On Wed, 23 Sep 2015, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Sep 2015, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> > > Expected:
> > > -4294967295
> > > Got:
> > > 1
> > I cannot reproduce this locally (even tried a 32bit docker container), so I
> > blindly changed a couple of minor things in that branch. Co
On Tue, 22 Sep 2015, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> > Expected:
> > -4294967295
> > Got:
> > 1
> I cannot reproduce this locally (even tried a 32bit docker container), so I
> blindly changed a couple of minor things in that branch. Could you give it
> another try?
> If that didn't help, here is
Yaroslav Halchenko schrieb am 21.09.2015 um 16:26:
> was reported in Debian against 0.23.2 so tried blindly freshier snapshot
> from 0.23.x branch and that one is no go too:
>
> ==
> FAIL: large_nums (line 95) (ct_DEF.__test__)
>
was reported in Debian against 0.23.2 so tried blindly freshier snapshot
from 0.23.x branch and that one is no go too:
==
FAIL: large_nums (line 95) (ct_DEF.__test__)
Doctest: ct_DEF.__test__.large_nums (line 95)
-