On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 5:07 PM, Robert Bradshaw <rober...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 1:07 AM, Stefan Behnel <stefan...@behnel.de> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I think the master branch is good enough for at least a 0.21 alpha. Are >> there any pending changes that should go in before it can be released? Any >> pull requests that should be considered? > > I started some work on support for static methods (for c++ and cdef > classes). I'll see if I can wrap this up and create a pull request. > >> We should get this in, I think: >> >> https://github.com/cython/cython/pull/284 >> >> And the gdb tests are still broken. >> >> Robert, could you take a look through the Sage test failures? Most of them >> might be issues in Sage rather than Cython, but it's better to make sure we >> can either fix or safely ignore them. > > Yeah, I'll take a look at those.
Not all of them look benign. I'm updating Sage to the latest release and will see what's goin on. _______________________________________________ cython-devel mailing list cython-devel@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cython-devel
