On Sun, Nov 9, 2014 at 1:29 PM, Nils Bruin wrote:
> On Saturday, November 8, 2014 12:15:02 PM UTC-8, Sturla Molden wrote:
>>
>> Presumably Cython
>> needs C and C++ function and method pointer syntax for wrapping C and C++
>> libraries, so why add another one?
>
>
> I think that's a valid point. T
On 2014-11-06, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
> I'd like to propose a more pythonic way to declare function pointer
> types, namelye
>
> type0 (*[ident])(type1, type2, type3)
>
> would instead become
>
> (type1, type2, type3) -> type0 [ident]
>
> I have a pull request up at https://github.com/cyth
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 6:25 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> On 2014-11-06, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>> I'd like to propose a more pythonic way to declare function pointer
>> types, namelye
>>
>> type0 (*[ident])(type1, type2, type3)
>>
>> would instead become
>>
>> (type1, type2, type3) -> typ
On 10 November 2014 20:23, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 6:25 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>> On 2014-11-06, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>>> I'd like to propose a more pythonic way to declare function pointer
>>> types, namelye
>>>
>>> type0 (*[ident])(type1, type2, type3)
>>>
>>>
Hi all - I get the following compiler crash from cython 0.21.1 (from pip)
when compiling a C++ module with debugging. It's fine without the --gdb
option.
[1/3] Compiling Cython CXX source for [project]...
FAILED: cd [project_build] && cython --cplus -I [project_src] -2 --gdb
--output-file [project
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 1:10 PM, Dima Pasechnik
wrote:
> On 10 November 2014 20:23, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 6:25 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>>> On 2014-11-06, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
I'd like to propose a more pythonic way to declare function pointer
types, nam
