On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 5:07 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 1:07 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I think the master branch is good enough for at least a 0.21 alpha. Are
>> there any pending changes that should go in before it can be released? Any
>> pull requests that
I just pushed another bugfix release for the 0.20.x line, available on
github, cython.org, or and pypi.
== Features added ==
* Some optimisations for set/frozenset instantiation.
* Support for C++ unordered_set and unordered_map.
== Bugs fixed ==
* Access to attributes of optimised builtin meth
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 1:07 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think the master branch is good enough for at least a 0.21 alpha. Are
> there any pending changes that should go in before it can be released? Any
> pull requests that should be considered?
I started some work on support for static
Cool.
I find their motivation "Since Java is rather present in industry,
while Python is more present in science, JyNI will be an important
step to lower the cost of using scientific code in industrial
environments" interesting.
On the other hand, I think IronClad is pretty dead.
On Mon, Jun 16,
Hi,
it looks like there is a C-API emulation for Jython on the way:
http://jyni.org/
https://github.com/Stewori/JyNI
I haven't tried it yet, and I'm sure Cython modules won't work with its
current state, but the effort I put into making them run in PyPy's cpyext
should pay off here, so we might
Hi,
I think the master branch is good enough for at least a 0.21 alpha. Are
there any pending changes that should go in before it can be released? Any
pull requests that should be considered?
We should get this in, I think:
https://github.com/cython/cython/pull/284
And the gdb tests are still b
