Just in case,
Dima
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 3:58 PM, Erik Bray wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> Sorry if I'm spamming the list too much, but I've encountered another
> pretty serious and unfortunate issue with Cython on Cygwin.
>
> T
On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 10:55 AM, Baptiste Carvello
wrote:
> Le 20/07/2016 08:01, Robert Bradshaw a écrit :
>
>> trac.cython.org
>> This is probably the most controversial, but I think it makes sense to
>> migrate to github issues. While clearly not as powerful, featureful,
>> or customizable as t
On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 9:42 AM, Baptiste Carvello
wrote:
> Le 20/07/2016 12:19, Dima Pasechnik a écrit :
>
>> Github is not spyware, IMHO. It would be good to understand which of these:
>>
>> https://help.github.com/articles/github-privacy-policy/
>>
>> you
On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 10:18 AM, Baptiste Carvello
wrote:
> Le 20/07/2016 19:23, Robert Bradshaw a écrit :
>
>> +1
>>
>> I'm a big advocate of privacy, and informed consent when choosing to
>> give any of it away (e.g. allowing linking of activities to build a
>> (pseudonymous or not) reputation)
I'd vote for sanity over marketing, i.e. 1.0.
On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 11:53 AM James C. McPherson
wrote:
>
>
> 1.0 runs the risk of hitting "never install a 1.0 release" habits.
>
> Jumping to 29.0 would not, imnsho, be such an issue because people
> are used to the rapid cadence of Firefox, Thu
SageMath has 700K Cython lines, yet not mentioned.
On Sun, 21 May 2023, 10:21 Stefane Fermigier, wrote:
>
> On 17/05/2023 14:44, Lisandro Dalcin wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, 16 May 2023 at 22:10, matus valo wrote:
>
>> The rationale is that the projects won't start really using Cython 3
>> until we
On thing to take care of before the release is to get rid of the hugely outdated
advice to ship generated C/C++ files!
On Sun, May 21, 2023 at 11:24 AM Stefan Behnel wrote:
>
> Dima Pasechnik schrieb am 21.05.23 um 11:38:
> > On Sun, 21 May 2023, 10:21 Stefane Fermigier, wrote:
>
