On 2014-11-06, Robert Bradshaw <rober...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'd like to propose a more pythonic way to declare function pointer > types, namelye > > type0 (*[ident])(type1, type2, type3) > > would instead become > > (type1, type2, type3) -> type0 [ident] > > I have a pull request up at https://github.com/cython/cython/pull/333; > what do people think?
we had a discussion with Volker about this few weeks ago - in my Cython code I needed to do, as he suggested, a workaround like this: int* vlamatrix "(int (*)[])" (int*) # a hack to get int (*)[] through cython This was for 2-dim arrays of variable length, and looks similar to the stuff here. IMHO it would be good to address this, too. I'd rather stick to C99 conventions in Cython. To me, using '->' for types looks way too close to what is used, with different semantics, in functional languages like Haskell or Coq. Dima _______________________________________________ cython-devel mailing list cython-devel@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cython-devel
