On Wed, 23 Sep 2015, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Sep 2015, Stefan Behnel wrote: > > > Expected: > > > -4294967295 > > > Got: > > > 1 > > I cannot reproduce this locally (even tried a 32bit docker container), so I > > blindly changed a couple of minor things in that branch. Could you give it > > another try? > > If that didn't help, here is a patch that adds a longness suffix to plain > > integer literals based on their type (e.g. found after coercions). I'm not > > sure yet if that's really a good idea, but would be helpful to know if it > > fixes this test. Could you try both and report back? > thanks -- will do! reporting: it did need guess_longness.patch to pass Thanks! -- Yaroslav O. Halchenko Center for Open Neuroscience http://centerforopenneuroscience.org Dartmouth College, 419 Moore Hall, Hinman Box 6207, Hanover, NH 03755 Phone: +1 (603) 646-9834 Fax: +1 (603) 646-1419 WWW: http://www.linkedin.com/in/yarik _______________________________________________ cython-devel mailing list cython-devel@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cython-devel
